Comparison of psychometric properties of three mobility measures for patients with stroke

Stroke

Volumn 34, Issue 7, 2003, Pages 1741-1745

  Hsueh, I Ping ^a   Wang, Chun Hou ^b   Sheu, Ching Fan ^c   Hsieh, Ching Lin ^a  

^a NATIONAL TAIWAN UNIVERSITY   (Taiwan)

^b CHUNG SHAN MEDICAL UNIVERSITY   (Taiwan)

^c DEPAUL UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Cerebrovascular accident; Disability evaluation; Psychometrics

Indexed keywords

ACCURACY; ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORRELATION ANALYSIS; DISABILITY; FEMALE; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MOBILIZATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PSYCHOMETRY; RELIABILITY; STROKE; VALIDATION PROCESS;

ACTIVITIES OF DAILY LIVING; AGED; CEREBROVASCULAR ACCIDENT; DISABILITY EVALUATION; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MOTOR ACTIVITY; OBSERVER VARIATION; PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS; PSYCHOMETRICS; RECOVERY OF FUNCTION; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; TAIWAN;

EID: 0037493218     PISSN: 00392499     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1161/01.STR.0000075295.45185.D4     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Chiou I, Burnett CN. Values of activities of daily living: a survey of stroke patients and their home therapists. Phys Ther. 1985;65:901-906.
2. Lennon S, Johnson L. The modified Rivermead Mobility Index: validity and reliability. Disabil Rehabil. 2000;22:833-839.
3. Hsieh CL, Hsueh IP, Mao HF. Validity and responsiveness of the Rivermead Mobility Index in stroke patients. Scand J Rehabil Med. 2000;32:140-142.
4. Gresham G, Duncan P, Stason W. Post-Stroke Rehabilitation: Assessment, Referral, and Patient Management: Quick Reference Guide Number 16. Rockville, Md: US Agency for Health Care Policy and Research. AHCPR publication No. 95-0663, 1995.
5. Forlander DA, Bohannon RW. Rivermead Mobility Index: a brief review of research to date. Clin Rehabil. 1999;13:97-100.
6. Lennon S, Hastings M. Key physiotherapy indicators for quality of stroke care. Physiotherapy. 1996;82:655-664.
7. Daley K, Mayo N, Danys I, Cabot R, Wood-Dauphinee S. The Stroke Rehabilitation Assessment of Movement (STREAM): refining and validating the content. Physiother Can. 1997;49:269-278.
8. Wang CH, Hsieh CL, Dai MH, Chen CH, Lai YF. Inter-rater reliability and validity of the Stroke Rehabilitation Assessment of Movement (STREAM) instrument. J Rehabil Med. 2002;34:20-24.
9. Spilg EG, Martin BJ, Mitchell SL, Aitchison TC. A comparison of mobility assessments in a geriatric day hospital. Clin Rehabil. 2001;15:296-300.
10. Mahoney F, Barthel D. Functional evaluation: the Barthel Index. Md State Med J. 1965;14:61-65.
11. Goldstein LB, Chilukuri V. Retrospective assessment of initial stroke severity with the Canadian Neurological Scale. Stroke. 1997;28:1181-1184.
12. Daley K, Mayo N, Wood-Dauphinee S. Reliability of scores on the Stroke Rehabilitation Assessment of Movement (STREAM) measure. Phys Ther. 1999;79:8-19.
13. Collen FM, Wade DT, Robb GF, Bradshaw CM. The Rivermead Mobility Index: a further development of the Rivermead motor assessment. Int Disabil Stud. 1991;13:50-54.
14. Wade DT, Collin C. The Barthel ADL Index: a standard measure of physical disability? Int Disabil Stud. 1988;10:64-67.
15. Green J, Forster A, Young J. A test-retest reliability study of the Barthel Index, the Rivermead Mobility Index, the Nottingham Extended Activities of Daily Living Scale and the Frenchay Activities Index in Stroke Patients. Disabil Rehabil. 2001;23:670-676.
16. Hsueh IP, Lin JH, Jeng JS, Hsieh CL. Comparison of the psychometric characteristics of the Functional Independence Measure, 5 item Barthel Index, and 10 item Barthel Index in patients with stroke. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2002;73:188-190.
17. Hsueh IP, Lee MM, Hsieh CL. Psychometric characteristics of the Barthel Activities of Daily Living Index in stroke patients. J Formos Med Assoc. 2001;100:526-532.
18. Bushnell CD, Johnston DC, Goldstein LB. Retrospective assessment of initial stroke severity: comparison of the NIH Stroke Scale and the Canadian Neurological Scale. Stroke. 2001;32:656-660.
19. Holmes WC, Shea JA. Performance of a new, HIV/AIDS-targeted quality of life (HAT-QoL) instrument in asymptomatic seropositive individuals. Qual Life Res. 1997;6:561-571.
20. Cohen J. Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates; 1988.
21. Shrout P, Fleiss J. Intraclass correlations: uses in assessing rater reliability. Psychol Bull. 1979;86:420-428.
22. Dorman PJ, Waddell F, Slattery J, Dennis M, Sandercock P. Are proxy assessments of health status after stroke with the EuroQol questionnaire feasible, accurate, and unbiased? Stroke. 1997;28:1883-1887.
23. Guyatt G, Walter S, Norman G. Measuring change over time: assessing the usefulness of evaluative instruments. J Chronic Dis. 1987;40:171-178.
24. Mao HF, Hsueh IP, Tang PF, Sheu CF, Hsieh CL. Analysis and comparison of the psychometric properties of three balance measures for stroke patients. Stroke. 2002;33:1022-1027.
25. Jorgensen HS, Nakayama H, Raaschou HO, Vive-Larsen J, Stoier M, Olsen TS. Outcome and time course of recovery in stroke, II: time course of recovery: the Copenhagen Stroke Study. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1995;76:406-412.
26. Rossier P, Wade DT. Validity and reliability comparison of 4 mobility measures in patients presenting with neurologic impairment. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2001;82:9-13.
27. Hobart JC, Thompson AJ. The five item Barthel Index. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2001;71:225-230.
28. Wallace D, Duncan PW, Lai SM. Comparison of the responsiveness of the Barthel Index and the Motor Component of the Functional Independence Measure in stroke: the impact of using different methods for measuring responsiveness. J Clin Epidemiol. 2002;55:922-928.