Testing abundance-range size relationships in European carabid beetles (Coleoptera, Carabidae)

Ecography

Volumn 26, Issue 5, 2003, Pages 553-566

  Kotze, D Johan ^a   Niemelä, Jari ^a   O'Hara, R Bob ^a   Turin, Hans ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF HELSINKI   (Finland)

^b NETHERLANDS INSTITUTE OF ECOLOGY NIOO KNAW   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ABUNDANCE; BEETLE; BODY SIZE; HABITAT TYPE; NICHE BREADTH; RANGE SIZE; ZOOGEOGRAPHY;

BELGIUM; BENELUX; DENMARK; EURASIA; EUROPE; NETHERLANDS; NORTHERN EUROPE; SCANDINAVIA; WESTERN EUROPE;

CARABIDAE; COLEOPTERA;

EID: 0344100106     PISSN: 09067590     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1034/j.1600-0587.2003.03488.x     Document Type: Article

References (63)

1. Assmann, T. and Janssen, J. 1999. The effects of habitat changes on the endangered ground beetle Carabus nitens (Coleoptera: Carabidae). - J. Insect Conserv. 3: 107-116.
2. Bangsholt, F. 1983. Sandspringernes og løbebillernes udbredelse og forekomst i Denmark ca. 1830-1981 (Coleoptera: Cicindelidae and Carabidae). - Dansk faunistik Bibliotek 4, København.
3. Blackburn, T. M. and Gaston, K. J. 1998. Some methodological issues in macroecology. - Am. Nat. 151: 68-83.
4. Blackburn, T. M. et al. 1997. Of mice and wrens: the relation between abundance and geographic range size in British mammals and birds. - Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B 352: 419-427.
5. Blackburn, T. M. et al. 1999. Do local abundances of British birds change with proximity to range edge? - J. Biogeogr. 26: 493-505.
6. Brown, J. H. 1984. The relationship between abundance and distribution of species. - Am. Nat. 124: 255-279.
7. Brown, J. H. 1995. Macroecology. - Univ. of Chicago Press.
8. Dempster, A. P., Laird, N. M. and Rubin, D. B. 1977. Maximum likelihood from incomplete data via the EM algorithm (with discussion). - J. R. Stat. Soc. B 39: 1-38.
9. Dennis, R. L. H. and Thomas, C. D. 2000. Bias in butterfly distribution maps: the influence of hot spots and recorder's home range. - J. Insect Conserv. 4: 73-77.
10. Desender, K. 1986a, b, c, d. Distribution and ecology of carabid beetles in Belgium (Coleoptera, Carabidae), Part 1, 2, 3, 4. - Inst. Roy. des Sci. Nat. de Belgique. Documents de Travail 26: 1-30; 27: 1-24; 30: 1-23; 34: 1-48.
11. Desender, K. 1986a, b, c, d. Distribution and ecology of carabid beetles in Belgium (Coleoptera, Carabidae), Part 1, 2, 3, 4. - Inst. Roy. des Sci. Nat. de Belgique. Documents de Travail 26: 1-30; 27: 1-24; 30: 1-23; 34: 1-48.
12. Desender, K. 1986a, b, c, d. Distribution and ecology of carabid beetles in Belgium (Coleoptera, Carabidae), Part 1, 2, 3, 4. - Inst. Roy. des Sci. Nat. de Belgique. Documents de Travail 26: 1-30; 27: 1-24; 30: 1-23; 34: 1-48.
13. Desender, K. 1986a, b, c, d. Distribution and ecology of carabid beetles in Belgium (Coleoptera, Carabidae), Part 1, 2, 3, 4. - Inst. Roy. des Sci. Nat. de Belgique. Documents de Travail 26: 1-30; 27: 1-24; 30: 1-23; 34: 1-48.
14. Desender, K. and Turin, H. 1989. Loss of habitats and changes in the composition of the ground and tiger beetle fauna in four west European countries since 1950 (Coleoptera: Carabidae: Cicindelidae). - Biol. Conserv. 48: 277-294.
15. Desender, K., Ervynck, A. and Tack, G. 1999. Beetle diversity and historical ecology of woodlands in Flanders. - Belg. J. Zool. 129: 139-156.
16. Draper, N. R. and Smith, H. 1998. Applied regression analysis. - Wiley.
