From noise to pitch: Transient and sustained responses of the auditory evoked field

Hearing Research

Volumn 218, Issue 1-2, 2006, Pages 50-63

  Seither Preisler, A ^a   Patterson, Roy D ^b   Krumbholz, K ^c   Seither, S ^a   Lutkenhoner B ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL MÜNSTER   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CAMBRIDGE   (United Kingdom)

^c MRC INSTITUTE OF HEARING RESEARCH   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Auditory cortex; MEG; Pitch; Pitch onset response; RIS; Spectral bandwidth; Sustained field; Temporal coding

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; AUDITORY NERVOUS SYSTEM; AUDITORY STIMULATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; EVOKED AUDITORY RESPONSE; FEMALE; HEMISPHERE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MAGNETOENCEPHALOGRAPHY; MALE; NOISE; NORMAL HUMAN; PITCH; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SOUND; STIMULUS RESPONSE;

ACOUSTIC STIMULATION; EVOKED POTENTIALS, AUDITORY; FEMALE; HUMANS; MAGNETOENCEPHALOGRAPHY; MALE; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; NOISE;

EID: 33746321069     PISSN: 03785955     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.heares.2006.04.005     Document Type: Article

References (57)

1. Bilsen F. Repetition pitch: monaural interaction of a sound with the repetition of the same, but phase shifted, sound. Acustica 17 (1966) 295-300
2. Braak H. On magnopyramidal temporal fields in the hyman brain- probable morphological counterparts of Wernike's sensory speech region. Anat. Embryol. 132 (1978) 141-169
3. Cariani P. Temporal coding of periodicity pitch in the auditory system: an overview. Neural Plasticity 6 (1999) 147-172
4. Galaburda A., and Sanides F. Cytoarchitectonic organization of the human auditory cortex. J. Comp. Neurol. (1980) 597-610
5. Gutschalk A., Patterson R., Rupp A., Uppenkamp S., and Scherg M. Sustained magnetic fields reveal separate sites for sound level and temporal regularity in human auditory cortex. NeuroImage 15 (2002) 207-216
6. Gutschalk A., Patterson R.D., Scherg M., Uppenkamp S., and Rupp A. Temporal dynamics of pitch in human auditory cortex. Neuroimage 22 (2004) 755-766
7. Hall D.A., Haggard M.P., Summerfield A.Q., Akeroyd M.A., Palmer A.R., and Bowtell R.W. Functional magnetic resonance imaging measurements of sound-level encoding in the absence of background scanner noise. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 109 (2001) 1559-1570
8. Hari R. The neuromagnetic method in the study of the human auditory cortex. In: Grandori F., Hoke M., and Romani G.L. (Eds). Auditory Evoked Magnetic Fields and Electric Potentials. Adv. Audiol. vol. 6 (1990), Karger, Basel 222-282
9. Hari R., Pelizzone M., Makela J.P., Hallstrom J., Leinonen L., and Lounasmaa O.V. Neuromagnetic responses of the human auditory cortex to on- and offsets of noise bursts. Audiology 26 (1987) 31-43
10. Hawley M.L., Melcher J.R., and Fullerton B.C. Effects of sound bandwidth on fMRI activation in human auditory brainstem nuclei. Hear. Res. 204 (2005) 101-110
11. Houtsma A.J.M., and Fleuren J.F.M. Analytic and synthetic pitch of two-tone complexes. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 90 3 (1991) 1674-1676
12. Krumbholz K., Patterson R., and Pressnitzer D. The lower limit of pitch as determined by rate discrimination. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 108 (2000) 1170-1180
13. Krumbholz K., Patterson R.D., Seither-Preisler A., Lammertmann C., and Lütkenhöner B. Neuromagnetic evidence for a pitch processing center in Heschl's gyrus. Cereb. Cortex 13 (2003) 765-772
14. Lopez-Poveda E.A., and Meddis R. A human nonlinear cochlear filterbank. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 110 (2001) 3107-3118
