Comparing the effectiveness of a supplemental online tutorial to traditional instruction with nutritional science students

Journal of Interactive Online Learning

Volumn 5, Issue 1, 2006, Pages 75-81

  Zubas, Patrice ^c   Heiss, Cindy ^a   Pedersen, Mary ^b  

^a MISSOURI STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b CALIFORNIA POLYTECHNIC STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 33747376086     PISSN: 15414914     EISSN: 15414914     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Buzzell, P.R., Chamberlain, V.M., & Pintauro, S.J. (2002). The effectiveness of web-based, multimedia tutorials for teaching methods of human body composition analysis. Advan Physiol Edu, 2, 21-29.
2. Byrd-Bredbenner, C. & K. Bauer. (1991). The development and evaluation of computer assisted instruction modules for an introductory, college-level nutrition course. Journal of Nutrition Education, 23(6), 275-282.
3. Cehn, S. (2002). A cognitive model of non-linear learning in hypermedia programs. British Journal of Educational Technology, 33(4), 449-460.
4. Corby, L. (1988). Microcomputers: How can nutrition educator use them more effectively. Canadian Home Economics Journal, 38(1), 7-9.
5. Daniels, H.L. & Moore, D.M. (2000). Interaction of cognitive style and learner control in a Hypermedia Environment. International Journal of Instructional Media, 27(4), 369-382.
6. Flashlight. (2004). TLT Group. Takoma Park, MD. Retrieved October 6, 2005, from http://www.tltgroup.org.
7. Ford, N.& Chen, Y. (2000). Individual differences, hypermedia navigation and learning: An empirical study. Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, 9(4), 281-311.
8. Garson, G.D. (1999). The role of technology in quality education. North Carolina State University. Retrieved October 6, 2005, from http://hcl.chass. ncsu.edu/sscore/garson2.htm.
9. Hodges, C.B. (2004). Designing to Motivate: Motivational Techniques to Incorporate in E-Learning Experiences. Journal of Interactive Online Learning, 2(3), 1-7.
10. Moore, D.S. & McCabe, G.P. (1993). Introduction to the Practice of Statistics. W.H. Freeman and Company, New York.
11. Oh, E. & Lim, D. (2005). Cross relationships between cognitive styles and learner variables in online learning environment. Journal of Interactive Online Learning, 4(1), 53-66.
12. Ott, R.L. (1993). An Introduction to Statistical Methods and Data Analysis, 4th Edition. Duxbury Press.
13. Raidl, M.A., Wood, O.B., Lehman, J.D., & Evers, W.D. (1995). Computer-assisted instruction improves clinical reasoning skills of dietetics students. Journal of the American Dietetic Association, 95, 868-873.
14. Reiser, R. A., & Dempsey, J.F. (2002). Trends and issues in instructional design and technology, Upper Saddle River, NY: Merril Prentice Hall.
15. Schroeder, L., & P. Kent. (1982). Computer-based instruction in dietetics education. Journal of Computer-Based Instruction 8(4), 85-90.
16. Swann, D.L, Branson, F. & Talbert. B.A. (2003). Educator beliefs regarding computer-based instruction. Journal of Extension. 41(1): http://www.joe.org/joe/2003february/rb4.shtml.
17. Turner, R.E., Evers, W.D., Wood, O.B., Lehman, J.D., & L.W. Peck, L.W. 2000. Computer-based simulations enhance clinical experience of dietetic interns. Journal of the American Dietetic Association, 100(2), 183-190.