Predictive model of functional independence in stroke patients admitted to a rehabilitation programme

Clinical Rehabilitation

Volumn 13, Issue 6, 1999, Pages 464-475

  Sánchez Blanco, Isidoro ^a   Ochoa Sangrador, C ^a   Lopez Munain L ^b   Izquierdo Sanchez M ^a   Fermoso Garcia J ^c  

^a HOSPITAL VIRGEN DE LA CONCHA   (Spain)

^b HOSPITAL UNIVERSITARIO MARQUÉS DE VALDECILLA   (Spain)

^c Hospital Virgen de la Concha ^*

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGE; AGED; ARTICLE; COHORT ANALYSIS; CONTROLLED STUDY; DAILY LIFE ACTIVITY; FECES INCONTINENCE; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; FUNCTIONAL ASSESSMENT; HEMIANOPIA; HUMAN; INDEPENDENCE; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS; PROGNOSIS; STATISTICAL MODEL; STROKE; SYNDROME DELINEATION; URINE INCONTINENCE; WALKING;

ACTIVITIES OF DAILY LIVING; AGED; CEREBROVASCULAR ACCIDENT; FEMALE; HEMIPLEGIA; HUMANS; LOGISTIC MODELS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PROGNOSIS; SURVIVAL ANALYSIS; TREATMENT OUTCOME; WALKING;

