Cross relationships between cognitive styles and learner variables in online learning environment

Journal of Interactive Online Learning

Volumn 4, Issue 1, 2005, Pages 53-66

  Oh, Eunjoo ^a,b   Lim, Doohun ^a,c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TENNESSEE   (United States)

^b Technology Enhanced Curriculum Lab   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF TENNESSEE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 24344496925     PISSN: 15414914     EISSN: 15414914     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Adam, N., Awerbuch, B., Slonim, J., Wegner, P., & Yesha, Y. (1997). Globalizing business, education, culture through the Internet. Communications of the ACM, 40(2), 115-121.
2. Blickle, G. (1996). Personality traits, learning strategies, and performance. European Journal of Personality, 10, 337-352.
3. rd International Conference on Asynchronous Learning Networks, New York.
4. Cameron, D., & Treagust, D. (1997). Navigation performance with interactive media: Impact of learning characteristics. Paper presented at the annual conference of the Australian Society for Computers in Learning in Tertiary Education, Curtin, Australia.
5. Chen, S. (2002). A cognitive model of non-linear learning in hypermedia programs. British Journal of Educational Technology, 33(4), 449-460.
6. Cooper, L, W. (2001). A comparison of Online and traditional computer applications classes. T.H.E. Journal, 25(8), 52-56.
7. Daniels, H. L., & Moore, D. M. (2000). Interaction of cognitive style and learner control in a Hypermedia Environment. International Journal of Instructional Media, 27(4), 369-382.
8. De Raad, B. (1996.) Personality traits in learning and education. European Journal of Personality, 10, 185-200.
9. Eislzer, C. F. (1983). Perceptual preferences as an aspect of adolescent learning styles. Education, 103(3), 231-242.
10. Ford, N., & Chen, Y. (2000). Individual differences, hypermedia navigation and learning: An empirical study. Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, 9(4), 281-311.
11. Gail, E. F., & Louis, P. S. (1997). Hypermediated learning; learning styles, path analysis and knowledge outcomes. Retrieved April 20, 2003, from http://tiger.coe.missouri.edu/vrcbd/pdf/edmed97.pdf
12. Hawkridge, D. (1999). Cost-effective support for university students via the Web. Association for Learning Technology Journal, 6(3), 24-29.
13. Hodgson, P. (1999). How to teach in cyberspace. Technique, 74(5), 34-56.
14. Jung, I. S. (2001). Building a theoretical framework of Web-based instruction in the context of distance education. British Journal of Educational Technology, 32(5), 525-534.
15. Keefe, J. W. (1991). Learning style: Cognitive and thinking skills. Reston, VA: National Association of Secondary School Principals.
16. Levis, K. (2002). The business of e-learning: A revolution in training and education markets. Retrieved May 15, 2003, from http://www.hrmguide.net/usa/ hrd/e-learning_survey.htm
17. Liu, M., & Reed, W. M. (1994). The relationship between the learning strategies and learning styles in a hypermedia environment. Computer in Human Behavior, 10(4), 419-434.
18. Manathunga, C. (2002). Designing online learning module: an Australian example in teacher education. International Journal of Instructional Media, 29(2), 185-195.
19. Reiser, R. A., & Dempsey, J. V. (2002). Trends and issues in instructional design and technology. Upper Saddle River, NY: Merril Prentice Hall.
20. Riding, R., & Cheema, I. (1991). Cognitive styles: An overview and integration. Educational Psychology, 11(3/4), 193-215.
21. Sofres, T. N. (2001). E-Learning in USA and Canada benchmarking survey. Retrieved May 17, 2003, from http://www.skillsoft.com/solutions/files/ whitepapers/whitepapers/tn_survey.pdf
22. Smith, S. M. (1997). Preparing faculty for instructional technology: From education to development to creative independence. Cause/Effect, 20, 36-44.
23. Truell, A. D. (2001). Student attitudes toward evaluation. The Delta Phi Epsilon Journal, 43(1), 40-49.
24. Vermunt, J. D. (1998). The regulation of constructive learning processes. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 68, 149-171.
25. Wang, X. C., Hinn, D. M., & Kanfer, A.G. (2001). Potential of computer-supported collaborative learning for learners with different learning styles. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 34(1), 75-85.
26. Witkin, H. A. (1950). Individual differences in ease of perception of embedded figures. Journal of Personality, 19, 1-15.
27. Witkin, H. A., Moore, C. A., Goodenough, D. R., & Cox, P. W. (1977). Field-dependent and field independent cognitive styles and their educational implications. Review of Educational Research, 47, 1-64.
28. Witkin, H. A., Oltman P. K., Raskin, E., & Karp, S. A. (1971). A manual for the Group Embedded Figures Test. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychology Press.
29. Wolfe, R. N., & Johnson, S. D. (1995). Personality as a predictor of college performance. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 55, 177-185.