Qualitative research on economic interdependence and conflict: Overcoming methodological hurdles

Economic Interdependence and International Conflict: New Perspectives on an Enduring Debate

Volumn , Issue , 2003, Pages 310-323

  Ripsman, Norrin M ^a   Blanchard, Jean Marc F ^b  

^a Gina Cody School of Engineering and Computer Science   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 33745653407     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: None     Document Type: Chapter

References (45)

1. Barbieri, Katherine. 1996. Economic Interdependence: A Path to Peace or a Source of Interstate Conflict? Journal of Peace Research 33:29-49.
2. Blanchard, Jean-Marc F., Edward D. Mansfield, and Norrin M. Ripsman. 1999-2000. The Political Economy of National Security: Economic Statecraft, Interdependence, and International Conflict. Security Studies 9:1-15.
3. Blanchard, Jean-Marc F., and Norrin M. Ripsman. 1996. Measuring Vulnerability Interdependence: A Geopolitical Approach. Geopolitics 1:225-46.
4. Blanchard, Jean-Marc F., and Norrin M. Ripsman. 2001. Rethinking Sensitivity Interdependence: Assessing Trade, Financial, and Monetary Linkages between States. International Interactions. 27:95-127.
5. Buzan, Barry. 1984. Economic Structure and International Security: The Limits of the Liberal Case. International Organization 38:597-624.
6. Checkel, Jeffrey T. 1998. The Constructivist Turn in International Relations Theory. World Politics 50:324-48.
7. Copeland, Dale C. 1996. Economic Interdependence and War: A Theory of Trade Expectations. International Security 20:5-41.
8. Copeland, Dale C. 1999-2000. Trade Expectations and the Outbreak of Peace: Détente, 1970-1974, and the End of the Cold War, 1985-1991. Security Studies 9:15-58.
9. Crawford, Beverly. 1993. Economic Vulnerability in International Relations: The Case of East-West Trade, Investment, and Finance. New York: Columbia University Press.
10. de Vries, Michael S. 1990. Interdependence, Cooperation, and Conflict: An Empirical Analysis. Journal of Peace Research 27:429-44.
11. Eckstein, Harry. 1975. Case Study and Theory in Political Science. In Handbook of Political Science, ed. Fred I. Greenstein and Nelson Polsby, 7:79-138. Reading, MA: Addison- Wesley.
12. Finnemore, Martha. 1996. National Interests in International Society. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
13. Gartzke, Eric, Quan Li, and Charles Boehmer. 2001. Investing in the Peace: Economic Interdependence and International Conflict. International Organization 55:391- 438.
14. George, Alexander L. 1997. Knowledge for Statecraft: The Challenge for Political Science and History. International Security 22:44-52.
15. George, Alexander L., and Timothy J. McKeown. 1985. Case Studies and Theories of Organizational Decision Making. In Advances in Information Processing in Organizations, ed. Robert Coulam and Richard Smith, 43-68. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
16. Gowa, Joanne. 1995. Allies, Adversaries, and International Trade. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
17. Jervis, Robert. 1976. Perception and Misperception in International Politics. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
18. Katzenstein, Peter J. 1985. Small States in World Markets: Industrial Policy in Europe. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
19. Keohane, Robert O. 1990. International Liberalism Revisited. In The Economic Limits to Modern Politics, ed. John Dunn, 165-94. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
20. Keohane, Robert O., and Joseph S. Nye Jr. 1977. Power and Interdependence: World Politics in Transition. Boston: Little, Brown.
21. Kupchan, Charles A. 1998. After Pax Americana: Benign Power, Regional Integration, and the Sources of a Stable Multipolarity. International Security 23:40-79.
22. Levy, Jack S., and Salvatore Ali. 1998. From Commercial Competition to Strategic Rivalry to War: The Evolution of the Anglo-Dutch Rivalry, 1609-1652. In The Dynamics of Enduring Rivalries, ed. Paul F. Diehl, 29-63. Urbana/Champaign: University of Illinois Press.
