Rethinking the multiplicity of cognitive resources and curricular representations: Alternatives to 'learning styles' and 'multiple intelligences'

Journal of Curriculum Studies

Volumn 35, Issue 1, 2003, Pages 45-81

  Klein, Perry D ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WESTERN ONTARIO   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 33646553475     PISSN: 00220272     EISSN: 13665839     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/00220270210141891     Document Type: Review

References (197)

1. ABBOTT, R. D. and BERNINGER, V. W. (1993) Structural equation modeling of relationships among developmental skills and writing skills in primary- and intermediate-grade writers. Journal of Educational Psychology, 85 (3), 478-508.
2. ANDERSON, R. E. and HELSTRUP, T. (1993) Visual discovery in the mind and on paper. Memory & Cognition, 21 (3), 283-293.
3. ANTONIETTI, A. (1999) Can students predict when imagery will allow them to discover the problem solution? Europe an Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 11 (3), 407-128.
4. ANTONIETTI, A. and GIORGETTI, M. (1998) The verbalizer-visualizer questionnaire: a review. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 86 (1), 227-239.
5. ARMSTRONG, T. (1994) Multiple Intelligences in the Classroom (Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development).
6. ATKINSON, R. K., LEVIN, J. R., KIEWRA, K. A., MEYERS, T., KIM, S.-I., ATKINSON, L. A., RENANDYA, W. A. and HWANG, Y. (1999) Matrix and mnemonic text-processing adjuncts: comparing and combining their components. Journal of Educational Psychology, 91 (2), 342-357.
7. ATWELL, N. (1998) In the Middle: New Understandings about Writing, Reading, and Learning, 2nd edn (Portsmouth, NH: Boynton/Cook).
8. BADDELEY, A. (1986) Working Memory (Oxford: Clarendon Press).
9. BARBE, W. B. and MILONE, JR., M. N. (1980) Modality. Instructor, 89 (6), 44-47.
10. BARBE, W. B. and MILONE, JR., M. N. (1981) What we know about modality strengths. Educational Leadership, 38 (5), 378-380.
11. BAUER, M. I. and JOHNSON-LAIRD, P. N. (1993) How diagrams can improve reasoning. Psychological Science, 4 (6), 372-378.
12. BEHM, M. E. (1996) Helping all students find their strength. In K. Gutloff (ed.), Multiple Intelligences (Westhaven, CT: National Education Association), 25-35.
13. BERNINGER, V. W., FULLER, F. and WHITAKER, D. (1996) A process model of writing development across the life span. Educational Psychology Review, 8 (3), 193-218.
14. BERRY, D. C., BANBURY, S. and HENRY, L. (1997) Transfer across form and modality in implicit and explicit memory. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, Section A: Human Experimental Psychology, 50A (1), 1-24.
15. BICKERTON, D. (1995) Language and Human Behavior (Seattle, WA: University of Washington Press).
16. BIEHLER, R. F., SNOWMAN, J., D'AMICO, M. and SCHMID, R. F. (1999) Psychology Applied to Teaching, 1st Canadian edn (Toronto, ON: Houghton Mifflin).
17. BROWN, A. L. and FERRARA, R. A. (1985) Diagnosing zones of proximal development. In J. V. Wertsch (ed.), Culture, Communication and Cognition: Vygotskian Perspectives (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), 273-305.
18. BROWN, A. L. and KANE, M. J. (1988) Preschool children can learn to transfer: learning to learn and learning from example. Cognitive Psychology, 20 (4), 493-523.
19. BUCCIARELLI, M. and JOHNSON-LAIRD, P. N. (1999) Strategies in syllogistic reasoning. Cognitive Science, 23 (3), 247-303.
20. BUTTERWORTH, B. (1999) The Mathematical Drain (London: Macmillan).
21. CALKINS, L. M. (1994) The Art of Teaching Writing, new edn (Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann).
22. CALVIN, W. H. (1993) The unitary hypothesis: a common neural circuitry for novel manipulations, language, plan-ahead, and throwing? In K. R. Gibson and T. Ingold (eds), Tools, Language, and Cognition in Human Evolution (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press) 230-250.
23. CAMPBELL, L. and CAMPBELL, B. (1999) Multiple Intelligences and Student Achievement: Success Stories from Six Schools (Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development).
