Lie detecting as a step towards critical literacy

L1 Educational Studies in Language and Literature

Volumn 2, Issue 3, 2002, Pages 179-220

  Caviglia, Francesco ^a  

^a AARHUS UNIVERSITY   (Denmark)

Author keywords

Cheating; Critical discourse analysis; Critical literacy; Lie; Literacy; Literature teaching

Indexed keywords

EID: 33745874778     PISSN: 15676617     EISSN: 15731731     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1023/a:1021356011948     Document Type: Article

References (113)

1. Barrett, S. (2001). Quackwatch. Retrieved from http://www.quackwatch.com on 29 May 2001.
2. Bartlett F.C. (1932). Remembering: A study in experimental and social psychology. Cambridge, UK: The University Press
3. Bateson, G. (1972). Steps to an ecology of mind. New York: Ballantine.
4. Bateson, P. (2000). Taking the stink out of instinct. In H. Rose & S. Rose (Eds), Alas, poor Darwin: Arguments against evolutionary psychology (pp. 57-173). London: Jonathan Cape.
5. Bereiter, C. (1997). Situated cognition and how to overcome it. In D. Kirshner & J.A. Whitson (Eds), Situated cognition: Social, semiotic and psychological perspectives (pp. 281-300). Mahwah, New Jersey: Erlbaum.
6. Bereiter, C. (2002). Education and mind in the knowledge age. Mahwah, New Jersey: Erlbaum.
7. Bereiter, C. & Scardamalia,M. (1989). Intentional learning as a goal of instruction. In L.B. Resnick (Ed.), Knowing, learning, and instruction: Essays in honor of Robert Glaser (pp. 361-392). Hillsdale, New Jersey: Erlbaum.
8. Bereiter, C. & Scardamalia, M. (1993). Surpassing ourselves: An inquiry into the nature and implications of expertise. Chicago: Open Court.
9. Bereiter C. & Scardamalia M. (1996). Rethinking learning. In D. Olson & N. Torrance (Eds), The handbook of education and human development (pp. 485-513). Malden, Massachusetts: Blackwell.
10. Bettettini, M. (2001). Breve storia della bugia. Da Ulisse a Pinocchio [Short history of lies. From Ulysses to Pinocchio]. Milan: Cortina.
11. Bimmel, P. (2001). Effects of reading strategy instruction in secondary education - a review of intervention studies. L1 - Educational Studies in Language and Literature 1, 273-298.
12. Bok, S. (1978). Lying: Moral choice in public and private life. Hassocks: The Harvester Press.
13. Brown, J.S., Collins, A.& Duguid, P. (1989). Situated cognition and the culture of learning. Educational Researcher 18, 32-42.
14. Burbules, N.C. & Berk, R. (1999). Critical thinking and critical pedagogy: Relations, differences, and limits. In Th.S. Popkewitz, & L. Fendler (Eds), Critical theories in education (pp. 45-65). New York: Routledge. [Also retrieved from http://faculty.Ed.uiuc.edu/burbules/ncb/papers/critical.html on 20 May 2002.]
15. Castelfranchi, C. & Poggi, I. (1994). Lying as pretending to give information. In H. Parret (Ed.), Pretending to communicate (pp. 276-291). Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.
16. Castelfranchi, C. & Poggi, I. (1998). Bugie, finzioni, sotterfugi. Per una scienza dell'inganno. [Lies, pretences, subterfuges. Towards a science of deceit.] Rome: Carocci.
17. Caviglia, F. (Ed.) (2000). Valori degli italiani: un percorso intorno alla famiglia. [Italian people's values: Examining the family.] (Pré)publications 177-178, 3-103. [Also retrieved from http://www.hum.au.dk/romansk/tidsskrift/ on 5 May 2002.]
18. Caviglia, F. (2001). Il naso di pinocchio: per una didattica della menzogna. [Pinocchio's nose: Towards a didactic of the lie.] Denmark: Romansk Institut, Aarhus University, p. 180. [Also retrieved from http://www.hum.au.dk/romansk/romfrc/papers/ naso_finale.htm on 5 May 2000.]
19. Chandler, M.J. & Afifi, J. (1996). On making a virtue out of telling lies. Social Research 63, 731-763.
20. Collodi [alias Carlo Lorenzini] (1883). Pinocchio. Florence: Paggi.
