Frequency effects in processing inflected Dutch nouns: A distributed connectionist account

Morphological Structure in Language Processing

Volumn , Issue , 2011, Pages 427-462

  Davis, Matthew H ^a   van Casteren, Maarten ^a   Marslen Wilson, William D ^a  

^a MRC COGNITION AND BRAIN SCIENCES UNIT   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 2142667515     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1515/9783110910186.427     Document Type: Chapter

References (46)

1. Baayen, R. Harald, Ton Dijkstra, and Robert Schreuder 1997 Singulars and plurals in Dutch: Evidence for a parallel dual-route modes. Journal of Memory and Language, 37(1), 94-117.
2. Baayen, R. Harald, Richard Piepenbrock, and Leon Guilikers 1995 The CELEX Lexical Database (CD-ROM) (Version v2.5). Philadelphia, PA: Linguistic Data Consortium, University of Pennsylvania.
3. Bechtel, William, and Adele Abrahamsen 1991 Connectionism and the mind. Oxford: Blackwell.
4. Bertram, Raymond, Jukka Hyönä, and Matti Laine 2000 The role of context in morphological processing: Evidence from Finnish. Language and Cognitive Processes, 15(4/5), 367-388.
5. Bertram, Raymond, Matti Laine, R. Harald Baayen, Robert Schreuder, and Jukka Hyönä 2000 Affixal homonymy triggers full-form storage, even with inflected words, even in a morphologically rich language. Cognition, 74(2), B13-B25.
6. Bertram, Raymond, Matti Laine, and Katja Karvinen 1999 The interplay of word formation type, affixal homonymy, and productivity in lexical processing: Evidence from a morphologically rich language. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 28(3), 213-226.
7. Bertram, Raymond, Robert Schreuder, and R.Harald Baayen 2000 The balance of storage and computation in morphological processing: The role of word formation type, affixal homonymy, and productivity. Journal of Experimental Psychology-Learning Memory and Cognition, 26(2), 489-511.
8. Besner, David, L. Twilley, R.S. McCann, and K. Seergobin 1990 On the connection between connectionism and data: are a few words necessary? Psychological Review, 97,432-446.
9. Borowsky, R., and M.E.J. Masson, 1996 Semantic ambiguity effects in word identification. Journal of Experimental Psychology-Learning Memory and Cognition, 22(1), 63-85.
10. Broadbent, Donald E. 1967 Word-Frequency effect and response bias. Psychological Review, 74(1), 1-15.
11. Bullinaria, John A. 1995 Neural networks learning from ambiguous training data. Connection Science, 7(2), 99-122.
12. Bullinaria, John A., and Nick Chater 1995 Connectionist modelling: Implications for cognitive neuropsychology. Language and Cognitive Processes, 10, 227-264.
13. Caramazza, Alfonso, Alessandro Laudanna, and Cristina Romani 1988 Lexical access and inflectional morphology. Cognition, 28(3), 297-332.
14. Caramazza, Alfonso., G. Miceli, M.C. Silveri, and Alessandro Laudanna 1985 Reading mechanisms and the organisation of the lexicon: Evidence from acquired dyslexia. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 2(1), 81-114.
15. Christiansen, Morton H., and Nick Chater 2000 Connectionist psycholinguistics: Capturing the empirical data. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 5, 82-88.
16. Cohen, Jonathan D., Kevin Dunbar, and James L. McClelland 1990 On the control of automatic processes: A parallel distributed processing account of the Stroop effect. Psychological Review, 97(3), 332-361.
17. Davis, Matthew H., William D. Marslen-Wilson, and M. Hare 1996 Representing regularity: The English past tense. In G. W. Cottrell (ed), Proceedings of the 18th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
18. Elman, Jeff, Elizabeth A. Bates, M.H. Johnson, A. Karmiloff-Smith, Domenico Parisi, and Kim Plunkett 1996 Rethinking innateness. Camb, MA: MIT Press.
19. Ford, Michael A., William D. Marslen-Wilson, and Matthew H. Davis In press Morphology and frequency: Contrasting methodologies. In R.H. Baayen (ed.), 91-125.
20. Forster, Ken I. 1976 Accessing the mental lexicon. In New approaches to language mechanisms, R. J. Wales and E. Walker (eds.), 257-287. Amsterdam: North-Holland.
21. Frauenfelder, Uli E., and Robert Schreuder 1991 Constraining psycholinguistic models of morphological processing and representation: the role of productivity. In Yearbook of Morphology, G. Booij and J. v. Marie (eds.), 165-183.
