The phylogenetic pattern of speciation and wing pattern change in neotropical Ithomia butterflies (Lepidoptera: Nymphalidae)

Evolution

Volumn 60, Issue 7, 2006, Pages 1454-1466

  Jiggins, Chris D ^a   Mallarino, Ricardo ^b,c   Willmott, Keith R ^d   Bermingham, Eldredge ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF EDINBURGH   (United Kingdom)

^b SMITHSONIAN TROPICAL RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (Panama)

^c HARVARD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA   (United States)

Author keywords

Comparative analysis; Lepidoptera; Mimicry; Pleistocene refugia; Speciation

Indexed keywords

BUTTERFLY; COLOR; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONVERGENT EVOLUTION; DIVERGENCE; MAXIMUM LIKELIHOOD ANALYSIS; MIMICRY; NEOTROPICAL REGION; NICHE OVERLAP; PARSIMONY ANALYSIS; PHYLOGENETICS; PLEISTOCENE; PUNCTUATED EQUILIBRIUM; REFUGIUM; SPECIATION (BIOLOGY); VICARIANCE; WING MORPHOLOGY;

CENTRAL AMERICA; SOUTH AMERICA;

ITHOMIA; LEPIDOPTERA; NYMPHALIDAE; PAPILIONOIDEA;

ANIMAL; ARTICLE; BUTTERFLY; CLASSIFICATION; ECOSYSTEM; EVOLUTION; FORELIMB; HISTOLOGY; PHYLOGENY; SPECIES DIFFERENTIATION;

ANIMALS; BUTTERFLIES; ECOSYSTEM; EVOLUTION; GENETIC SPECIATION; PHYLOGENY; WING;

EID: 33748179821     PISSN: 00143820     EISSN: 15585646     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1554/05-483.1     Document Type: Article

References (65)

