Sustaining innovations through lead teacher learning: A learning sciences perspective on supporting professional development

Teaching Education

Volumn 17, Issue 2, 2006, Pages 181-194

  Fogleman, Jay ^a,b   Fishman, Barry ^a   Krajcik, Joe ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN   (United States)

^b Center for Highly Interactive Computing in Education   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 33646837859     PISSN: 10476210     EISSN: 14701286     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/10476210600680416     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. Ball, D. L. and Cohen, D. K. (1996) Reform by the book: What is - or might be - The role of curriculum materials in teacher learning and instructional reform? Educational Researcher, 25(9), pp. 6-8.
2. Barab, S. A. and Duffy, T. M. (1999) From practice fields to communities of practice. In Theoretical foundations of learning environments. (pp. 25-55). Mahwah NJ: Erlbaum.
3. Blumenfeld, P. and Fishman, B. J. and Krajcik, J. and Marx, R. W. (2000) Creating usable innovations in systemic reform: Scaling up technology-embedded project-based science in urban schools Educational Psychologist, 33(3), pp. 149-164.
4. Brown, J. S. and Collins, A. and Duguid, P. (1989) Situated cognition and the culture of learning Educational Researcher, 18, pp. 32-42.
5. Cohen, D. K. and Ball, D. L. (1999) Instruction, capacity, and improvement. Philadelphia: Consortium for Policy Research in Education, University of Pennsylvania.
6. Committee on Science and Mathematics Teacher Preparation. (2001) Educating teachers of science, mathematics, and technology: New practices for the new millennium. Washington DC: National Academy Press.
7. Davis, E. and Krajcik, J. (2005) Designing educative curriculum materials to promote teacher learning Educational Researcher, 34(3), pp. 3-14.
8. DeBoer, G. E. (1991) A history of ideas in science education: Implications for practice. New York: Teachers College Press.
9. Fishman, B. and Best, S. and Foster, J. and Marx, R. (2000). Fostering teacher learning in systemic reform: A design proposal for developing professional development. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Association of Research on Science Teaching. In [pp.].
10. Fishman, B. and Best, S. and Marx, R. and Tal, R. T. (2001). Fostering teacher learning in systemic reform: Liinking professional development to teacher and student learning. Paper presented at the National Association of Research on Science Teaching St LouisMO. In [pp.].
11. Fishman, B. and Fogleman, J. and Kubitskey, B. and Peek-Brown, D. and Marx, R. (2003). Taking charge of innovations: Fostering teacher leadership in professional development to sustain reform. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the National Association of Research on Science Teaching Philadelphia. In [pp.].
12. Fishman, B. and Marx, R. and Best, S. and Tal, R. (2003) Linking teacher and student learning to improve professional development in systemic reform Teaching and Teacher Education, 19(6), pp. 643-658.
13. Fishman, B. and Marx, R. and Blumenfeld, P. and Krajcik, J. S. and Soloway, E. (2004) Creating a framework for research on systemic technology innovations The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 13(1) pp. 43-76.
14. Fullan, M. (1982) The meaning of educational change. New York: Teachers College Press.
15. Goldman, S. R. (2005) Designing for scalable educational improvement: Processes of inquiry in practice. In Scaling up success: Lessons from technology-based educational improvement. (pp. 67-96). New York: Jossey-Bass.
16. Hug, B. and Krajcik, J. and Marx, R. (2003, 2001) How can good friends make you sick?. Michigan: University of Michigan Center for Highly Interactive Computing In Education.
17. Kolodner, J. L. (2002) Facilitating the learning by design practices: Lessons learned from an inquiry into science education Journal of Industrial Teacher Education. Retrieved June 29, 2004, from
18. Krajcik, J. and Blumenfeld, B. and Marx, R. and Soloway, E. (2000) Instructional, curricular, and technological supports for inquiry in science classrooms. In Inquiry into inquiry: Science learning and teaching. (pp. 283-315). Washington DC: American Association for the Advancement of Science Press.
19. Krajcik, J. S. and Blumenfeld, P. C. and Marx, R. W. and Soloway, E. (1994) A collaborative model for helping middle grade science teachers learn project based instruction Elementary School Journal, 94(5), pp. 483-497.
20. Kubitskey, B. and Fishman, B. and Margerum-Leys, J. and Fogleman, J. and Brunvand, S. and Marx, R. W. (2006) Professional development and teacher learning: Using concept maps in inquiry classrooms. In Assessment in science: Practical experiences and education research. (pp. 107-118). Arlington VA: NSTA Press.
