Self-monitoring and consumer psychology

Journal of Personality

Volumn 74, Issue 3, 2006, Pages 715-738

  DeBono, Kenneth G ^a,b  

^a UNION COLLEGE   (United States)

^b UNION COLLEGE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 33646590271     PISSN: 00223506     EISSN: 14676494     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-6494.2006.00390.x     Document Type: Article

References (63)

1. Aaker, J. L. (1999). The malleable self: The role of self-expression in persuasion. Journal of Marketing Research, 36, 45-57.
2. Bearden, W. O., Shuplrine, F. K., & Teel, J. E. (1989). Self-monitoring and reactions to image appeals and claims about product quality. Advances in Consumer Research, 16, 703-710.
3. Becherer, R. C., Morgan, F. W. Jr., & Richard, L. M. (1979). Person-situation interaction within a consumer behavior context. Journal of Psychology, 102, 235-242.
4. Brinberg, D., & Plimpton, L. (1986). Self-monitoring and product conspicuousness on reference group influence. Advances in Consumer Research, 13, 297-300.
5. Browne, A. B., & Kaldenberg, D. O. (1997). Self-monitoring and image appeals in advertising. Psychological Reports, 81, 1267-1275.
6. Cash, T. F., & Wunderle, J. M. Jr. (1987). Self-monitoring and cosmetic use among college women. Journal of Social Behavior and Personality, 2, 563-566.
7. Celuch, K., & Slama, M. (1995). "Getting along" and "getting ahead" as motives for self-presentation: Their impact on advertising effectiveness. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 25, 1700-1713.
8. Chao, P. (1998). Impact of country of origin dimensions on product quality and design quality perceptions. Journal of Business Research, 42, 1-6.
9. Chatteriee, A., & Hunt, J. M. (1996). Self-monitoring as a personality correlate of materialism: An investigation of related cognitive orientation. Psychological Reports, 79, 523-528.
10. Compeau, L. D., Grewal, D., & Monroe, K. B. (1998). Role of prior affect and sensory cues on consumers" affective and cognitive responses and overall perceptions of product quality. Journal of Business Research. 42, 295-308.
11. Covell, K. C., Dion, K. L., & Dion, K. K. (1994). Gender differences in evaluations of tobacco and alcohol advertisements. Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science, 26, 404-420.
12. Darley, W. K., & Lim, J. S. (1992). The effect of consumer's emotional reactions on behavioral intention: The moderating role of personal relevance and self-monitoring. Psychology and Marketing, 9, 329-346.
13. Davis, L. L., & Lennon, S. J. (1985). Self-monitoring, fashion opinion leadership, and attitudes toward clothing. In M. Solomon (Ed.), Psychology and fashion (pp. 177-182). Lexington, MA: D. C. Heath.
14. Davis, L. L., & Lennon, S. J. (1989). Apparel advertising appeals as a function of apparel classification: Trendy versus classic. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 68, 1011-1014.
15. DeBono, K. G. (1987). Investigating the social adjust!ve and value expressive functions of attitudes: Implications for persuasion processes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 279-287.
16. DeBono, K. G. (2000). Attitude functions and consumer psychology: Understanding perceptions of product quality. In G. M. Maio & J. M. Olson (Eds.). Why we evaluate: The functions of attitudes (pp. 195-221). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
17. DeBono, K. G., & Edmonds, A. (1989). Cognitive dissonance and self-monitoring: A matter of context? Motivation and Emotion, 13, 259-270.
18. DeBono, K. G., & Harnish, R. J. (1988). Source expertise, source attractiveness, and the processing of persuasive information: A functional approach. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 55, 541-546.
19. DeBono, K. G., & Krim, S. (1997). Compliments and perceptions of product quality: An individual difference approach. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 27, 1359-1366.
20. DeBono, K. G., Leavitt, A., & Backus, J. (2003). Product packaging and product evaluation: An individual difference approach. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 33, 513-521.
21. DeBono, K. G., & Packer, M. (1991). The effects of advertising appeal on perceptions of product quality. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 17, 194-200.
22. DeBono, K. G., & Rubin, K. (1995). Country of origin and perceptions of product quality: An individual difference perspective. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 17, 239-247.
23. DeBono, K. G., & Snyder, M. (1989). Understanding consumer decision-making processes: The role of form and function in product evaluation. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 19, 416-424.
24. DeBono, K. G., & Telesca, C. (1990). The influence of source physical attractiveness on advertising effectiveness: A functional perspective. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 20, 1383-1395.
25. Dodds, W. B., Monroe, K. B., & Grewal, D. (1991). Effects of price, brand, and store information on buyers' product evaluations. Journal of Marketing Research, 28, 307-319.
26. Eagly, A. H. (1981). Recipient characteristics as determinants of responses to persuasion. In R. E. Petty, T. M. Ostrom, & T. C. Brock (Eds.), Cognitive responses in persuasion (pp. 173-195). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
27. Erickson, G. M., Johansson, J. K., & Chao, P. (1984). Image variables in multi-attribute product evaluations: Country of origin effects. Journal of Consumer Research, 11, 694-699.
28. Fox, S. (1984). The mirror makers. New York: Morrow.
29. Gangestad, S., & Snyder, M. (2000). Self-monitoring: Appraisal and reappraisal. Psychological Bulletin, 126, 530-555.
30. Graeff, T. R. (1996). Image congruence effects on product evaluations: The role of self-monitoring and public/private consumption. Psychology and Marketing, 13, 481-499.