24. CAMPBELL, L., CAMPBELL, B. and DICKINSON, D. (1996) Teaching and Learning Through Multiple Intelligences (Needham Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon).
25. CARBO, M. (1997a) Reading styles times twenty. Educational Leadership, 54 (6), 38-12.
26. CARBO, M. (1997b) What Every Principal Should Know About Teaching Reading: How to Raise Test Scores and Nurture a Love of Reading (Syosset, NY: National Reading Styles Institute).
27. CARRUTHERS, P. (1998) Thinking in language? evolution and a modularist possibility. In P. Carruthers and J. Boucher (eds), Language and Thought: Interdisciplinary Themes (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), 94-119.
28. CHAFE, W. (1994) Discourse, Consciousness, and Time: The Flow and Displacement of Conscious Experience in Speaking and Writing (Chicago: Chicago University Press).
29. CLARK, J. M. and PAIVIO, A. (1991) Dual coding theory and education. Educational Psychology Review, 3 (3), 149-210.
30. CLARK, R. (1996) Art Education: Issues in Postmodern Pedagogy (Reston, VA: National Art Education Association).
31. COSMIDES, L. and TOOBY, J. (1994) Origins of domain specificity: the evolution of functional organization. In L. A. Hirschfeld and S. A. Gelman (eds), Mapping the Mind: Domain Specificity in Cognition and Culture (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), 85-116.
32. Cox, R. (1999) Representation, construction, externalised cognition, and individualized differences. Learning and Instruction, 9 (4), 343-363.
33. CUNNINGHAM, D. J. (1992) Beyond educational psychology: steps toward an educational semiotic. Educational Psychology Review, 4 (2), 165-194.
34. DAY, R. S. (1988) Alternative representations. In G. H. Bower (ed.), The Psychology of Learning and Motivation, Vol. 22 (New York: Academic Press), 261-305.
35. DEHAENE, S. (1997) The Number Sense: How the Mind Creates Mathematics (New York: Oxford University Press).
36. DEHAENE, S., BOSSINI, S. and GIRAUX, P. (1993) The mental representation of parity and number magnitude. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 122 (3), 371-396.
37. DENIS, M. (1982) Imagery while reading text: a study of individual differences. Memory & Cognition, 10 (6), 540-545.
38. DOBSON, M. (1999a) Information enforcement and learning with interactive graphical systems. Learning and Instruction, 9 (4), 365-390.
39. DOBSON, M. (1999b) Introduction. Learning and Instruction, 9 (4), 303-307.
40. DONALD, M. (1991) Origins of the Modern Mind: Three Stages in the Evolution of Culture and Cognition (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press).
41. DUNN, R. and DUNN, K. (1993) Teaching Secondary Students Through Their Individual Learning Styles: Practical Approaches for Grades 7-12 (Boston: Allyn & Bacon).
42. DUNN, R., DUNN, K. and PRICE, G. E. (1989) Learning Styles Inventory (Lawrence, KS: Price Systems).
43. EISNER, E. W. (1994) Commentary: putting multiple intelligences in context: some questions and observations. Review of H. Gardner, Multiple Intelligences: The Theory in Practice. Teachers College Record, 95 (4), 555-560.
44. ELLIS, N. C. and HENNELLY, R. A. (1980) A bilingual word-length effect: implications for intelligence testing and the relative ease of mental calculation in Welsh and English. British Journal of Psychology, 71 (1), 43-51.
45. EMERSON, M. J., MIYAKE, A. and RETTINGER, D. A. (1999) Individual differences in integrating and coordinating multiple sources of information. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 25 (5), 1300-1321.
46. ERICSSON, K. A. and CHARNESS, N. (1994) Expert performance: its structure and acquisition. American Psychologist, 49 (8), 725-747.
47. FLOWER, L. and HAYES, J. R. (1981) A cognitive process theory of writing. College Composition and Communication, 32 (4), 365-387.
48. FLOWER, L. S., STEIN, V., ACKERMAN, J., KANTZ, M. J., MCCORMICK, K. and PECK, C. W. (1990) Reading-to-write: Exploring a Cognitive and Social Process (New York: Oxford University Press).
