A fluorescent lectin array using supramolecular hydrogel for simple detection and pattern profiling for various glycoconjugates

Journal of the American Chemical Society

Volumn 128, Issue 32, 2006, Pages 10413-10422

  Koshi, Yoichiro ^a   Nakata, Eiji ^a   Yamane, Hiroki ^a   Hamachi, Itaru ^a  

^a KYOTO UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

FLUORESCENCE; HYDROGELS; PATTERN RECOGNITION; SUGAR (SUCROSE); TITRATION;

BIMOLECULAR FLUORESCENCE QUENCHING AND RECOVERY (BFQR); GLYCOCONJUGATES; SACCHARIDES;

SUPRAMOLECULAR CHEMISTRY;

CARBOHYDRATE DERIVATIVE; GLUCOSE; GLYCOCONJUGATE; GLYCOPROTEIN; LECTIN; OLIGOSACCHARIDE;

AQUEOUS SOLUTION; ARTICLE; BINDING AFFINITY; CELL LYSATE; FLUORESCENCE; HIGH THROUGHPUT SCREENING; HYDROGEL; MOLECULAR RECOGNITION; PROTEIN DENATURATION; TECHNIQUE; TITRIMETRY;

FLUORESCENT DYES; GLYCOCONJUGATES; HYDROGEL; LECTINS; MOLECULAR STRUCTURE; PROTEIN ARRAY ANALYSIS;

EID: 33747609846     PISSN: 00027863     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1021/ja0613963     Document Type: Article

References (67)

