Prevalence of intraspecific relationships between range size and abundance in Danish birds

Diversity and Distributions

Volumn 12, Issue 4, 2006, Pages 417-422

  Borregaard, Michael Krabbe ^a   Rahbek, Carsten ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF COPENHAGEN   (Denmark)

Author keywords

Nature management; Range abundance relationships; Rarity; Resource use

Indexed keywords

ABUNDANCE; BIOMONITORING; BIRD; INTRASPECIFIC INTERACTION; NICHE; POPULATION SIZE; RANGE SIZE; RARE SPECIES; RESOURCE USE;

AVES;

EID: 33745727181     PISSN: 13669516     EISSN: 14724642     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1366-9516.2006.00258.x     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. Bart, J. & Klosiewski, S.P. (1989) Use of presence-absence to measure changes in avian density. Journal of Wildlife Management, 53, 847-852.
2. Blackburn, T.M., Gaston, K.J., Greenwood, J.J.D. & Gregory, R.D. (1998) The anatomy of the interspecific abundance-range size relationship for the British avifauna: II. Temporal dynamics. Ecology Letters, 1, 47-55.
3. Brown, J.H. (1984) On the relationship between abundance and distribution of species. American Naturalist, 124, 255-279.
4. Colwell, R.K., Rahbek, C. & Gotelli, N.J. (2004) The mid-domain effect and species richness patterns: What have we learned so far? American Naturalist, 163, 1-23.
5. Conrad, K.F., Perry, J.N. & Woiwod, I.P. (2001) An abundance-occupancy time-lag during the decline of an arctiid tiger moth. Ecology Letters, 4, 300-303.
6. DMU (2000) NOVANA Programbeskrivelse Del 3, Bilag 1: Naturtyper og arter. Danmarks Miljøundersøgelser, Kalø'.
7. Dybbro, T. (1976) De danske ynglefugles udbredelse. Dansk Ornitologisk Forening, Copenhagen.
8. Gaston, K.J. (1994) Rarity. Chapman & Hall, London.
9. Gaston, K.J. (1996a) Species-range-size distributions: patterns, mechanisms and implications. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 11, 197-201.
10. Gaston, K.J. (1996b) The multiple forms of the interspecific abundance-distribution relationship. Oikos, 76, 211-220.
11. Gaston, K.J. (1999) Implications of interspecific and intraspecific abundance-occupancy relationships. Oikos, 86, 195-207.
12. Gaston, K.J. & Curnutt, J.L. (1998) The dynamics of abundance-range size relationships. Oikos, 81, 38-44.
13. Gaston, K.J. & Gregory, R.D. (1997) Interspecific abundance-range size relationships: Range position and phylogeny. Ecography, 20, 390-399.
14. Gaston, K.J., Blackburn, T.M. & Gregory, R.D. (1999a) Intraspecific abundance-occupancy relationships: case studies of six bird species in Britain. Diversity and Distributions, 5, 197-212.
15. Gaston, K.J., Gregory, R.D. & Blackburn, T.M. (1999b) Intraspecific relationships between abundance and occupancy among species of Paridae and Sylviidae in Britain. Ecoscience, 6, 131-142.
16. Gaston, K.J. & Lawton, J.H. (1997) Interspecific abundance-range size relationships: an appraisal of mechanisms. Journal of Animal Ecology, 66, 579-601.
17. Gregory, R.D. (1998) An intraspecific model of species' expansion, linking abundance and distribution. Ecography, 21, 92-96.
18. Gregory, R.D. & Gaston, K.J. (2000) Explanations of commonness and rarity in British breeding birds: separating resource use and resource availability. Oikos, 88, 515-526.
19. Grell, M.B. (1998) Fuglenes Danmark. Gads Forlag, Copenhagen, Denmark.
20. Hanski, I. & Gyllenberg, M. (1993) Two general metapopulation models and the core-satellite species hypothesis. American Naturalist, 142, 17-41.
21. Hanski, I. & Gyllenberg, M. (1997) Uniting two general patterns in the distribution of species. Science, 275, 397-400.
