Analyzing large-scale structural change in proteins: Comparison of principal component projection and Sammon mapping

Proteins: Structure, Function and Genetics

Volumn 64, Issue 1, 2006, Pages 210-218

  Mesentean, Sidonia ^a   Fischer, Stefan ^a   Smith, Jeremy C ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF HEIDELBERG   (Germany)

Author keywords

Conformational change; Dimensionality reduction techniques; Protein flexibility

Indexed keywords

BACTERIAL ENZYME; NUCLEASE; PROTEIN P21; RAS PROTEIN;

ANALYTIC METHOD; ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONFORMATIONAL TRANSITION; MACROMOLECULE; MOLECULAR DYNAMICS; PRINCIPAL COMPONENT ANALYSIS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN ANALYSIS; PROTEIN FOLDING; PROTEIN QUATERNARY STRUCTURE; PROTEIN STRUCTURE; REDUCTION; SAMMON MAPPING; SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION; STAPHYLOCOCCUS; STRUCTURE ANALYSIS; TECHNIQUE;

AMINO ACID SUBSTITUTION; HEMOGLOBINS; MODELS, MOLECULAR; MODELS, THEORETICAL; PEPTIDE MAPPING; PROTEIN CONFORMATION; PROTEINS;

EID: 33744814656     PISSN: 08873585     EISSN: 10970134     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/prot.20981     Document Type: Article

References (63)

