How we interact with objects: learning from brain lesions

Trends in Cognitive Sciences

Volumn 10, Issue 6, 2006, Pages 265-270

  Daprati, Elena ^a   Sirigu, Angela ^b  

^a IRCCS FONDAZIONE SANTA LUCIA   (Italy)

^b CNRS   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

LEARNING SYSTEMS; MOTORS; SEMANTICS; TUMORS;

MODULAR ORGANIZATION; MOTOR IMPAIRMENTS; OBJECT INTERACTION; SEMANTIC FEATURES;

BRAIN;

AGNOSIA; APRAXIA; ATAXIA; BRAIN DAMAGE; BRAIN FUNCTION; EYE HAND COORDINATION; GRIP STRENGTH; HUMAN; MOTOR COORDINATION; MOTOR DYSFUNCTION; NEUROPSYCHOLOGY; PARIETAL LOBE; PROPRIOCEPTION; REVIEW; SEMANTICS; TASK PERFORMANCE; TEMPORAL LOBE; VISUAL STIMULATION; VISUOMOTOR COORDINATION;

BRAIN INJURIES; HAND; HAND STRENGTH; HUMANS; LEARNING; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE;

EID: 33744936597     PISSN: 13646613     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.tics.2006.04.005     Document Type: Review

References (66)

