Increasing the net charge and decreasing the hydrophobicity of bovine carbonic anhydrase decreases the rate of denaturation with sodium dodecyl sulfate

Biophysical Journal

Volumn 91, Issue 1, 2006, Pages 298-310

  Gudiksen, Katherine L ^a   Gitlin, Irina ^a   Moustakas, Demetri T ^a   Whitesides, George M ^a  

^a HARVARD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACETIC ANHYDRIDE; CARBONATE DEHYDRATASE; DODECYL SULFATE SODIUM; HEXANOIC ACID;

ACYLATION; ARTICLE; CAPILLARY ELECTROPHORESIS; CHEMICAL ANALYSIS; ELECTRICITY; HYDROPHOBICITY; MATHEMATICAL MODEL; PROTEIN DENATURATION; PROTEIN FOLDING; PROTEIN INTERACTION; PROTEIN MODIFICATION; PROTEIN STABILITY;

BOS TAURUS;

EID: 33745752989     PISSN: 00063495     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1529/biophysj.106.081547     Document Type: Article

References (77)

1. Gallagher, S. R. 2005. One-dimensional SDS gel electrophoresis of proteins. In Current Protocols in Molecular Biology. F. M. Ausubel, R. Brent, R. E. Kingston, D. D. Moore, J. G. Seidman, J. A. Smith, and K. Struhl, editors. John Wiley & Sons, New York. 10.2A.1-10.2A.34.
2. Rigaud, J. L., M. Chami, O. Lambert, D. Levy, and J. L. Ranck. 2000. Use of detergents in two-dimensional crystallization of membrane proteins. Biochim. Biophys. Acta. 1508:112-128.
3. le Maire, M., P. Champeil, and J. V. Moller. 2000. Interaction of membrane proteins and lipids with solubilizing detergents. Biochim. Biophys. Acta. 1508:86-111.
4. Jones, M. N. 1999. Surfactants in membrane solubilisation. Int. J. Pharm. 177:137-159.
5. Svenson, S. 2004. Controlling surfactant self-assembly. Curr. Opin. Colloid Interface Sci. 9:201-212.
6. Duro, R., C. Souto, J. L. Gomez-Amoza, R. Martinez-Pacheco, and A. Concheiro. 1999. Interfacial adsorption of polymers and surfactants: implications for the properties of disperse systems of pharmaceutical interest. Drug Dev. Ind. Pharm. 25:817-829.
7. Jones, L. S., N. B. Bam, and T. W. Randolph. 1997. Surfactant-stabilized protein formulations: a review of protein-surfactant interactions and novel analytical methodologies. ACS Symp. Ser. 675:206-222.
8. Pitt-Rivers, R., and F. S. A. Impiombato. 1968. Binding of sodium dodecyl sulfate to various proteins. Biochem. J. 109:825-830.
9. Fish, W. W., J. A. Reynolds, and C. Tanford. 1970. Gel chromatography of proteins in denaturing solvents. Comparison between sodium dodecyl sulfate and guanidine hydrochloride as denaturants. J. Biol. Chem. 245:5166-5168.
10. Reynolds, J. A., and C. Tanford. 1970. Gross conformation of protein-sodium dodecyl sulfate complexes. J. Biol. Chem. 245:5161-5165.
11. Reynolds, J. A., and C. Tanford. 1970. Binding of dodecyl sulfate to proteins at high binding ratios. Possible implications for the state of proteins in biological membranes. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 66:1002-1003.
12. Ibel, K., R. P. May, K. Kirschner, H. Szadkowski, E. Mascher, and P. Lundahl. 1990. Protein-decorated micelle structure of sodiumdodecyl-sulfate - protein complexes as determined by neutron scattering. Eur. J. Biochem. 190:311-318.
13. Jones, M. N. 1992. Surfactant Interactions with biomembranes and proteins. Chem. Soc. Rev. 21:127-136.
14. Shirahama, K., K. Tsujii, and T. Takagi. 1974. Free-boundary electrophoresis of sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS)-protein polypeptide complexes with special reference to SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis. J. Biochem. (Tokyo). 75:309-319.
15. Mattice, W. L., J. M. Riser, and D. S. Clark. 1976. Conformational properties of the complexes formed by proteins and sodium dodecyl sulfate. Biochemistry. 15:4264-4272.
16. Lundahl, P., E. Greijer, M. Sandberg, S. Cardell, and K. O. Eriksson. 1986. A model for ionic and hydrophobic interactions and hydrogen-bonding in sodium dodecyl sulfate-protein complexes. Biochim. Biophys. Acta. 873:20-26.