31. Haugtvedt, C. P., Petty, R. E., & Cacioppo, J. T. (1992). Need for cognition and advertising: Understanding the role of personality variables in consumer behavior. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 1, 239-260.
32. Hovland, C. I., & Janis, I. L. (1959). Personality and persuasion. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
33. Johar, J. S., & Sirgy, M. J. (1991). Value-expressive versus utilitarian advertising appeals: When and why to use which appeal. Journal of Advertising, 20, 23-33.
34. Kristiansen, C. M., & Zanna, M. P. (1988). Justifying attitudes by appealing to values: A functional perspective. British Journal of Social Psychology, 27, 247-256.
35. Lammers, H. B. (1991). Moderating influence of self-monitoring and gender on responses to humorous advertising. The Journal of Psychology, 131, 57-69.
36. Lavine, H., & Snyder, M. (2000). Cognitive processes and the functional matching effect in persuasion: Studies of personality and political behavior. In G. M. Maio & J. M. Olson (Eds.), Why we evaluate: Functions of attitudes (pp. 97-132). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
37. Lennon, S. J., Davis, L. L., & Fairhurst, A. (1988). Evaluations of apparel advertising as a function of self-monitoring. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 66, 987-996.
38. Lennox, R., & Wolfe, R. (1984). A revision of the self-monitoring scale. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 46, 1348-1364.
39. Lewin, K. (1951). Field theory in social science. New York: Harper.
40. Martin, B. A. S. (2003). The influence of gender on mood effects in advertising. Psychology and Marketing, 20, 249-273.
41. Petty, R. E., Cacioppo, J. T., & Goldman, R. (1981). Personal involvement as a determinant of argument-based persuasion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 41, 847-855.
42. Petty, R. E., & Wegener, D. T. (1998a). Attitude change: Multiple roles for persuasion variables. In D. T. Gilbert, S. T. Fiske, & G. Lindzey (Eds.), The handbook of social psychology (4th ed., Vol. 2, pp. 323-390). New York: McGraw-Hill.
43. Petty, R. E., & Wegener, D. T. (1998b). Matching versus mismatching attitude functions: Implications for scrutiny of persuasive messages. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 24, 227-240.
44. Petty, R. E., Wells, G. L., & Brock, T. C. (1976). Distraction can enhance or reduce yielding to propaganda: Thought disruption or effort justification? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 34, 874-884.
45. Petty, R. E., Wheeler, S. C., & Bizer, G. Y. (2000). Attitude functions and persuasion: An elaboration likelihood approach to matched versus mismatched messages. In G. M. Maio & J. M. Olson (Eds.), Why we evaluate: Functions of attitudes (pp. 133-162). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
46. Rao, A. R., & Monroe, K. B. (1989). The effect of price, brand name, and store name on buyer's perceptions: An integrative review. Journal of Marketing Research, 26, 351-357.
47. Ratner, R. K., & Kahn, B. E. (2002). The impact of private versus public consumption on variety-seeking behavior. Journal of Consumer Research, 29, 246-257.
48. Rumbo, J. D. (2002). Consumer resistance in a world of advertising clutter: The case of "Adbusters." Psychology and Marketing, 19, 127-148.
49. Shavitt, S. (1990). The role of attitude objects in attitude functions. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 26, 124-148.
50. Shavitt, S., Lowrey, P., & Haefner, J. (1998). Public attitudes toward advertising: More favorable than you might think. Journal of Advertising Research, 38, 7-22.
51. Shavitt, S., Lowrey, T. M., & Han, S. (1992). Attitude functions in advertising: The interactive role of product and self-monitoring. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 1, 337-364.
52. Sirgy, J. (1982). Self-concept in consumer behavior: A critical review. Journal of Consumer Research, 9, 287-300.
53. Slama, M. E., & Singley, R. B. (1996). Self-monitoring and value-expressive vs. utilitarian ad effectiveness: Why the mixed findings? Journal of Current Issues and Research in Advertising, 18, 39-52.
54. Snyder, M. (1974). The self-monitoring of expressive behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 30, 526-537.
55. Snyder, M. (1979). Self-monitoring processes. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 12). New York: Academic Press.
56. Snyder, M. (1987). Public appearances/private realities: The psychology of self-monitoring. New York: Freeman.
57. Snyder, M., Berscheid, E., & Matwychuk, A. (1988). Orientations toward personnel selection: Differential reliance on appearance and personality. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 972-979.
58. Snyder, M., & DeBono, K. G. (1985). Appeals to image and claim about quality: Understanding the psychology of advertising. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 49, 586-597.
59. Snyder, M., & DeBono, K. G. (1987). A functional approach to attitudes and persuasion. In M. P. Zanna, J. M. Olson, & C. P. Herman (Eds.), Social Influence: The Ontario symposium (Vol. 5, pp. 107-125). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
60. Snyder, M., & Gangestad, S. (1986). On the nature of self-monitoring: Matters of assessment, matters of validity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 125-139.
61. Snyder, M., Simpson, J. A., & Gangestad, S. (1986). Personality and sexual relations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 181-190.
62. Stayman, D. M., & Kardes, F. R. (1992). Spontaneous inference processes in advertising: Effects of need for cognition and self-monitoring on inference generation and utilization. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 1, 125-142.
63. Zuckerman, M., Gioioso, C., & Tellini, S. (1988). Control orientation, self-monitoring, and preference for image versus quality approach to advertising. Journal of Research in Personality, 22, 89-100.