49. FOGARTY, G. F. and BURTON, L. J. (1996) A comparison of measures of preferred processing style: method or trait variance? Journal of Mental Imagery, 20 (3 & 4), 87-112.
50. FORD, M. (1995) Two modes of mental representation and problem solving in syllogistic reasoning. Cognition, 54 (1), 1-71.
51. FULBRIGHT, R. K., MOLFESE, D. L., STEVENS, A. A., SKUDLARSKI, P., LACADIE, C. M. and GORE, J. C. (2000) Cerebral activation during multiplication: a functional MR imaging study of number processing. AJNR: American Journal of Neuroradiology, 21 (6), 1048-1054.
52. GARDNER, H. (1983) Frames of Mind: The Theory of Multiple Intelligences (New York: Basic Books).
53. GARDNER, H. (1993a) Frames of Mind: The Theory of Multiple Intelligences, 2nd edn (New York: Basic Books).
54. GARDNER, H. (1993b) Multiple Intelligences: The Theory in Practice (New York: Basic Books).
55. GARDNER, H. (1996) MI: Intelligence, Understanding and the Mind [Videotape], prod. R. DiNozzi (Los Angeles, CA: Kinetic, Inc., Into the Classroom Media).
56. GARDNER, H. (1998) A reply to Perry D. Klein's 'Multiplying the problems of intelligence by eight'. Canadian Journal of Education, 23 (1), 96-102.
57. GARDNER, H. (1999a) The Disciplined Mind: What all Students Should Understand (New York: Simon & Schuster).
58. st Century (New York: Basic Books).
59. GARDNER, H. and HATCH, T. (1989) Multiple intelligences go to school: educational implications of the theory of multiple intelligences. Educational Researcher, 18 (8), 4-9.
60. GARNER, R. and GILLINGHAM, M. G. (1991) Topic knowledge, cognitive interest, and text recall: a microanalysis. Journal of Experimental Education, 59 (4), 310-319.
61. GARNER, R., GILLINGHAM, M. G. and WHITE, C. S. (1989) Effects of 'seductive details' on macroprocessing and microprocessing in adults and children. Cognition and Instruction, 6 (1), 41-57.
62. GATTIS, M. and HOLYOAK, K. J. (1996) Mapping conceptual to spatial relationships in spatial reasoning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 22 (1), 231-239.
63. GEDDIS, A. N. and WOOD, E. (1997) Transforming subject matter and managing dilemmas: a case study in teacher education. Teaching and Teacher Education, 13 (6), 611-626.
64. GENTNER, D. (1983) Structure-mapping: a theoretical framework for analogy. Cognitive Science, 7 (2), 155-170.
65. GENTNER, D. and GENTNER, D. R. (1983) Flowing waters or teeming crowds: mental models of electricity. In D. Gentner and A. L. Stevens (eds), Mental Models (Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum), 99-129.
66. GILBERT, M. (1987) The Holocaust: The Jewish Tragedy (London: Fontana).
67. GIVON, T. (1995) Functionalism and Grammar (Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins).
68. GLENBERG, A. M. and LANGSTON, W. E. (1992) Comprehension of illustrated text: pictures help to build mental models. Journal of Memory and Language, 31 (2), 129-151.
69. GOBERT, J. D. and CLEMENT, J. J. (1999) Effects of student-generated diagrams versus student-generated summaries on conceptual understanding of causal and dynamic knowledge in plate tectonics. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 36 (1), 39-53.
70. GOEL, V. (1995) Sketches of Thought (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press).
71. GOLDIN-MEADOW, S., KIM, S. and SINGER, M. (1999) What the teacher's hands tell the student's mind about mathematics. Journal of Educational Psychology, 91 (4), 720-730.
72. GOODMAN, N. (1976) Languages of Art: An Approach to a Theory of Symbols, 2nd edn (Indianapolis, IN: Hackett).
73. GRAHAM, N. A. and KERSHNER, J. R. (1996) Reading styles in children with dyslexia: a neuropsychological evaluation of the Reading Style Inventory. Learning Disability Quarterly, 19 (4), 233-240.
74. GRAY, L. (1996) How are you smart? In K. Gutloff (ed.), Multiple Intelligences (Westhaven, CT: National Education Association), 9-23.
