Auditory evoked magnetic fields in relation to bandwidth variations of bandpass noise

Hearing Research

Volumn 202, Issue 1-2, 2005, Pages 47-54

  Soeta, Yoshiharu ^a   Nakagawa, Seiji ^a   Tonoike, Mitsuo ^a  

^a NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF ADVANCED INDUSTRIAL SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY AIST   (Japan)

Author keywords

Auditory evoked response; Autocorrelation function; Bandpass noise; Magnetoencephalography; N1m

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; AUDITORY STIMULATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; EVOKED AUDITORY RESPONSE; FREQUENCY MODULATION; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MAGNETIC FIELD; NOISE; NORMAL HUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SOUND PRESSURE; STIMULUS RESPONSE; TEMPORAL LOBE; WAVEFORM;

EID: 16344372830     PISSN: 03785955     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.heares.2004.09.012     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. P. Alku, P. Sivonen, K. Palomäki, and H. Tiitinen The periodic structure of vowel sounds is reflected in human electromagnetic brain responses Neurosci. Lett. 298 2001 25 28
2. Y. Ando Architectural Acoustics: Blending Sound Sources, Sound Fields, and Listeners 1998 AIP Press/Springer New York
3. Y. Ando, S. Sato, and H. Sakai Fundamental subjective attributes of sound fields based on the model of auditory brain system J.J. Sendra Computational Acoustics in Architecture 1999 WIT Press Southampton 63 99
4. G. von Békésy Hearing theories and complex sounds J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 35 1963 588 601
5. P.A. Cariani, and B. Delgutte Neural correlates of the pitch of complex tones. I. Pitch and pitch salience J. Neurophysiol. 76 1996 1698 1716
6. P.A. Cariani, and B. Delgutte Neural correlates of the pitch of complex tones. II. Pitch shift, pitch ambiguity, phase-invariance, pitch circularity, and the dominance region for pitch J. Neurophysiol. 76 1996 1717 1734
7. A. de Cheveigné, and H. Kawahara YIN, a fundamental frequency estimator for speech and music J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 111 2002 1917 1930
8. H. Fastl, and G. Stoll Scaling of pitch strength Hear. Res. 1 1979 293 301
9. T.D. Griffiths, C. Buechel, R.S.J. Frackowiak, and R.D. Patterson Analysis of temporal structure in sound by the human brain Nat. Neurosci. 1 1998 421 427
10. T.D. Griffiths, S. Uppenkamp, I. Johnsrude, O. Josephs, and R.D. Patterson Encoding of the temporal regularity of sound in the human brainstem Nat. Neurosci. 4 2001 633 637
11. W.L. Gulick, G.A. Gescheider, and R.D. Frisna Hearing: Physiological Acoustics, Neural Coding, and Psychoacoustics 1989 Oxford University Press Oxford
12. M.S. Hämäläinen, R. Hari, R.J. Ilmoniemi, J. Knuutila, and O.V. Lounasmaa Magnetoencephalography - theory, instrumentation, and applications to noninvasive studies of the working human brain Rev. Mod. Phys. 65 1993 413 497
13. E. Kaukoranta, M. Hämäläinen, J. Sarvas, and R. Hari Mixed and sensory nerve stimulations activate different cytoarchitectonic areas in the human primary somatosensory cortex SI: Neuromagnetic recordings and statistical considerations Exp. Brain Res. 63 1986 60 66
14. J. Knuutila, A. Ahonen, M. Hämäläinen, M. Kajola, P. Laine, O. Lounasmaa, L. Parkkonen, J. Simola, and C. Tesche A 122-channel whole cortex SQUID system for measuring the brain's magnetic fields IEEE Trans. Magn. 29 1993 3315 3320
15. G. Langner, M. Sams, P. Heli, and H. Schulze Frequency and periodicity are represented in orthogonal maps in the human auditory cortex: evidence from magnetoencephalography J. Comp. Physiol. A 181 1997 665 676
16. J.C.R. Licklider A duplex theory of pitch perception Experimenta 7 1951 128 134
17. R. Lyon, and S. Shamma Auditory representations of timbre and pitch H. Hawkins T. McMullin A.N. Popper R.R. Fay Auditory Computation 1995 Springer New York 221 270
