Phylogenetics of New World Astragalus: Screening of novel nuclear loci for the reconstruction of phylogenies at low taxonomic levels

Brittonia

Volumn 57, Issue 4, 2005, Pages 354-366

  Scherson, Rosa A ^a   Choi, Hong Kyu ^a   Cook, Douglas R ^a   Sanderson, Michael J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Astragalus; Genomics; Medicago truncatula; Nuclear genes

Indexed keywords

MEDICAGO TRUNCATULA;

EID: 31144471749     PISSN: 0007196X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1663/0007-196X(2005)057[0354:PONWAS]2.0.CO;2     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Barneby, R. C. 1964. Atlas of North American Astragalus. Memoirs of The New York Botanical Gardens 13: 1-1188.
2. Bell, C. J., R. A. Dixon, A. D. Farmer, R. Flores, J. Inman, R. A. Gonzales, M. J. Harrison, N. L. Paiva, A. D. Scott, J. W. Weller & G. D. May. 2001. The Medicago Genome Initiative: a model legume database. Nucleic Acids Research 29: 114-117.
3. Bonnin, I., T. Huguet, M. Gherardi, J. M. Prosperi & I. Olivieri. 1996. High level of polymorphism and spatial structure in a selfing plant species, Medicago truncatula (Leguminosae), shown using RAPD markers. American Journal of Botany 83: 843-855.
4. Britt, A. B. & G. D. May. 2003. Re-engineering plant gene targeting. Trends in Plant Science 8: 90-95.
5. Brumfield, R. T., P. Beerli, D. A. Nickerson & S. V. Edwards. 2003. The utility of single nucleotide polymorphisms in inferences of population history. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 18: 249-256.
6. Choi, H. K., D. Kim, T. Uhm, E. Limpens, H. Lim, J. H. Mun, P. Kalo, R. V. Penmetsa, A. Seres, O. Kulikova, B. A. Roe, T. Bisseling, G. B. Kiss & D. R. Cook. 2004. A sequence-based genetic map of Medicago truncatula and comparison of marker colinearity with M. sativa. Genetics 166: 1463-1502.
7. Cook, D. R. 1999. Medicago truncatula - a model in the making! Commentary. Current Opinion in Plant Biology 2: 301-304.
8. Cunningham, C. W. 1997. Can three incongruence tests predict when data should be combined? Molecular Biology and Evolution 14: 733-740.
9. de Queiroz, A., M. J. Donoghue & J. Kim. 1995. Separate versus combined analysis of phylogenetic evidence. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 26: 657-681.
10. Doyle, J. J., J. L. Doyle & J. D. Palmer. 1995. Multiple independent losses of 2 genes and one intron from legume chloroplast genomes. Systematic Botany 20: 272-294.
11. Felsenstein, J. 1985. Confidence limits on phylogenies - an approach using the bootstrap. Evolution 39: 783-791.
12. _. 2003. Inferring phylogenies. Sinauer Associates, Inc., Sunderland, Massachusetts.
13. Ford, V. S. & L. D. Gottlieb. 2003. Reassessment of phylogenetic relationships in Clarkia sect. Sympherica. American Journal of Botany 90: 284-292.
14. Gene-Codes. 1991-2000. Sequencher. Gene Codes Corp., Ann Arbor, Michigan.
15. Gottlieb, L. D. & V. S. Ford. 1996. Phylogenetic relationships among the sections of Clarkia (Onagraceae) inferred from the nucleotide sequences of PgiC. Systematic Botany 21: 45-62.
16. Graham, S. W., P. A. Reeves, A. C. Burns & R. G. Olmstead. 2000. Microstructural changes in non-coding chloroplast DNA: interpretation, evolution, and utility of indels and inversions in basal angiosperm phylogenetic inference. International Journal of Plant Sciences 161(6 Suppl.): S83-S96.
17. Graur, D. & W-H Li. 2000. Fundamentals of molecular evolution. Sinauer Associates, Inc., Sunderland, Massachusetts.
18. Gugerli, F., C. Sperisen, U. Buchler, L. Brunner, S. Brodbeck, J. D. Palmer & Y. L. Qiu. 2001. The evolutionary split of Pinaceae from other conifers: evidence from an intron loss and a multigene phylogeny. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 21: 167-175.