21. Kubitskey, B. and Fishman, B. and Marx, R. (2003). The relationship between professional development and student learning: Exploring the link through design research. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Researchers Association New Orleans. In [pp.].
22. Lave, J. and Wenger, E. (1991) Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
23. McNeill, K. L. and Krajcik, J.Middle school students' use of appropriate and inappropriate evidence in writing scientific explanations. In Thinking with data: The proceedings of the 33rd Carnegie Symposium on Cognition. Mahwah NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. (in press)
24. McNeill, K. L. and Harris, C. J. and Heitzman, M. and Lizotte, D. J. and Sutherland, L. M. and Krajcik, J. (2004) How can I make new stuff from old stuff?. In IQWST: Investigating and questioning our world through science and technology. Ann Arbor MI: University of Michigan.
25. National Research Council. (1996) National science education standards. Washington DC: National Academy Press.
26. Novak, J. D. and Gowin, B. D. (1984) Learning how to learn. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
27. Pea, R. D. (1993) Practices of distributed intelligence and designs for education. In Distributed cognitions: Psychological and educational considerations. (pp. 47-87). New York: Cambridge University Press.
28. Pinto, R. (2005) Introducing curriculum innovations in science: Identifying teachers' transformations and the design of related teacher education Science Education, 89(1), pp. 1-12.
29. Putnam, R. T. and Borko, H. (1997) Teacher learning: Implications of new views of cognition. In International handbook of teachers and teaching. (pp. 1223-1295). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
30. Putnam, R. T. and Borko, H. (2000) What do new views on knowledge and thinking have to say about research on teacher learning? Educational Researcher, 29(1), pp. 4-15.
31. Reiser, B. and Spillane, J. P. and Steinmuller, F. and Sorsa, D. and Carney, K. and Kyza, E. (2000) Investigating the mutual adaptation process in teachers' design of technology-infused curricula. In International conference of the learning sciences proceedings. (pp. 342-349). Mahwah NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
32. Rivet, A. and Krajcik, J.S. (2002). Project-based science curricula: Achieving national standards in urban systemic reform. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching New OrleansLA. In [pp.].
33. Schneider, R. M. and Krajcik, J. S. and Blumenfeld, P. (2002). Exploring the role of curriculum materials to support teachers in education reform. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching New OrleansLA. In [pp.].
34. Shulman, L. (1986) Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching Educational Researcher, 15(2), pp. 4-14.
35. Silva, D. Y. and Gimbert, B. and Nolan, J. (2000) Sliding the doors: Locking and unlocking the possibilities for teacher leadership Teachers College Record, 102(4), pp. 779-804.
36. Simon, H. A. (1996) The sciences of the artificial. Cambridge MA: MIT Press.
37. Singer, J. and Marx, R. W. and Krajcik, J. and Chambers, J. C. (2000) Constructing extended inquiry projects: Curriculum materials for science reform Educational Psychologist, 35(3), pp. 165-178.
38. Singer, J. and Rivet, A. and Schneider, R. M. and Krajcik, J. S. and Amati, K. and Marx, R. W. (2000). Setting the stage: Engaging students in water quality. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association New OrleansLA. In [pp.].
39. Songer, N. B. and Lee, H.-S. and McDonald, S. (2002) Research towards an expanded understanding of inquiry science beyond one idealized standard Science Education, 87(4), pp. 490-516.
40. Supovitz, J. A. and Mahyer, D. P. and Kahle, J. B. (2000) Promoting inquiry-based instructional practice: The longitudinal impact of professional development in the context of systemic reform Educational Policy, 14(3), pp. 331-356.
41. Sutherland, L. M. and Meriweather, A. and Rucker, S. and Sarratt, P. and Hines-Hale, Y. and Moje, E. B. and Krajcik, J. (2006) "More emphasis" on scientific explanation: Developing conceptual understanding while developing scientific literacy. In Exemplary science in grades 5-8: Standards-based success stories. Arlington VA: NSTA Press.
42. Tyack, D. and Cuban, L. (1995) Tinkering toward Uutopia: A century of public school reform. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.
43. Vygotsky, L. S. (1978) Mind in society: The development of the higher psychological processes. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.
44. Wefel, A. and Hi-ce. (2002) What is the quality of air in my community?. Ann Arbor MI: The University of Michigan School of Education.
45. Wertsch, J. (1985) Vygotsky and the social formation of mind. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.
46. York-Barr, J. and Duke, K. (2004) What do we know about teacher leadership? Findings from two decades of scholarship Review of Educational Research, 74(3), pp. 255-316.