EID: 0344462730     PISSN: 02692155     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1191/026921599672994947     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. Task Force on Stroke Impairment, Task Force on Stroke Disability, and Task Force on Stroke Handicap: Symposium recommendations for methodology in stroke outcome research. Stroke 1990; 21(2 suppl): 68S-73S.
2. Jørgensen HS, Nakayama H, Raaschou HO, Olsen TS. Intracerebral hemorrhage versus infarction: stroke severity, risk factors and prognosis. Ann Neurol 1995; 38: 45-50.
3. Jørgensen HS, Nakayama H, Reith J, Raaschou HO, Olsen TS. Acute stroke with atrial fibrillation. The Copenhagen stroke study. Stroke 1996; 10: 1765-69.
4. Hertanu JS, Demopoulos JT, Yang WC, Calhoun WF, Fenigstein HA. Stroke rehabilitation: correlation and prognostic value of computerised tomography and sequential functional assessment. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1984; 65: 505-508.
5. Dromerick AW, Reding MJ. Functional outcome for patients with hemiparesis, hemihypesthesia, and hemianopsia. Does lesion location matter? Stroke 1995; 26: 2023-26.
6. Jongbloed L. Prediction of function after stroke: a critical review. Stroke 1986; 17: 765-76.
7. Wade DT, Langton Hewer R. Functional abilities after stroke: measurement, natural history and prognosis. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1987; 50: 177-82.
8. Scott Osberg J, DeJong G, Haley SM, Seward ML, McGinnis GE, Germaine J. Predicting long-term outcome among post-rehabilitation stroke patients. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 1988; 67: 94-103.
9. Foucault P, Renardel-Irani A, Bareth F et al. L'hémiplégique agé de plus de 60 ans: principes et limites de l'hospitalisation en milieu spécialité de rééducation. Ann Réadap Méd Phys 1995; 38: 429-34.
10. Wade DT, Skilbeck CE, Langton Hewer R. Predicting Barthel ADL score at 6 months after an acute stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1983; 64: 224-28.
11. Wade DT, Hewer RL. Motor loss and swallowing difficulty after stroke: frequency, recovery and prognosis. Acta Neurol Scand 1987; 76: 50-54.
12. Prescott RJ, Garraway WM, Akhtar AJ. Predicting functional outcome following acute stroke using a standard clinical examination. Stroke 1982; 13: 641-47.
13. Barer DH. Continence after stroke: useful predictor or goal of therapy? Age Ageing 1989; 18: 183-91.
14. Loewen SC, Anderson BA. Predictors of stroke outcome using objective measurement scales. Stroke 1990; 21: 78-81.
15. Sandin KJ, Smith BS. The measure of balance in sitting in stroke rehabilitation prognosis. Stroke 1990; 21: 82-86.
16. Novack TA, Haban G, Graham K, Satterfield WT. Prediction of stroke rehabilitation outcome from psychological screening. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1987; 68: 729-34.
17. Kelly-Hayes M, Wolf PA, Kannel WB, Sytkowski P, D'Agostino RB, Gresham GE. Factors influencing survival and need for institutionalization following stroke: the Framingham study. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1988; 69: 415-18.
18. Sterzi R, Bottini G, Celani MG et al. Hemianopsia, hemianaesthesia, and hemiplegia after right and left hemisphere damage. A hemispheric difference. J Neural Neurosurg Psychiatry 1993; 56: 308-10.
19. Gladman JRF, Harwood DMJ, Barer DH. Predicting the outcome of acute stroke: prospective evaluation of five multivariate models and comparison with simple methods. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1992; 55: 347-51.
20. Reding MJ, Potes E. Rehabilitation outcome following initial unilateral hemispheric stroke: life table analysis approach. Stroke 1988; 19: 1354-58.
21. World Health Organization: Stroke - 1989. Recommendation on stroke prevention, diagnosis, and therapy: report of the WHO Task Force on Stroke and other Cerebrovascular Disorders. Stroke 1989; 20: 1407-31.
22. Demeurisse G, Demol O, Robaye E. Motor evaluation in vascular hemiplegia. Eur Neurol 1980; 19: 382-89.
23. Lincoln NB, Crow JL, Jackson JM, Waters GR, Adams SA, Hodgson P. The unreliability of sensory assessment. Clin Rehabil 1991; 5: 273-82.
24. Bamford J, Sandercock P, Dennis M, Burn J, Warlow Ch. Classification and natural history of clinically identifiable subtypes of cerebral infarction. Lancet 1991; 337: 1521-26.
25. Lindley RI, Warlow Ch, Wardlaw JM, Dennis M, Slattery J, Sandercock P. Interobserver reliability of a clinical classification of acute cerebral infarction. Stroke 1993; 24: 1801-804.
26. Teasdale G, Jennet B. Assessment of coma and impaired consciousness: a practical scale. Lancet 1974; 2: 81-84.
27. Hodkinson HM. Evaluation of a mental test score for assessment of mental impairment in the elderly. Age Ageing 1972; 1: 233-38.
28. Friedman P. The star cancellation test in acute stroke. Clin Rehabil 1992; 6: 3021-3023.
29. Brun V, Dhoms G, Henrion G, Codine P, Founau H, Terraza M. L'équilibre postural de l'hémiplégique par accident vasculaire cérébral: méthodologie d'évaluation et étude corrélative. Ann Réadap Méd Phys 1993; 36: 169-77.
30. Mahoney FI, Barthel DW. Functional evaluation: the Barthel index. Md State Med J 1965; 14: 61-65.
31. Holden MK, Gill KM, Magliozzi MR, Nathan J, Piehl-Baker L. Clinical ambulation assessment in the neurologically impaired: reliability and meaningfulness. Phys Ther 1984; 64: 35-40.
32. Kay R. Wong KS, Perez G, Woo J. Dichotomizing stroke outcomes based on self-reported dependency. Neurology 1997; 49: 1694-96.
33. Granger CV, Hamilton BB, Gresham GE. The stroke rehabilitation outcome study - part I: general description. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1988: 69: 506-509.
34. Chino N. Efficacy of Barthel index in evaluating activities of daily living in Japan, the United States, and United Kingdom. Stroke 1990; 21(2 suppl): 64S-65S.
35. Barton LA, Black KS. Learning treatment strategies applied to stroke rehabilitation. In: Gordon WA ed. Advances in stroke rehabilitation. Boston: Andover Medical Publishers, 1993: 63-78.
36. Bohanon RW. Ambulation performance of hemiparetic stroke patients: selected variables. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1987; 68: 777-81.
37. Bohanon RW, Horton MG, Wikholm JB. Importance of four variables of ambulation to patients with stroke. Int J Rehabil Res 1991; 14: 246-50.
38. Pohjasvaara T, Erkinjuntti T, Vataja R, Kaste M. Comparison of stroke features and disability in daily life in patients with ischemic stroke aged 55 to 70 and 71 to 85 years. Stroke 1997; 28: 729-35.
39. Granger CV, Hamilton BB, Gresham GE, Kramer AA. The stroke rehabilitation outcome study - part II. Relative merits of the total Barthel index score and a four-item subscore in predicting patient outcomes. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1989; 70: 100-103.
40. Colantonio A, Kasl SV, Ostfeld AM, Berkman LF. Prestroke physical function predicts stroke outcome in the elderly. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1996; 77: 562-66.
41. Braitman LE, Davidoff F. Predicting clinical states in individual patients. Ann Intern Med 1996; 125: 406-12.
42. Gresham GE, Duncan PW, Stason WB et al. Post-stroke rehabilitation. Clinical Practice Guideline, no. 16. Rockville, MD: US Department of Health and Human Services. Public Health Service, Agency for Health Care Policy and Research. AHCPR Publication no. 95-0662. May 1995.