21. Cosmides, L. & Tooby, J. (1992). Cognitive adaptations for social exchange. In J.H. Barlow, L. Cosmides & J. Tooby (Eds), The adapted mind: Evolutionary psychology and the generation of culture (pp. 163-228). New York: Oxford University Press.
22. Couzijn, M. & Rijlaarsdam, G. (1996). Learning to read and write argumentative text by observation. In G. Rijlaarsdam, H. van den Bergh &M. Couzijn (Eds), Effective teaching and learning of writing (pp. 253-272). Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.
23. Damasio, A.R. (1994). Descartes' error: Emotion, reason, and the human brain. New York: Putnam.
24. Darwin, C. (1872). The expression of emotions in man and animals. London: J. Murray.
25. De Certeau, M. (1984). The practice of everyday life. Berkeley: University of California Press. [Originally published in French, L'invention du quotidien, Vol. 1. Arts de faire, 1974.]
26. Di Bella, G. (2001). Di Bella, una cura scientifica. [Di Bella, a scientific cure.] La Padania [official newspaper of the Lega Nord party], 10 July 2001, p. 3. [Also retrieved from http://www.lapadania.com/2001/luglio/10/10072001p06a3.htm on 5 May 2002.]
27. Eco, U. (1977). Morfologia della bugia. [Morphology of the lie.] In Dalla periferia dell'impero. Cronache da un nuovo medioevo. [From the outskirts of the empire. Chronicles from a new Middle Age] (pp. 167-172). Milan: Bompiani. [Originally published in L'Espresso in 1973.]
28. Eco, U. (1990). The limits of interpretation. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
29. Eco, U. (with Richard Rorty, Jonathan Culler and Christine Brooke-Rose) (1992). Stefan Collini (Ed.), Interpretation and overinterpretation. Cambridge, New York: Cambridge University Press.
30. Eibl-Eibesfeldt, I. (1989). Human ethology. New York: Aldine de Gruyter.
31. Emery, D. (2001). Urban legends and folklore. Retrieved from http://urbanlegends.about.com on 20 May 2001.
32. Fairclough, N. (1989). Language and power. London: Longman.
33. Fairclough, N. (Ed.) (1992). Critical language awareness. London: Longman.
34. Fairclough, N. & Wodak, R. (1997). Critical discourse analysis. In T.A. Van Dijk (Ed.), Discourse as social interaction (pp. 258-283). London: Sage.
35. Fauconnier, G. & Turner, M. (2002). The way we think: Conceptual blending and the mind's hidden complexities. New York: Basic Books.
36. Fontana, L. (2001). Percossi e attoniti. [Crushed and astonished.] Diario della settimana, 2-8 March 2001. [Also http://www.diario.it/cnt/articoli/inchieste/articolo228.htm, accessed 20 May 2001.]
37. Ferraris, M., Caviglia, F. & Degl'Innocenti, R. (1992). WordProf: A writing environment on computer. In W. Hartley (Ed.), Technology and text: Readings in the psychology of written communication (pp. 221-232). London/Philadelphia: Kingsley.
38. Gallina, V. (Ed.) (2000). La competenza alfabetica in Italia. Una ricerca sulla cultura della popolazione. [Literacy in Italy: An investigation into the cultural level of the population.] Milan: Franco Angeli.
39. Geist, U. (1996). Imitation as a tool in writing pedagogy. In G. Rijlaarsdam, H. van den Bergh & M. Couzijn (Eds), Effective teaching and learning of writing (pp. 51-60). Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.
40. Ginzburg, C. (1992). Spie. Radici di un paradigma indiziario. [Clues: Roots of an evidential paradigm.] In Miti, emblemi, spie. Morfologia e storia [Clues, myths, and the historical method] (pp. 158-209). Turin: Einaudi.
41. Ginzburg, C. (1998). Uccidere un mandarino cinese: le implicazioni morali della distanza. [To kill a Chinese Mandarin: The moral implications of distance.] In Occhiacci di legno: nove riflessioni sulla distanza [Wooden eyes: Nine perspectives on distance] (pp. 194- 209). Milan: Feltrinelli.