18. R. Meddis, and M.J. Hewitt Virtual pitch and phase sensitivity of a computer model of the auditory periphery. I: Pitch identification J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 89 1991 2866 2882
19. R. Meddis, and M.J. Hewitt Virtual pitch and phase sensitivity of a computer model of the auditory periphery. II: Phase sensitivity J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 89 1991 2883 2894
20. B.C.J. Moore, B.R. Glasberg, and T. Baer A model for the prediction of threshold, loudness and partial loudness J. Audio Eng. Soc. 45 1997 224 240
21. B.C.J. Moore An Introduction to the Psychology of Hearing 2003 Academic Press, Elsevier New York
22. R. Näätänen, and T. Picton The N1 wave of the human electric and magnetic response to sound: a review and an analysis of the component structure Psycophysiology 24 1987 375 425
23. K.J. Palomäki, H. Tiitinen, V. Mäkinen, P. May, and P. Alku Cortical processing of speech sounds and their analogues in a spatial auditory environment Cogn. Brain Res. 14 2002 294 299
24. C. Pantev, M. Hoke, K. Lehnertz, B. Lütkenhöner, G. Anogianakis, and W. Wittkowski Tonotopic organization of the human auditory cortex revealed by transient auditory evoked magnetic fields Electroenceph. Clin. Neurophysiol. 69 1988 160 170
25. C. Pantev, M. Hoke, B. Lütkenhöner, and K. Lehnertz Tonotopic organization of the auditory cortex: pitch versus frequency representation Science 246 1989 486 487
26. C. Pantev, M. Hoke, K. Lehnertz, and B. Lütkenhöner Neuromagnetic evidence of an amplitopic organization of the human auditory cortex Electroenceph. Clin. Neurophysiol. 72 1989 225 231
27. C. Pantev, O. Bertrand, C. Eulitz, C. Verkindt, S. Hampson, G. Schuierer, and T. Elbert Specific tonotopic organizations of different areas of the human auditory cortex revealed by simultaneous magnetic and electric recordings Electroenceph. Clin. Neurophysiol. 94 1995 26 40
28. R.D. Patterson, S. Handel, W.A. Yost, and A.J. Datta The relative strength of the tone and noise components in iterated rippled noise J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 100 1996 3286 3294
29. M. Reite, J.T. Zimmerman, J. Edrich, and J.E. Zimmerman Auditory evoked magnetic fields: Responses amplitude vs. to stimulus intensity Electroenceph. Clin. Neurophysiol. 54 1982 147 152
30. M. Reite, J.T. Zimmerman, and J.E. Zimmerman MEG and EEG auditory responses to tone, click and white noise stimuli Electroenceph. Clin. Neurophysiol. 53 1982 643 651
31. T.P.L. Roberts, and D. Poeppel Latency of auditory evoked M100 as a function of tone frequency NeuroReport 7 1996 1138 1140
32. G.L. Romani, S.J. Williamson, and L. Kaufman Tonotopic organization of the human auditory cortex Science 216 1982 1339 1340
33. M. Sams, and R. Salmelin Evidence of sharp tuning in the human auditory cortex Hear. Res. 75 1994 67 74
34. S. Sato, T. Kitamura, and Y. Ando Loudness of sharply (2068 dB/Octave) filtered noises in relation to the factors extracted from the autocorrelation function J. Sound Vibr. 250 2002 47 52
35. B. Scharf Complex sounds and critical bands Psychol. Bull. 58 1961 205 217
36. A. Seither-Preisler, K. Krumbholz, and B. Lütkenhöner Sensitivity of the neuromagnetic N100m deflection to spectral bandwidth: a function of the auditory periphery? Audiol. Neurootol. 8 2003 322 337
37. F.L. Wightman The pattern-transformation model of pitch J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 54 1973 407 416
38. W.A. Yost Pitch strength of iterated ripple noise J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 100 1996 3329 3335
39. W.A. Yost Fundamentals of Hearing; An Introduction 2000 Academic Press San Diego
40. E. Zwicker, G. Flottorp, and S.S. Stevens Critical bandwidth in loudness summation J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 29 1957 548 557
41. E. Zwicker, and H. Fastl Psychoacoustics - Facts and Models 1999 Springer New York