Universal newborn hearing screening in an inner-city, managed care environment

Laryngoscope

Volumn 110, Issue 6, 2000, Pages 881-894

  Isaacson, Glenn ^a  

^a TEMPLE UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

Auditory brainstem responses; Cost effective medicine; Deafness; Hearing screening; Otoacoustic emissions

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; AUDITORY SCREENING; COST BENEFIT ANALYSIS; EVOKED OTOACOUSTIC EMISSION; FOLLOW UP; HEARING LOSS; HUMAN; LONGITUDINAL STUDY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; NEWBORN; NEWBORN SCREENING; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSPECTIVE STUDY;

EID: 0034044463     PISSN: 0023852X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/00005537-200006000-00002     Document Type: Article

References (105)

1. National Institutes of Health. Early identification of hearing impairment in infants and young children. NIH Consensus Statement 1993;11(1):1-24.
2. Joint Committee on Infant Hearing. Position Statement. Audiol Today 1994;93:330-334.
3. Joint Committee on Infant Hearing 1994 Position Statement. Pediatrics 1995;95;152-156.
4. American Academy of Audiology American Academy of Audiology position statement: early identification of hearing loss in children. Audiol Today 1988;1:1-2.
5. US Department of Health and Human Services. Health People. Washington, DC: US Public Health Service, 2000: 1990; DIIHS Publication 91-50213.
6. Bess FH, Paradise JL. Universal screening for infant hearing impairment: not simple, not risk-free, not necessarily beneficial, and not presently justified. Pediatrics 1994;93:330-334.
7. Sorri M, Rantakallio P. Prevalence of hearing loss at the age of 15 in a birth cohort of 12,000 children from northern Finland. Scand Audiol 1985;14:203-207.
8. Van Naarden K, Decoufle P, Caldwell K. Prevalence and characteristics of children with serious hearing impairment in metropolitan Atlanta: 1991-1993. Pediatrics 1999;103:570-575.
9. White KR, Maxon AB. Universal screening for infant hearing impairment: simple, beneficial, and presently justified. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 1995;32(3):201-211.
10. Northern JL, Hayes D. Universal screening for infant hearing impairment: necessary, beneficial, and justifiable. Audiol Today 1994;6:10-13.
11. Windmill IM. Universal screening of infants for hearing loss: further justification. J Pediatr 1998;133:318-319.
12. Horn KL, McDaniel SL, Olguin M. Universal newborn hearing screening. Am J Otol 1997;18:539.
13. Doyle KJ, Fujikawa S, Rogers P, Newman E. Comparison of newborn hearing screening by transient otoacoustic emissions and auditory brainstem responses using ALGO-2. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 1998;43:207-211.
14. Yoshinaga-Itano C, Sedey AL, Coulter DK, Mehl AL. Language of early- and later-identified children with hearing loss. Pediatrics 1998;102(5):1161-1171.
15. Mason JA, Herrmann KR. Universal infant hearing screening by automated auditory brainstem response measurement. Pediatrics 1998;101:221-228.
16. Maxon AB, White KR, Culpepper B, Vohr BR. Maintaining acceptably low referral rates in TEOAE-based newborn hearing screening programs. J Commun Disord 1997;30(6):457-475.
17. Mehl AL, Thomson MA. Newborn hearing screening: the great omission. Pediatrics 1998;101:97-98.
18. Vohr BR, Carty LM, Moore PE, et al. The Rhode Island Hearing Assessment Program: experience with statewide hearing screening (1993-1996) J Pediatr 1998;133(3):318-319.
19. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania Department of Public Welfare. Statewide mandatory Medicaid managed care expansions discussion paper. December 1996. http://www.state-.pa.us/PA_Exec/Public_Welfare/overview.html
20. AAA Task Force on Early Identification of Hearing Loss. Considerations for the use of support personnel for newborn hearing screening. http://audiology.org.infant.supportpersonnel.htm
21. Joint Committee on Infant Hearing. Position Statement. Pediatrics 1982;70:496-497.
22. Stapells DR, Oates P. Estimation of pure-tone audiogram by auditory brainstem response: a review. Audiol Neurootol 1997;2:257-280.