75. GUILFORD, J. P. (1967) The Nature of Human Intelligence (New York: McGraw-Hill).
76. GURI-ROZENBLIT, S. (1988) The interactions between diagrammatic representations and verbal explanations in learning from social science texts. Instructional Science, 17 (3), 219-234.
77. GUTLOFF, K. (ed.) (1996) Multiple Intelligences (West Haven, CT: National Education Association).
78. HAGGERTY, B. A. (1995) Nurturing Intelligences: A Guide to Multiple Intelligences Theory and Teaching (Menlo Park, CA: Addison Wesley).
79. HALLIDAY, M. A. K. and MARTIN, J. R. (1993) Writing Science: Literacy and Discursive Power (London: Falmer).
80. HATCH, T. (1997) Getting specific about multiple intelligences. Educational Leadership, 54 (6), 26-29.
81. HEDRICK, J. and ROBERTS, S. (1996) Turning research into action. In K. Gutloff (ed.), Multiple Intelligences (Westhaven, CT: National Education Association), 73-85.
82. HEGARTY, M. and KOZHEVNIKOV, M. (1999) Types of visual-spatial representations and mathematical problem solving. Journal of Educational Psychology, 91 (4), 684-689.
83. HOERR, T. R. (2000) Becoming a Multiple Intelligences School (Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development).
84. HOLYOAK, K. J. and THAGARD, P. (1995) Mental Leaps: Analogy in Creative Thought (Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press).
85. HUGHES, C. and PLOMIN, R. (2000) Individual differences in the understanding of mind: genes, non-shared environment and modularity. In P. Carruthers and A. Chamberlain (eds), Evolution and the Human Mind: Modularity, Language and Meta-cognition (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), 47-61.
86. IDING, M. K. (1997) How analogies foster learning from science texts. Instructional Science, 25 (4), 233-253.
87. JACKENDOFF, R. (1996) How language helps us think. Pragmatics and Cognition, 4 (1), 1-34.
88. JENKINS, J. M. (1988) A learning style approach to effective instruction. In J. W. Keefe (ed.), Profiling and Utilizing Learning Style (Reston, VA: National Association of Secondary School Principals), 41-45.
89. JITENDRA, A. K. and KAMEENUI, E. J. (1993) Dynamic assessment as a compensatory assessment approach: a description and analysis. RASE: Reading and Special Education, 14 (5), 6-18.
90. JUMPER, S. (1996) Gifts within every student. In K. Gutloff (ed.), Multiple Intelligences (West Haven, CT: National Education Association), 37-47.
91. KALYUGA, S., CHANDLER, P. and SWELLER, J. (1999) Managing split-attention and redundancy in multimedia instruction. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 13 (4), 351-371.
92. KANT, I. (1963 [1787]) Critique of Pure Reason, trans. N. K. Smith (London: Macmillan).
93. KAVALE, K. A. and FORNESS, S. R. (1987) Substance over style: assessing the efficacy of modality testing and teaching. Exceptional Children, 54 (3), 228-239.
94. KEEFE, J. W. (1988) Development of the NAASP learning style profile. In J. W. Keefe (ed.), Profiling and Utilizing Learning Style (Reston, VA: National Association of Secondary School Principals), 1-21.
95. KENDALL, B. and HARLESS, S. (1996) Weathering multiple intelligences. In K. Gutloff (ed.), Multiple Intelligences (West Haven, CT: National Education Association), 61-71.
96. KINTSCH, W., HEALY, A. F., HEGARTY, M., PENNINGTON, B. F. and SALTHOUSE, T. A. (1999) Models of working memory: eight questions and some general issues. In A. Miyake and P. Shah (eds), Models of Working Memory: Mechanisms of Active Mechanism and Executive Control (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), 412-441.
97. KIRBY, J. R. (1993) Collaborative and competitive effects of verbal and spatial processes. Learning and Instruction, 3 (3), 201-214.
98. KIRBY, J. R. and BOULTER, D. R. (1999) Spatial ability and transformational geometry. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 14 (2), 283-294.
99. KIRBY, J. R., MOORE, P. J. and SCHOELD, N. J. (1988) Verbal and visual learning styles. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 13 (2), 169-184.
100. KLEIN, P. D. (1997) Multiplying the problems of intelligence by eight: a critique of Gardner's theory. Canadian Journal of Education, 22 (4), 377-394.
