Dimensions of Peer Evaluation, Overall Satisfaction, and Overall Evaluation: An Investigation in a Group Task Environment

Journal of Education for Business

Volumn 79, Issue 4, 2004, Pages 225-231

  Paswan, Audhesh K ^a   Gollakota, Kamala ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NORTH TEXAS   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH DAKOTA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 33745847967     PISSN: 08832323     EISSN: 19403356     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3200/JOEB.79.4.225-231     Document Type: Article

References (52)

1. Cederblom, D., & Lounsbury, J. W. (1980). An investigation of user acceptance of peer evaluations. Personnel Psychology, 33(3), 567-579.
2. Deutsch, M. (1975). Equity, equality, and need: What determines which value will be used as the basis of distributive justice? Journal of Social Issues, 31(3), 137-149.
3. Adler, N. (1991). International dimensions of organizational behavior. Boston: PWS Kent.
4. Amir, Y., Kovarsky, Y., & Sharron, S. (1970). Peer nominations as predictors of multi-stage promotions in a ramified organization. Journal of Applied Psychology, 54, 462-469.
5. Antonioni, D., & Park, H. (2001, Summer). The effects of personality similarity on peer ratings of contextual work behaviors. Personnel Psychology, 54, 331.
6. Bales, R. F. (1970). Personality and interpersonal behavior. New York: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston.
7. Beatty, J., Haas, R., & Sciglimpaglia, D. (1996). Using peer evaluations to assess individual performances in group class projects. Journal of Marketing Education, 18(2), 17-28.
8. Benne, K. D., & Sheats, P. (1948). Functional roles of group members. Journal of Social Issues, 4(2), 41-49.
9. Berge, Z. (1998). Differences in teamwork between postsecondary classrooms and the workplace. Education and Training, 40(5), 194-201.
10. Biddle, B. J., & Thomas, E. J. (Eds.). (1966). Role theory: Concepts and research. New York: Wiley.
11. Byrne, D. (1971). The attraction paradigm. New York: Academic Press.
12. Duffy, M. K., Shaw, J. D., & Stark, E. M. (2000). Performance and satisfaction in conflicted interdependent groups: When and how does self-esteem make a difference? Academy of Management Journal, 43(4), 772-783.
13. Falchikov, N., & Magin, D. (1997). Detecting gender bias in peer marking of students' group process work. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 22(4), 385-397.
14. Haas, A. L, Haas, R., & Wotruba, T. R. (1998). The use of self-ratings and peer-ratings to evaluate performances of student group members. Journal of Marketing Education, 20(3), 200-210.
15. Hair, J. F., Jr., Anderson, R. E., Tatham, R. L., & Black, W. C. (1998). Multivariate data analysis. New Jersey: Prentice Hall.
16. Hare, L. R., & O'Neill, K. (2000). Effectiveness and efficiency in small academic peer groups: A case study. Small Group Research, 31(1), 24-53.
17. Heslin, R., & Dunphy, D. (1964). Three dimensions of member satisfaction in small groups. Human Relations, 17(2), 99-112.
18. Hollander, E. P. (1954). Peer nominations on leadership as a predictor of the pass-fail criterion in naval air training. Journal of Applied Psychology, 38, 150-153.
19. Hollander, E. P. (1957). The reliability of peer nominations under various conditions of administration. Journal of Applied Psychology, 41, 85-90.
20. Imada, A. S. (1982, January). Social interaction, observation, and stereotype as determinants of differentiation in peer ratings. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 29, 397-415.
21. Keyton, J. (1991). Evaluating individual group member satisfaction as a situational variable. Small Group Research, 22(2), 200-219.
22. Kim, K. I., Park, H., & Suzuki, N. (1990). Reward allocations in the United States, Japan, and Korea: A comparison of individualistic and collectivistic cultures. Academy of Management Journal, 33(1), 188-198.
23. Kraut, A. I. (1975). Prediction of managerial success by peer and training staff ratings. Journal of Applied Psychology, 59, 14-19.
24. Long, W. S., Long, E. J., & Dobbins, G. H. (1998). Correlates of satisfaction with a peer evaluation system: Investigation of performance levels and individual differences. Journal of Business and Psychology, 12(3), 299-312.
25. Miles, R. E. (1964). Attitudes toward management theory as a factor in managers' relationships with their supervisors. Academy of Management Journal, 7, 308-314.
26. Morahan-Martin, J. (1996). Should peers' evaluations be used in class projects? Questions regarding reliability, leniency, and acceptance. (Special Issue). Psychological Reports, 78(3), 1243-1251.