23. Ballenger WL. Diseases of the Nose, Throat and Ear. Philadelphia: Lea & Febiger, 1911;934.
24. Myers D. The deaf child. In: Jackson C, Jackson CL, eds. Diseases of the Nose, Throat and Ear. Philadelphia: WB Saunders, 1959:452-457.
25. Osberger M. Language and learning skills of hearing-impaired students. ASHA Monogr 1986;23:92-98.
26. Furth HG. A comparison of reading test norms of deaf and hearing children. Am Ann Deaf 1966;111:461-462.
27. Wrightstone JW, Aronow MS, Moskowitz S. Developing reading test norms for deaf children. Am Ann Deaf 1963;108:311-316.
28. Hensen V. Beobachtungen uber die trommelfell-spanners bei hund und katze. Arch fur Anatomie und Physiologie, Physiologische Abtheilung 1878;2:312-319.
29. Potter AB. Function of the stapedius muscle. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1936;45:639-543.
30. Metz O. The acoustic impedance measured on normal and pathological ears. Acta Otolaryngol Suppl (Scand) 1946;63:1-254.
31. Metz O. Threshold of reflex contractions of muscles of the middle ear and recruitment of loudness. Arch Otolaryngol 1952;55:536-543.
32. Terkildsen K, Scott-Nielsen S. An electroacoustic impedance measuring bridge for clinical use. Arch Otolaryngol 1960;73:339-346.
33. Handler SD, Margolis RH. Predicting hearing loss from stapedial reflex thresholds in patients with sensorineural impairment. Trans Am Acad Ophthalmol Otolaryngol 1977;84:425-431.
34. Wilson RH, Shanks JE, Velde TM. Aural acoustic-immittance measurements: inter-aural differences. J Speech Hear Res 1981;46:413-421.
35. Bennett MJ. Acoustic impedance bridge measurement with the neonate. Br J Audiol 1975;9:117-124.
36. Keith RW. Middle ear function in neonates. Arch Otolaryngol 1975;101:376-379.
37. Weatherby LA, Bennett MJ. The neonatal acoustic reflex. Scand Audiol 1980;9:103-110.
38. Wilson RH, Margolis RH. Acoustic reflex measurements. In: Rintelmann WF, ed. Hearing Assessment. Austin, TX: Pro-Ed, Inc., 1991:247-319.
39. Schwartz DM, Schwartz JA. Auditory evoked potentials in clinical pediatrics. In: Rintelmann WF, ed. Hearing Assessment. Austin, TX: Pro-Ed, Inc., 1991:429-479.
40. Jewett DL. Volume-conducted potentials in response to auditory stimuli as detected by averaging in the cat. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1970;28:609-618.
41. Jewett DL, Romano MN, Williston JS. Human auditory evoked potentials: possible brain-stem components detected on the scalp. Science 1970;167:1517-1518.
42. Hecox K, Galambos R. Brain stem auditory evoked responses in human infants and adults. Arch Otolaryngol 1974;99:30-33.
43. Schulman-Galambos C, Galambos R. Brainstem auditory-evoked responses in premature infants. J Speech Hear Res 1975;18:456-455.
44. ASHA Committee on Infant Hearing. Audiologic screening of newborn infants who are at risk for hearing impairment. ASHA 1989;31:89-92.
45. Kileny PR: ALGO-1 Automated infant hearing screener: preliminary results. Semin Hear 1987;8:125-131.
46. Rotteveel JJ, de Graaf R, Colon EJ, Stegeman DF, Visco YM. The maturation of the central auditory conduction in preterm infants until three months post term, II: the auditory brainstem responses (ABRs). Hear Res 1987;26:21-35.
47. Quinonez RE, Crawford MR. Electrophysiologic changes in preterm infants: auditory brainstem responses and distortion product otoacoustic emissions. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1997;106:721-728.
48. Van Straaten HL, Groote ME, Oudesluys-Murphy AM. Evaluation of an automated auditory brainstem response infant hearing screening method in at risk neonates. Eur J Pediatr 1996;155:702-705.
49. Chen SJ, Yang EY, Kwan ML, Chang P, Shiao AS, Lien CF. Infant hearing screening with an automated brainstem response screener and auditory brainstem response. Acta Pediatr 1996;85(1):14-18.
50. Kemp DT. Stimulated acoustic emissions form within the human auditory system. J Acoust Soc Am 1977;64:1386-1391.
51. Kemp DT. Hearing faculty test device. UK provision patent 5467/78.
52. Bray P, Kemp DT. An advanced cochlear echo technique suitable for infant screening. Br J Audiol 1987;21:191-204.