101. KLEIN, P. D. (1998) A response to Howard Gardner: falsifiability, empirical evidence, and pedagogical usefulness in educational psychologies. Canadian Journal of Education, 23 (1), 103-112.
102. KLEIN, P. D. (2000) Elementary students' strategies for writing-to-learn in science. Cognition and Instruction, 18 (3), 317-348.
103. KRULEY, P., SCIAMA, S. C. and GLENBERG, A. M. (1994) On-line processing of textual illustrations in the visuospatial sketchpad: evidence from dual-task studies. Memory & Cognition, 22 (3), 261-272.
104. KULHAVY, R. W., LEE, J. B. and CATERINO, L. C. (1985) Conjoint retention of maps and related discourse. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 10 (1), 28-37.
105. LAMPERT, M. (1985) How do teachers manage to teach: perspectives on problems in practice. Harvard Educational Review, 55 (2), 178-194.
106. LANGER, S. K. (1942) Philosophy in a New Key: A Study in the Symbolism of Reason, Rite, and Art (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press).
107. LARKIN, J. H. and SIMON, H. A. (1987) Why a diagram is (sometimes) worth ten thousand words. Cognitive Science, 11 (1), 65-99.
108. LAZEAR, D. (1999) Eight Ways of Knowing: Teaching for Multiple Intelligences, 3rd edn (Arlington Heights, IL: SkyLight Training and Publishing).
109. LEAVER, B. L. (1997) Teaching the Whole Class, 4th edn (Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press).
110. LEUNG, M., LOW, R. and SWELLER, J. (1997) Learning from equations or words. Instructional Science, 25 (1), 37-70.
111. LEWIS, A. B. (1989) Training students to represent arithmetic word problems. Journal of Educational Psychology, 81 (4), 521-531.
112. LOWRIE, T. (1996) The use of visual imagery as a problem-solving tool: classroom implementation. Journal of Mental Imagery, 20 (3 and 4), 127-139.
113. MAYER, R. E. and MORENO, R. (1998) A split-attention effect in multimedia learning: evidence for dual processing systems in working memory. Journal of Educational Psychology, 90 (2), 312-320.
114. MAYER, R. E. and SIMS, V. K. (1994) For whom is a picture worth a thousand words? extensions of a dual-coding theory of multimedia learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 86 (3), 389-401.
115. MAYER, R. E., BOVE, W., BRYMAN, A., MARS, R. and TAPANGCO, L. (1996) When less is more: meaningful learning from visual and verbal summaries of science textbook lessons. Journal of Educational Psychology, 88 (1), 64-73.
116. MCCOWN, R. R., DRISCOLL, M., ROOP, P., SAKLOFSKE, D. H., SCHWEAN, V. L., KELLY, I. W. and HAINES, L. P. (1999) Educational Psychology: A Learning-Centred Approach to Classroom Practice, 2nd Canadian edn (Scarborough, ON: Allyn & Bacon).
117. MESSICK, S. (1994) The matter of style: manifestations of personality in cognition, learning, and teaching. Educational Psychologist, 29 (3), 121-136.
118. MITHEN, S. (1996) The Prehistory of the Mind: A Search for the Origins of Art, Religion and Science (London: Thames and Hudson).
119. MORENO, R. and MAYER, R. E. (1999a) Cognitive principles of multimedia learning: the role of modality and contiguity. Journal of Educational Psychology, 91 (2), 358-368.
120. MORENO, R. and MAYER, R. E. (1999b) Multimedia-supported metaphors for meaning making in mathematics. Cognition and Instruction, 17 (3), 215-248.
121. MOUSAVI, S. Y., LOW, R. and SWELLER, J. (1995) Reducing cognitive load by mixing auditory and visual presentation modes. Journal of Educational Psychology, 87 (2), 319-334.
122. MUNRO, J. and HOWES, D. (1998) The effect of cognitive style on learning to write a letter of complaint. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 68 (2), 243-254.
123. NASH, J. G., SCHUMACHER, G. M. and CARLSON, B. W. (1993) Writing from sources: a structure-mapping model. Journal of Educational Psycliology, 85 (1), 159-170.