42. Ginzburg, C. (1999). History, rhetoric and proof. Hanover, New York: University Press of New England.
43. Glass, R.D. (2001). On Paulo Freire's philosophy of praxis and the foundations of Liberation Education. Educational Researcher 30, 15-25.
44. Gumbrecht, H.U. (1985). The body versus the printing press: Media in the early modern period, mentalities in the reign of Castile, and another history of literary forms. Poetics 14, 209-227.
45. Halpern, D.F. (1998). Teaching critical thinking for transfer across domains. Dispositions, skills, structure training, and metacognitive monitoring. American Psychologist 53, 449- 455.
46. Harris, R. (1997). Evaluating Internet research sources. Retrieved from http://www.virtualsalt.com/evalu8it.htm on 20 May 2001.
47. Hedegaard, M. (1999). The influence of societal knowledge traditions on children's thinking and conceptual development. In M. Hedegaard & J. Lompscher (Eds), Learning activity and development. Aarhus, Denmark: Aarhus University Press.
48. Hedegaard, M. (2001). Learning through acting within societal traditions: Learning in classrooms. In M. Hedegaard (Ed.), Learning in classrooms: A cultural-historical approach (pp. 15-35). Aarhus, Denmark: Aarhus University Press.
49. Karmiloff-Smith, A. (2000). Why babies' brains are not Swiss Army knives. In H. Rose & S. Rose (Eds), Alas, poor Darwin: Arguments against evolutionary psychology (pp. 144- 156). London: Jonathan Cape.
50. Kooy, M. & Wells, J. (1996). Reading response logs: Inviting students to read, write, and respond to novels, short stories, plays and poetry. Markham, Canada: Pembroke.
51. Lakoff, G. (1987). Women, fire, and dangerous things: What categories reveal about the mind. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
52. Lakoff, G. & Johnson, M. (1999). Philosophy in the flesh: The embodied mind and its challenge to Western thought. New York: Basic Books.
53. Lave, J. (1990). The culture of acquisition and the practice of understanding. In J.W. Stigler, R.A. Shweder & G. Herdt (Eds), Cultural psychology: Essays on comparative human development. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
54. Leland, K.N. & Bateson, P. (2001). The mechanisms of imitation. Cybernetics and Systems 32, 195-224.
55. Loftus, E. (1997). Creating false memories. Scientific American 277, 70-75.
56. Lovisolo, D. (1998). Review of Minerva. L'Indice dei libri del mese, n. 9.
57. Maass, P. (1996). Love thy neighbor: A story of war. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.
58. Maturana, H. & Varela, F. (1987). The tree of knowledge. The biological roots of human understanding. Boston: Shambhala.
59. Minerva, D. (1998). La leggenda del santo guaritore. [The legend of the holy healer.] Rome: Editori Riuniti.
60. Minsky, M. (1975). A framework for representing knowledge. In P.H. Winston (Ed.), The psychology of computer vision (pp. 211-277). New York: McGraw-Hill.
61. Nixon, R. (1973). TheWatergate speech (the 30th April 1973). Retrieved from http://www.cnn.com/SPECIALS/cold.war/episodes/16/documents/watergate/ on 20 May 2001.
62. Nølke, H. (1999). La polyphonie: analyses littéraire et linguistique. [Polyphony: Literary and linguistic analysis.] Tribune 9, pp. 5-19. Retrieved from http://www.hum.au.dk/ romansk/polyfoni/Tribune9/Nolketrib.htm on 5 May 2002.
63. Nølke, H. (2002). La polyphonie comme théorie linguistique. [Polyphony as language theory.] In M. Carel (Ed.), Les facettes du dire.Hommage à Oswald Ducrot [The aspects of saying: Hommage to Oswald Ducrot] (pp. 215-224). Paris: Kimé.
64. Oatley, K. (1999). Why fiction may be twice as true as fact: Fiction as cognitive and emotional simulation. Review of General Psychology 3, 101-117.