53. Sininger YS, Abdala C. Otoacoustic emissions for the study of auditory function in infants and children. In: Berlin CI, ed. Otoacoustic Emission: Basic Science and Clinical Applications. San Diego: Singular Publication Group, Inc. 1998;105-125.
54. White WR, Behrens TR, The Rhode Island Hearing Assessment Project: implication for universal newborn screening. Semin Hear 1993;14:18-29.
55. Bonfils P, Francois M, Avan P, Londero A, Trotoux J, Narcy P. Spontaneous and evoked emissions in preterm neonates. Laryngoscope 1992;102:182-189.
56. Doyle KJ, Burggraaff B, Fujikawa S, Kim J, MacArthur, CJ. Neonatal hearing screening with otoscopy, auditory brain stem response, and otoacoustic emissions. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1997;116:597-603.
57. Brass D, Watkins P, Kemp DT. Assessment of an implementation of a narrow band, neonatal otoacoustic emission screening method. Ear Hear 1994;15:467-475.
58. Weirather YP, Korth N, White KR, Downs D, Woods-Kershner N. Cost analysis of TEOAE-based universal newborn hearing screening. J Commun Disord 1997;30:477-493.
59. Bantock HM, Croxson S. Universal hearing screening using transient otoacoustic emissions in a community health clinic. Arch Dis Child 1998;78:249-252.
60. Johnson JL, Kuntz NL, Sia CCJ, White KR, Johnson RL. Newborn hearing screening in Hawaii. Hawaii Med J 1997;56:352-355.
61. Choi SS, Pafitis IA, Zalzal GH, Herer GR, Patel KM. Clinical application of transiently evoked otoacoustic emissions in the pediatric population. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1999;108:132-138.
62. Sininger YS, Cone-Wesson B, Ma E. Auditory status of the newborn during the first days postpartum [abstract]. Abstr Assoc Res Otolaryngol 1993;16:5.
63. Isaacson G, Mintz MC, Sasaki CT. Magnetic resonance imaging of the fetal temporal bone. Laryngoscope 1986;96:1343-1346.
64. Northrop C, Piza J, Eavey RD. Histological observations of amniotic fluid cellular contents in the ears of neonates and infants. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 1986;11:113-127.
65. Isaacson G. The antenatal diagnosis of congenital deafness. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1988;97:124-127.
66. McNellis EL, Klein AJ. Pass/fail rates for repeated click-evoked otoacoustic emissions and auditory brain stem response screenings n newborns. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1997;116:431-437.
67. Chang KW, Vohr BR, Norton SJ, Lekas MD. External and middle ear status related to evoked otoacoustic emission in neonates. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1993;119:276-282.
68. Schmiedt RA, Adams JC. Stimulated acoustic emissions in the ear canal of the gerbil. Hear Res 1981;5:295-305.
69. Mills DM, Norton SJ, Rubel EW. Development of active and passive mechanics in the mammalian cochlea. Audiol Neurosci 1994;1:77-99.
70. Starr A, McPherson D, Patterson J, et al. Absence of both auditory and evoked potentials and auditory percepts depending on timing clues. Brain 1991;114:1157-1180.
71. Sinsinger YS, Hood LJ, Starr A, Berlin CI, Picton TW. Hearing loss due to auditory neuropathy. Audiol Today 1995;7:10-13.
72. Berlin CI, Bordelon J, St John P, et al. Reversing click polarity may uncover auditory neuropathy in infants. Ear Hear 1998;19:37-47.
73. Miyamoto RT, Kirk KI, Renshaw J, Hussain D. Cochlear implantation in auditory neuropathy. Laryngoscope 1999;109:181-185.
74. Scholer C, Schonweiler R, Ptok M. Transitory evoked and distortion products of otoacoustic emissions in absent auditory evoked potentials. HNO 1997;45:1008-1015.
75. Bonfils P, Avan P, Landais P, Erminy M, Biacabe B. Statistical evaluation of hearing screening by distortion product otoacoustic emissions. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1997;106:1052-1062.
76. Gorga MP, Neely ST, Berman BM, et al. A comparison of transient-evoked and distortion product otoacoustic emissions in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired subjects. J Acoust Soc Am 1993;94(5):2639-2648.
