The scope of advance planning in written picture naming

Language and Cognitive Processes

Volumn 21, Issue 1-3, 2006, Pages 205-237

  Bonin, Patrick ^a   Malardier, Nathalie ^a   Méot, Alain ^a   Fayol, Michel ^a  

^a UNIVERSITÉ BLAISE PASCAL   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MALE; MULTIPLE REGRESSION; NORMAL HUMAN; PLANNING; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SEMANTICS; VERBAL COMMUNICATION; VISUAL STIMULATION; WRITING;

EID: 33745110995     PISSN: 01690965     EISSN: 14640732     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/01690960400002141     Document Type: Article

References (77)

1. Alario, X., & Ferrand, L. (1999). A set of 400 pictures standardized for French: Norms for name agreement, image agreement, familiarity, visual complexity, image variability, and age of acquisition. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, and Computers, 31, 531-552.
2. Alario, F.-X., Costa, A., & Caramazza, A. (2002). Frequency effects in noun phrase production: Implications for models of lexical access. Language and Cognitive Processes, 17, 299-319.
3. Bachoud-Lévi, A. C., Dupoux, E., Cohen, L., & Mehler, J. (1998). Where is the length effect? A cross-linguistic study of speech production. Journal of Memory and Language, 39, 331-346.
4. Barry, C., Hirsh, K. W., Johnston, R. A., & Williams, C. L. (2001). Age of acquisition, word frequency, and the locus of repetition priming of picture naming. Journal of Memory and Language, 44, 350-375.
5. Barry, C., Morrison, C. M., & Ellis, A. W. (1997). Naming the Snodgrass and Vanderwart pictures: Effects of age of acquisition, frequency, and name agreement. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Experimental Psychology, 50A, 560-585.
6. Bock, J. K., & Levelt, W. J. M. (1994). Language production: Grammatical encoding. In M. A. Gernsbacher (Ed.), Handbook of psycholinguistics (pp. 945-984). New York, NY: Academic Press.
7. Bonin, P. (2002). La dénomination écrite de mots à partir d'images [Written picture naming]. L'Année Psychologique, 102, 320-362.
8. Bonin, P. (2003). Production verbale de mots. Approche cognitive. [Word production: A cognitive approach]. Bruxelles: DeBoeck Université.
9. Bonin, P., Chalard, M., Méot, A., & Fayol, M. (2002). The determinants of spoken and written picture naming latencies. British Journal of Psychology, 93, 89-114.
10. Bonin, P., & Fayol, M. (2000). Writing words from pictures: What representations are activated and when? Memory and Cognition, 28, 677-689.
11. Bonin, P., Fayol, M., & Chalard, M. (2001). Age of acquisition and word frequency in written picture naming. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 54A, 469-489.
12. Bonin, P., Fayol, M., & Malardier, N. (2000). Writing two words from pictures: An interference paradigm study. Current Psychology Letters: Brain, Behavior and Cognition, 3, 43-58.
13. Bonin, P., Méot, A., & Boyer, B. (2003). Where are AoA effects in written picture naming? Some insights with the use of objective written AoA norms. In P. Bonin (Ed.), Mental lexicon. New York, NY: NovaScience publishers.
14. Bonin, P., Peereman, R., & Fayol, M. (2001). Do phonological codes constrain the selection of orthographic codes in written picture naming? Journal of Memory and Language, 45, 688-720.
15. Bonin, P., Peereman, R., Malardier, N., Méot, A., & Chalard, M. (2003). A set of 299 pictures for psycholinguistic studies: French norms for name agreement, image agreement, conceptual familiarity, visual complexity, image variability, age of acquisition, and naming latencies. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, and Computers, 35, 158-167.
16. Brysbaert, M., Van Wijnendaele, I., & De Deyne, S. (2000). Age-of-acquisition effects in semantic processing tasks. Acta Psychologica, 104, 215-226.
17. Caramazza, A. (1997). How many levels of processing are there in lexical access? Cognitive Neuropsychology, 14, 177-208.
18. Caramazza, A., & Costa, A. (2000). The semantic interference effect in the picture-word interference paradigm: Does the response set matter? Cognition, 75, B51-B64.
19. Caramazza, A., & Miozzo, M. (1997). The relation between syntactic and phonological knowledge in lexical access: Evidence from the "tip-of-the-tongue" phenomenon. Cognition, 64, 309-343.
20. Caramazza, A., & Miozzo, M. (1998). More is not always better: A response to Roelofs, Meyer, and Levelt. Cognition, 69, 231-241.
21. Carroll, J. B., & White, M. N. (1973). Word frequency and age of acquisition as determiners of picture-naming latency. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 25, 85-95.
22. Chalard, M., Bonin, P., Méot, A., Boyer, B., & Fayol, M. (2003). Objective age-of-acquisition (AoA) norms for a set of 230 object names in French: Relationships with other variables used in psycholinguistic experiments (rated AoA, name agreement, image agreement, etc.), the English data from Morrison et al. (1997) and naming latencies. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 15, 209-245.
