Human Sgo1 is an excellent target for induction of apoptosis of transformed cells

Cell Cycle

Volumn 5, Issue 8, 2006, Pages 896-901

  Yang, Yali ^a   Wang, Xiaoxing ^b   Dai, Wei ^b  

^a Shanghai Jiao Tong University Affiliated Sixth People s Hospital   (China)

^b NEW YORK MEDICAL COLLEGE   (United States)

Author keywords

Apoptosis; Cancer cells; Cell cycle; Kinetochores; Mitosis; Mitotic catastrophe; Sgo1

Indexed keywords

NUCLEAR PROTEIN; PROTEIN SHUGOSHIN 1; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

AMINO ACID SEQUENCE; APOPTOSIS; ARTICLE; CANCER CELL; CELL CYCLE PROGRESSION; CELL MEMBRANE PERMEABILITY; CELL STRUCTURE; CELL TRANSFORMATION; CELL VIABILITY; CHROMOSOME SEGREGATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; HELA CELL; HUMAN; HUMAN CELL; IN VIVO STUDY; MITOSIS INHIBITION; PROTEIN FUNCTION;

EUKARYOTA;

EID: 33746620936     PISSN: 15384101     EISSN: 15514005     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.4161/cc.5.8.2691     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Cicatiello L, Sica V, Bresciani F, Weisz A. Identification of a specific pattern of "immediateearly" gene activation induced by estrogen during mitogenic stimulation of rat uterine cells. Receptor 1993; 3:17-30.
2. Michel LS, Liberal V, Chatterjee A, Kirchwegger R, Pasche B, Gerald W, Dobles M, Sorger PK, Murty VV, Benezra R. MAD2 haplo-insufficiency causes premature anaphase and chromosome instability in mammalian cells. Nature 2001; 409:355-359.
3. Dai W, Wang Q, Liu TY, Swamy M, Fang YQ, Xie SQ, Mahmood R, Yang YM, Xu M, Rao CV. Slippage of mitotic arrest and enhanced tumor development in mice with BUBR1 haploinsufficiency. Cancer Res 2004; 15:440-445.
4. Rao CV, Yang M, Malisetty S, Liu TY, Fang YQ, Mahmood R, Jhanwar-Uniyal M, Dai W. Colonic tumorigenesis in BubR1+/-ApcMin/+ mutant mice is linked to premature separation of sister chromatids and enahnced genomic instability. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2005; 102:4365-70.
5. Babu JR, Jeganathan KB, Baker DJ, Wu X, Kang-Decker N, van Duersen JM. Rae1 is an essential mitotic checkpoint regulator that cooperates with Bub3 to prevent chromosome missegregation. J Cell Biol 2003; 160:341-53.
6. Jeganathan KB, Malureanu L, van Deursen JM. The Rae1-Nup98 complex prevents aneuploidy by inhibiting securin degradation. Nature 2005; 438:1036-9.
7. Bharadwaj R, Yu H. The spindle checkpoint, aneuploidy, and cancer. Oncogene 2004; 23:2016-27.
8. Wang X, Dai W. Shugoshin, a guardian for sister chromatid segregation. Exp Cell Res 2005; 310:1-9.
9. Gimenez-Abian JF, Diaz-Martinez LA, Wirth KG, Andrews CA, Gimenez-Martin G, Clarke DJ. Regulated separation of sister centromeres depends on the spindle assembly checkpoint but not on the Anaphase Promoting Complex/Cyclosome. Cell Cycle 2005; 4:1561-75.
10. Uhlmann F. The mechanism of sister chromatid cohesion. Exp Cell Res 2004; 296:80-85.
11. Gruber S, Haering CH, Nasmyth K. Chromosomal cohesin forms a ring. Cell 2003; 112:765-77.
12. Hauf S, Roitinger E, Koch B, Dittrich CM, Mechtler K, Peters JM. Dissociation of cohesin from chromosome arms and loss of arm cohesion during early mitosis depends on phosphorylation of SA2. PLoS Biol 2005; 3:e69.
13. Sumara I, Vorlaufer E, Stukenberg PT, Kelm O, Redemann N, Nigg Ea, Peters JM. The dissociation of cohesin from chromosomes in prophase is regulated by Polo-like kinase. Mol Cell 2002; 9:515-25.
14. Waizenegger IC, Hauf S, Meinke A, Peters JM. Two distinct pathways remove mammalian cohesin from chromosome arms in prophase and from centromeres in anaphase. Cell 2000; 103:399-410.
15. McGuinness BE, Hirota T, Kudo NR, Peters JM, Nasmyth K. Shugoshin prevents dissociation of cohesin from centromeres during mitosis in vertebrate cells. PLoS Biol 2005; 3:e86.
16. Tang Z, Sun Y, Harley SE, Zou H, Yu H. Human Bub1 protects centromeric sister-chromatid cohesion through Shugoshin during mitosis. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2004; 101:18012-7.
17. Kitajima TS, Kawashima SA, Watanabe Y. The conserved kinetochore protein shugoshin protects centromeric cohesion during meiosis. Nature 2004; 427:510-7.
18. Salic A, Waters JC, Mitchison TJ. Vertebrate shugoshin links sister centromere cohesion and kinetochore microtubule stability in mitosis. Cell 2004; 118:567-78.
19. Wang X, Yang Y, Dai W. Differential subcellular localizations of two human Sgo1 isoforms: Implications in regulation of sister chromatid cohesion and microtubule dynamics. Cell Cycle 2006; 5:635-40.
20. Chan GK, Liu ST, Yen TJ. Kinetochore structure and function. Trends Cell Biol 2005; 15:589-98.
21. Kerrebrock AW, Moore DP, Wu JS, Orr-Weaver TL. Mei-S332, a Drosophila protein required for sister-chromatid cohesion, can localize to meiotic centromere regions. Cell 1995; 83:247-56.
22. Kanovsky M, Raffo A, Drew L, Rosal R, Do T, Friedman FK, Rubinstein P, Visser J, Robinson R, Brandt-Rauf PW, Michl J, Fine RL, Pincus MR. Peptides from the amino terminal mdm-2-binding domain of p53, designed from conformational analysis, are selectively cytotoxic to transformed cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2001; 98:12438-43.
23. Yuan J, Kramer A, Eckerdt F, Kaufmann M, Strebhardt K. Efficient internalization of the polo-box of polo-like kinase 1 fused to an Antennapedia peptide results in inhibition of cancer cell proliferation. Cancer Res 2002; 62:4186-90.
24. Derossi D, Chassaing G, Prochiantz A. Trojan peptides: The penetratin system for intracellular delivery. Trends Cell Biol 1998; 8:84-87.
25. Watanabe Y. Modifying sister chromatid cohesion for meiosis. J Cell Sci 2004; 117:4017-23.
26. Ouyang B, Pan H, Lu L, Li J, Stambrook P, Li B, Dai W. Human Prk is a conserved protein serine/threonine kinase involved in regulating M phase functions. J Biol Chem 1997; 272:28646-51.