77. Abdala C, Sininger YS, Ekelid M, Zeng, F-G. Distortion product otoacoustic emission suppression tuning curves in human adults and neonates. Hear Res 1996;98:38-53.
78. Love RR, Camilli AE. The value of screening. Cancer 1981;48(2 [Suppl]):489-494.
79. Frankenburg WK. Selection of diseases and tests in pediatrie screening. Pediatrics 1974;54(5):612-616.
80. Wilson JMG, Jugner G. Principles and Practice of Screening for Disease. Geneva: World Health Organization, 1968. Public Health Paper 4.
81. Schapira MM, Matchar DB, Young MJ. The effectiveness of ovarian cancer screening: a decision analysis model. Ann Intern Med 1993;118:838-843.
82. Larry Katzenstein. Can the prostate test be hazardous to your health? The New York Times, p G4.
83. Froding CA. Acoustic investigation of newborn infants. Acta Otolaryngol (Stockh) 1960;52:31-41.
84. Wedenberg E. Auditory tests on newborn infants. Acta Otolaryngol (Stockh) 1956;46:446-461.
85. Downs MP, Sterritt G. Identification audiometry for neonates: a preliminary report. J Audiol Res 1964;4:69-80.
86. Downs MP, Hemenway WG. Report on hearing screening of 17,000 neonates. Int Audiol 1969;8:72-76.
87. Feinmesser M, Tell L. Neonatal screening for deafness. Arch Otolaryngol 1971;102:297-299.
88. Mencher GT. A program for neonatal hearing screening. Audiology 1974;13(6):495-500.
89. Richards IDG, Roberts CJ. The at-risk infant. Lancet 1967;2:711-714.
90. Matkin N: Re-evaluating our evaluations. In: Bess FH, ed. Hearing Impairment in Children. Parkton, MD: York Press, 1988:101-111.
91. Stein L, Clark S, Kraus N. The hearing-impaired infant: patterns of identification and habilitation. Ear Hear 1983;4:232-286.
92. Downs MP. Universal newborn hearing screening: the Colorado story. Int J Pediatr Otolaryngol 1995;32:257-259.
93. Finitzo T, Albright K, O'Neal J. The newborn with hearing loss: detection in the nursery. Pediatrics 1998;102:1452-1460.
94. Barsky-Firsky L, Sun S. Universal newborn hearing screening: a three-year experience. Pediatrics 1997;99(6):e4. www:pediatrics.org/cgi/contentyfull/99/6/1997:e4.
95. Erenberg A, Lemons J, Sia C, Trunkel D, Ziring P. Newborn and infant hearing loss: detection and intervention. American Academy of Pediatrics. Task Force in Newborn and Infant Hearing, 1998-1999. Pediatrics 1999;103(2):527-530.
96. Rask KJ, Williams MV, Parker RM, McNagny SE. Obstacles predicting lack of regular and delays in seeking care for patients at an urban public hospital. JAMA 1994;271:1953-1954.
97. Reece AE, Whiteman V, Geguizamon G, et al. Prospective population-based clinical interventional maternity program: perinatal and economic outcomes. Presented at the Meeting of the Society of Perinatal Obstetricians. Anaheim, CA, 1997.
98. Fairbrother G, Friedman S, DuMont KA, Lobach KS. Markers for primary care: missed opportunities to immunize and screen for lead and tuberculosis by private physicians serving large numbers of inner-city Medicaid-eligible children. Pediatr 1996;97:785-790.
99. Fairbrother G, Friedman S, Hanson KL, Butts GC. Effect of vaccines for children program on inner-city neighborhood physicians. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 1997;151:1229-1235.
100. Abrams MJ, Pensak ML, Buhrer K. Perspectives on a state enacted hearing screening assessment program in the newborn population. Am J Otol 1997;18:368-372.
101. Connelly PE, Schneider NG. Universal neonatal hearing screening at an urban teaching hospital: one year's experience. Presented at the Meeting of the Eastern Section of the American laryngological, Rhinological and Otological Society, Inc. Providence, RI, January 30, 1999.
102. Kanne TJ, Schaefer L, Perkins JA. Potential pitfalls in initiating a newborn hearing screening program. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1999;125:28-32.
103. Paradise JL. Universal newborn hearing screening: should we leap before we look? Pediatrics 1999;103:670-672.
104. Newman L. Newborn hearing tests: critics drowning in the tidal wave. Medical Outcomes and Guidelines Alert 1998;6:4-7.
105. DeUzcategui CA, Yoshinaga-Itano C: Parents' reactions to newborn hearing screening. Audiol Today 1997;24:27.