23. Cohen, J., MacWhinney, B., Flatt, M., & Provost, J. (1993). PsyScope: An interactive graphic system for designing and controlling experiments in the psychology laboratory using Macintosh computers. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, and Computers, 25, 257-271.
24. Cycowicz, Y. M., Friedman, D., Rothstein, M., & Snodgrass, J. G. (1997). Picture naming by young children: Norms for name agreement, familiarity, and visual complexity. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 65, 171-237.
25. Dell, G. S., & O'Seaghdha, P. G. (1992). Stages of lexical access in language production. Cognition, 42, 287-314.
26. Dell, G. S., Schwartz, M. F., Martin, N., Saffran, E. M., & Gagnon, D. A. (1997). Lexical access in aphasic and non aphasic speakers. Psychological Review, 104, 801-838.
27. De Moor, W., Ghyselinck, M., & Brysbaert, M. (2000). A validation study of the age-of-acquisition norms collected by Ghyselinck, De Moor, & Brysbaert. Psychologica Belgica, 40, 99-114.
28. Ellis, A. W. (1988). Normal writing processes and peripherical acquired dysgraphias. Language and Cognitive Processes, 3, 99-127.
29. Ellis, A. W., & Morrison, C. M. (1998). Real age-of-acquisition effects in lexical retrieval. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 24, 515-523.
30. Gilhooly, K. J., & Gilhooly, M. L. (1979). Age-of-acquisition effects in lexical and episodic memory tasks. Memory and Cognition, 7, 214-223.
31. Gilhooly, K. J., & Gilhooly, M. L. M. (1980). The validity of age-of-acquisition ratings. British Journal of Psychology, 71, 105-110.
32. Gilhooly, K. J., & Logie, R. H. (1980). Age-of acquisition, imagery, concreteness, familiarity, and ambiguity measures for 1,944 words. Behavior Research Methods and Instrumentation, 12, 395-427.
33. Griffin, Z. M. (2001). Gaze durations during speech reflect word selection and phonological encoding. Cognition, 82, B1-B14.
34. Griffin, Z. M., & Bock, K. (1998). Constraint, word frequency, and the relationship between lexical processing levels in spoken word production. Journal of Memory and Language, 38, 313-338.
35. Hillis, A. E., Rapp, B. C., & Caramazza, A. (1999). When a rose is a rose in speech but a tulip in writing. Cortex, 35, 337-356.
36. Hillis, A. E., Rapp, B., Romani, C., & Caramazza, A. (1990). Selective impairment of semantics in lexical processing. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 7, 191-243.
37. Humphreys, G. W., Riddoch, M. J., & Quinlan, P. T. (1988). Cascade processes in picture identification. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 5, 67-103.
38. Humphreys, G. W., Lamote, C., & Lloyd-Jones, T. J. (1995). An interactive activation approach to object processing: Effects of structural similarity, name frequency, and task in normality and pathology. Memory, 3, 535-586.
39. Izura, C., & Ellis, A. W. (2002). Age of acquisition effects in word recognition and production in first and second languages. Psicologica, 23, 245-281.
40. Jescheniak, J. D., & Levelt, W. J. M. (1994). Word frequency effects in speech production: Retrieval of syntactic information and of phonological forms. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 20, 824-843.
41. Jolicoeur, P. (1985). The time to name disoriented natural objects. Memory and Cognition, 13, 289-303.
42. Lachman, R. (1973). Uncertainty effects on time to access the internal lexicon. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 99, 199-208.
43. Lachman, R., Schaffer, J. P., & Henrikus, D. (1974). Language and cognition: Effects of stimulus codability, name-word frequency, and age-of-acquisition on lexical reaction time. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 13, 613-625.
44. Lété, B., Sprenger-Charolles, L., & Colé, P. (2004). MANULEX: A Grade-Level Lexical Database from French Elementary-School Readers. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, and Computers, 36, 156-166.
45. Levelt, W. J. M. (1989). Speaking: From intention to articulation. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
46. Levelt, W. J. M. (1999). Models of word production. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 3, 223-232.
47. Levelt, W. J. M. (2000). Producing spoken language: A blueprint of the speaker. In C. M. Brown & P. Hagoort (Eds.), The neurocognition of language (pp. 83-122). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
48. Levelt, W. J. M., & Meyer, A. S. (2000). Word for word: Multiple access in speech production. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 12, 433-452.
49. Levelt, W. J. M., Roelofs, A., & Meyer, A. S. (1999). A theory of lexical access in speech production. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 22, 1-75.
50. Meyer, A. S. (1996). Lexical access in phrase and sentence production: Results from picture-word interference experiments. Journal of Memory and Language, 35, 477-496.