27. Napier, R. W., & Greshenfeld, M. K. (1993). Groups: Theory and experience (5th ed.). Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
28. Schoenecker, T. S., Martell, K. D., & Michlitsch, J. F. (1997). Diversity, performance and satisfaction in student group projects: An empirical study. Research in Higher Education, 38(4), 479-495.
29. Fiechtner, S. B., & Davis, E. A. (1992). Why some groups fail: A survey of students' experiences with learning groups. In A. Goodsell, M. M. Maher, & V. Tinto (Eds.), Collaborative learning: A sourcebook for higher education (pp. 59-74). University Park, PA: National Center on Post-Secondary Teaching, Learning, and Assessment.
30. Ghorpade, J., & Lackritz, J. R. (2001, May-June). Peer evaluation in the classroom: A check for sex and race/ethnicity effects. Journal of Education for Business, 76(5), 274-281.
31. Barclay, J. H., & Harland, L. K. (1995). Peer performance appraisals: The impact of rater competence, rater location, and rating correctability on fairness perceptions. Group and Organization Management, 20(1), 39-60.
32. Barrick, M. R., Stewart, G. L., Neubert, M. J., & Mount, M. K. (1998). Relating member ability and personality to work-team processes and team effectiveness. Journal of Applied Psychology, 83, 377-391.
33. Barry, B., & Stewart, G. L. (1997). Composition, process, and performance in self-managed groups: The role of personality. Journal of Applied Psychology, 82, 62-78.
34. Schwarzwald, J., Koslowsky, M., & Mager-Bibi, T. (1999). Peer ratings versus peer nominations during training as predictors of actual performance criteria. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 35(3), 360-372.
35. Senger, J. (1971). Managers' perceptions of subordinates' competence as a function of personal value orientations. Academy of Management Journal, 14, 415-423.
36. Sherrard, W. R., & Raafat, F. (1994). An empirical study of peer bias in evaluation: Students rating students. Journal of Education for Business, 70(1), 43-48.
37. Watson, W. E., Michaelsen, L. K., & Sharp, W. (1991). Member competence, group interaction, and group decision-making: A longitudinal study. Journal of Applied Psychology, 76(6), 803-809.
38. Waters, L. K., & Waters, C. S. (1970). Peer nominations as predictors of short-term sales performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 54, 42-44.
39. Werner, J. M., and Lester, S. (2001). Applying a team effectiveness framework to the performance of student case teams. Human Resource Development Quarterly, 12(4), 385-402.
40. Hollander, E. P. (1965). Validity of peer nominations in predictive distant performance criteria. Journal of Applied Psychology, 49, 434-438.
41. Williams, D. L., Beard, J. D., & Rymer, J. (1991, Summer). Team projects: Achieving their full potential. Journal of Marketing Education, 13, 45-53.
42. Shore, T. H., Shore, L. M., & Thornton, G. C. (1992). Construct validity of self- and peer evaluations of performance dimensions in an assessment center. Journal of Applied Psychology, 77(1), 42-54.
43. Stubblebine, P. C. (2001). Perception and acceptance of evaluations by supervisors and peers. Current Psychology, 20(1), 85-94.
44. Topping, K. (1998). Peer assessment between students in colleges and universities. Review of Educational Research, 68(3), 249-276.
45. Glaman, J. M., Jones, A. P., & Rozelle, R. (1996). The effects of co-worker similarity on the emergence of affect in work teams. Group and Organization Management, 21(2), 192-216.
46. Gomez, C., Shapiro, D. L., & Kirkman, B. L. (2000). The impact of collectivism and ingroup/out-group membership on the evaluation generosity of team members. Academy of Management Journal, 43(6), 1097-1107.
47. Goretsky, M. E. (1985, Fall). Class projects as a form of instruction. Journal of Marketing Education, 6, 33-37.
48. Persons, O. S. (1998). Factors influencing students' peer evaluation in cooperative learning. Journal of Education for Business, 73(4), 225-230.
49. Saavedra, R., & Kwun, S. K. (1993). Peer evaluation in self-managing work groups. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78(3), 450-462.
50. Reagan, P., & Rohrbaugh, J. (1990). Group decision process effectiveness: A competing values approach. Group and Organization Studies, 15(1), 20-43.
51. Mayfield, E. C. (1972). Value of peer nominations in predicting life insurance sales performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 56, 319-323.
52. McBain, W. N. (1970). Arousal, monotony, and accidents in line driving. Journal of Applied Psychology, 54, 509-519.