23. Liberman, Peter. 1999-2000. The Offense-Defense Balance, Interdependence, and War. Security Studies 9:59-91.
24. Mansfield, Edward D., and Jon C. Pevehouse. 2000. Trade Blocs, Trade Flows, and International Conflict. International Organization 54:775-808.
25. McMillan, Susan M. 1997. Interdependence and Conflict. Mershon International Studies Review 41:33-58.
26. Oneal, John R., and Bruce M. Russett. 1997. The Classical Liberals Were Right: Democracy, Interdependence, and Conflict, 1950-85. International Studies Quarterly 41:267-94.
27. Oneal, John R., and Bruce M. Russett. 1999. The Kantian Peace: The Pacific Benefits of Democracy, Interdependence, and International Organization, 1885-1992. World Politics 52:1-37.
28. Papayoanou, Paul. 1996. Interdependence, Institutions, and the Balance of Power: Britain, Germany, and World War I. International Security 20:42-76.
29. Papayoanou, Paul, and Scott Kastner. 1999-2000. Sleeping with the (Potential) Enemy: Assessing the U.S. Policy of Engagement with China. Security Studies 9:157-87.
30. Ripsman, Norrin M. 2002. Peacemaking by Democracies: Domestic Structure, Executive Autonomy and the Post-World War Settlements. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press.
31. Ripsman, Norrin M., and Jean-Marc F. Blanchard. 1996-97. Commercial Liberalism under Fire: Evidence from 1914 and 1936. Security Studies 6:4-50.
32. Ripsman, Norrin M., and Jean-Marc F. Blanchard. 2000. Contextual Information and the Study of Trade and Conflict: The Utility of an Interdisciplinary Approach. In Beyond Boundaries? Disciplines, Paradigms, and Theoretical Integration in International Studies, ed. Rudra Sil and Eileen M. Doherty, 57-85. Albany: SUNY Press.
33. Rogowski, Ronald. 1995. The Role of Theory and Anomaly in Social-Scientific Inference. American Political Science Review 89:467-70.
34. Rosecrance, Richard. 1986. The Rise of the Trading State: Commerce and Conquest in the Modern World. New York: Basic Books.
35. Russett, Bruce M. 1970. International Behavior Research: Case Studies and Cumulation. In Approaches to the Study of Political Science, ed. Michael Haas and Henry S. Kariel, 425-53. San Francisco: Chandler.
36. Skidmore-Hess, Thomas. 1996. Business Conflict and Theories of the State. In Business and the State in International Relations, ed. Ronald W. Cox, 199-216. Boulder: Westview Press.
37. Solingen, Etel. 1998. Regional Orders at Century's Dawn: Global and Domestic Influences on Grand Strategy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
38. Stein, Arthur A. 1993. Governments, Economic Interdependence, and International Cooperation. In Behavior, Society, and International Conflict, ed. Philip Tetlock, Jo Husbands, Robert Jervis, Paul Stern, and Charles Tilly, 241-324. New York: Oxford University Press, for the National Research Council of the National Academy of Sciences.
39. Tarrow, Sidney. 1995. Bridging the Quantitative-Qualitative Divide in Political Science. American Political Science Review 89:471-74.
40. Tetreault, Mary Ann. 1980. Measuring Interdependence. International Organization 34:429-43.
41. Uchitel, Anne. 1993. Interdependence and Instability. In Coping with Complexity in the International System, ed. Jack Snyder and Robert Jervis, 243-64. Boulder: Westview Press.
42. Van Evera, Stephen. 1997. A Guide to Methodology for Students of Political Science. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
43. Waltz, Kenneth N. 1970. The Myth of National Interdependence. In The International Corporation, ed. Charles P. Kindleberger, 205-23. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
44. Wendt, Alexander. 1992. Anarchy Is What States Make of It: The Social Construction of Power Politics. International Organization 46:391-426.
45. Yin, Robert K. 1989. Case Study Research: Design and Methods. Rev. ed. Beverly Hills: Sage.