15. Loveless N., Levanen S., Jousmaki V., Sams M., and Hari R. Temporal integration in auditory sensory memory: neuromagnetic evidence. Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol. 100 (1996) 220-228
16. Lütkenhöner B., and Steinsträter O. High-precision neuromagnetic study of the functional organization of the human auditory cortex. Audiol. NeuroOtol. 3 (1998) 191-213
17. Lütkenhöner B., Lammertmann C., and Knecht S. Latency of auditory evoked field deflection N100m ruled by pitch or spectrum?. Audiol. NeuroOtol. 6 (2001) 263-278
18. Lütkenhöner B., Krumbholz K., and Seither-Preisler A. Studies of tonotopy based on wave N100 of the auditory evoked field are problematic. NeuroImage 19 (2003) 935-949
19. Lütkenhöner B., Seither-Preisler A., and Seither S. Piano tones evoke stronger magnetic fields than pure tones or noise, both in musicians and non-musicians. NeuroImage 30 (2006) 927-937
20. Lütkenhöner B., Krumbholz K., Lammertmann C., Seither-Preisler A., Steinstrater O., and Patterson R.D. Localization of primary auditory cortex in humans by magnetoencephalography. NeuroImage 18 (2003) 58-66
21. Martin B.A., and Boothroyd A. Cortical auditory event related potentials in response to periodic and aperiodic stimuli with the same spectral envelope. Ear Hear. 20 (1999) 33-44
22. Martin B.A., and Boothroyd A. Cortical auditory evoked potentials in response to changes of spectrum and amplitude. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 107 (2000) 2155-2161
23. Meddis R. Simulation of mechanical to neural transduction in the auditory receptor. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 79 (1986) 702-711
24. Meddis R. Simulation of auditory-neural transduction: further studies. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 83 (1988) 1056-1063
25. Meddis R., and O'Mard L. A unitary model of pitch perception. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 102 (1997) 1811-1820
26. Meddis R., O'Mard L.P., and Lopez-Poveda E.A. A computational algorithm for computing nonlinear auditory frequency selectivity. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 109 (2001) 2852-2861
27. Moore B.C., and Glasberg B.R. A revision of Zwicker's loudness model. Acta Acust. 82 (1996) 335-345
28. Moore B.C., Glasberg B.R., and Baer T. A model for the prediction of threshold, loudness, and partial loudness. J. Audio. Eng. Soc. 45 (1997) 224-240
29. Näätänen R., and Picton T. The N1 wave of the human electric and magnetic response to sound: a review and an analysis of the component structure. Psychophysiology 24 (1987) 375-425
30. Ostroff J.M., Martin B.A., and Boothroyd A. Cortical evoked response to acoustic change within a syllable. Ear Hear. 19 (1998) 290-297
31. Patterson R.D., and Irino T. Modeling temporal asymmetry in the auditory system. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 104 (1998) 2967-2979
32. Patterson R.D., Allerhand M.H., and Giguere C. Time-domain modelling of peripheral auditory processing: a modular architecture and a software platform. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 98 (1995) 1890-1894
33. Patterson R.D., Uppenkamp S., Johnsrude I.S., and Griffiths T.D. The processing of temporal pitch and melody information in auditory cortex. Neuron 36 (2002) 767-776
34. Patterson R.D., Robinson K., Holdsworth J., McKeown D., Zhang C., and Allerhand M. Complex sounds and auditory images. In: Cazals Y., Demany L., and Horner K. (Eds). Auditory Physiology and Perception (1992), Pergamon, Oxford 429-446
35. Pressnitzer D., Patterson R.D., and Krumbholz K. The lower limit of melodic pitch. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 109 (2001) 2074-2084
36. Rivier F., and Clarke S. Cytochrome oxidase, actylcholinessterase, and NADPH-diphorase staining in human supratemporal and insular cortex: evidence for multiple auditory areas. NeuroImage 6 (1997) 288-304