1. Castiello U. The neuroscience of grasping. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 6 (2005) 726-736
2. Johnson-Frey S.H. The neural bases of complex tool use in humans. Trends Cogn. Sci. 8 (2004) 71-78
3. Battaglia-Mayer A., and Caminiti R. Optic ataxia as a result of the breakdown of the global tuning fields of parietal neurons. Brain 125 (2002) 225-237
4. Jeannerod M., et al. Impairment of grasping movements following a bilateral posterior parietal lesion. Neuropsychologia 32 (1994) 369-380
5. Pisella L., et al. An 'automatic pilot' for the hand in human posterior parietal cortex: toward reinterpreting optic ataxia. Nat. Neurosci. 3 (2000) 729-736
6. Rossetti Y., et al. Optic ataxia revisited: visually guided action versus immediate visuomotor control. Exp. Brain Res. 153 (2003) 171-179
7. Timsit S., et al. Evolving isolated hand palsy: a parietal lobe syndrome associated with carotid artery disease. Brain 120 (1997) 2251-2257
8. Goodale M.A., and Westwood D.A. An evolving view of duplex vision: separate but interacting cortical pathways for perception and action. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 14 (2004) 203-211
9. Milner A.D., et al. Perception and action in visual form agnosia. Brain 114 (1991) 405-428
10. Milner A.D., et al. A paradoxical improvement of misreaching in optic ataxia: new evidence for two separate neural systems for visual localization. Proc Biol Sci. 266 (1999) 2225-2229
11. Milner A.D., et al. Grasping the past. Delay can improve visuomotor performance. Curr. Biol. 11 (2001) 1896-1901
12. Goodale M.A., et al. Separate neural pathways for the visual analysis of object shape in perception and prehension. Curr. Biol. 4 (1994) 604-610
13. Milner A.D., and Goodale M.A. The Visual Brain in Action (1995), Oxford University Press
14. Ungerleider L., and Mishkin M. Two cortical visual systems. In: Ingle D.J., Goodale M.A., and Mansfield R.J.W. (Eds). Analysis of Visual Behaviour (1982), MIT Press 549-586
15. Jeannerod M. The representing brain: neural correlates of motor intention and imagery. Behav. Brain Sci. 17 (1994) 187-245
16. Dassonville P. The induced Roelofs effect: two visual systems or the shift. Vision Res. 44 (2004) 603-611
17. Dassonville P., and Bala J.K. Perception, action, and Roelofs effect: A mere illusion of dissociation. PLoS Biol. 2 (2004) e364
18. Catani C., and ffytche D.H. The rises and falls of disconnection syndromes. Brain 128 (2005) 2224-2239
19. Catani C., Jones D.K., and ffytche D.H. Perisylvian language networks of the human brain. Ann. Neurol. 57 (2005) 8-16
20. Distler C., et al. Cortical connections of inferior temporal area TEO in macaque monkeys. J. Comp. Neurol. 334 (1993) 125-150
21. Webster M.J., et al. Connections of inferior temporal areas TEO and TE with parietal and frontal cortex in macaque monkeys. Cereb. Cortex 4 (1994) 470-483
22. Rizzolatti G., and Matelli M. Two different streams form the dorsal visual system: anatomy and functions. Exp. Brain Res. 153 (2003) 146-157
23. Rizzolatti G., and Luppino G. The cortical motor system. Neuron 31 (2001) 889-901
24. Sirigu A., et al. A selective impairment of hand posture for object utilization in apraxia. Cortex 31 (1995) 41-56
25. Sirigu A., et al. How the human brain represents manual gestures: effects of brain damage. In: Johnson S.H. (Ed). Cognitive Neuroscience Perspectives on the Problem of Intentional Action (2003), MIT Press
26. Goldenberg G. Apraxia and beyond: Life and work of Hugo Liepmann. Cortex 39 (2003) 509-524
27. Koski L., et al. Deconstructing apraxia: understanding disorders of intentional movements after stroke. Curr. Opin. Neurol. 15 (2002) 71-77
28. Heilman K.M., et al. Two forms of ideo-motor apraxia. Neurology 32 (1982) 342-346
29. De Renzi E., et al. Modality-specific and supramodal mechanisms of apraxia. Brain 105 (1982) 301-312
30. De Renzi E., and Luchelli F. Ideational apraxia. Brain 111 (1988) 1173-1185
31. Buxbaum L.J., et al. Cognitive representations of hand posture in ideomotor apraxia. Neuropsychologia 41 (2003) 1091-1113
32. Goldenberg G., and Hagmann S. Tool use and mechanical problem solving in apraxia. Neuropsychologia 36 (1998) 581-589
33. Hartmann K., et al. It takes the whole brain to make a cup of coffee: the neuropsychology of naturalistic actions involving technical devices. Neuropsychologia 43 (2005) 625-637
34. Rumiati R., et al. Neural basis of pantomiming the use of visually presented objects. Neuroimage 21 (2004) 1224-1231
35. Hodges J.R., et al. The role of conceptual knowledge in object use. Evidence from semantic dementia. Brain 123 (2000) 1913-1925
36. Spatt J., et al. Apraxia mechanical problem solving and semantic knowledge contributions to object usage in corticobasal degeneration. J. Neurol. 249 (2002) 601-608
37. Eimer M., et al. S-R compatibility and response selection. Acta Psychol. (Amst.) 90 (1995) 301-313
38. Tucker M., and Ellis R. On the relations between seen objects and components of actions. J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. 24 (1998) 830-846
39. Cooper R., and Shallice T. Contention scheduling and the control of routine activities. Cogn. Neuropsychol. 17 (2000) 297-338
40. Craighero L., et al. Visuomotor priming. Vis. Cogn. 5 (1998) 109-125
41. Kellenbach M.L., et al. Actions speak louder than functions: the importance of manipulability and action in tool representation. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 15 (2003) 30-45
42. Rumiati R.I., and Humphrey G.W. Recognition by action: dissociating visual and semantic routes to action in normal observers. J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. 24 (1998) 631-647
43. Rumiati R.I., et al. A form of ideational apraxia as a selective deficit of contention scheduling. Cogn. Neuropsychol. 18 (2001) 617-642
44. Buxbaum L.J., et al. The role of semantic memory in object use. Cogn. Neuropsychol. 14 (1997) 219-254
45. Riddoch M.J., et al. Dissociations between object knowledge and everyday action. Neurocase 8 (2002) 100-110
46. Sirigu A., et al. The role of sensorimotor experience in object recognition. A case of multimodal agnosia. Brain 114 (1991) 2555-2573
47. Lauro-Grotto R., et al. Modality-specific operations in semantic dementia. Cortex 33 (1997) 593-622
48. Hodges J.R., et al. "What" and "how": Evidence for the dissociation of object knowledge and mechanical problem-solving skills in the human brain. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 96 (1999) 9444-9448
49. Dunn J.C., and Kirsner K. What can we infer from double dissociations?. Cortex 39 (2003) 1-7
50. Cubelli R. Defining dissociations. Cortex 39 (2003) 211-214
51. Heilman K.M. Case reports and case studies: An endangered species. Cogn. Behav. Neurol. 17 (2004) 121-123
52. Van Orden G.C., et al. What do double dissociations prove?. Cogn. Sci. 25 (2001) 111-172
53. Marshall J.C., and Fink G.R. Cerebral localization, then and now. Neuroimage 20 (2003) S2-S7
54. Shallice T. Functional imaging and neuropsychology findings: how can they be linked?. Neuroimage 20 (2003) S146-S154
55. Goldenberg G., and Strauss S. Hemisphere asymmetries for imitation of novel gestures. Neurology 59 (2002) 893-897
56. Rumiati R.I. Right, left or both? Brain hemispheres and apraxia of naturalistic actions. Trends Cogn. Sci. 9 (2005) 167-169
57. Sirigu A., et al. Perception of self-generated movement following left parietal lesion. Brain 122 (1999) 1867-1874
58. Daprati, E. et al. (1997) Looking for the agent: an investigation into consciousness of action and self-consciousness in schizophrenic patients
59. Rushworth, M.F.S. et al. (2003) The left parietal and premotor cortices: motor attention and selection. Neuroimage 20, S89-100
60. Rushworth M.F.S., et al. Complementary localization and lateralization of orienting and motor attention. Nat. Neurosci. 4 (2001) 656-661
61. Castiello U., and Paine M. Effects of parietal injury on covert orienting of attention. J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry 72 (2002) 73-76
62. Haaland K.Y., et al. Neural representations of skilled movement. Brain 123 (2000) 2306-2313
63. Goldenberg G. Imitation and matching of hand and finger postures. Neuroimage 14 (2001) S132-S136
64. Hermsdorfer J., and Goldenberg G. Ipsilesional deficits during fast diadochokinetic hand movements following unilateral brain damage. Neuropsychologia 40 (2002) 2100-2115
65. Sirigu A., et al. The mental representation of hand movements after parietal cortex damage. Science 273 (1996) 1564-1568
66. Jeannerod M., and Frak V. Mental imaging of motor activity in humans. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 9 (1999) 735-739