Explicit and Implicit Memory for Rotating Objects

Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning Memory and Cognition

Volumn 29, Issue 4, 2003, Pages 554-562

  Liu, Taosheng ^a,b   Cooper, Lynn A ^a  

^a Och Spine at New York Presbyterian Hospitals   (United States)

^b NEW YORK UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; HUMAN; LONG TERM MEMORY; MEMORY; MOVEMENT PERCEPTION; REACTION TIME; RECOGNITION; ROTATION; VISION;

HUMANS; MEMORY; MOTION PERCEPTION; REACTION TIME; RECOGNITION (PSYCHOLOGY); RETENTION (PSYCHOLOGY); ROTATION; VISUAL PERCEPTION;

EID: 0141641026     PISSN: 02787393     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/0278-7393.29.4.554     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Anstis, S. (1986). Motion perception in the frontal plane. In K. R. Boff, L. Kaufman, & J. P. Thomas (Eds.), Handbook of perception and human performance (Vol. 1, pp. 16.1-16.27). New York: Wiley.
2. Beauchamp, M. S., Lee, K. E., Haxby, J. V., & Martin, A. (2002). Parallel visual motion processing streams for manipulable objects and human movements. Neuron, 34, 149-159.
3. Bernstein, L. J., & Cooper, L. A. (1997). Direction of motion influences perceptual identification of ambiguous figures. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 23, 721-737.
4. Biederman, I. (1985). Human image understanding: Recent research and a theory. Computer Vision, Graphics, & Image Processing, 32, 29-73.
5. Biederman, I., & Cooper, E. E. (1992). Size invariance in visual object priming. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 18, 121-133.
6. Bülthoff, H. H., & Edelman, S. (1992). Psychophysical support for a two-dimensional view interpolation theory of object recognition. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science, 89, 60-64.
7. Carrasco, M., & Seamon, J. G. (1996). Priming impossible figures in the object decision test: The critical importance of perceived stimulus complexity. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 3, 344-351.
8. Cooper, L. A., Hilton, H. J., Schacter, D. L., Frost, J., & Liu, T. (1997, November). Invariance over shape distorting transformations. Paper presented at the 38th Annual Meeting of the Psychonomic Society, Philadelphia, PA.
9. Cooper, L. A., & Schacter, D. L. (1992). Dissociation between structural and episodic representations of visual objects. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 1, 141-145.
10. Cooper, L. A., Schacter, D. L., Ballesteros, S., & Moore, C. (1992). Priming and recognition of transformed three-dimensional objects: Effects of size and reflection, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 18, 43-57.
11. Edelman, S. (1995). Class similarity and viewpoint invariance in recognition of 3D objects. Biological Cybernetics, 72, 207-220.
12. Freyd, J. J. (1987). Dynamic mental representations. Psychological Review, 94, 427-438.
13. Gibson, J. J. (1979). The ecological approach to visual perception. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
14. Hill, H., & Johnston, A. (2001). Categorizing sex and identity from the biological motion of faces. Current Biology, 11, 880-885.
15. Johansson, G. (1973). Visual perception of biological motion and a model for its analysis. Perception & Psychophysics, 14, 201-211.
16. Jolicoeur, P., Gluck, M. A., & Kosslyn, S. M. (1984). Pictures and names: Making the connection. Cognitive Psychology, 16, 243-275.
17. Kersteen-Tucker, Z. (1991). Long-term repetition priming with symmetric polygons and words. Memory & Cognition, 19, 37-43.
18. Kourtzi, Z., Bülthoff, H. H., Erb, M., & Grodd, W. (2002). Object-selective responses in the human motion area MT/MST. Nature Neuroscience, 5, 17-18.
19. Kozlowski, T. L., & Cutting, J. E. (1977), Recognizing the sex of a walker from a dynamic point-light display. Perception & Psychophysics, 21, 575-580.
20. Liu, T., & Cooper, L. A. (2001). The influence of task requirements on priming in object decision and matching. Memory & Cognition, 29, 874-882.
21. Loftus, G. R., & Masson, M. E. J. (1994). Using confidence intervals in within-subject designs. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 1, 476-490.
22. Marr, D., & Nishihara, H. K. (1978). Representation and recognition of the spatial organization of three-dimensional shapes. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, B, 200, 269-294.
23. O'Toole, A. J., Roark, D. A., & Abdi, H. (2002). Recognizing moving faces: A psychological and neural synthesis. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 6, 261-266.
24. Price, C. M. & Gilden, D. L., (2000). Representations of motion and direction. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 26, 18-30.
25. Ratcliff, R., & McKoon, G. (1995). Bias in the priming of object decisions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 21, 754-767.
26. Roediger, H. L., & McDermott, K. B. (1993). Implicit memory in normal human subjects. In F. Boller & J. Grafman (Eds.), Handbook of neuropsychology (pp. 63-131). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
27. Rosch, E., Mervis, C. B., Gray, W. D., Johnson, D. M., & Boyes-Braem, P. (1976). Basic objects in natural categories. Cognitive Psychology, 8, 382-439.
28. Schacter, D. L. (1987). Implicit memory: History and current status. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 13, 501-518.
29. Schacter, D. L., & Cooper, L. A. (1993). Implicit and explicit memory for novel visual objects: Structure and function. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 19, 995-1009.
30. Schacter, D. L., Cooper, L. A., & Delaney, S. M. (1990). Implicit memory for unfamiliar objects depends on access to structural descriptions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 119, 5-24.
31. Schacter, D. L., Cooper, L. A., Tharan, M., & Rubens, A. B. (1991). Preserved priming of novel objects in patients with memory disorders. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 3, 117-130.
32. Srinivas, K., & Schwoebel, J. (1998). Generalization to novel views from view combination. Memory & Cognition, 26, 768-779.
33. Stone, J. V. (1998). Object recognition using spatiotemporal signatures. Vision Research, 38, 947-951.
34. Stone, J. V. (1999). Object recognition: View-specificity and motion-specificity. Vision Research, 39, 4032-4044.
35. Tarr, M. J., & Bülthoff, H. H. (1998). Image-based object recognition in man, monkey and machine. Cognition, 67, 1-20.
36. Tarr, M. J., & Pinker, S. (1989). Mental rotation and orientation-dependence in shape recognition. Cognitive Psychology, 21, 233-282.
37. Tjan, B. S., & Legge, G. E. (1998). The viewpoint complexity of an object-recognition task. Vision Research, 38, 2335-2350.
38. Ungerleider, L. G., & Mishkin, M. (1982). Two cortical visual systems. In D. J. Ingle, M. A. Goodale, & R. J. W. Mansfield (Eds.), Analysis of visual behavior (pp. 549-580). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
39. Wallach, H., & O'Connell, D. N. (1953). The kinetic depth effect. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 45, 205-217.
40. Williams, P., & Tarr, M. J. (1997). Structural processing and implicit memory for possible and impossible figures. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 23, 1344-1361.