Modeling peer assessment as agent negotiation in a computer supported collaborative learning environment

Educational Technology and Society

Volumn 9, Issue 3, 2006, Pages 16-26

  Lai, K Robert ^a   Lan, Chung Hsien ^a  

^a YUAN ZE UNIVERSITY   (Taiwan)

Author keywords

Agent negotiation; Assessment agent; Collaborative learning; Fuzzy constraint; Peer assessment

Indexed keywords

EID: 33746872159     PISSN: 11763647     EISSN: 14364522     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (27)

1. Arnold, L., Willoughby, L., Calkins, V., Gammon, L., & Eberhart, G. (1981). Use of peer evaluation in the assessment of medical students. Journal of Medical Education, 56 (1), 35-42.
2. Bangert-Drowns, R. L., Kulick, C. L. C., Kulick, J. A., & Morgan, M. T. (1991). The instructional effect of feedback in test-like events. Review of Educational Research, 61, 213-238.
3. Biggs, J. (1999). Teaching for Quality Learning at University, Buckingham: SRHE and Open University Press.
4. Chiu, C. H., Wang, W. R., & Yuan, S. M. (1998). Web-based collaborative homework review system. Proceedings of ICCE'98, 474-477.
5. Davies, P. (2002). Using agent reflective self-assessment for awarding degree classifications. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 39 (4), 307-319.
6. Davis, R., & Berrow, T. (1998). An evaluation of the use of computer supported peer review for developing higher-level skills. Computers and Education, 30, 111-115.
7. Falchikov, N. (2001). Learning Together: Peer tutoring in higher education, London: Routledge Falmer.
8. Falchikov, N. (1995). Peer feedback marking: developing peer assessment. Innovations in Education and Training International, 32, 175-186.
9. Ford, K., Bradshaw, J., Adams-Webber, J., & Agnew, N. (1993). Knowledge acquisition as a constructive modeling activity. International Journal of Intelligent Systems, 8(1), 9-32.
10. Freeman, N. (1995). Peer assessment by groups of group work. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 20, 289-300.
11. Kwok, R. C. W., & Ma, J. (1999). Use of a group support system for collaborative assessment. Computers and Education, 32 (2), 109-125.
12. Lai, K. R., & Lin, M. W. (2004). Modeling agent negotiation via Fuzzy constraints in E-Business. Computational Intelligence, 20 (4), 624-642.
13. Lin, S. S. J., Liu, E. Z. F., & Yuan, S. M. (2001). Web-based peer Assessment feedback for students with various thinking styles. Journal of Computer-Assisted Learning, 17(4), 420-432.
14. Lin, S. S. J., Liu, E. Z. F., Chiu, C. H., & Yuan, S. M. (2001). Web-based peer assessment: attitude and achievement. IEEE Transaction on Education, 4 (2), 211.
15. Liu, C. C., Liu, B. J., Hui, T. A., & Horng, J. T. (2002). Web based peer assessment using knowledge acquisition techniques: tools for supporting contexture awareness. International Conference on Computers in Education, Auckland, New Zealand, 4-6 December, 2002.
16. Liu, E. Z. F. (2003). Networked knowledge management and evaluation system for CSCL: A case study. The Hawaii International Conference on Business, Hawaii, USA.
17. Liu, E. Z. F., Lin, S. S. J., Chiu, C. H., & Yuan, S. M. (1999). Student participation in computer sciences courses via the Network Peer Assessment System. Advanced Research in Computers and Communications in Education, 2, 744-747.
18. McDowell, L., & Mowl, G. (1996). Innovative assessment. In Gibbs, G. (Ed.), Improving student learning through assessment and evaluation, Oxford: The Oxford Centre for Staff Development, 131-147.
19. Pruitt, D. G. (1981). Negotiation behavior, New York: Academic Press.
20. Rada, T. (1998). Efficiency and effectiveness in computer-supported peer-peer learning. Computers and Education, 30(3), 134-146.
21. Rogoff, B. (1991). Social interaction as apprenticeship in thinking: guidance and participation in spatial planning. In L. B. Resnick, J. M. Levine, & S. Teasley (Eds.), Perspectives on socially shared cognition, Washington: APA Press, 349-383.
22. Sitthiworachart, J., & Joy, M. (2003). Web-based peer assessment in learning computer programming. The 3rd IEEE International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies, 180-184.
23. Strachan, I. B., & Wilcox, S. (1996). Peer and self assessment of group work: developing an effective response to increased enrollment in a third year course in microclimatology. Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 20 (3), 343-353.
24. Topping, K. J., Smith, E. F., Swanson, I., & Elliot, A. (2000). Formative peer assessment of academic writing between postgraduate agents. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 25 (2), 149-166.
25. Van Lehn, K. A., Chi, M. T. H., Baggett, W., & Murray, R. C. (1995). Progress report: Towards a theory of learning during tutoring, Pittsburgh: Learning Research and Development Center, University of Pittsburgh.
26. Yu, F. Y., Liu, Y. H., & Chan, T. W. (2004). A networked question-posing and peer assessment learning system: a cognitive enhancing tool. International Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 32, 211-226.
27. Zhao, Y. (1998). The effects of anonymity on computer-mediated peer review. International Journal of Educational Telecommunications, 4 (4), 311-345.