1. Gerstein M, Lesk A, Chothia C. Structural mechanisms for domain movements in proteins. Biochemistry 1994;33(22):6739-6749.
2. Hayward S, Kitao A, Go N. Harmonic and anharmonic aspects in the dynamics of BPTI: a normal mode analysis and principal component analysis. Protein Sci 1994;3:936-943.
3. Amadei A, Linssen ABM, Berendsen HJC. Essential dynamics of proteins. Proteins 1993;17(3):412-425.
4. Hayward S, Kitao A, Hirata F, Go N. Effect of solvent of collective motions in globular protein. J Mol Biol 1993;234:1204-1217.
5. Tournier A, Smith JC. Principal components of the protein dynamical transition. Phys Rev Lett 2003;91(20):208106.
6. Agrafiotis DK. A new method for analyzing protein sequence relationships based on Sammon maps. Protein Sci 1997;6(2):287-293.
7. Apostol I, Szpankowski W. Indexing and mapping of proteins using a modified nonlinear Sammon projection. J Comp Chem 1999;20(10):1049-1059.
8. Ewing RM, Cherry JM. Visualization of expression clusters using Sammon's non-linear mapping. Bioinformatics 2001;17:658-659.
9. Karpen ME, Tobias DJ, Brooks CL. Statistical clustering techniques for the analysis of long molecular dynamics trajectories: analysis of 2.2-ns trajectories of YPGDV. Biochemistry 1993;32:412-420.
10. Duan J, Nilsson L. Thermal unfolding simulations of a multimeric protein-transition state and unfolding pathways. Proteins 2005;59:170-182.
11. Fischer S, Karplus M. Conjugate peak refinement: an algorithm for finding reaction paths and accurate transition states in systems with many degrees of freedom. Chem Phys Lett 1992;194:252-261.
12. Olsen K, Fischer S, Karplus M. A continuous path for the T→R allosteric transition of hemoglobin. Biophys J 2000;78:394A.
13. Noe F, Ille F, Smith JC, Fischer S. Automated computation of low-energy pathways for complex rearrangements in proteins: application to the conformational switch of Ras p21. Proteins 2005;59:534-544.
14. Fischer S, Windshuegel B, Horak D, Holmes KC, Smith JC. Structural mechanism of the recovery stroke in the myosin molecular motor. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2005;102(19):6873-6878.
15. Pearson K. On lines and planes of closest fit to systems of points in space. London, Edinburgh and Dublin Philos Mag J Sci 1901;2:572.
16. Hotelling H. Analysis of a complex of statistical variables into principal components. J Educ Psychol 1933;24:417-441, 498-520.
17. Fersht AR. Nucleation mechanisms in protein folding. Curr Opin Struct Biol 1997;7:3-9.
18. Garcia ANE. Large-amplitude nonlinear motions in proteins. Phys Rev Lett 1992;68:2696-2699.
19. Becker OM. Quantitative visualization of a macromolecular potential energy funnel. J Mol Struct (THEOCHEM) 1997;398-399:507-516.
20. Karplus M, Kushick JN. Method for estimating the configurational entropy of macromolecules. Macromolecules 1981;14:325-332.
21. Perahia D, Levy RM, Karplus M. Motions of an alpha-helical polypeptide: comparison of molecular and harmonic dynamics. Biopolymers 1990;29:645-677.
22. Ichiye T, Karplus M. Collective motions in proteins: a covariance analysis of atomic fluctuations in molecular dynamics and normal mode simulations. Proteins 1991;11:205-217.
23. De Groot BL, Van Aalten DMF, Amadei A, Berendsen HJC. The consistency of large concerted motions in proteins in molecular dynamics simulations. Biophys J 1996;71(4):1707-1713.
24. Hayward S, Kitao A, Berendsen HJC. Model-free methods of analyzing domain motions in proteins from simulations: a comparison of normal mode analysis and molecular dynamics simulation of lysozyme. Proteins 1997;24:425-437.
25. Caves LS, Evanseck JD, Karplus M. Locally accessible conformations of proteins: multiple molecular dynamics simulations of crambin. Protein Sci 1998;7(3):649-666.
26. Kidera A, Go N. Refinement of protein dynamic structure: normal mode refinement. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1990;87:3718-3722.
27. Mizuguchi K, Kidera A, Go N. Collective motions in proteins investigated by X-ray diffuse scattering. Proteins 1994;18:34-48.
28. Abseher R, Nilges M. Are there non-trivial dynamic cross-correlations in proteins? J Mol Biol 1998;279:911-920.
29. Van Aalten DMF, Findlay JBC, Amadei A, Berendsen HJC. Essential dynamics of the cellular retinol binding protein: evidence for ligand induced conformational changes. Protein Eng 1995;8:1129-1136.
30. Van Aalten DMF, De Groot BL, Berendsen HJC, Findlay JBC, Amadei A. A comparison of techniques for calculating protein essential dynamics. J Comp Chem 1997;18:169-181.
31. Sammon JW Jr. A nonlinear mapping for data structure analysis. IEEE Trans Comput 1969;C-18:401-409.
32. Pekalska E, de Ridder D, Duin RPW, Kraaijveld MA. A new method of generalizing Sammon mapping with application to algorithm speed-up. Annual Conference of the Advanced School for Computing and Imaging 1999:221-228.