17. Westerhuis, W. H. J., J. N. Sturgis, and R. A. Niederman. 2000. Reevaluation of the electrophoretic migration behavior of soluble globular proteins in the native and detergent-denatured states in polyacrylamide gels. Anal. Biochem. 284:143-152.
18. Turro, N. J., X.-G. Lei, K. P. Ananthapadmanabhan, and M. Aronson. 1995. Spectroscopic probe analysis of protein-surfactant interactions: the BSA/SDS system. Langmuir. 11:2525-2533.
19. Xu, Q., and T. A. Keiderling. 2004. Effect of sodium dodecyl sulfate on folding and thermal stability of acid-denatured cytochrome c: A spectroscopic approach. Protein Sci. 13:2949-2959.
20. Nielsen, A. D., L. Arleth, and P. Westh. 2005. Analysis of protein-surfactant interactions: a titration calorimetric and fluorescence spectroscopic investigation of interactions between Humicola insolens cutinase and an anionic surfactant. Biochim. Biophys. Acta. 1752:124-132.
21. Moosavi-Movahedi, A. A. 2005. Thermodynamics of protein denaturation by sodium dodecyl sulfate. J. Iranian Chem. Soc. 2:189-196.
22. Moosavi-Movahedi, A. A., and A. A. Saboury. 1999. Elucidation of binding sites for protein denaturation by surfactant. J. Chem. Soc. Pak. 21:248-259.
23. Chattoraj, D. K., S. C. Biswas, P. K. Mahapatra, and S. Chatterjee. 1999. Standard free energies of binding of solute to proteins in aqueous medium. Part 2. Analysis of data obtained from equilibrium dialysis and isopiestic experiments. Biophys. Chem. 77:9-25.
24. Andrade, M. I. P., E. Boitard, M. A. Saghal, P. Manley, M. N. Jones, and H. A. Skinner. 1981. Enthalpy of interaction of ribonucleaseA and n-alkyl sulfates in aqueous solution. J.Chem. Soc. Faraday Trans. 77:2939-2948.
25. Tipping, E., M. N. Jones, and H. A. Skinner. 1974. Enthalpy of interaction between globular proteins and sodium n-dodecyl sulfate in aqueous solution. J. Chem. Soc. Faraday Trans. 70:1306-1315.
26. Colton, I. J., J. D. Carbeck, J. Rao, and G. M. Whitesides. 1998. Affinity capillary electrophoresis. a physical-organic tool for studying interactions in biomolecular recognition. Electrophoresis. 19:367-382.
27. Day, Y. S. N., C. L. Baird, R. L. Rich, and D. G. Myszka. 2002. Direct comparison of binding equilibrium, thermodynamic, and rate constants determined by surface- and solution-based biophysical methods. Protein Sci. 11:1017-1025.
28. Hakansson, K., M. Carlsson, L. A. Svensson, and A. Liljas. 1992. Structure of native and apo carbonic anhydrase II and structure of some of its anion-ligand complexes. J. Mol. Biol. 227:1192-1204.
29. Stams, T., and D. W. Christianson. 2000. X-ray crystallographic studies of mammalian carbonic anhydrase isozymes. In The Carbonic Anhydrases: New Horizons. W. R. Chegwidden, N. D. Carter, and Y. H. Edwards, editors. Birkhaeuser Verlag, Basel. 159-174.
30. Supuran, C. T., A. Scozzafava, and A. Casini. 2003. Carbonic anhydrase inhibitors. Med. Res. Rev. 23:146-189.
31. Carlsson, U., and B.-H. Jonsson. 1995. Folding of. beta-sheet proteins. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 5:482-487.
32. Carlsson, U., and B.-H. Jonsson. 2000. Folding and stability of human carbonic anhydrase II. In The Carbonic Anhydrases: New Horizons. W. R. Chegwidden, N. D. Carter, and Y. H. Edwards, editors. Birkhaeuser Verlag. Basel. 241-259.
33. Bushmarina, N. A., I. M. Kuznetsova, A. G. Biktashev, K. K. Turoverov, and V. N. Uversky. 2001. Partially folded conformations in the folding pathway of bovine carbonic anhydrase II: a fluorescence spectroscopic analysis. ChemBioChem. 2:813-821.
34. Edsall, J. T., S. Mehta, D. V. Myers, and J. M. Armstrong. 1966. Structure and denaturation of human carbonic anhydrases in urea and guanidine hydrochloride solutions. Biochemische Z. 345:9-36.
