Two invaders achieve higher densities in reserves

Aquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems

Volumn 16, Issue 3, 2006, Pages 301-311

  Klinger, Terrie ^a   Padilla, Dianna K ^b   Britton Simmons, Kevin ^c,d  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON   (United States)

^b STONY BROOK UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON   (United States)

Author keywords

Biological invasion; Crassostrea; Exotic species; Marine reserves; Sargassum

Indexed keywords

ABUNDANCE; BIODIVERSITY; BIOLOGICAL INVASION; INVASIVE SPECIES; MARINE PARK; SEAWEED; SHELLFISH;

NORTH AMERICA; UNITED STATES; WASHINGTON [UNITED STATES];

CRASSOSTREA; OSTREIDAE; SARGASSUM;

EID: 33744829231     PISSN: 10527613     EISSN: 10990755     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/aqc.717     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Allison GW, Lubchenco J, Carr MH. 1998. Marine reserves are necessary but not sufficient for marine conservation. Ecological Applications 8: S79-S92.
2. Britton-Simmons KH. 2003. Establishment, spread, and impact of the introduced Japanese seaweed, Sargassum muticum, in the San Juan Islands, Washington. PhD thesis, University of Chicago.
3. Britton-Simmons KH. 2004. Direct and indirect effects of the introduced alga Sargassum muticum on benthic, subtidal communities of Washington State, USA. Marine Ecology Progress Series 277: 61-78.
4. Byers JE. 2002. Physical habitat attribute mediates biotic resistance to non-indigenous species invasion. Oecologia 130: 146-156.
5. Byers JE. 2005. Marine reserves enhance abundance but not competitive impacts of a harvested nonindigenous species. Ecology 86(2): 487-500.
6. D'Antonio CM, Jackson NE, Horvitz CC, Hedberg R. 2004. Invasive plants in wildland ecosystems: merging the study of invasion processes with management needs. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 10: 513-521.
7. Dukes JS, Mooney HA. 1999. Does global change increase the success of biological invaders? Trends in Ecology and Evolution 14: 135-139.
8. Dunstan PK, Johnson CR. 2004. Invasion rates increase with species richness in a marine epibenthic community by two mechanisms. Oecologia 138: 285-292.
9. Gaines SD, Gaylord B, Largier JL. 2003. Avoiding current oversights in marine reserve design. Ecological Applications 13: S32-S46.
10. Gordon DG, Blanton NE, Nosho TY. 2001. Heaven on the half shell: the story of the Northwest's love affair with the oyster. Washington Sea Grant Program, Seattle.
11. Hall RO, Tank JL, Dybdahl MF. 2003. Exotic snails dominate nitrogen and carbon cycling in a highly productive stream. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 1: 407-411.
12. Kennedy TA, Naeem S, Howe KM, Knops JMH, Tilman D, Reich P. 2002. Biodiversity as a barrier to ecological invasion. Nature 417: 636-638.
13. Lawson J, Davenport J, Whitaker A. 2004. Barnacle distribution in Lough Hyne Marine Nature Reserve: a new baseline and an account of invasion by the introduced Australasian species Elminius modestus Darwin. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science 60: 729-735.
14. Levin PS, Coyer JA, Petrik R, Good T. 2002. Community-wide effects on non-indigenous species on temperate rocky reefs. Ecology 83. 3182-3193.
15. Levine JM. 2000. Species diversity and biological invasions: relating local process to community pattern. Science 288: 852-854.
16. Levine JM, D'Antonio C. 1999. Elton revisited: a review of evidence linking diversity and invasibility. Oikos 87: 15-26.
17. Lonsdale WM. 1999. Global patterns of plant invasions and the concept of invasibility. Ecology 80: 1522-1536.
18. Louda SM, Kendall D, Connor J, Simberloff D. 1997. Ecological effects of an insect introduced for the biological control of weeds. Science 277: 1088-1090.
19. MacDonald IA, Loope LL, Usher MB, Hamann O. 1989. Wildlife conservation and the invasion of nature reserves by introduced species: a global perspective. In: Biological Invasions: A Global Perspective, Drake JA, Mooney HA, diCastri F, Groves RH, Kruger FJ, Rejmanek M, Williams M (eds). John Wiley: New York; 215-255.