1. (a) Bertozzi, C. R.; Kiessling, L. L. Science 2001, 291, 2357.
2. (b) Dwek, R. A. Chem. Rev. 1996, 96, 683.
3. Raman, R.; Raguram, S.; Venkataraman, G.; Paulson, J. C.; Sasisekharan, R. Nat. Methods 2005, 2, 817.
4. (a) Montreuil, J.; Vliegenthart, J. F. G.; Schachater, H. Glycoproteins and Disease; Elsevier Science Ltd.: Oxford, 1996.
5. (b) Dwek, R. A.; Butters. T. D.; Platt, F. M.; Zitzmann, N. Nat. Rev. Drug Discovery 2002, 1, 65.
6. (c) Maruyama, M.; Kato, R.; Kobayashi, S.; Kasuga, Y. Arch. Pathol. Lab. Med. 1998, 122, 715.
7. (a) Shin, I.; Park, S.; Lee, M.-r. Chem.-Eur. J. 2005, 11, 2894.
8. (b) Park, S.; Lee, M.-r.; Pyo, S.-J.; Shin, I. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2004, 126, 4812.
9. (c) Park, S.; Shin, I. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2002, 41, 3180.
10. (d) Burn, M. A.; Disney, M. D.; Seeberger, P. H. ChemBioChem 2006, 7, 421.
11. (e) Diseny, M. D.; Seeberger, P. H. Chem. Biol. 2004, 11, 1701.
12. (f) Adams, E. W.; Ratner, D. M.; Bokesch, H. R.; McMahon, J. B.; O'Keefe, B. R.; Seeberger, P. H. Chem. Biol. 2004, 11, 875.
13. (g) Blixt, O.; et al. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2004, 101, 17033.
14. (h) Bryan, M. C.; Lee, L. V.; Wong, C.-H. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2004, 14, 3185.
15. (i) Nimrichter, L.; Gargir, A.; Gorltler, M.; Altstock, R. T.; Shtevi, A.; Weisshaus, O.; Fire, E.; Dotan, N.; Schnaar, R. L. Glycobiology 2004, 14, 197.
16. (j) Wang, D.; Liu, S.; Trummer, B. J.; Deng, C.; Wang, A. Nat. Biotechnol. 2002, 20, 275.
17. (k) Willats, W. G. T.; Rasmussen, S. E.; Kristensen, T.; Mikkelsen, J. D.; Knox, J. P. Proteomics 2002, 2, 1666.
18. (a) Hsu, K.-L.; Pilobello, K. T.; Mahal, L. K. Nat. Chem. Biol. 2006, 2, 153.
19. (b) Kuno, A.; Uchiyama, N.; Koseki-Kuno, S.; Ebe, Y.; Takashima, S.; Yamada, M.; Hirabayashi, J. Nat. Methods 2005, 2, 851.
20. (c) Zheng, T.; Peelen, D.; Smith, L. M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005, 127, 9982.
21. (d) Pilobello, K. T.; Krishnamoorthy, L.; Slawek, D.; Mahal, L. K. ChemBioChem 2005, 6, 985.
22. (e) Ebe, Y.; Kuno, A.; Uchiyama, N.; Koseki-Kuno, S.; Yamada, M.; Sato, T.; Nishimatsu, H.; Hirabayashi, J. J. Biochem. 2006, 139, 323.
23. (a) Lis, H.; Sharon, N. Chem. Rev. 1998, 98, 637.
24. (b) Dam, T. K.; Brewer, C. F. Chem. Rev. 2002, 102, 387.
25. (a) Kiyonaka, S.; Sada, K.; Yoshimura, I.; Shinkai, S.; Kato, N.; Hamachi, I. Nat. Mater. 2004, 3, 58.
26. (b) Yoshimura, I.; Miyahara, Y.; Kasagi, N.; Yamane, H.; Ojida, A.; Hamachi, I. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2004, 126, 12204.
27. (c) Yamaguchi, S.; Yoshimura, I.; Kohira, T.; Tamaru, S.; Hamachi, I. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005, 127, 11835.
28. (d) Kiyonaka, S.; Shinkai, S.; Hamachi, I. Chem.-Eur. J. 2003, 9, 976.
29. (e) Kiyonaka, S.; Sugiyasu, K.; Shinkai, S.; Hamachi, I. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2002, 124, 10954.
30. (f) Hamachi, I.; Kiyonaka, S.; Shinkai, S. Chem. Commun. 2000, 1281.
31. (a) Estroff, L. A.; Hamilton, A. D. Chem. Rev. 2004, 104, 1201.
32. (b) Xing, B.; Yu, C.-W.; Chow, K.-H.; Ho, P.-L.; Fu, D.; Xu, B. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2002, 124, 14846.
33. (a) Medintz, I. L.; Clapp, A. R.; Mattoussi, H.; Goldman, E. R.; Fisher, B.; Mauro, J. M. Nat. Mater. 2003, 2, 630.
34. (b) Medintz, I. L.; Goldman, E. R.; Lassman, M. E.; Mauro, J. M. Bioconjugate Chem. 2003, 14, 909.
35. (c) Sandros, M. G.; Gao, D.; Benson, D. E. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005, 127, 12198.
36. 7d
37. Benerjee, A. B.; Swanson, M.; Roy, B. C.; Jia, X.; Haldar, M. K.; Mallik, S.; Srivastava, D. K. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2004, 126, 10875.
38. (a) Lakowicz, J. R. Principles of Fluorescence Spectroscopy, 2nd ed.; Kluwer Academic/Plenum: New York, 1999.
39. (b) Tong, A. K.; Jockusch, S.; Li, Z.; Zhu, H.-R.; Akins, D. L.; Turro, N. J.; Ju, J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2001, 123, 12923.
40. We confirmed that the abnormal quenching of F-Con A reproducibly occurred only at the high concentration (10 mM) of Man-tri not only in gel spots, but also in aqueous solution. However, the fluorescence recovery up to 1 mM of Man-tri is reasonable. This is probably due to a small amount of impurity included in the commercialized Man-tri sample.