124. NETZ, R. (1999) Linguistic formulae as cognitive tools. Pragmatics and Cognition, 7 (1), 147-176.
125. NEUMAN, Y. and SCHWARZ, B. (2000) Substituting one mystery for another: the role of self-explanations in solving algebra word problems. Learning and Instruction, 10 (3), 203-220.
126. NEWELL, A. and SIMON, H. A. (1972) Human Problem Solving (Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall).
127. NORMAN, D. A. (1993) Things that Make us Smart: Defending Human Attributes in the Age of the Machine (Cambridge, MA: Perseus Books).
128. OESTERMEIER, U. and HESSE, F. W. (2000) Verbal and visual arguments. Cognition, 75 (1), 65-104.
129. OGBORN, J. and MARTINS, I. (1996) Metaphorical understandings and scientific ideas. International Journal of Science Education, 18 (6), 631-652.
130. O'HALLORAN, A.-M. and GAUVIN, L. (1994) The role of preferred cognitive style in the effectiveness of imagery training. International Journal of Sport Psychology, 25 (1), 19-31.
131. OLSON, D. R. (1977) From utterance to text: the bias of language in speech and writing. Harvard Educational Review, 47 (3), 257-281.
132. OLSON, D. R. (1994) The World on Paper: The Conceptual and Cognitive Implications of Writing and Reading (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
133. PAIVIO, A. (1986) Mental Representations: A Dual-Coding Approach (New York: Oxford University Press).
134. PAIVIO, A. and HARSHMAN, R. (1983) Factor analysis of a questionnaire on imagery and verbal habits and skills. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 37 (4), 461-483.
135. PAIVIO, A., CLARK, J. M. and KHAN, M. (1988) Effects of concreteness and semantic relatedness on composite imagery ratings and cued recall. Memory & Cognition, 16 (5), 422-430.
136. PEIRCE, C. S. (1998 [1907]) Pragmatism. In N. Houser, A. De Tienne, J. R. Eller, C. L. Clark, A. C. Lewis and D. B. Davis (eds), The Essential Peirce: Selected Philosophical Writings (1893-1913), Vol. 2 (Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press), 398-433.
137. PERNER, J. (1998) The meta-intentional nature of executive functions and theory of mind. In P. Carruthers and J. Boucher (eds), Language and Thought: Interdisciplinary Themes (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), 270-283.
138. PERRY, J. (1996) Getting support from parents and administrators. In K. Gutloff (ed.), Multiple Intelligences (West Haven, CT: National Education Association), 49-59.
139. PILLAY, H. (1998) Cognitive processes and strategies employed by children to learn spatial representations. Learning and Instruction, 8 (1), 1-18.
140. PLASS, J. L., CHUN, D. M., MAYER, R. E. and LEUTNER, D. (1998) Supporting visual and verbal learning preferences in a second-language multimedia learning environment. Journal of Educational Psychology, 90 (1), 25-36.
141. PRESMEG, N. C. (1992) Prototypes, metaphors, metonymies and imaginative rationality in high school mathematics. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 23 (6), 595-610.
142. REIFF, J. C. (1992) Learning Styles (Washington, DC: National Education Association).
143. RICHARDS, C. A. and SANDERSON, J. A. (1999) The role of imagination in facilitating deductive reasoning in 2-, 3- and 4-year-olds. Cognition, 72 (2), B1-B9.
144. RICHARDSON, A. (1977) Verbalizer-visualizer: a cognitive style dimension. Journal of Mental Imagery, 1 (1), 109-126.
145. RIDING, R. and DOUGLAS, G. (1993) The effect of cognitive style and mode of presentation on learning performance. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 63 (2), 297-307.
146. RIDING, R. and RAYNER, S. (1998) Cognitive Style and Learning Strategics: Understanding Style Differences in Learning and Behaviour (London: David Fulton).
147. RIDING, R. and SADLER-SMITH, E. (1992) Type of instructional material, cognitive style and learning performance. Educational Studies, 18 (3), 323-340.
148. ROBINSON, A. H. (1987) Reflections on the Gall-Peters projection. Social Education, 51 (4), 260-264.
149. ROBINSON, D. H. and KIEWRA, K. A. (1995) Visual argument: graphic organizers are superior to outlines in improving learning from text. Journal of Educational Psychology, 87 (3), 455-467.