20. Mack M, D'Antonio C. 1998. Impacts of biological invasions on disturbance regimes. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 13: 195-198.
21. Mack M, Simberloff D, Lonsdale W, Evans H, Clout M, Bazzaz F. 2000. Biotic invasions: causes, epidemiology, global consequences, and control. Ecological Applications 10: 689-710.
22. Murray MR. 1998. The status of marine protected areas in Puget Sound, Vol. II: MPA site profiles and appendices. Puget Sound/Georgia Basin Environmental Report Series, number 10, Puget Sound Water Quality Action Team, US EPA, Region 10, Olympia, WA.
23. Naeem S, Knops JMH, Tilman D, Howe KM, Kennedy T, Gale S. 2000. Plant diversity increases resistance to invasion in the absence of covarying extrinsic factors. Oikos 91: 97-108.
24. Orensanz JM, Schwindt E, Pastorino G, Bortolus A, Casas G, Darrigran G, Elías R, López Gappa JJ, Obenat S, Pascual M, Penchaszadeh P, Luz Piriz M, Scarabino F, Spivak ED, Vallarino EA. 2002. No longer the pristine confines of the world ocean: a survey of exotic marine species in the southwestern Atlantic. Biological Invasions 4: 115-143.
25. Perrings C, Williamson M, Barbier E, Edward B, Delfino D, Dalmazzone S, Shogren J, Simmons P, Watkinson A. 2002. Biological invasion risks and the public good: an economic perspective. Conservation Ecology 6(1): 1. http://www.consecol.org/vo16/iss1/art1/
26. Richter BD, Braun DP, Mendelson MA, Master LL. 1997. Threats to imperiled freshwater fauna. Conservation Biology 11: 1081-1093.
27. Roberts CM. 1997. Connectivity and management of Caribbean coral reefs. Science 278: 1454-1457.
28. Roberts CM, Andelman S, Branch G, Bustamante RH, Castilla JC, Dugan J, Halpern BS, Lafferty KD, Leslie H, Lubchenco J, McArdle D, Possingham HP, Ruckelshaus M, Warner RR. 2003. Ecological criteria for evaluating candidate sites for marine reserves. Ecological Applications 113: S199-S214.
29. Scagel RF. 1956. Introduction of a Japanese alga, Sargassum muticum, into the Northeast Pacific. Washington Department of Fisheries, Fisheries Research Papers 1; 1-10.
30. Simberloff D. 2001. Biological invasions: How are they affecting us, and what can we do about them? Western North American Naturalist 61: 308-315.
31. Stachowicz JJ, Whitlatch RB, Osman RW. 1999. Species diversity and invasion resistance in a marine ecosystem. Science 286: 1577-1579.
32. Stachowicz JJ, Fried H, Osman RW, Whitlatch RB. 2002. Biodiversity, invasion resistance, and marine ecosystem function: reconciling pattern and process. Ecology 83: 2575-2590.
33. Stohlgren TJ, Binkley D, Chong GW, Kalkhan MA, Schell LD, Bull KA, Otsuki Y, Newman G, Bashkin M, Son Y. 1999. Exotic plant species invade hotspots of native diversity. Ecological Monographs 69: 25-46.
34. Stohlgren TJ, Chong GW, Schell LD, Rimar KA, Otsuki Y, Lee M, Kalkhan MA, Villa CA. 2002. Assessing vulnerability to invasion by non-native plant species at multiple scales. Environmental Management 29: 566-577.
35. Stohlgren TJ, Barnett DT, Kartesz JT. 2003. The rich get richer: patterns of plant invasion in the United States. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 1: 11-14.
36. Usher MB. 1988. Biological invasions of nature reserves: a search for generalizations. Biological Conservation 44: 119-135.
37. Vitousek PM, D'Antonio CM, Loope LL, Westbrooks R. 1996. Biological invasions as global environmental change. American Scientist 84: 468-478.
38. Vitousek PM, D'Antonio CM, Loope LL, Rejmanek M, Westbrooks R. 1997. Introduced species: a significant component of human-caused global change. New Zealand Journal of Ecology 21: 1-16.
39. Westman WE. 1990. Park management of exotic plant species: problems and issues. Conservation Biology 4: 251-260.
40. Wilcove DS, Rothstein D, Dubow J, Phillips A, Losos E. 1998. Quantifying threats to imperiled species in the United States. BioScience 48: 607-615.
41. Wilson EO. 1992. The Diversity of Life. Belknap Press: Cambridge, MA.