41. (a) Schwartz, M. W.; Porte, D., Jr. Science 2005, 307, 375.
42. (b) Lowell, B. B.; Shulman, G. I. Science 2005, 307, 384.
43. (a) Williams, R. L.; Greene, S. M.; McPherson, A. J. Biol. Chem. 1987, 262, 16020.
44. (b) Green, E. D.; Adelt, G.; Baenziger, J. U. J. Biol. Chem. 1988, 263, 18253.
45. (c) Harvey, D. J.; Wing, D. R.; Kuster, B.; Wilson, I. B. H. J. Am. Soc. Mass Spectrum. 2000, 11, 564.
46. (d) Karlsson, N. G.; Packer, N. H. Anal. Biochem. 2002, 305, 173.
47. The response to the high concentration (40 μg/μL) of BSA is probably ascribed to nonspecific interactions of F-lectins with a hydrophobic pocket of BSA. Such nonspecific interactions are not negligible especially for the case of WGA, but not for other lectins. Thus, these data suggested that the considerable positive response was an over 10% recovery ratio for lectins other than WGA and over 20% for WGA in the glycoprotein analysis.
48. Serious variability of the recovery ratio between spots on the same plate was not observed (see Figure s-4). Similarly, it is shown that the response patterns were practically conserved between independent arrays (see Figure s-5).
49. WGA is able to bind both the β-GlcNAc derivatives and the NeuNAc (sialic acid) derivatives as shown in Figure 1c. In contrast, GSL-II can bind only GlcNAc derivatives, but not NeuNAc derivatives. As shown in Figure 8, the mammalian cell lines responded at the WGA spots, but not at the GSL-II spots. Thus, it is reasonable to conclude that these cell lines include NeuNAc derivatives in greater amount than GlcNAc. In the matter of AAL, the great difference between the AAL response and the UEA-I response is probably due to the difference in the affinity of AAL and UEA-I for fucose. As shown in Figure s-2, AAL shows an affinity to fucose that is stronger by 10-fold than UEA-I. Based on these data, the amount of the fucosylated species may be roughly speculated.
50. (a) Angata, T.; Varki, A. Chem. Rev. 2002, 102, 439.
51. (b) Becker, D. J.; Lowe, J. B. Glycobiology 2003, 13, 41.
52. (a) Usui, K.; Ojima, T.; Tomizaki, K.; Mihara, H. Nano Biotechnol. 2005, 1, 191.
53. (b) Usui, K.; Tomizaki, K.; Ohyama, T.; Nokihara, K.; Mihara, H. Mol. Biosyst. 2006, 2, 113.
54. (c) Tkahashi, M.; Nokihara, K.; Mihara, H. Chem. Biol. 2003, 10, 53.
55. (d) Tomizaki, K.; Usui, K.; Mihara, H. ChemBioChem 2005, 6, 782.
56. (a) Muller, S.; Hanisch, F.-G. J. Biol. Chem. 2002, 277, 26103.
57. (b) Christie, K. N.; Thomson, C. J. Histochem. Cytochem. 1989, 37, 1303.
58. The detection sensitivity is adjustable by modulating the quencher concentration. As a typical example, Table s-1 shows that we can tune the detection sensitivity of glucose from 5 to 24 mM.
59. The detection limit for a monosaccharide (glucose) was 1 mM; a glycoprotein (Ribo B) was 0.5 μg/μL (30 μM). The typical pattern for a bacteria (NM522) lysate was detected at 0.5 μg/μL (Figure s-6).
60. These may not be so problematic, because the corresponding quenchers were easily synthesized by the reaction of 13 with various saccharides, which have a reducing terminal using the aminooxy-method (Scheme 1b), and the pair can be universally used for various analytes once it is optimized.
61. (a) Lavigne, J. L.; Anslyn, E. V. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2001, 40, 3118.
62. (b) Wright, A. T.; Griffin, M. J.; Zhong, Z.; McCleskey, S. C.; Anslyn, E. V.; McDevitt, J. T. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2005, 44, 6375.
63. (c) Zhang, C.; Suslick, K. S. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005, 127, 11548.
64. (d) Zhou, H.; Baldini, L.; Hong, J.; Wilson, A. J.; Hamilton, A. D. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006, 128, 2421.
65. (e) Baldini, L.; Wilson, A. J.; Hong, J.; Hamilton, A. D. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2004, 126, 5656.
66. (f) Buryak, A.; Severin, K. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005, 127, 3700.
67. Haugland, R. P. Handbook of Fluorescent Probe and Research Chemicals, 9th ed.; Molecular Probes, Inc.: Eugene, OR, 2002.