35. Fransson, C., P. O. Freskgaard, H. Herbertsson, A. Johansson, P. Jonasson, L. G. Martensson, M. Svensson, B. H. Jonsson, and U. Carlsson. 1992. Cis-trans isomerization is rate-determining in the reactivation of denatured human carbonic anhydrase II as evidenced by proline isomerase. FEBS Lett. 296:90-94.
36. Ko, B. P. N., A. Yazgan, P. L. Yeagle, S. C. Lottich, and R. W. Henkens. 1977. Kinetics and mechanism of refolding of bovine carbonic anhydrase. A probe study of the formation of the active site. Biochemistry. 16:1720-1725.
37. Montich, G. G. 2000. Partly folded states of bovine carbonic anhydrase interact with zwitterionic and anionic lipid membranes. Biochim. Biophys. Acta. 1468:115-126.
38. Ptitsyn, O. B. 1992. The molten globule state. In Protein Folding. T. E. Creighton, editor. 243-300. Freeman, New York.
39. Svensson, M., P. Jonasson, P.-O. Freskgaard, B.-H. Jonsson, M. Lindgren, L.-G. Maartensson, M. Gentile, K. Boren, and U. Carlsson. 1995. Mapping the folding intermediate of human carbonic anhydrase II. Probing substructure by chemical reactivity and spin and fluorescence labeling of engineered cysteine residues. Biochemistry. 34:8606-8620.
40. Wong, K.-P., and C. Tanford. 1973. Denaturation of bovine carbonic anhydrase B by guanidine hydrochloride. Process involving separable sequential conformational transitions. J. Biol. Chem. 248:8518-8523.
41. Semisotnov, G. V., V. N. Uverskii, I. V. Sokolovskii, A. M. Gutin, O. I. Razgulyaev, and N. A. Rodionova. 1990. Two slow stages in refolding of bovine carbonic anhydrase B are due to proline isomerization. J. Mol. Biol. 213:561-568.
42. Henkens, R.W., and T. P. Oleksiak. 1991. Structural elements in unfolded carbonic anhydrase. Carbonic Anhydrase, Proc. Int. Workshop. 44-49.
43. Martensson, L. G., B. H. Jonsson, P. O. Freskgard, A. Kihlgren, M. Svensson, and U. Carlsson. 1993. Characterization of folding intermediates of human carbonic anhydrase II: probing substructure by chemical labeling of SH groups introduced by site-directed mutagenesis. Biochemistry. 32:224-231.
44. Ptitsyn, O. B. 1995. Molten globule and protein folding. Adv. Protein Chem. 47:83-229.
45. Wetlaufer, D. B., and Y. Xie. 1995. Control of aggregation in protein refolding: a variety of surfactants promote renaturation of carbonic anhydrase II. Protein Sci. 4:1535-1543.
46. Cleland, J. L., and D. I. C. Wang. 1990. Refolding and aggregation of bovine carbonic anhydrase B: quasi-elastic light scattering analysis. Biochemistry. 29:11072-11078.
47. Gitlin, I., K. L. Gudiksen, and G. M. Whitesides. 2005. Peracetylated bovine carbonic anhydrase (BCA-Ac18) is kinetically more stable than native BCA to sodium dodecyl sulfate. J. Phys. Chem. B. 110:2372-2377.
48. Gudiksen, K. L., A. R. Urbach, I. Gitlin, J. Yang, J. A. Vazquez, C. E. Costello, and G. M. Whitesides. 2004. The influence of the Zn(II) cofactor on the refolding of bovine carbonic anhydrase after denaturation with sodium dodecyl sulfate. Anal. Chem. 76:7151-7161.
49. Yang, J., I. Gitlin, V. M. Krishnamurthy, J. A. Vazquez, C. E. Costello, and G. M. Whitesides. 2003. Synthesis of monodisperse polymers from proteins. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 125:12392-12393.
50. + groups on the surface of carbonic anhydrase has no significant influence on its folding from sodium dodecyl sulfate. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 127:4707-4714.
51. Colton, I. J., J. R. Anderson, J. Gao, R. G. Chapman, L. Isaacs, and G. M. Whitesides. 1997. Formation of protein charge ladders by acylation of amino groups on proteins. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 119:12701-12709.
52. Gao, J., and G. M. Whitesides. 1997. Using protein charge ladders to estimate the effective charges and molecular weights of proteins in solution. Anal. Chem. 69:575-580.
53. Gao, J., M. Mammen, and G. M. Whitesides. 1996. Evaluating electrostatic contributions to binding with the use of protein charge ladders. Science. 272:535-537.