19. Ingvarsson, P. K., S. Ribstein & D. R. Taylor. 2003. Molecular evolution of insertions and deletion in the chloroplast genome of Silene. Molecular Biology and Evolution 20: 1737-1740.
20. Kawakita, A., T. Sota, J. S. Ascher, M. Ito, H. Tanaka & M. Kato. 2003. Evolution and phylogenetic utility of alignment gaps within intron sequences of three nuclear genes in bumble bees (Bombus). Molecular Biology and Evolution 20: 87-92.
21. Lavin, M., J. J. Doyle & J. D. Palmer. 1990. Evolutionary significance of the loss of the chloroplast-DNA inverted repeat in the Leguminosae subfamily Papilionoideae. Evolution 44: 390-402.
22. Mathews, S. & M. J. Donoghue. 1999. The root of angiosperm phylogeny inferred from duplicate phytochrome genes. Science 286: 947-950.
23. _. 2000. Basal angiosperm phylogeny inferred from duplicate phytochromes A and C. International Journal of Plant Sciences 161: S41-S55.
24. Morin, P. A., G. Luikart & R. K. Wayne. 2004. SNPs in ecology, evolution and conservation. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 19: 208-216.
25. Nozaki, H., M. Matsuzaki, M. Takahara, O. Misumi, H. Kuroiwa, M. Hasegawa, T. Shin-i, Y. Kohara, N. Ogasawara & T. Kuroiwa. 2003. The phylogenetic position of red algae revealed by multiple nuclear genes from mitochondria-containing eukaryotes and an alternative hypothesis on the origin of plastids. Journal of Molecular Evolution 56: 485-497.
26. Pons, J., T. G. Barraclough, K. Theodorides, A. Cardoso & A. P. Vogler. 2004. Using exon and intron sequences of the gene Mp20 to resolve basal relationships in Cicindela (Coleoptera: Cicindelidae). Systematic Biology 53: 554-570.
27. Pryer, K. M., H. Schneider, A. R. Smith, R. Cranfill, P. G. Wolf, J. S. Hunt & S. D. Sipes. 2001. Horsetails and ferns are a monophyletic group and the closest living relatives to seed plants. Nature 409: 618-622.
28. Rambaut, A. 1996. Se-Al: sequence alignment editor. University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
29. Sanderson, M. J. 1991. Phylogenetic relationships within North American Astragalus L. (Fabaceae). Systematic Botany 16: 414-430.
30. _ & J. J. Doyle. 1993. Phylogenetic-relationships in North-American Astragalus (Fabaceae) based on chloroplast DNA restriction site variation. Systematic Botany 18: 395-408.
31. _ & M. F. Wojciechowski. 1996. Diversification rates in a temperate legume clade: are there "so many species" of Astragalus (Fabaceae)? American Journal of Botany 83: 1488-1502.
32. Simmons, M. P. & H. Ochoterena. 2000. Gaps as characters in sequence-based phylogenetic analyses. Systematic Biology 49: 369-381.
33. _, _ & T. G. Carr. 2001. Incorporation, relative homoplasy, and effect of gap characters in sequence-based phylogenetic analyses. Systematic Biology 50: 454-462.
34. Spellenberg, R. 1976. Chromosome-numbers and their cytotaxonomic significance for North-American Astragalus (Fabaceae). Taxon 25: 463-476.
35. Swofford, D. L. 2001. PAUP*. Phylogenetic analysis using parsimony. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland.
36. Wojciechowski, M. F., M. J. Sanderson, B. G. Baldwin & M. J. Donoghue. 1993. Monophyly of aneuploid Astragalus (Fabaceae) - Evidence from nuclear ribosomal DNA internal transcribed spacer sequences. American Journal of Botany 80: 711-722.
37. _, _ & J. M. Hu. 1999. Evidence on the monophyly of Astragalus (Fabaceae) and its major subgroups based on nuclear ribosomal DNA ITS and chloroplast DNA trnL intron data. Systematic Botany 24: 409-437.
38. _, M. Lavin & M. J. Sanderson. 2004. A phylogeny of legumes (Leguminosae) based on analyses of the plastid matK gene resolves many well-supported subclades within the family. American Journal of Botany 91: 1846-1862.