Expanding the utility of one-pot multistep reaction networks through compartmentation and recovery of the catalyst

Angewandte Chemie - International Edition

Volumn 45, Issue 14, 2006, Pages 2209-2212

  Phan, Nam T S ^a   Gill, Christopher S ^a   Nguyen, Joseph V ^a   Zhang, Z John ^b   Jones, Christopher W ^a  

^a Georgia Institute of Technology   (United States)

^b GEORGIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

Author keywords

Acidity; Heterogeneous catalysis; Magnetic properties; Nanostructures; Synthetic methods

Indexed keywords

NANOPARTICLE-BOUND BASE; NON-COMPLEMENTARY CATALYSTS; ONE-POT MULTISTEP REACTION NETWORKS; SYNTHETIC METHODS;

ACIDITY; CATALYST ACTIVITY; GRAVIMETRIC ANALYSIS; MAGNETIC PROPERTIES; NANOSTRUCTURED MATERIALS; SYNTHESIS (CHEMICAL);

CATALYSIS;

ACID; ALKALI; SILANE DERIVATIVE;

ARTICLE; CATALYSIS; CHEMICAL STRUCTURE; CHEMISTRY; MAGNETISM;

ACIDS; ALKALIES; CATALYSIS; MAGNETICS; MODELS, MOLECULAR; SILANES;

EID: 33746286331     PISSN: 14337851     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/anie.200503445     Document Type: Article

References (65)