1. Barraclough, T. G., and A. P. Vogler. 2000. Detecting the geographical pattern of speciation from species- level phylogenies. Am. Nat. 155:419-434.
2. _. 2002. Recent diversification rates in North American tiger beetles estimated from a dated mtDNA phylogenetic tree. Mol. Bio. Evol. 19:1706-1716.
3. Barraclough, T. G., J. E. Hogan, and A. P. Vogler. 1999. Testing whether ecological factors promote cladogenesis in a group of tiger beetles (Coleoptera: Cicindelidae). Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 266:1061-1067.
4. Bates, H. W. 1862. Contributions to an insect fauna of the Amazon valley. Lepidoptera: Heliconidae. Trans. Linn. Soc. Lond. 23:495-566.
5. Beccaloni, G. W. 1997. Ecology, behaviour and natural history of ithomiine butterflies (Lepidoptera: Nymphalidae) and their mimics in Ecuador. Trop. Lepid. 8:103-124.
6. Benson, W. W. 1982. Alternative models for infrageneric diversification in the humid tropics: tests with passion vine butterflies. Pp. 608-640 in G. T. Prance, ed. Biological diversification in the tropics. Columbia Univ. Press, New York.
7. Berlocher, S. H., and J. L. Feder. 2002. Sympatric speciation in phytophagous insects: moving beyond controversy? Annu. Rev. Entomol. 47:773-815.
8. Brower, A. V. Z. 1994. Rapid morphological radiation and convergence among races of the butterfly Heliconius erato inferred from patterns of mitochondrial DNA evolution. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci USA 91:6491-6495.
9. Brower, A. V. Z., and E. G. Egan. 1997. Cladistic analysis of Heliconius butterflies and relatives (Nymphalidae: Heliconiiti): a revised phylogenetic position for Eueides based on sequences from mtDNA and a nuclear gene. Proc. R. Soc. Lond B 264:969-977.
10. Brower, L. P. 1959. Speciation in butterflies of the Papilio glaucus group. II. Ecological relationships and interspecific sexual behavior. Evolution 13:212-228.
11. Brown, K. S. 1979. Ecologia Geográfica e Evoluçâo nas Florestas Neotropicais. Universidade Estadual de Campinas, Campinas, Brazil.
12. _. 1981. The biology of Heliconius and related genera. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 26:427-456.
13. _. 1982. Historical and ecological factors in the biogeography of aposematic Neotropical butterflies. Am. Zool. 22:453-471.
14. Cracraft, J., and R. O. Prum. 1988. Patterns and processes of diversification: speciation and historical congruence in some neotropical birds. Evolution 42:603-620.
15. Deering, M. D., and J. M. Scriber. 2002. Field bioassays show heterospecific mating preference asymmetry between hybridizing North American Papilio butterfly species (Lepidoptera: Papillonidae). J. Ethol. 20:25-33.
16. Dittrich, W., F. Gilbert, P. Green, P. McGregor, and D. Grewcock. 1993. Imperfect mimicry: a pigeons perspective. Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. B 251:195-200.
17. Edwards, A. W. F. 1972. Likelihood. Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, U.K.
18. Emerson, B. C., and N. Kolm. 2005. Species diversity can drive speciation. Nature 434:1015-1017.
19. Endler, J. A. 1977. Geographic variation, speciation, and clines. Princeton Univ. Press, Princeton, NJ.
20. Fitzpatrick, B. M. 2002. Molecular correlates of reproductive isolation. Evolution 56:191-198.
21. Fitzpatrick, B. M., and M. Turelli. 2006. The geography of mammalian speciation: mixed signals from phylogenies and range maps. Evolution 60:601-615.
22. Fjeldså, J. 1994. Geographical patterns for relict and young species of birds in Africa and South America and implications for conservation priorities. Biodiv. Conserv. 3:207-226.
23. Fordyce, J. A., C. C. Nice, M. L. Forister, and A. M. Shapiro. 2002. The significance of wing pattern diversity in the Lycaenidae: mate discrimination by two recently diverged species. J. Evol. Biol. 15:871-879.
24. Fox, R. M. 1940. A generic review of the Ithomiinae (Lepidoptera: Nymphalidae). Trans. Am. Entomol. Soc. 66:161-207.
25. Graham, C. H., S. R. Ron, J. C. Santos, C. J. Schneider, and C. Moritz. 2004. Integrating phylogenetics and environmental niche models to explore speciation mchanisms in dendrobatid frogs. Evolution 58:1781-1793.
26. Gregory-Wodzicki, K. M. 2000. Uplift history of the Central and Northern Andes: a review. Geol. Soc. Am. Bull. 112:1091-1105.
27. Haber, W. A. 1978. Evolutionary ecology of tropical mimetic butterflies (Lepidoptera: Ithomiinae). Ph.D. diss. Univ. of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN.
28. Haffer, J. 1977. Pleistocene speciation in Amazonian birds. Amazoniana 6:161-191.
29. Hall, J. P. W., and D. J. Harvey. 2002. The phylogeography of Amazonia revisited: new evidence from riodinid butterflies. Evolution 56:1489-1497.
30. Hall, J. P. W., R. K. Robbins, and D. J. Harvey. 2004. Extinction and biogeography in the Caribbean: new evidence from a fossil riodinid butterfly in Dominican amber. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 271:797-801.
31. Hewitt, G. 2000. The genetic legacy of the Quaternary ice ages. Nature 405:907-913.
32. Hill, J. K., Y. C. Collingham, C. D. Thomas, D. S. Blakeley, R. Fox, D. Moss, and B. Huntley. 2001. Impacts of landscape structure on butterfly range expansion. Ecol. Lett. 4:313-321.
33. Huelsenbeck, J. P., and F. Ronquist. 2001. MrBayes: Bayesian inference of phylogeny. Bioinformatics 17:754-755.
34. Isaac, N. J. B., K. E. Jones, J. L. Gittleman, and A. Purvis. 2005. Correlates of diversity in mammals: body size, life history and ecology. Am. Nat. 165:600-607.