22. Gaskell, M. Gareth, and William D. Marslen-Wilson 1997 Integrating form and meaning: a distributed model of speech perception. Language and Cognitive Processes, 12, 613-656.
23. Gasser, Michael 1994 Acquiring receptive morphology: a connectionist model. Proceedings of the International Conference on Computational Linguistics, 15, 214-220.
24. Hinton, Geoffrey E. 1989 Connectionist learning procedures. Artificial Intelligence, 40, 185-234.
25. Howes, D.H., and R.L. Solomon 1951 Visual duration threshold as a function of word-probability. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 41, 401-410.
26. MacLeod, P., Kim Plunkett, and E.T. Rolls 1998 Introduction to connectionist modelling of cognitive processes. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
27. McClelland, James L. 1979 On the time relations of mental processes: An examination of systems of processes in cascade. Psychological Review, 86(4), 287-330.
28. McClelland, James L., and David E. Rumelhart 1980 An interactive activation model of context effects in letter perception: Part 1. An account of basic findings. Psychological Review, 88(375-407).
29. Morton, John 1969 Interaction of information in word recognition. Psychological Review, 76(2), 165-178.
30. Page, M. 2001 Connectionist modelling in psychology: A localist manifesto. Behavioural and Brain Sciences, 23(4), 443-512.
31. Pinker, Steven 1991 Rules of language. Science, 253(August), 530-535.
32. Pinker, Steven 1999 Words and rules: The ingredients of language. New York: Basic Books.
33. Plaut, David C. 1997 Structure and function in the lexical system: Insights from distributed models of word reading and lexical decision. Language and Cognitive Processes, 12(5-6), 765-805.
34. Plaut, David C., and Laura M. Gonnerman 2000 Are non-semantic morphological effects incompatible with a distributed connectionist approach to lexical processing? Language and Cognitive Processes, 15(4-5), 445-485.
35. Plaut, David C., James L. McClelland, M.S. Seidenberg, and K. Patterson 1996 Understanding normal and impaired word reading: Computational principles in quasi-regular domains. Psychological Review, 103(1), 56-115.
36. Plunkett, Kim, and V. Marchman 1991 U-shaped learning and frequency effects in a multi-layered perceptron: Implications for child language acquisition. Cognition 38,43-102.
37. Plunkett, Kim, and V. Marchman 1993 From rote learning to system building: acquiring verb morphology in children and connectionist nets. Cognition, 48,21-69.
38. Rodd, J.M., M. Gareth Gaskell, and William D. Marslen-Wilson 2002 Making sense out of ambiguity: Semantic competition in lexical access. Journal of Memory and Language, 46(2), 245-266.
39. Rueckl, Jay. G., and Michal Raveh 1999 The influence of morphological regularities on the dynamics of a connectionist network. Brain and Language, 68(1-2), 110-117.
40. Rumelhart, David E., Geoffrey E. Hinton, and R.J. Williams 1986 Learning internal representations by error propagation. In Parallel distributed processing: Explorations in the microstructure of cognition (vol. 1), D.E. Rumelhart and J.L. McClelland (eds.),. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
41. Rumelhart, David E., and James L. McClelland 1986 On learning the past tenses of English verbs. In Parallel distributed processing: Explorations in the microstructure of cognition (Vol. 2), J.L. McClelland and D.E. Rumelhart (eds.),). Cambridge: MA: MIT Press.
42. Schreuder, Robert, and R. Harald Baayen 1995 Modeling morphological processing. In Morphological aspects of language processing, L.B. Feldman (ed.), 131-154. Hillsdale, New Jersey: Erlbaum.
43. Seidenberg, M.S., and James L. McClelland 1989 A distributed, developmental model of word recognition and naming. Psychological Review, 96, 523-568.
44. Sereno, Joan A., and Allard Jongman 1997 Processing of English inflectional morphology. Memory and Cognition, 25(4), 425-437.
45. Tail, Marcus 1979 Recognition of affixed words and the word frequency effect. Memory and Cognition, 7(4), 263-272.
46. Taraban, Roman, and James L. McClelland 1987 Conspiracy effects in word pronunciation. Journal of Memory and Language, 26(6), 608-631.