22. Hanski, I., Kouki, J. & Halkka, A. (1993) Three explanations of the positive relationship between distribution and abundance of species. Species diversity in ecological communities: historical and geographical perspectives (ed. by R.E. Rickleffs and D. Schluter), pp. 108-116. University of Chicago Press, Chicago & London.
23. Harcourt, A.H., Coppeto, S.A. & Parks, S.A. (2002) Rarity, specialization and extinction in primates. Journal of Biogeography, 29, 445-456.
24. Harcourt, A.H., Coppeto, S.A. & Parks, S.A. (2005) The distribution-abundance (i.e. density) relationship: its form and causes in a tropical mammal order, primates. Journal of Biogeography, 29, 445-456.
25. Heino, J. (2005) Positive relationship between regional distribution and local abundance in stream insects: a consequence of niche breadth or niche position? Ecography, 28, 345-354.
26. Holt, A.R., Gaston, K.J. & He, F.L. (2002a) Occupancy-abundance relationships and spatial distribution: a review. Basic and Applied Ecology, 3, 1-13.
27. Holt, A.R., Warren, P.H. & Gaston, K.J. (2002b) The importance of biotic interactions in abundance-occupancy relationships. Journal of Animal Ecology, 71, 846-854.
28. Jetz, W. & Rahbek, C. (2002) Geographic range size and determinants of avian species richness. Science, 297, 1548-1551.
29. Jetz, W., Rahbek, C. & Colwell, R.K. (2004) The coincidence of rarity and richness and the potential signature of history in centres of endemism. Ecology Letters, 7, 1180-1191.
30. Kean, J. & Barlow, N. (2004) Exploring rarity using a general model for distribution and abundance. American Naturalist, 163, 407-416.
31. Kotze, D.J., Niemela, J., O'Hara, R.B. & Turin, H. (2003) Testing abundance-range size relationships in European carabid beetles (Coleoptera, Carabidae). Ecography, 26, 553-566.
32. Lawton, J.H. (1993) Range, population abundance and conservation. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 8, 409-412.
33. Lennon, J.J., Koleff, P., Greenwood, J.J.D. & Gaston, K.J. (2004) Contribution of rarity and commonness to patterns of species richness. Ecology Letters, 7, 81-87.
34. McKinney, M.L. & Lockwood, J.L. (1999) Biotic homogenization: a few winners replacing many losers in the next mass extinction. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 14, 450-453.
35. Miller, G.H., Fogel, M.L., Magee, J.W., Gagan, M.K., Clarke, S.J. & Johnson, B.J. (2005) Ecosystem collapse in Pleistocene Australia and a human role in megafaunal extinction. Science, 309, 287-290.
36. Newton, I. (1997) Links between the abundance and distribution of birds. Ecography, 20, 137-145.
37. Nijboer, R.C. & Schmidt-Kloiber, A. (2004) The effect of excluding taxa with low abundances or taxa with small distribution ranges on ecological assessment. Hydrobiologia, 516, 347-363.
38. Pollard, E., Moss, D. & Yates, T.J. (1995) Population trends of common British butterflies at monitored sites. The Journal of Applied Ecology, 32, 9-16.
39. Ruggiero, A. & Kitzberger, T. (2004) Environmental correlates of mammal species richness in South America: effects of spatial structure, taxonomy and geographic range. Ecography, 27, 401-416.
40. SAS Institute I. SAS. [8.02]. (2000) SAS Institute, Cary, NC, USA.
41. Tales, E., Keith, P. & Oberdorff, T. (2004) Density-range size relationships in French riverine fishes. Oecologia, 138, 360-370.
42. Voous, K.H. (1973) List of recent Holarctic bird species, non-passerines. Ibis, 115, 612-638.
43. Voous, K.H. (1977) List of recent Holarctic bird species, passerines. Ibis, 119, 367-406.
44. Warren, M., McGeoch, M.A. & Chown, S.L. (2003) Predicting abundance from occupancy: a test for an aggregated insect assemblage. Journal of Animal Ecology, 72, 468-477.
45. Zar, J.H. (1984) Biostatistical analysis. Prentice Hall, New Jersey.