Thinking within the box: The relational processing style elicited by counterfactual mind-sets

Journal of Personality and Social Psychology

Volumn 91, Issue 1, 2006, Pages 33-48

  Kray, Laura J ^a,c   Galinsky, Adam D ^b,d   Wong, Elaine M ^a,c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^d NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Analytical; Counterfactuals; Creativity; Mind sets; Relational processing

Indexed keywords

ACHIEVEMENT; AFFECT; ARTICLE; ATTITUDE; CONTROL; CREATIVITY; DECISION MAKING; EGO; HUMAN; IMAGINATION; INDIVIDUALITY; LEARNING; LOGIC; PAIRED ASSOCIATE LEARNING; PERSONALITY TEST; PROBLEM SOLVING; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; STUDENT; THINKING;

ACHIEVEMENT; AFFECT; ASSOCIATION LEARNING; ATTITUDE; CREATIVENESS; DECISION MAKING; HUMANS; IMAGINATION; INDIVIDUALITY; INTERNAL-EXTERNAL CONTROL; LOGIC; PAIRED-ASSOCIATE LEARNING; PERSONALITY ASSESSMENT; PROBLEM SOLVING; REALITY TESTING; SET (PSYCHOLOGY); STUDENTS; THINKING;

EID: 33746359968     PISSN: 00223514     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/0022-3514.91.1.33     Document Type: Article

References (50)

