High rate of recent intron gain and loss in simultaneously duplicated Arabidopsis genes

Molecular Biology and Evolution

Volumn 23, Issue 8, 2006, Pages 1548-1557

  Knowles, David G ^a   McLysaght, Aoife ^a  

^a TRINITY COLLEGE DUBLIN   (Ireland)

Author keywords

Arabidopsis thaliana; Genome evolution; Intron evolution; Intron gain and loss

Indexed keywords

ARABIDOPSIS; ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DUPLICATE GENE; GENE DELETION; GENE DUPLICATION; GENE EXPRESSION; GENE INSERTION; GENE STRUCTURE; GENETIC CONSERVATION; INTRON; MEASUREMENT; MEMBRANE TRANSPORT; NONHUMAN; NUCLEOTIDE SEQUENCE; ONTOGENY; PARSIMONY ANALYSIS; PHYLOGENY; PLANT GENETICS; STRUCTURE ANALYSIS; TETRAPLOIDY;

ARABIDOPSIS; BASE SEQUENCE; DNA, PLANT; EVOLUTION, MOLECULAR; GENE DUPLICATION; GENES, PLANT; INTRONS; MOLECULAR SEQUENCE DATA; PHYLOGENY; RNA SPLICE SITES; SEQUENCE HOMOLOGY, AMINO ACID;

ARABIDOPSIS; ARABIDOPSIS THALIANA;