35. Jiggins, C. D., R. E. Naisbit, R. L. Coe, and J. Mallet. 2001. Reproductive isolation caused by colour pattern mimicry. Nature 411:302-305.
36. Jiggins, C. D., I. Emelianov, and J. Mallet. 2004a. Pleiotropy promotes speciation: examples from phytophagous moths and mimetic butterflies. Pp. 451-473 in M. Fellowes, G. Holloway, and J. Rolff, eds. Insect evolutionary ecology. Royal Entomological Society, London.
37. Jiggins, C. D., C. Estrada, and A. Rodrigues. 2004b. Mimicry and the evolution of pre-mating isolation in Heliconius melpomene. J. Evol. Biol. 17:680-691.
38. Lamas, G. 2004. Ithomiinae. Pp. 172-191 in J. B. Heppner, ed. Atlas of Neotropical Lepidoptera. Checklist: Part 4A. Hesperioidea: Papilionoidea. Association for Tropical Lepidoptera/Scientific Publishers, Gainseville, FL.
39. Lederhouse, R. C., and J. M. Scriber. 1996. Intrasexual selection constrains the evolution of the dorsal color pattern of male black swallowtail butterflies, Papilio polyxenes. Evolution 50:717-722.
40. Losos, J. B., and R. E. Glor. 2003. Phylogenetic comparative methods and the geography of speciation. Trends Ecol. Evol. 18:220-227.
41. Lukhtanov, V. A., N. P. Kandul, J. B. Plotkin, A. V. Dantchenko, D. Haig, and N. E. Pierce. 2005. Reinforcement of pre-zygotic isolation and karyotype evolution in Agrodiaetus butterflies. Nature 436:385-389.
42. Lynch, J. D. 1989. The guage of speciation: on the frequency of modes of speciation. Pp. 527-553 in D. Otte and J. A. Endler, eds. Speciation and its consequences. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, MA.
43. Maddison, W. P., and D. R. Maddison. 1997. MacClade: analysis of phylogeny and character evolution. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, MA.
44. Mallarino, R., E. Bermingham, K. R. Willmott, A. Whinnett, and C. D. Jiggins. 2005. Molecular systematics of the butterfly genus Ithomia (Lepidoptera: Ithomiinae): a composite phylogenetic hypothesis based on seven genes. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 34:625-644.
45. Maynard Smith, J. 1966. Sympatric speciation. Am. Nat. 100:637-650.
46. Moritz, C., J. L. Patton, C. J. Schneider, and T. B. Smith. 2000. Diversification of rainforest faunas: an integrated molecular approach. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 31:533-563.
47. Müller, F. 1879. Ituna and Thyridia: a remarkable case of mimicry in butterflies. Trans. Entomol. Soc. Lond. 1879:xx-xxix.
48. Naisbit, R. E., C. D. Jiggins, and J. Mallet. 2003. Mimicry: developmental genes that contribute to speciation. Evol. Dev. 5:269-280.
49. Nee, S., A. O. Mooers, and P. H. Harvey. 1992. Tempo and mode of evolution revealed from molecular phylogenies. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 89:8322-8326.
50. Pagel, M. 1994. Detecting correlated evolution on phylogenies: a general method for the comparative analysis of discrete characters. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 255:37-45.
51. Pagel, M., A. Meade, and D. Barker. 2004. Bayesian estimation of ancestral states on phylogenies. Syst. Biol. 53:673-684.
52. Paradis, E., J. Claude, and K. Strimmer. 2004. APE: analyses of phylogenetics and evolution in R language. Bioinformatics 20:289-290.
53. Pybus, O. G., and P. H. Harvey. 2000. Testing macro-evolutionary models using incomplete molecular phylogenies. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 267:2267-2272.
54. Schluter, D. 2000. The ecology of adaptive radiation. Oxford Univ. Press, New York.
55. Schneider, C. J., T. B. Smith, B. Larison, and C. Moritz. 1999. A test of alternative models of diversification in tropical rainforests: ecological gradients versus rainforest refugia. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 96:13869-13873.
56. Stride, G. O. 1957. Investigations into the courtship behaviour of the male of Hypolimnas misippus L. (Lepidoptera: Nymphalidae) with special reference to the role of visual stimuli. Bri. J. Anim. Behav. 5:153-167.
57. _. 1958. Further studies on the courtship behaviour of African mimetic butterflies. Anim. Behav. 6:224-230.
58. Taberlet, P., and R. Cheddadi. 2002. Quaternary refugia and persistence of biodiversity. Science 297:2009-2010.
59. Thomas, C. D., E. J. Bodsworth, R. J. Wilson, A. D. Simmons, Z. G. Davies, M. Musche, and L. Conradt. 2001. Ecological and evolutionary processes at expanding range margins. Nature 411:577-581.
60. Turner, J. R. G. 1976. Adaptive radiation and convergence in subdivisions of the butterfly genus Heliconius (Lepidoptera: Nymphalidae). Zool. J. Linn. Soc. 58:297-308.
61. _. 1977. Butterfly mimicry: genetical evolution of an adaptation. Evol. Biol. 10:163-206.
62. Vane-Wright, R. I. 1978. Ecological and behavioural origins of diversity in butterflies. Pp. 56-70 in L. A. Mound and N. Waloff, eds. Diversity of insect faunas. Blackwell Scientific, Oxford, U.K.
63. _. 2004. Butterflies at that awkward age. Nature 428:477-478.
64. Whinnett, A., M. Zimmermann, K. R. Willmott, N. Herrera, R. Mallarino, F. Simpson, M. Joron, G. Lamas, and J. Mallet. 2005. Strikingly variable divergence times inferred across an Amazonian butterfly "suture zone." Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 272:2525-2533.
65. Zakharov, E. V., M. S. Caterino, and F. A. H. Sperling. 2004. Molecular phylogeny, historical biogeography, and divergence time estimates for swallowtail butterflies of the genus Papilio (Lepidoptera: Papilionidae). Sys. Biol. 53:193-215.