51. Meyer, A. S. (1997). Conceptual influences on grammatical planning units. Language and Cognitive Processes, 12, 859-863.
52. Meyer, A. S., Roelofs, A., & Levelt, W. J. M. (2003). Word length effects in object naming: The role of a response criterion. Journal of Memory and Language, 48, 131-147.
53. Meyer, A. S., Sleiderink, A., & Levelt, W. J. M. (1998). Viewing and naming objects: Eye movements during noun phrase production. Cognition, 66, B25-B33.
54. Meyer, A. S., & van der Meulen, F. F. (2000). Phonological priming effects on speech onset latencies and viewing times in object naming. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 7, 314-319.
55. Miceli, G., Capasso, R., & Caramazza, A. (1999). Sublexical conversion procedures and the interaction of phonological and orthographic lexical forms. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 16, 557-572.
56. Morrison, C. M., Ellis, A. W., & Quinlan, P. T. (1992). Age of acquisition, not word frequency, affects object naming, not object recognition. Memory and Cognition, 20, 705-714.
57. Morrison, C. M., Hirsh, K. W., Chappell, T., & Ellis, A. W. (2002). Age and age of acquisition: An evaluation of the cumulative frequency hypothesis. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 14, 435-459.
58. New, B., Pallier, C., Ferrand, L., & Matos, R. (2001). Une base de données lexicales du français contemporain sur internet: LEXIQUE. L'Année Psychologique, 101, 447-462.
59. Oldfield, R. C., & Wingfield, A. (1964). The time it takes to name an object. Nature, 6, 1031-1032.
60. Oldfield, R. C., & Wingfield, A. (1965). Response latencies in naming objects. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 17, 273-281.
61. Pickering, M., & Branigan, H. (1998). The representation of verbs: Evidence from syntactic priming in language production Journal of Memory and Language, 39, 633-651.
62. Rapp, B., & Caramazza, A. (1997). From graphemes to abstract letter shapes: Levels of representation in written spelling. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 23, 1130-1152.
63. Roelofs, A. (2000). WEAVER ++ and other computational models of lemma retrieval and word-form encoding. In L. Wheeldon (Ed.), Aspects of speech production (pp. 71-114). Hove, UK: Psychology Press.
64. Roelofs, A., Meyer, A. S., & Levelt, W. J. M. (1998). A case for the lemma/lexeme distinction in models of speaking: Comment on Caramazza and Miozzo (1997). Cognition, 69, 219-230.
65. Sanfeliu, M. C., & Fernandez, A. (1996). A set of 254 Snodgrass-Vanderwart pictures standardized for Spanish: Norms for name agreement, image agreement, familiarity, and visual complexity. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, and Computers, 28, 537-555.
66. Schriefers, H., & Teruel, E. (1999). Phonological facilitation in the production of two-word utterances. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 11, 17-50.
67. Schriefers, H., Meyer, A. S., & Levelt, W. J. M. (1990). Exploring the time-course of lexical access in language production: Picture-word interference studies. Journal of Memory and Language, 29, 86-102.
68. Snodgrass, J. C., & Vanderwart, M. (1980). A standardized set of 260 pictures: Norms for name agreement, image agreement, familiarity, and visual complexity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 6, 174-215.
69. Snodgrass, J. G., & Yuditsky, T. (1996). Naming times for the Snodgrass and Vanderwart pictures. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, and Computers, 28, 516-536.
70. Starreveld, P. A., & La Heij, W. (1995). Semantic interference, orthographic facilitation and their interaction in naming tasks. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 21, 686-698.
71. Starreveld, P. A., & La Heij, W. (1996). The locus of orthographic-phonological facilitation: Reply to Roelofs, Meyer, and Levelt (1996). Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 22, 1-4.
72. Tainturier, M. J., & Caramazza, A. (1996). The status of double letters in graphemic representations. Journal of Memory and Language, 35, 53-73.
73. Van Orden, G. C., Johnston, J. C., & Hale, B. L. (1988). Word identification in reading proceeds from spelling to sound to meaning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 14, 371-386.
74. Vitkovitch, M., & Tyrrell, L. (1995). Sources of disagreement in object naming. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 48A, 822-848.
75. Zeno, S. (Ed.) (1995). The educator's word frequency guide. Brewster, NJ: Touchstone Applied Science Associates.
76. Zevin, J. D., & Seidenberg, M. S. (2002). Age of acquisition effects in word reading and other tasks. Journal of Memory and Language, 47, 1-29.
77. Zesiger, P., Orliaget, J. P., Boë, L. J., & Mounoud, P. (1994). The influence of syllabic structure in handwriting and typing production. In C. Faure, P. Keuss, G. Lurette, & A. Vinter (Eds.), Advances in handwriting: A multidisciplinary approach. Paris: Europia.