EID: 33748029468     PISSN: 07374038     EISSN: 15371719     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/molbev/msl017     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. Arabidopsis Genome Initiative. 2000. Analysis of the genome sequence of the flowering plant Arabidopsis thaliana. Nature 408:796-815.
2. Babenko VN, Rogozin IB, Mekhedov SL, Koonin EV. 2004. Prevalence of intron gain over intron loss in the evolution of paralogous gene families. Nucleic Acids Res 32:3724-33.
3. Benjamini Y, Hochberg Y. 1995. Controlling the false discovery rate: a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. J R Stat Soc B 85:289-300.
4. Berardini TZ, Mundodi S, Reiser R, et al. (18 co-authors). 2004. Functional annotation of the Arabidopsis genome using controlled vocabularies. Plant Physiol 135:1-11.
5. Blanc G, Barakat A, Guyot R, Cooke R, Delseny M. 2000. Extensive duplication and reshuffling in the Arabidopsis genome. Plant Cell 12:1093-101.
6. Blanc G, Hokamp K, Wolfe KH. 2003. A recent polyploidy super-imposed on older large-scale duplications in the Arabidopsis genome. Genome Res 13:137-44.
7. Blanc G, Wolfe KH. 2004. Widespread paleopolyploidy in model plant species inferred from age distributions of duplicate genes. Plant Cell 16:1667-78.
8. Bowers JE, Chapman BA, Rong J, Paterson AH. 2003. Unravelling angiosperm genome evolution by phylogenetic analysis of chromosomal duplication events. Nature 422:433-8.
9. Castillo-Davis CI, Bedford TB, Hartl DL. 2004. Accelerated rates of intron gain/loss and protein evolution in duplicate genes in human and mouse malaria parasites. Mol Biol Evol 21:1422-7.
10. Castillo-Davis CI, Mekhedov SL, Hartl DL, Koonin EV, Kondrashov FA. 2002. Selection for short introns in highly expressed genes. Nat Genet 31:415-8.
11. Cho S, Jin SW, Cohen A, Ellis RE. 2004. A phylogeny of caenorhabditis reveals frequent loss of introns during nematode evolution. Genome Res 14:1207-20.
12. Coghlan A, Wolfe KH. 2004. Origins of recently gained introns in Caenorhabditis. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 101:11362-7.
13. Duret L, Mouchiroud D, Gautier C. 1995. Statistical analysis of vertebrate sequences reveals that long genes are scarce in GC-rich isochores. J Mol Evol 40:308-17.
14. Fedorov A, Roy S, Cao X, Gilbert W. 2003. Phylogenetically older introns strongly correlate with module boundaries in ancient proteins. Genome Res 13:1155-7.
15. Fedorov A, Roy S, Fedorova L, Gilbert W. 2003. Mystery of intron gain. Genome Res 13:2236-41.
16. Jeffares DC, Mourier T, Penny D. 2006. The biology of intron gain and loss. Trends Genet 22:16-22.
17. Krzywinski J, Besansky NJ. 2002. Frequent intron loss in the white gene: a cautionary tale for phylogeneticists. Mol Biol Evol 19:362-6.
18. Lin K, Zhang DY. 2005. The excess of 5′ introns in eukaryotic genomes. Nucleic Acids Res 33:6522-7.
19. Loftus BJ, Fung E, Roncaglia P, et al. (54 co-authors). 2005. The genome of the basidiomycetous yeast and human pathogen Cryptococcus neoformans. Science 307:1321-4.
20. Lynch M. 2002. Intron evolution as a population-genetic process. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 99:6118-23.
21. Lynch M. 2006. The origins of eukaryotic gene structure. Mol Biol Evol 23:450-68.
22. McLysaght A, Enright AJ, Skrabanek L, Wolfe KH. 2000. Estimation of synteny conservation and genome compaction between pufferfish (Fugu) and human. Yeast 17:22-36.
23. Mourier T, Jeffares DC. 2003. Eukaryotic intron loss. Science 300:1393.
24. Nguyen HD, Yoshihama M, Kenmochi N. 2005. New maximum likelihood estimators for eukaryotic intron evolution. PLoS Comput Biol 1:e79.
25. Nielsen CB, Friedman B, Birren B, Burge CB, Galagan JE. 2004. Patterns of intron gain and loss in fungi. PLoS Biol 2:e422.
26. Notredame C, Higgins DG, Heringa J. 2000. T-Coffee: a novel method for fast and accurate multiple sequence alignment. J Mol Biol 302:205-17.
27. Paterson AH, Bowers JE, Burow MD, et al. (11 co-authors). 2000. Comparative genomics of plant chromosomes. Plant Cell 12:1523-40.
28. Pearson WR. 1996. Effective protein sequence comparison. Methods Enzymol 266:227-58.
29. Qiu WG, Schisler N, Stoltzfus A. 2004. The evolutionary gain of spliceosomal introns: sequence and phase preferences. Mol Biol Evol 21:1252-63.
30. Rogers JH. 1989. How were introns inserted into nuclear genes? Trends Genet 5:213-6.
31. Rogozin IB, Sverdlov AV, Babenko VN, Koonin EV. 2005. Analysis of evolution of exon-intron structure of eukaryotic genes. Brief Bioinform 6:118-34.
32. Rogozin IB, Wolf YI, Sorokin AV, Mirkin BG, Koonin EV. 2003. Remarkable interkingdom conservation of intron positions and massive, lineage-specific intron loss and gain in eukaryotic evolution. Curr Biol 13:1512-7.
33. Roy SW, Fedorov A, Gilbert W. 2003. Large-scale comparison of intron positions in mammalian genes shows intron loss but no gain. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 100:7158-62.
34. Roy SW, Gilbert W. 2005a. Rates of intron loss and gain: implications for early eukaryotic evolution. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 102:5773-8.
35. Roy SW, Gilbert W. 2005b. Complex early genes. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 102:1986-91.
36. Roy SW, Gilbert W. 2006. The evolution of spliceosomal introns: patterns, puzzles and progress. Nat Rev Genet 7: 211-21.
37. Seoighe C, Gehring C. 2004. Genome duplication led to highly selective expansion of the Arabidopsis thaliana proteome. Trends Genet 20:461-4.
38. Seoighe C, Gehring C, Hurst LD. 2005. Gametophytic selection in Arabidopsis thaliana supports the selective model of intron length reduction. PLoS Genet 1:e13.
39. Simillion C, Vandepoele K, Van Montagu MC, Zabeau M, Van de Peer Y. 2002. The hidden duplication past of Arabidopsis thaliana. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 99:13627-32.
40. Sistrunk ML, Antosiewicz DM, Purugganan MM, Braam J. 1994. Arabidopsis TCH3 encodes a novel Ca2+ binding protein and shows environmentally induced and tissue-specific regulation. Plant Cell 6:1553-65.
41. Su Z, Wang J, Yu J, Huang X, Gu X. 2006. Evolution of alternative splicing after gene duplication. Genome Res 16:182-9.
42. Thompson JD, Higgins DG, Gibson TJ. 1994. CLUSTAL W: improving the sensitivity of progressive multiple sequence alignment through sequence weighting, position-specific gap penalties and weight matrix choice. Nucleic Acids Res 22:4673-80.
43. Vision TJ, Brown DG, Tanksley SD. 2000. The origins of genomic duplications in Arabidopsis. Science 290:2114-7.
44. Wendel JF, Cronn RC, Alvarez I, Liu B, Small RL, Senchina DS. 2002. Intron size and genome size in plants. Mol Biol Evol 19:2346-52.