65. Oatley, K. (2001). Shakespeare's invention of theatre as simulation that runs on minds. Paper presented at IGEL2000, the 7th International Congress of the International Society for the Empirical Study of Literature, Toronto (IGEL), July 31-August 4, 2000. Also in Empirical Studies of the Arts, retrieved from http://citd.scar.utoronto.ca/ igel2000/ESA.html on 10 April 2002.
66. Oatley, K. & Jenkins, J.M. (1996). Understanding emotions. Oxford: Blackwell Press.
67. OECD (Ed.) (2000). Literacy in the information age. Final report on the International Adult Literacy Survey. Paris:OECD.
68. Ong, W. (1982). Orality and literacy: The technologizing of the word. London: Routledge.
69. Paul, R. (1992). Critical thinking: What every person needs to survive in a rapidly changing world, 2nd edn. Santa Rosa, California: Foundation for Critical Thinking. [See especially ethics without indoctrination (pp. 240-254); Dialogic and dialectical thinking (pp. 309-318); Teaching critical thinking in the strong sense: A focus on self-deception, world views, and a dialectical mode of analysis (pp. 465-474); McPeck's mistakes:Why critical thinking applies across disciplines and domains (pp. 509-518).]
70. Ponte, M. (2001). I killer erano dentro casa [The killers were in the house]. Repubblica, 24 February 2001.
71. Portanova, M. (2001). Il giorno degli sciacalli [The day of the jackals]. Diario della settimana, 2-8 March 2001. [Also retrieved from http://www.diario.it/cnt/articoli/ buonsenso/buonsenso75.htm on 20 May 2001.]
72. Poyas, Y. (2001). Student teachers as readers: Toward a change in teacher education. L1 - Educational Studies in Language and Literature 1, 37-54.
73. Preve, M. (2001). Madre e figlio uccisi dai ladri [Mother and son murdered by thieves]. Repubblica, 22 February 2001.
74. Prosperi, A. (1996). Tribunali della coscienza. Inquisitori, confessori, missionari. La Chiesa cattolica in Italia fra '500 e '600. [Tribunals of consciousness. Inquisitors, confessors, missionaries. The Catholic Church in Italy from 1500 to 1600.] Turin: Einaudi.
75. Raskin, R. (1982). The functional analysis of art. Aarhus, Denmark: Arkona.
76. Rodrigues Rojo, R.H. (2001). School literacy. Three literate practices at basic school and the construction of monovocality. Presented at symposium Cultural historical approach to education, literacy and organisations (community, institution, state), Aarhus, Denmark, 14-15 June 2001. Retrieved from http://www.iscrat.org/dk/iscratdk/ PhD2.htm#Schoolliteracy on 1 July 2002.
77. Rosenblatt, L.M. (1995). Literature as exploration. New York: Modern Language Association. [Originally published in 1938.]
78. Rositi, F. (Ed.) (1999). Il caso Di Bella nella televisione e nella stampa italiana. [Press and television coverage of the Di Bella case.] Rome: RAI-ERI.
79. Rowling, J.K. (1997). Harry Potter and the Philosopher's Stone. London: Bloomsburry.
80. Rowling, J.K. (1998). Harry Potter and the Chamber of Secrets. London: Bloomsburry.
81. Rowling, J.K. (1999). Harry Potter and the Prisoner from Azkaban. London: Bloomsburry.
82. Rowling, J.K. (2000). Harry Potter and the Goblet of Fire. London: Bloomsburry.
83. Schank, R.C. & Abelson, R.P. (1977). Scripts, plans, goals, and understanding. Hillsdale, New Jersey: Erlbaum.
84. Scheck, B. & Neufeld, P. (2001). Junk science, junk evidence. The New York Times, 11 May 2001.
85. Serra, M. (2001). Il Pinocchio delle Borse e il barbiere di Agnelli. [Pinocchio in the Bourse and Gianni Agnelli's barber.] Repubblica, 16 March 2001.
86. Simone R. (2000). La terza fase. Forme di sapere che stiamo perdendo. [The third phase. Forms of knowledge we are losing.] Bari: Laterza.
87. Sokal, A.D. (2000). The Sokal hoax: The sham that shook the academy. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press. [Also retrieved from Sokal's web page, www.physics.nyu.edu/ faculty/sokal/ on 20 May 2001.]
88. Specter, M. (2000). Search and deploy. The New Yorker, 29 May 2000.