33. Barlow TW, Richards WG. A novel representation of protein structure. J Mol Graph 1995;13:373-376.
34. Fisher AJ, Smith CA, Thoden J, et al. X-ray structures of the myosin motor domain of Dictyostelium discoideum complexed with MgADP.cntdot.BeFx and MgADP.cntdot.AlF4-. Biochemistry 1995;34(28):8960-8972.
35. .vanadate complex of the Dictyostelium discoideum myosin motor domain to 1.9 Å resolution. Biochemistry 1996;35(17):5404- 5417.
36. Lymn RW, Taylor EW. Mechanism of adenosine triphosphate hydrolysis by actomyosin. Biochemistry 1971;10(25):4617-4624.
37. Geeves MA, Holmes KC. Structural mechanism of muscle contraction. Annu Rev Biochem 1999;68:687-728.
38. Baldwin J, Chothia C. Hemoglobin: the structural changes related to ligand binding and its allosteric mechanism. J Mol Biol 1979;129:175-220.
39. Hayward S, Berendsen HJC. Systematic analysis of domain motions in proteins from conformational change: new results on citrate synthase and T4 lysozyme. Proteins 1998;30:144-154.
40. Zhou B, Jing GZ. Conformational features of a truncated staphylococcal nuclease R (SNR135) and their implications for catalysis. Arch Biochem Biophys 1998;360:33-40.
41. Whitten ST, Garcia-Moreno B. pH dependence of stability of staphylococcal nuclease: evidence of substantial electrostatic interactions in the denatured state. Biochemistry 2000;39:14292-14304.
42. Alexandrescu AT, Shortle D. Backbone dynamics of a highly disordered 131 residue fragment of staphylococcal nuclease. J Mol Biol 1994;242:527-546.
43. Wrabl JO, Shortle D, Woolf TB. Correlation between changes in nuclear magnetic resonance order parameters and conformational entropy: molecular dynamics simulations of native and denatured staphylococcal nuclease. Proteins 2000;38:123-133.
44. Ermacora MR, Ledman DW, Fox RO. Mapping the structure of a non-native state of staphylococcal nuclease. Nat Struct Biol 1996;3:59-65.
45. Wang Yi, Shortle A. A dynamic bundle of four adjacent hydrophobic segments in the denatured state of staphylococcal nuclease. Protein Sci 1996;5:1898-1906.
46. Shortle D, Meeker AK. Residual structure in large fragments of staphylococcal nuclease: effects of amino acid substitution. Biochemistry 1989;28:936-944.
47. Flanagan JM, Kataoka M, Shortle D, Angelman DM. Truncated staphylococcal nuclease is compact but disordered. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1992;89:748-752.
48. Gruia AD, Fischer S, Smith JC. Molecular dynamics simulations reveals a surface salt bridge forming a kinetic trap in unfolding of truncated staphylococcal nuclease. Proteins 2003;50:507-515.
49. Barbacid M. Ras genes. Annu Rev Biochem 1987;56:779-827.
50. Lowy DR, Willumsen BM. Function and regulation of Ras. Annu Rev Biochem 1993;62:851-891.
51. Milburn MV, Tong L, deVos AM, et al. Molecular switch for signal transduction: structural differences between active and inactive forms of protooncogenic Ras proteins. Science 1990;247:939-945.
52. Wittinghofer A, Pai E. The structure of ras protein: a model for a universal molecular switch. Trends Biochem Sci 1991;16:382-387.
53. Wittinghofer A, Herrmann C. Ras-effector interactions, the problem of specificity. FEBS Lett 1995;369:52-56.
54. Ma J, Karplus M. Molecular switch in signal transduction: reaction paths of the conformational changes in ras p21. Proc Natl Sci USA 1997;94:11905-11910.
55. Grubmüller H. Predicting slow structural transitions in macromolecular systems: conformational flooding. Phys Rev E 1995;52:2893-2906.
56. Schulze BG, Grubmüller H, Evanseck JD. Functional significance of hierarchical tiers in carbonmonoxy myoglobin: conformational substrates and transitions studied by conformational flooding simulations. J Am Chem Soc 2000;12:8700-8711.
57. Amadei A, Linssen AB, De Groot BL, Van Aalten DMF, Berendsen HJ. An efficient method for sampling the essential subspace of proteins. J Biomol Struct Dyn 1996;13(4):615-626.
58. De Groot BL, Amadei A, Scheek RM, Van Nuland NA, Berendsen HJ. An extended sampling of the configurational space of HPr from E. coli. Proteins 1996;26:314-322.
59. De Groot BL, Amadei A, Van Aalten DM, Berendsen HJ. Towards an exhaustive sampling of the configurational spaces of the two forms of the peptide hormone guanylin. J Biomol Struct Dyn 1996;13:741-751.
60. Ota M, Ikeguchi M, Kidera A. Phylogeny of protein-folding trajectories reveals a unique pathway to native structure. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2004;101(51):17658-17663.
61. Aszodi A, Taylor WR. Homology modeling by distance geometry. Fold Des 1996;1:325-334.
62. Aszodi A, Munro RE, Taylor WR. Distance geometry based comparative modelling. Fold Des 1997;2:S3-S6.
63. Hess B. Convergence of sampling in protein simulations. Phys Rev E 2002;65:031910.