Don't give up on me baby: Spousal correlation in smoking behaviour

Journal of Health Economics

Volumn 25, Issue 5, 2006, Pages 958-978

  Clark, Andrew E ^a   Etilé, Fabrice ^b  

^a PARIS SCHOOL OF ECONOMICS   (France)

^b CEMAGREF   (France)

Author keywords

Bargaining; Health; Learning; Matching; Smoking

Indexed keywords

HEALTH CARE; HEALTH SURVEY; SMOKING; SOCIAL BEHAVIOR;

ADULT; ARTICLE; CIGARETTE SMOKING; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORRELATION ANALYSIS; FEMALE; HEALTH BEHAVIOR; HEALTH BELIEF; HUMAN; MALE; MARRIAGE; MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS; SOCIAL LEARNING; SPOUSE; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS;

DATA COLLECTION; FEMALE; GREAT BRITAIN; HEALTH BEHAVIOR; HUMANS; INTERPERSONAL RELATIONS; MALE; SMOKING; SPOUSES;

EID: 33747184552     PISSN: 01676296     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2006.02.002     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Becker G.S. A theory of marriage. Part I. Journal of Political Economy 81 (1974) 813-846
2. Becker G.S., and Murphy K.M. A theory of rational addiction. Journal of Political Economy 96 (1988) 675-700
3. Bergstrom T. A survey of theories of the family. In: Rosenzweig M.R., and Stark O. (Eds). Handbook of Population and Family Economics vol. 1A (1997), Elsevier Science B.V., Amsterdam 21-74
4. Bolin K., Jacobson L., and Lindgren B. The family as the health producer-when spouses are Nash-bargainers. Journal of Health Economics 20 (2001) 349-362
5. Bolin K., Jacobson L., and Lindgren B. The family as the health producer-when spouses act strategically. Journal of Health Economics 21 (2002) 475-495
6. Celeux, G., Chauveau, D., Diebolt, J., 1995. On stochastic versions of the EM algorithm. Working Paper No. 2514. Institut National de Recherche en Informatique et en Automatique.
7. Clark A.E., and Etilé F. Do health changes affect smoking? Evidence from British panel data. Journal of Health Economics 21 (2002) 533-562
8. Currie J., and Madrian B. Health, health insurance and the labour market. In: Ashenfelter O., and Card D. (Eds). Handbook of Labor Economics vol. 3C (1999), Elsevier Science B.V., Amsterdam 3309-3416
9. Contoyannis P., and Jones A. Socio-economic status, health and lifestyle. Journal of Health Economics 23 (2004) 965-995
10. Dempster A.P., Laird N.M., and Rubin P.B. Maximum-likelihood from incomplete data via the E-M algorithm. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society B 39 (1977) 1-38
11. Deb P., and Trivedi P.K. Demand for medical care by the elderly: a finite mixture approach. Journal of Applied Econometrics 12 (1997) 313-336
12. Farrell L., and Shields M. Investigating the economic and demographic determinants of sporting participation in England. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society A 165 (2002) 335-348
13. Fernández R., Guner N., and Knowles J. Love and money: a theoretical and empirical analysis of household sorting and inequality. Quarterly Journal of Economics 120 (2005) 273-344
14. Greene W.H. Econometric Analysis. fifth ed. (2002), Prentice Hall, New York
15. Jedidi K., Jagpal H.S., and DeSarbo W.S. Finite-mixture structural equation models for response-based segmentation and unobserved heterogeneity. Marketing Science 16 (1997) 39-59
16. Jenkins S., and Osberg L. Nobody to play with? The implications of leisure coordination. In: Hamermesh D., and Pfann G. (Eds). The Economics of Time Use (2005), Elsevier Science B.V., Amsterdam 113-145
17. Kan M.-Y., and Heath A. The Political Attitudes and Choices of Husbands and Wives (2003), University of Oxford, Mimeo
18. Keane M. A Note on identification in the multinomial probit model. Journal of Business and Economic Statistics 10 (1992) 193-200
19. Latkin C., Mandell W., Oziemkowska M., Celentano D., Vlahov D., Ensminger M., and Knowlton A. Using social network analysis to study patterns of drug use among urban drug users at high risk for HIV/AIDS. Drug and Alcohol Dependence 38 (1995) 1-9
20. Leonard K., and Mudar P. Peer and partner drinking and the transition to marriage: a longitudinal examination of selection and influence processes. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors 17 (2003) 115-125
21. Levine P.B., Gustafson T.A., and Velenchik A.D. More bad news for smokers? The effects of cigarette smoking on wages. Industrial and Labor Relations Review 50 (1997) 493-509
22. Manser M., and Brown M. Marriage and household decision-making: a bargaining analysis. International Economic Review 21 (1980) 31-44
23. McElroy M., and Horney M. Nash-bargained decisions: toward a generalization of the theory of demand. International Economic Review 22 (1981) 333-349
24. Manski C. Identification Problems in the Social Sciences (1995), Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA
25. Rose E. A Joint Econometric Model of Marriage and Partner Choice (2004), University of Washington, Mimeo
26. Van Ours J. A pint a day raises a man's pay; but smoking blows that gain away. Journal of Health Economics 23 (2004) 863-886
27. Wedel M., DeSarbo W.S., Bult J.R., and Ramaswamy V. A latent class poisson regression model for heterogeneous count data. Journal of Applied Econometrics 8 (1993) 397-411
28. Weiss Y. The formation and dissolution of families: why marry? Who marries whom? And what happens upon divorce. In: Rosenzweig M.R., and Stark O. (Eds). Handbook of Population and Family Economics vol. 1A (1997), Elsevier Science B.V., Amsterdam 81-124
29. Wilson S. The health capital of families: an investigation of the inter-spousal correlation in health status. Social Science and Medicine 55 (2002) 1157-1172
30. Wooldridge J.M. Econometric Analysis of Cross Section and Panel Data (2002), The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA
31. Wooldridge, J.M., 2002b. Simple solutions to the initial conditions problem in dynamic non-linear panel data models with unobserved heterogeneity. IFS/UCL CEMFI Working Paper 18/02.