150. ROTH, W.-M. and BOWEN, G. M. (1999) Complexities of graphical representations during ecology lectures: an analysis rooted in semiotics and hermeneutic phenomenology. Learning and Instruction, 9 (3), 235-255.
151. SADLER-SMITH, E. and RIDING, R. (1999) Cognitive style and instructional preferences. Instructional Science, 27 (5), 355-371.
152. SADOSKI, M. and PAIVIO, A. (2001) Imagery and Text: A Dual Coding Theory of Reading and Writing (Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum).
153. SARASIN, L. C. (1999) Learning Style Perspectives: Impact in the Classroom (Madison, WI: Atwood).
154. SARTON, G. (1955) The Appreciation of Ancient and Medieval Science During the Renaissance (1450-1600) (Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press).
155. SCHIANO, D. J. and TVERSKY, B. (1992) Structure and strategy in encoding simplified graphs. Memory & Cognition, 20 (1), 12-20.
156. SCHNOTZ, W., PICARD, E. and HRON, A. (1993) How do successful and unsuccessful learners use texts and graphics? Learning and Instruction, 3 (3), 181-199.
157. SCHOFIELD, N. J. and KIRBY, J. R. (1994) Position location on topographical maps: effects of task factors, training, and strategies. Cognition and Instruction, 12 (1), 35-60.
158. SCHWARTZ, D. L. and BLACK, J. B. (1996) Shuttling between depictive models and abstract rules: induction and fallback. Cognitive Science, 20 (4), 457-497.
159. SEIFERT, L. S. (1997) Activating representations in permanent memory: different benefits for pictures and words. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 23 (5), 1106-1121.
160. SHAH, P., MAYER, R. E. and HEGARTY, M. (1999) Graphs as aids to knowledge construction: signaling techniques for guiding the process of graph comprehension. Journal of Educational Psychology, 91 (4), 690-702.
161. SHULMAN, L. S. (1986) Those who understand: knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15 (2), 4-14.
162. SIEGEL, M. (1995) More than words: the generative power of transmediation for learning. Canadian Journal of Education, 20 (4), 455-475.
163. SLAVIN, R. E. (1997) Educational Psychology: Theory and Practice, 5th edn (Needham Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon).
164. SMAGORINSKY, P. (1995) Constructing meaning in the disciplines: reconceptualizing writing across the disciplines as composing across the curriculum. American Journal of Education, 103 (2), 160-184.
165. SMITH, H. A. (1995) Introduction: cultural psychology and semiotics: confronting meaning in educational practice. Canadian Journal of Education, 20 (4), 407-414.
166. SNIDER, V. E. (1992) Learning styles and learning to read: a critique. Remedial and Special Education, 13 (1), 6-18.
167. SPECHT, J. A. and MARTIN, J. (1998) Individual differences in imaginal and verbal thinking habits of grade 6 students. Journal of Mental Imagery, 22 (3 and 4), 229-236.
168. STAHL, S. A. and KUHN, M. R. (1995) Does whole language or instruction matched to learning styles help children learn to read? School Psychology Review, 24 (3), 393-404.
169. STANESCU-COSSON, R., PINEL, P., VAN DE MOORTELE, P.-F., LE BIHAN, D., COHEN, L. and DEHAENE, S. (2000) Understanding dissociations in dyscalculia: a brain imaging study of the impact of number size on the cerebral networks for exact and approximate calculation. Brain, 123 (11), 2240-2255.
170. STANOVICH, K. E. (1993) Does reading make you smarter? literacy and the development of verbal intelligence. In H. W. Reese (ed.), Advances in Child Development and Behavior, Vol. 24 (San Diego, CA: Academic Press), 133-180.
171. STANOVICH, K. E., SIEGEL, L. S. and GOTTARDO, A. (1997) Converging evidence for phonological and surface subtypes of reading disability. Journal of Educational Psychology, 89 (1), 114-127.
172. STENNING, K. (1999) The cognitive consequences of modality assignment for educational communication: the picture in logic teaching. Learning and Instruction, 9 (4), 391-410.
173. STENNING, K., COX, R. and OBERLANDER, J. (1995) Contrasting the cognitive effects of graphical and sentential logic teaching: reasoning, representation, and individual differences. Language and Cognitive Processes, 10 (3 and 4), 333-354.
