The dynamics of abundance-range size relationships

Oikos

Volumn 81, Issue 1, 1998, Pages 38-44

  Gaston, Kevin J ^a   Curnutt, J L ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SHEFFIELD   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TENNESSEE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ABUNDANCE; ABUNDANCE-RANGE SIZE RELATIONSHIP; BIRD; RANGE SIZE;

NORTH AMERICA;

EID: 0031912415     PISSN: 00301299     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2307/3546465     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Bock, C. E. 1984. Geographical correlates of abundance vs. rarity in some North American winter landbirds. - Auk 101:266-273.
2. _ 1987. Distribution-abundance relationships of some Arizona landbirds: a matter of scale? - Ecology 68: 124-129.
3. _ and Ricklefs, R. E. 1983. Range size and local abundance of some North American songbirds: a positive correlation. _ Am. Nat. 122: 295-299.
4. Brown, J. H. 1984. On the relationship between abundance and distribution of species. - Am. Nat. 124: 255-279.
5. _ and Maurer, B. A. 1987. Evolution of species assemblages: effects of energetic constraints and species dynamics on diversification of the North American avifauna. - Am. Nat. 130: 1-17.
6. Fuller, R. J., Gregory, R. D., Gibbons, D. W., Marchant, J. H., Wilson, J. D., Baillie, S. R. and Carter, N. 1995. Population declines and range contractions among lowland farmland birds in Britain. - Conserv. Biol. 9: 1425-1441.
7. Gaston, K. J. 1994. Rarity. - Chapman & Hall, London.
8. _ 1996. The multiple forms of the interspecific abundancedistribution relationship. - Oikos 75: 211-220.
9. _ and Lawton, J. H. 1990. Effects of scale and habitat on the relationship between regional distribution and local abundance. - Oikos 58: 329-335.
10. _ , Blackburn, T. M. and Lawton, J. H. 1997. Interspecific abundance-range size relationships: an appraisal of mechanisms. - J. Anim. Ecol. 66: 579-601.
11. Gibbons, D. W., Reid, J. B. and Chapman, R. A. 1993. The new atlas of breeding birds in Britain and Ireland: 1988-1991. - Poyser, London.
12. Gyllenberg, M. and Hanski, I. 1992. Single -species metapopulation dynamics: a structured model. - Theor. Popul. Biol. 42: 35-66.
13. Hanski, I. 1982. Dynamics of regional distribution: the core and satellite species hypothesis. - Oikos 38: 210-221.
14. _ 1991a. Single-species metapopulation dynamics: concepts, models and observations. - Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 42: 17-38.
15. _ 1991b. Reply to Nee, Gregory and May. - Oikos 62: 88-89.
16. _ and Gyllenberg, M. 1993. Two general metapopulation models and the core-satellite species hypothesis. - Am. Nat. 142, 17-41.
17. _ , Kouki, J. and Halkka, A. 1993. Three explanations of the positive relationship between distribution and abundance of species. - In: Ricklefs, R. and Schluter, D. (eds), Historical and geographical determinants of community diversity. Univ. of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp. 108-116.
18. Järvinen, O. and Sammalisto, L. 1976. Regional trends in the avifauna of Finnish peatland bogs. - Ann. Zool. Fenn. 13: 31 -43.
19. Kouki, J. and Häyrinen, U. 1991. On the relationship between distribution and abundance in birds breeding on Finnish mires: the effect of habitat specialization. - Ornis Fenn. 68: 170-177.
20. Lacy, R C. and Bock, C. E. 1986. The correlation between range size and local abundance of some North American birds. - Ecology 67: 258-260.
21. Lawton, J. H. 1993. Range, population abundance and conservation. - Trends Ecol. Evol. 8: 409-413.
22. _ 1994. Population dynamic principles. - Philos Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B 344: 61-68.
23. _ 1995. The response of insects to environmental change. -In: Harrington, R. and Stork, N.E. (eds), Insects in a changing environment. Academic Press, London, pp. 3-26.
24. _ 1996. Population abundances, geographic ranges and conservation. 1994 Witherby lecture. - Bird Study 43: 3-19.
25. _ , Nee, S., Letcher, A. J. and Harvey, P. H. 1994. Animal distributions: patterns and processes. - In: Edwards, P. J., May, R. M. and Webb, N. R. (eds), Large-scale ecology and conservation biology. Blackwell Science, Oxford, pp. 41-58.
26. Marshall, C. T. and Frank, K. T. 1994. Geographic responses of groundfish to variation in abundance: methods of detection and their interpretation. - Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 51: 808-816.
27. _ and Frank, K. T. 1995. Density-dependent habitat selection by juvenile haddock (Melanogrammus aeglefinus) on the southwestern Scotian shelf. - Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 52: 1007-1017.
28. Maurer, B. A. 1990. The relationship between distribution and abundance in a patchy environment. - Oikos 58: 181-189.
29. McArdle, B. H. 1990. When are rare species not there? -Oikos 57: 276-277.
30. _ , Gaston, K. J. and Lawton, J. H. 1990. Variation in the size of animal populations: patterns, problems and artefacts. - J. Anim. Ecol. 59: 439-454.
31. Nee, S., Gregory, R. D. and May, R. M. 1991. Core and satellite species: theory and artefacts. - Oikos 62: 83-87.
32. Peterjohn, B. G. 1994. The North American breeding bird survey. - Birding 26: 386-398.
33. Pollard, E., Moss, D. and Yates, T. J. 1995. Population trends of common British butterflies at monitored sites. - J. Appl. Ecol. 32: 9-16.
34. Price, J., Droege, S. and Price, A. 1995. The Summer Atlas of North American birds. - Academic Press, London.
35. Ryder, R. A. 1986. Songbirds. - In: Cooperrider, A. Y., Boyd, R. J. and Stuart, H. R. (eds). Inventory and monitoring of wildlife habitats. U.S. Dept. Interior, Bureau of Land Management, Denver, CO, pp. 291-312.
36. Tucker, G. M. and Heath, M. F. 1994. Birds in Europe: their conservation status. - BirdLife International, Cambridge.
37. van Swaay, C. A. M. 1995. Measuring changes in butterfly abundance in The Netherlands. - In: Pullin, A. S. (ed.), Ecology and conservation of butterflies. Chapman & Hall, London, pp. 230-247.
38. Willis, J. C. 1922. Age and area: a study in geographical distribution and origin of species. - Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge.
39. Wright, D. H. 1991. Correlations between incidence and abundance are expected by chance. - J. Biogeogr. 18: 463-466.