17. Dufrêne, M. and Legendre, P. 1997. Species assemblages and indicator species: the need for a flexible asymmetrical approach. - Ecol. Monogr. 67: 345-366.
18. Durrer, S. and Schmid-Hempel, P. 1995. Parasites and the regional distribution of bumblebee species. - Ecography 18: 114-122.
19. Eeley, H. A. C. and Lawes, M. J. 1999. Large-scale patterns of species richness and species range size in anthropoid primates. - In: Fleagle, J. G., Janson, C. H. and Reed, K. E. (eds), Primate communities. Cambridge Univ. Press, pp. 191-219.
20. Gaston, K. J. 1990. Patterns in the geographical ranges of species. - Biol. Rev. 65: 105-129.
21. Gaston, K. J. 1991. How large is a species' geographic range size. - Oikos 61: 434-438.
22. Gaston, K. J. 1994. Rarity. - Chapman and Hall.
23. Gaston, K. J. 1996. The multiple forms of the interspecific abundance-distribution relationship. - Oikos 76: 211-220.
24. Gaston, K. J. and Lawton, J. H. 1990. Effects of scale and habitat on the relationship between regional distribution and abundance. - Oikos 58: 329-335.
25. Gaston, K. J. and Blackburn, T. M. 1996. Global scale macroecology: interactions between population size, geographic range size and body size in the Anseriformes. - J. Anim. Ecol. 65: 701-714.
26. Gaston, K. J., Blackburn, T. M. and Gregory, R. D. 1997a. Interspecific abundance-range size relationships: range position and phylogeny. - Ecography 20: 390-399.
27. Gaston, K. J., Blackburn, T. M. and Lawton, J. H. 1997b. Interspecific abundance-range size relationships: an appraisal of mechanisms. - J. Anim. Ecol. 66: 579-601.
28. Gaston, K. J., Blackburn, T. M. and Lawton, J. H. 1998. Aggregation and interspecific abundance-occupancy relationships. - J. Anim. Ecol. 67: 995-999.
29. Gregory, R. D. and Blackburn, T. M. 1998. Macroecological patterns in British breeding birds: covariation of species' geographical range size at differing spatial scale. - Ecography 21: 527-534.
30. Gregory, R. D. and Gaston, K. J. 2000. Explanations of commonness and rarity in British breeding birds: separating resource use and resource availability. - Oikos 88: 515-526.
31. Griffiths, D. 1998. Sampling effort, regression method, and the shape and slope of size-abundance relations. - J. Anim. Ecol. 67: 795-804.
32. Hanski, I. 1991. Reply to Nee, Gregory and May. - Oikos 62: 88-89.
33. Hanski, I. 2000. Extinction debt and species credit in boreal forests: modelling the consequences of different approaches to biodiversity conservation. - Ann. Zool. Fenn. 37: 271-280.
34. Hanski, I., Kouki, J. and Halkka, A. 1993. Three explanations of the positive relationship between distribution and abundance of species. - In: Ricklefs, R. E. and Schluter, D. (eds), Species diversity in ecological communities. The Univ. of Chicago Press, pp. 108-116.
35. Harvey, P. H. and Pagel, M. D. 1991. The comparative method in evolutionary ecology. - Oxford Univ. Press.
36. Hengeveld, R. 1985. Dynamics of Dutch beetle species during the twentieth century (Coleoptera, Carabidae). - J. Biogeogr. 12: 389-411.
37. Hengeveld, R. and Haeck, J. 1982. The distribution of abundance. I. Measurements. - J. Biogeogr. 9: 303-316.
38. Högmander, H. and Møller, J. 1995. Estimating distribution maps from atlas data using methods of statistical image analysis. - Biometrics 51: 393-404.
39. Johnson, C. N. 1998. Species extinction and the relationship between distribution and abundance. - Nature 394: 272-274.
40. Kolasa, J., Hewitt, C. L. and Drake, J. A. 1998. Rapoport's rule: an explanation or a byproduct of the latitudinal gradient in species richness? - Biodiv. Conserv. 7: 1447-1455.