174. STERNBERG, R. J. (1983) How much gall is too much gall? a review of H. Gardner, Frames of Mind: The Theory of Multiple Intelligences. Contemporary Education Review, 2 (3), 215-224.
175. STERNBERG, R. J. (1997) Thinking Styles (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
176. STERNBERG, R. J. and GRIGORENKO, E. L. (2002) Dynamic Testing: The Nature and Measurement of Learning Potential (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
177. SUHOR, C. (1984) Towards a semiotics-based curriculum. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 16 (3), 247-257.
178. TABACHNECK-SCHIJF, H. J. M., LEONARDO, A. M. and SIMON, H. A. (1997) CaMeRa: a computational model of multiple representations. Cognitive Science, 21 (3), 305-350.
179. TOMASELLO, M. (1999) The Cultural Origins of Human Cognition (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press).
180. TREAGUST, D. F., HARRISON, A. G., VENVILLE, G. J. and DAGHER, Z. (1996) Using an analogical approach to engender conceptual change. International Journal of Science Education, 18 (2), 213-229.
181. TUFTE, E. R. (1997) Visual Explanations: Images and Quantities, Evidence and Narrative (Cheshire, CT: Graphics Press).
182. TVERSKY, B., KUGELMASS, S. and WINTER, A. (1991) Cross-cultural and developmental trends in graphic productions. Cognitive Psychology, 23 (4), 515-557.
183. VAN DER MOLEN, J. H. W. and VAN DER VOORT, T. H. A. (1997) Children's recall of television and print news: a media comparison study. Journal of Educational Psychology, 89 (1), 82-91.
184. VENVILLE, G. J. and TREAGUST, D. F. (1996) The role of analogies in promoting conceptual change in biology. Instructional Science, 24 (4), 295-320.
185. VIDAL, A. and GILABERT, R. (1995) Teaching strategies to create visual representations of key ideas in content area materials: a long-term intervention inserted in school curriculum. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 10 (4), 433-147.
186. VYGOTSKY, L. and LURIA, A. (1994) Tool and symbol in child development. In R. van der Veer and J. Valsiner (eds), The Vygotsky Reader (Oxford: Basil Blackwell), 99-174.
187. WATSON, C. and WILLOWS, D. M. (1993) Evidence for a visual-processing- deficit subtype among disabled readers. In D. M. Willows, R. S. Kruk and E. Corcos (eds), Visual Processes in Reading and Reading Disabilities (Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum), 287-309.
188. WESTMAN, A. S., ALLISTON, G. R. and THERIAULT, E. A. (1997) Lack of correlations of sense-modality-oriented indices of learning styles with each other and with classroom tasks. Perceptual & Motor Skills, 84 (3), 731-737.
189. WILEY, J. and VOSS, J. F. (1999) Constructing arguments from multiple sources: tasks that promote understanding and not just memory for text. Journal of Educational Psychology, 91 (2), 301-311.
190. WONG, C.-M. T., DAY, J. D., MAXWELL, S. E. and MEARA, N. M. (1995) A multitrait-multimethod study of academic and social intelligence in college students. Journal of Educational Psychology, 87 (1), 117-133.
191. WYNN, T. (2000) Symmetry and the evolution of the modular linguistic mind. In P. Carruthers and A. Chamberlain (eds), Evolution and the Human Mind: Modularity, Language and Metacognition (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), 113-139.
192. YATES, G. C. R. (2000) Applying learning style research in the classroom: some cautions and the way ahead. In R. Riding and R. Rayner (eds), International Perspectives on Individual Differences: Vol. 1, Cognitive Styles (Stamford, CT: Ablex), 347-364.
193. YEE, P. L., HUNT, E. and PELLEGRINO, J. W. (1991) Coordinating cognitive information: task effects and individual differences in integrating information from several sources. Cognitive Psychology, 23 (4), 615-680.
194. 4. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 27 (4), 435-457.
195. ZHANG, J. (1997) The nature of external representations in problem solving. Cognitive Science, 21 (2), 179-217.
196. ZHANG, J. and NORMAN, D. A. (1994) Representations in distributed cognitive tasks. Cognitive Science, 18 (1), 87-122.
197. ZHANG, J. and NORMAN, D. A. (1995) A representational analysis of numeration systems. Cognition, 57 (3), 271-295.