37. Robin D.A., Tranel D., and Damasio H. Auditory perception of temporal and spectral events in patients with focal left and right cerebral lesions. Brain Lang. 39 (1990) 539-555
38. Rupp A., Uppenkamp S., Bailes J., Gutschalk A., and Patterson R. Time constants in temporal pitch extraction: a comparison of psychophysical and neuromagnetic data. In: Pressnitzer D., de Cheveigne A., Mc Adams S., and Collet L. (Eds). Auditory Signal Processing: Physiology, Psychoacoustics, and Models. Proceedings of the 13th International Symposium on Hearing (2003), Springer, New York, Dourdan 119-125
39. Sams M., Hari R., Rif J., and Knuutila J. The human auditory sensory memory trace persists about 10 s: neuromagnetic evidence. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 5 (1993) 363-370
40. Schneider P., Scherg M., Dosch H.G., Specht H.J., Gutschalk A., and Rupp A. Morphology of Heschl's gyrus reflects enhanced activation in the auditory cortex of musicians. Nat. Neurosci. 5 (2002) 688-694
41. Schneider P., Sluming V., Roberts N., Scherg M., Goebel R., Specht H.J., Dosch H.G., Bleeck S., Stippich C., and Rupp A. Structural and functional asymmetry of lateral Heschl's gyrus reflects pitch perception preference. Nat. Neurosci. 8 (2005) 1241-1247
42. Seither-Preisler A., Krumbholz K., and Lütkenhöner B. Sensitivity of the neuromagnetic N100m deflection to spectral bandwidth: a function of the auditory periphery?. Audiol. NeuroOtol. 8 (2003) 322-337
43. Seither-Preisler A., Krumbholz K., Patterson R., Seither S., and Lütkenhöner B. Interaction between the neuromagnetic responses to sound energy onset and pitch onset suggests common generators. Eur. J. Neurosci. 19 (2004) 3073-3080
44. Seither-Preisler A., Patterson R., Krumbholz K., Seither S., and Lütkenhöner B. Evidence of pitch processing in the N100m component of the auditory evoked field. Hear. Res. 213 (2006) 88-98
45. Shamma S.A., Chadwick R.S., Wilbur W.J., Morrish K.A., and Rinzel J. A biophysical model of cochlear processing: Intensity dependence of pure tone responses. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 80 (1986) 133-145
46. Shofner W.P., and Selas G. Pitch strength and Stevens's power law. Percept. Psychophys. 64 (2002) 437-450
47. Smoorenburg G.F. Pitch perception of two-frequency stimuli. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 48 (1970) 924-942
48. Soeta Y., Nakagawa S., and Tonoike M. Auditory evoked magnetic fields in relation to bandwidth variations of bandpass noise. Hear. Res. 202 (2005) 47-54
49. Sumner C., Lopez-Poveda E.A., O'Mard L.P., and Meddis R. A revised model of the inner-hair cell and auditory-nerve complex. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 111 (2002) 2178-2188
50. Terhardt E., Stoll G., and Seewann M. Pitch of complex signals according to virtual pitch theory: tests, examples and predictions. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 71 (1982) 671-678
51. Wallace M.N., Johnston P.W., and Palmer A.R. Histochemical identification of cortical areas in the auditory region of the human brain. Exp. Brain Res. 143 (2002) 499-508
52. Yates G.K., Winter I.M., and Robertson D. Basilar membrane nonlinearity determines auditory nerve rate-intensity functions and cochlear dynamic range. Hear. Res. 45 (1990) 203-220
53. Yost W.A. Pitch of iterated rippled noise. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 100 (1996) 511-518
54. Yost W.A., Patterson R., and Sheft S. A time domain description for the pitch strength of iterated rippled noise. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 99 (1996) 1066-1078
55. Zatorre R.J., and Samson S. Role of the right temporal neocortex in retention of pitch in auditory short-term memory. Brain 114 (1991) 2403-2417
56. Zatorre R.J., Belin P., and Penhune V.B. Structure and function of auditory cortex: music and speech. Trends Cogn. Sci. 6 (2002) 37-46
57. Zwicker E., and Fastl H. Psychoacoustics - Facts and Models (1990), Springer, New York