41. Kotze, D. J. and O'Hara, R. B. 2003. Species decline - but why? Explanations of carabid beetle (Coleoptera, Carabidae) declines in Europe. - Oecologia 135: 138-148.
42. Lawton, J. H. 1993. Range, population abundance and conservation. - Trends Ecol. Evol. 8: 409-413.
43. Lawton, J. H. 1994. Population dynamic principles. - Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B 344: 61-68.
44. Lindroth, C. H. 1985. The Carabidae (Coleoptera) of Fennoscandia and Denmark. - Fauna Entomol. Scand. 15, part 1. Scand. Sci. Press, Copenhagen.
45. Lindroth, C. H. 1986. The Carabidae (Coleoptera) of Fennoscandia and Denmark. - Fauna Entomol. Scand. 15, part 2. Scand. Sci. Press, Copenhagen.
46. Lövei, G. L. and Sunderland, K. D. 1996. Ecology and behavior of ground beetles (Coleoptera: Carabidae). - Annu. Rev. Entomol. 41: 231-256.
47. Maddison, D. R., Baker, M. D. and Ober, K. A. 1999. Phylogeny of carabid beetles as inferred from 18S ribosomal DNA (Coleoptera: Carabidae). - Syst. Entomol. 24: 103-138.
48. McCullagh, P. and Nelder, J. A. 1989. Generalized linear models, 2nd ed. - Chapman and Hall.
49. Niemelä, J. 2001. Carabid beetles (Coleoptera, Carabidae) and habitat fragmentation: a review. - Eur. J. Entomol. 98: 127-132.
50. Niemelä, J. and Spence, J. R. 1991. Distribution and abundance of an exotic ground beetle (Carabidae): a test of community impact. - Oikos 62: 351-359.
51. Poulin, R. 1999. The intra-and interspecific relationships between abundance and distribution in helminth parasites of birds. - J. Anim. Ecol. 68: 719-725.
52. Pyron, M. 1999. Relationships between geographical range size, body size, local abundance, and habitat breadth in North American suckers and sunfishes. - J. Biogeogr. 26: 549-558.
53. Quinn, R. M. et al. 1997. Abundance-range size relationships of macrolepidoptera in Britain: the effects of taxonomy and life history variables. - Ecol. Entomol. 22: 453-461.
54. Rabinowitz, D., Cairns, S. and Dillon, T. 1986. Seven forms of rarity and their frequency in the flora of the British Isles. -In: Soulé, M. E. (ed.), Conservation biology: the science of scarcity and diversity. Sinauer, pp. 182-204.
55. Sampford, M. R. 1955. The truncated negative binomial distribution. - Biometrika 42: 58-69.
56. Simpson, G. G. 1964. Species density of North American recent mammals. - Syst. Zool. 13: 57-73.
57. Taylor, C. M., Winston, M. R. and Matthews, W. J. 1993. Fish species-environment and abundance relationships in a Great Plains river system. - Ecography 16: 16-23.
58. Thiele, H.-U. 1977. Carabid beetles in their environments. - Springer.
59. Thompson, K., Hodgson, J. G. and Gaston, K. J. 1998. Abundance-range size relationships in the herbaceous flora of central England. - J. Ecol. 86: 439-448.
60. Turin, H. 2000. De Nederlandse Loopkevers, Verspreiding en Oecologie (Coleoptera: Carabidae). - Nederlandse Fauna 3. Nationaal Natuurhistorisch Museum Naturalis, KNNV Uitgeverij and EIS-Nederland, Leiden.
61. Turin, H. and Den Boer, P. J. 1988. Changes in the distribution of carabid beetles in the Netherlands since 1880. II. Isolation of habitats and long-term trends in the occurrence of carabid species with different powers of dispersal (Coleoptera, Carabidae). - Biol. Conserv. 44: 179-200.
62. Turin, H. and Heijerman, T. 1988. Ecological classification of forest-dwelling Carabidae (Coleoptera) in the Netherlands. - Tijdschrift Entomol. 131: 65-71.
63. Venables, W. N. and Ripley, B. D. 1999. Modern applied statistics with S-PLUS, 3rd ed. - Springer.