1. Amabile, T. M. (1983). The social psychology of creativity: A componential conceptualization. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45, 357-376.
2. Amabile, T. M., Conti, R., Coon, H. Lazenby, J., & Ilerron. M. (1996). Assessing the work environment for creativity. Academy of Management Journal, 39, 1154-1184.
3. Brehm, J. W. (1966). A theory of psychological reactance. New York: Academic Press.
4. byrne. R. M. J., & Tasso, A. (1994, August). Counterfactual reasoning: Inferences from hypothetical conditional. In A. Ram & K. Eiselt (Eds.), Proceedings of the 16th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society. Hillsdale, NJ: Brlbaum.
5. Cosier, R. A. (1978). The effects of three potential aids for making strategic decisions on prediction accuracy. Organizational Behavior and. Human Decision Processes, 22, 295-306.
6. Duncker. K. (1945). On problem solving. Psychological Monographs, 58, 270.
7. Einhorn, H. J., & Hogarth, R. M. (1986). Judging probable cause. Psychological Bulletin, 99, 3-19.
8. Feldman, L. A. (1995). Valence focus and arousal focus: Individual differences in the structure of affective experience. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69, 153-166.
9. Friedman, R. S., & Forster, J. (2001). The effects of promotion and prevention cues on creativity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81, 1001-1013.
10. Galinsky, A. D., & Kray, L. J. (2004). From thinking about what might have been to sharing what we know: The effects of counterfactual mind-sets on information sharing in groups. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 40, 606-618.
11. Galinsky, A. D., & Moskowitz, G. B. (2000). Counterfactuals as behavioral primes: Priming the simulation heuristic and consideration of alternatives. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 36, 257-383.
12. Gleicher, F., Boninger, D. S., Strathman, A., Armor, D., Iletts. J., & Aim, M. (1995). With an eye toward the future: The impact of counterfactual thinking on affect, attitudes, and behavior. In N. J. Roese & J. M. Olson (Eds.), What might have been: The social psychology of counterfactual thinking (pp. 283-304). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
13. Glucksberg. S., & Weisberg, W. R. (1966). Verbal behavior and problem solving: Effects of labeling in a functional fixedness problem. The Journal of Experimental Psychology, 71, 659-664.
14. Guilford, J. P. (1950). Creativity. American Psychologist, 5, 444-454.
15. Janis, I. L., & Mann, L. (1977). Emergency decision making: A theoretical analysis of responses to disaster warnings. Journal of Human Stress, 3, 35-48.
16. Kahneman, D., & Miller, D. T. (1986). Norm theory: Comparing reality to its alternatives. Psychological Review, 93, 136-153.
17. Kelley, H. H. (1973). The processes of causal attribution. American Psychologist, 28, 107-128.
18. Kray, L. J., & Galinsky, A. D. (2003). The debiasing effect of counterfactual mind-sets: Increasing the search for disconfirmatory information in group decisions. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 91, 69-81.
19. Krishnamurthy, P., & Sivaraman, A. (2002). Counterfactual thinking and advertising responses. Journal of Consumer Research, 28, 650-658.
20. Law School Admission Council. (2005).Preparingforthe ISAT. Retrieved April 11, 2006, from http://www.lsac.org/pdfs/2006-2007/TestPrep06.pdf
21. Liljenquist, K. A., Galinsky, A. D., & Kray, L. J. (2004). Exploring the rabbit hole or possibilities by myself or with my group: The benefits and liabilities of activating counterfactual mind-sets for information sharing and group coordination. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 17, 263-279.
22. Lord, C. G., Lepper, M. R., & Preston, B. (1984). Considering the opposite: A corrective strategy for social judgment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 47, 1231-1243.
23. Mandel, D. R. (2003). Judgment dissociation theory: An analysis of differences in causal, counterfactual, and covariational reasoning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 132, 419-434.
24. Mandel. D. R., & Lehman, D. R. (1996). Counterfactual thinking and ascriptions of cause and preventability. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71, 450-463.
25. Markman, K. D., & McMullen, M. N. (2003). A reflection and evaluation model of comparative thinking. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 7, 244-267.
26. McGill, A. L. (1998). Relative use of necessity and sufficiency information in causal judgments about natural categories. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75, 70-81.
27. McGill, A. L., & Klein, J. G. (1993). Contrastive and counterfactual reasoning in causal judgment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 64, 897-905.
28. Mednick, M. T., Mednick, S. A., & Mednick. E. V. (1964). Incubation of creative performance and specific associative priming. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 69, 84-88.
29. Mednick, S. A. (1962). The associative basis of the creative process. Psychological Review, 69, 220-232.
30. Merriam-Webster. (2006). Merriam-Webster online dictionary. Retrieved April 11, 2006, from http://www.m-w.com/dict.ionary/analysis.
31. Mussweiler, T., Strack, F., & Pfeiffer, T. (2000). Overcoming the inevitable anchoring effect: Considering the opposite compensates for selective accessibility. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 26, 1142-1150.
32. O'Hara. L. A., & Sternberg. R. J. (2001). It doesn't hurt to ask: Effects of instructions to be creative, practical, or analytical on essay-writing performance and their interaction with students' thinking styles. Creativity Research Journal, 13, 197-210.
33. Peterson, R. S., & Nemeth, C. J. (1996). Focus versus flexibility: Majority and minority influence can both improve performance. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 22, 14-23.
34. Princeton Review. (2005). The LSAT in detail. Retrieved May 3, 2006, from http://www.princetonreview.com/law/testprep/testprep.asp? TPRPAGE=87&TYPE= LSAT-SECTIONS
35. Roese, N. J. (1994). The functional basis of counterfactual thinking. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66, 805-818.
36. Roese, N. J., & Hur, T. (1997). Affective determinants of counterfactual thinking. Social Cognition, 15, 274-290.
37. Roese, N. J., Hur. T., & Pennington, G. L. (1999). Counterfactual thinking and regulatory focus: Implications for action versus inaction and sufficiency versus necessity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77, 1109-1120.
38. Roese, N. J., & Olson, J. M. (1995). Functions of counterfactual thinking. In N. J. Roese & J. M. Olson (Eds.), The social psychology of counterfactual thinking (pp. 169-197). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
39. Roese, N. J., & Olson, J. M. (1997). Counterfactual thinking: The intersection of affect and function. In M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 29, pp. 1-59). New York: Academic Press.
40. Rubin, D. C., Stoltzfus, E. R., & Wall, K. L. (1991). The abstraction of form in semantic categories. Memory & Cognition, 19, 1-7.
41. Russell, J. A. (1980). A circumplex model of affect. Journal of Personality and Social. Psychology, 39, 1161-1178.
42. Schwarz, N., & Bless, II. (1991). Happy and mindless, but sad and smart? The impact of affective states on analytic reasoning. In J. P. Forgas (Ed.), Emotion and social judgments: International series in experimental social psychology (pp. 55-71). Elmsford, NY: Pergamon Press.
43. Smith, S. M., Ward, T. B., & Schumacher, J. S. (1993). Constraining effects of examples in a creative generation task. Memory & Cognition, 21, 837-845.
44. Sternberg, R. J. (1988). Mental self-government: A theory of intellectual styles and their development. Human Development, 31, 197-224.
45. Sternberg, R. J., & Wagner, R. K. (1991). MSG thinking styles inventory manual. Unpublished manuscript.
46. Tetlook, P. E., & Lebow, R. N. (2001). Poking counterfactual holes in covering laws: Cognitive styles and historical reasoning. American Political Science Review, 95, 829-843.
47. Ward, T. B. (1994). Structured imagination: The role of category structure in exemplar generation. Cognitive Psychology, 27, 1-40.
48. Wason, P. C. (1966). Reasoning. In B. Foss (Ed.), New horizons in psychology (pp. 135-151). Middlesex, England: Penguin.
49. Watson, D., Clark, L. A., & Tellegen, A. (1988). Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: The PANAS scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 1063-1070.
50. Wells, G. L., & Gavanski, I. (1989). Mental simulation of causality. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 56, 161-169.