54. Menon, M. K., and A. L. Zydney. 2000. Determination of effective protein charge by capillary electrophoresis: effects of charge regulation in the analysis of charge ladders. Anal. Chem. 72:5714-5717.
55. Gitlin, I., M. Mayer, and G. M. Whitesides. 2003. Significance of charge regulation in the analysis of protein charge ladders. J. Phys. Chem. B. 107:1466-1472.
56. Gitlin, I., J. D. Carbeck, and G. M. Whitesides. 2006. Why are proteins charged? Networks of charge-charge interactions in proteins measured by charge ladders and capillary electrophoresis. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 45:3022-3060.
57. Linderstrom-Lang, K. 1924. The ionization of proteins. Compt. Rend. Trav. Lab. Carlsberg. 15:1-29.
58. Reference deleted in proof.
59. Fujita, T., J. Iwasa, and C. Hansch. 1964. A new substituent constant, P, derived from partition coefficients. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 86:5175-5180.
60. Pliska, V., M. Schmidt, and J. L. Fauchere. 1981. Partition coefficients of amino acids and hydrophobic parameters p of their side-chains as measured by thin-layer chromatography. J. Chromatogr. 216:79-92.
61. Hansch, C., and E. Coats. 1970. α-Chymotrypsin: case study of substituent constants and regression analysis in enzymic structure-activity relations. J. Pharm. Sci. 59:731-743.
62. Fersht, A. R. 1999. Structure and Mechanism in Protein Science. W.H. Freeman, New York.
63. Hagen, S. J., J. Hofrichter, A. Szabo, and W. A. Eaton. 1996. Diffusion-limited contact formation in unfolded cytochrome c: estimating the maximum rate of protein folding. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 93:11615-11617.
64. Chan, C. K., Y. Hu, S. Takahashi, D. L. Rousseau, W. A. Eaton, and J. Hofrichter. 1997. Submillisecond protein folding kinetics studied by ultrarapid mixing. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 94:1779-1784.
65. Semisotnov, G. V., N. A. Rodionova, V. P. Kutyshenko, B. Ebert, J. Blanck, and O. B. Ptitsyn. 1987. Sequential mechanism of refolding of carbonic anhydrase B. FEBS Lett. 224:9-13.
66. Yazgan, A., and R. W. Henkens. 1972. Role of zinc(II) in the refolding of guanidine hydrochloride denatured bovine carbonic anhydrase. Biochemistry. 11:1314-1318.
67. Putnam, F., and H. Neurath. 1945. Interaction between proteins and synthetic detergents. II. Electrophoretic analysis of serum albumin-sodium dodecyl sulfate mixtures. J. Biol. Chem. 159:195-209.
68. Gelamo, E. L., and M. Tabak. 2000. Spectroscopic studies on the interaction of bovine (BSA) and human (HSA) serum albumins with ionic surfactants. Spectrochim. Acta (A). 56A:2255-2271.
69. Paz-Andrade, M. I., M. N. Jones, and H. A. Skinner. 1978. Enthalpy of interaction between some cationic polypeptides and n-alkyl sulfates in aqueous solution. J. Chem. Soc. Faraday Trans. 74:2923-2929.
70. Reference deleted in proof.
71. Hilser, V. J., and E. Freire. 1995. Quantitative analysis of conformational equilibrium using capillary electrophoresis: applications to protein folding. Anal. Biochem. 224:465-485.
72. Simonson, T. 2003. Electrostatics and dynamics of proteins. Rep. Prog. Phys. 66:737-787.
73. Simonson, T., and C. L. Brooks III. 1996. Charge screening and the dielectric constant of proteins: insights from molecular dynamics. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 118:8452-8458.
74. Reference deleted in proof.
75. Dill, K. A., and S. Bromberg. 2002. Molecular Driving Forces: Statistical Thermodynamics in Chemistry and Biology. Garland Science, New York.
76. Gill, S. J., and I. Wadso. 1976. An equation of state describing hydrophobic interactions. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 73:2955-2958.
77. Zhou, H., and Y. Zhou. 2002. Stability scale and atomic solvation parameters extracted from 1023 mutation experiments. Proteins. 49:483-492.