1. J. Ovádi, P. A. Srere, Int. Rev. Cytol. 2000, 192, 255.
2. a) A. Bruggink, R. Schoevaart, T. Kieboom, Org. Process Res. Dev. 2003, 7, 622;
3. b) R. Schoevaart, F. van Rantwijk, R. A. Sheldon, J. Org. Chem. 2000, 65, 6940;
4. c) P. A. Srere, B. Mattiass, K. Mosbach, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1973, 70, 2534;
5. d) S. F. Mayer, W. Kroutil, K. Faber, Chem. Soc. Rev. 2001, 30, 332;
6. e) R. Schoevaart, F. van Rantwijk, R. A. Sheldon, Chem. Commun. 1999, 2465;
7. f) N. Nakajima, K. Tanizawa, H. Tanaka, K. Soda, J. Biotechnol. 1988, 8, 243.
8. Simplified workup of the reaction and purification of the product in sequences of reactions can be achieved by following the example of Ley and co-workers, who have used a variety of polymer-supported catalysts, reagents, and scavengers in complex reaction sequences. For example, see: a) I. R. Baxendale, S. V. Ley, C. Piutti, Angew. Chem. 2002, 114, 2298;
9. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2002, 41, 2194;
10. b) R. I. Storer, T. Takemoto, P. S. Jackson, S. V. Ley, Angew. Chem. 2003, 115, 2625;
11. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2003, 42, 2521;
12. c) S. V. Ley, I. R. Baxendale, G. Brusotti, M. Caldarelli, A. Massi, M. Nesi, Farmaco 2002, 57, 321.
13. a) J. C. Wasilke, S. J. Obrey, R. T. Baker, G. C. Bazan, Chem. Rev. 2005, 105, 1001, 2005;
14. b) L. F. Tietze, U. Beifuss, Angew. Chem. 1993, 105, 137;
15. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 1993, 32, 131;
16. c) L. F. Tietze, M. E. Lieb, Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol. 1998, 2, 363;
17. d) L. F. Tietze, Chem. Rev. 1996, 96, 115;
18. e) A. J. McCarroll, J. C. Walton, J. Chem. Soc. Perkin Trans. 1 2001, 3215;
19. f) P. J. Parsons, C. S. Penkett, A. J. Shell, Chem. Rev. 1996, 96, 195;
20. g) K. C. Nicolau, T. Montagnon, S. A. Snyder, Chem. Commun. 2003, 551;
21. h) E. V. Gorobets, M. S. Miftakhov, F. A. Valeev, Russ. Chem. Rev. 2000, 69, 1001;
22. i) J. M. Lee, Y. Na, H. Han, S. Chang, Chem. Soc. Rev. 2004, 33, 302;
23. j) M. Burk, J. R. Lee, J. P. Martinez, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1994, 116, 10 847;
24. k) S. E. Denmark, A. Thorarensen, Chem. Rev. 1996, 96, 137;
25. l) M. Makkee, A. P. G. Kieboom, H. Van Bekkum, J. Chem. Soc. Chem. Commun. 1980, 930;
26. m) R. Schoevaart, T. Kieboom, Top. Catal. 2004, 27, 3;
27. n) R. Schoevaart, T. Kieboom, Tetrahedron Lett. 2002, 43, 3399;
28. o) M. Makkee, A. P. G. Kieboom, H. Van Bekkum, Carbohydr. Res. 1985, 138, 237;
29. p) G. H. Posner, Chem. Rev. 1986, 86, 831;
30. q) A. L. E. Larsson, B. A. Persson, J. E. Bäckvall, Angew. Chem. 1997, 109, 1256;
31. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 1997, 36, 1211;
32. r) B. A. Persson, A. L. E. Larsson, M. Le Ray, J. E. Bäckvall, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1999, 121, 1645.
33. Using solid catalysts, a catalyst mixture may be recovered although its separation into pure components is generally not possible using published methodologies. a) F. Gelman, J. Blum, D. Avnir, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2000, 122, 11 999;
34. b) F. Gelman, J. Blum, D. Avnir, Angew. Chem. 2001, 113, 3759;
35. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2001, 40, 3647;
36. c) F. Gelman, J. Blum, D. Avnir, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2002, 124, 14 460;
37. d) F. Gelman, J. Blum, H. Schuman, D. Avnir, J. Sol-Gel Sci. Technol. 2003, 26, 43;
38. e) F. Gelman, J. Blum, D. Avnir, New J. Chem. 2003, 27, 205;
39. f) K. Motokura, N. Fujita, K. Mori, T. Mizugaki, K. Ebitani, K. Kaneda, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005, 127, 9674;
40. g) B. Helms, S. J. Guillaudeau, Y. Xie, M. McUrdo, C. J. Hawker, J. M. J. Fréchet, Angew. Chem. 2005, 117, 6542;
41. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2005, 44, 6384.
42. As noted in reference [3], Ley and co-workers have demonstrated that complex, multistep organic syntheses can be carried out with simplified workup procedures by using polymer supported reagents, catalysts, and scavengers. However, the recovery and reuse of pure catalysts from a mixture of catalysts used in a multistep, one-pot reaction has not been demonstrated.
43. Magnetic catalysts have been reported for a number of years. For example, see: a) W. Teunissen, A. A. Bol, J. W. Geus, Catal. Today 1999, 48, 329;
44. b) G. M. Whitesides, R. J. Kazlauskas, L. Josephson, Trends Biotechnol. 1983, 1, 144;
45. c) C. L. Hill, A. Lamotte, W. Althoff, J. C. Brunie, G. M. Whitesides, J. Catal. 1976, 43, 53;
46. d) X. Gao, K. M. K. Yu, K. Y. Tam, S. K. Tsang, Chem. Commun. 2003, 24, 2998;
47. e) T.-J. Yoon, W. Lee, Y.-S. Oh, J.-K. Lee, New J. Chem. 2003, 27, 227;
48. f) X. Q. Liu, J. M. Xing, Y. P. Guan, G. B. Shan, H. Z. Liu, Colloids Surf. A 2004, 238, 127;
49. g) A. H. Lu, W. C. Li, A. Kiefer, W. Schmidt, N. Matoussevitch, H. Bonnemann, B. Spliethoff, B. Tesche, E. Bill, A. Kiefer, F. Schuth, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2004, 126, 8618;
50. h) W. Schmidt, E. Bill, G. Fink, F. Schuth, Angew. Chem. 2004, 116, 4403;
51. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2004, 43, 4303;
52. i) A. Hu, G. T. Yee, W. Lin, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005, 127, 12 486.
53. Gravimetric separation implies the recovery of solid catalysts from liquid media by means of filtration or settling.
54. Membranes are increasingly used for recycling homogeneous catalysts. For example, see: H. P. Dijkstra, G. P. M. Van Klink, G. Van Koten, Acc. Chem. Res. 2002, 35, 798.
55. Membranes have been effectively used for enzyme manipulation, and membrane reactors currently represent the state-of-the-art in the commercial practice of biocatalytic reactions. For an early example, see: a) M. D. Bednarski, H. K. Chenault, E. S. Simon, G. M. Whitesides, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1987, 109, 1283;
56. for a review, see: b) J. Wötinger, A. S. Bommarius, K. Drauz, C. Wandrey, Org. Process Res. Dev. 2001, 5, 241;
57. c) J. Wötinger, A. S. Bommarius, K. Drauz, Appl. Catal. A 2001, 221, 171.
58. A. J. Rondinone, A. C. S. Samia, Z. J. Zhang, J. Phys. Chem. B 1999, 103, 6876.
59. X. C. Shen, X. Z. Fang, Y. H. Zhou, H. Liang, Chem. Lett. 2004, 55, 1468.
60. The data in Figure 2 for the first and second runs for the conversion of 1→2→3 match each other quite well, except for what appears to be a slight incubation period in the conversion of 2 into 3 in the first run. As this reaction was run in a two-step, one-pot sequence, there is some delay in the conversion of 2 into 3 because the former is formed in situ. In contrast, the second set of data for the conversion of 2 into 3 come from the one-pot reaction of 2→3→4. In this case, 2 is present at the outset and there is therefore no delay in its conversion. The second set of data for the conversion of 1 into 2 come from the single reaction 1→2 using the acid resin catalyst recovered from the one-pot reaction of 1→2→3.
61. No kinetic data were collected for the conversion of 1 into 5a and 5b or into 6a and 6b. Consequently, no reliable TOF values were obtained.
62. 2. They coined the term "cartridge catalysis" for this methodology: M. Solinas, J. Jiang, O. Stelzer, W. Leitner, Angew. Chem. 2005, 117, 1370;
63. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2005, 44, 2291.
64. For production purposes, high-throughput approaches to multistep catalytic reactions based on a) membranes or b) fixed beds are also promising: a) B. B. Lakshmi, C. R. Martin, Nature 1997, 388, 758;
65. b) A. M. Hafez, A. E. Taggi, T. Dudding, T. Lectka, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2001, 123, 10 853.