89. Starr, L. (2000). Fact, fiction, or opinion? Evaluating Online information. Education World. Retrieved from http://www.education-world.com/a_curr/curr194.shtml on 20 May 2001.
90. Swift, J. (1729). A modestal proposal. Dublin: Harding. Retrieved from http://www.library.utoronto.ca/utel/nonfiction_u/swiftj_modest/modest_titlepage.html on 20 June 2002.
91. Tagliapietra, A. (2001). Filosofia della bugia. Figure della menzogna nella storia del pensiero occidentale. [Philosophy of the lie. Figures of deceit in the history of Western thinking.] Milan: Bruno Mondadori.
92. Tannen, D. (1993). What's in a frame? Surface evidence for underlying expectations. In Framing in discourse (pp. 14-56). New York: Oxford University Press.
93. Tannen, D. (1984). Conversational style: Analyzing talk among friends. Norwood, New Jersey: Ablex.
94. Tannen, D. (1986). That's not what I meant! How conversational style makes or breaks relationships. New York: Ballantine.
95. Tannen, D. (1989). Talking voices: Repetition, dialogue and imagery in conversational discourse. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
96. Tannen, D. (1990). You just don't understand: Women and men in conversation. NewYork: Morrow.
97. Tannen, D. (1992). How is conversation like literary discourse? The role of imagery and details in creating involvement. In P. Downing, S.D. Lima & M. Noonan (Eds), The linguistics of literacy (pp. 31-46). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
98. Tannen, D. (1997). Involvement as dialogue: Linguistic theory and the relation between conversational and literary discourse. In M. Macovski (Ed.), Dialogue and critical discourse (pp. 137-157). New York/Oxford: Oxford University Press.
99. Todorov, T. (1981). Mikhail Bakhtine. Le principe dialogique. [Mikhail Bakhtin: The dialogical principle.] Paris: Éditions du Seuil.
100. Todorov, T. (1982): La conquête de l'Amérique. La question de l'autre. [The conquest of America: The question of the other.] Paris: Éditions du Seuil.
101. Tufte, E. (1983). The visual display of quantitative information. Cheshire, Connecticut: Graphics Press.
102. Tsui, L. (2001). Faculty attitudes and the development of students' critical thinking. JGE: The Journal of General Education 50, 1-28.
103. Valli, W. (2001). Novi Ligure, rivolta tra le lacrime: «Qui ci vuole la pena di morte...». [Tears and rebellion in Novi Ligure: "bring back the death penalty!"] Repubblica, 23 February 2001.
104. Wallace, C. (1992). Critical literacy awareness in the EFL classroom. In N. Fairclough (Ed.), Critical language awareness (pp. 59-81). London: Longman.
105. Weinrich, H. (2000). Linguistik der Lüge. [Linguistics of the lie.] Munich: Beck. [Originally published in 1966.]
106. Weinrich, H. (1976). Sprache in texten. [Language in texts.] Stuttgard: Klett-Kotta.
107. Wertsch, J.V. (1991). Voices of the mind: A sociocultural approach to mediated action. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
108. Wertsch, J. (1998). Mind as action. New York: Oxford University Press.
109. Widdowson, H.G. (2000). On the limitations of linguistics applied. Applied Linguistics 21, 3-25.
110. Winograd, T. & Flores, F. (1986). Understanding computers and cognition: A new foundation for design. Norwood, New Jersey: Ablex.
111. Woods, C. (2001). Bridging the creative and the critical. L1 - Educational Studies in Language and Literature 1, 55-72.
112. Zumthor, P. (1987). La lettre et la voix. De la "litterature" médiévale. [The letter and the voice: On medieval "literature".] Paris: Éditions du Seuil.
113. Zumthor, P. (1994). Body and performance. In H.U. Gumbrecht & K.L. Pfeiffer (Eds), Materialities of communication (pp. 217-226). Stanford, California: Stanford University Press. [Originally published in German 1988 and 1991.]