Brain responses to a subject's own name uttered by a familiar voice

Brain Research

Volumn 1082, Issue 1, 2006, Pages 142-152

  Holeckova, Irena ^a,b   Fischer, Catherine ^a   Giard, Marie Hélène ^c   Delpuech, Claude ^c   Morlet, Dominique ^c  

^a HÔPITAL NEUROLOGIQUE   (France)

^b CHARLES UNIVERSITY   (Czech Republic)

^c UNIVERSITÉ LYON 1   (France)

Author keywords

Coma; ERPs; Familiarity; Late slow waves; Novelty P3; Voice

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ARTICLE; ATTENTION; BRAIN FUNCTION; COGNITION; CONTROLLED STUDY; COOPERATION; DATA ANALYSIS; ELECTRODE; EVENT RELATED POTENTIAL; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; HYPOTHESIS; INVOLUNTARY MOVEMENT; MALE; NOMENCLATURE; NORMAL HUMAN; PASSIVE MOVEMENT; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROBABILITY; SCALP; SPATIAL DISCRIMINATION; SPEECH DISCRIMINATION; TASK PERFORMANCE; TEMPORAL SUMMATION; VOCALIZATION; VOICE;

ACOUSTIC STIMULATION; ADULT; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; BRAIN; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY; EVOKED POTENTIALS, AUDITORY; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; NAMES; REACTION TIME; RECOGNITION (PSYCHOLOGY); TIME FACTORS; VOICE;

EID: 33646491274     PISSN: 00068993     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.brainres.2006.01.089     Document Type: Article

References (60)

1. Alho K., Winkler I., Escera C., Huotilainen M., Virtanen J., Jaaskelainen I.P., Pekkonen E., and Ilmoniemi R.J. Processing of novel sounds and frequency changes in the human auditory cortex: magnetoencephalographic recordings. Psychophysiology 35 2 (1998) 211-224
2. Berlad I., and Pratt H. P300 in response to the subject's own name. Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol. 96 5 (1995) 472-474
3. Binder J.R., Frost J.A., Hammeke T.A., Bellgowan P.S., Springer J.A., Kaufman J.N., and Possing E.T. Human temporal lobe activation by speech and nonspeech sounds. Cereb. Cortex 10 5 (2000) 512-528
4. Courchesne E., Hillyard S.A., and Galambos R. Stimulus novelty, task relevance and the visual evoked potential in man. Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol. 39 2 (1975) 131-143
5. Curran T. Effects of attention and confidence on the hypothesized ERP correlates of recollection and familiarity. Neuropsychologia 42 8 (2004) 1088-1106
6. Damasio H., Grabowski T.J., Tranel D., Hichwa R.D., and Damasio A.R. A neural basis for lexical retrieval. Nature 380 6574 (1996) 499-505
7. De Giorgio C.M., Rabinowicz A.L., and Gott P.S. Predictive value of P300 event-related potentials compared with EEG and somatosensory evoked potentials in non-traumatic coma. Acta Neurol. Scand. 87 5 (1993) 423-427
8. Debener S., Makeig S., Delorme A., and Engel A.K. What is novel in the novelty oddball paradigm? Functional significance of the novelty P3 event-related potential as revealed by independent component analysis. Brain Res. Cogn. Brain Res. 22 3 (2005) 309-321
9. Delplanque S., Silvert L., Hot P., and Sequeira H. Event-related P3a and P3b in response to unpredictable emotional stimuli. Biol. Psychol. 68 2 (2005) 107-120
10. Escera C., Alho K., Winkler I., and Näätänen R. Neural mechanisms of involuntary attention to acoustic novelty and change in the acoustic environment. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 10 5 (1998) 590-604
11. Escera C., Yago E., and Alho K. Electrical responses reveal the temporal dynamics of brain events during involuntary attention switching. Eur. J. Neurosci. 14 5 (2001) 877-883
12. Escera C., Yago E., Corral M.-J., Corbera S., and Nunez M.I. Attention capture by auditory significant stimuli: semantic analysis follows attention switching. Eur. J. Neurosci. 18 8 (2003) 2408-2412
13. Fischer C., Morlet D., Bouchet P., Luaute J., Jourdan C., and Salord F. Mismatch negativity and late auditory evoked potentials in comatose patients. Clin. Neurophysiol. 110 9 (1999) 1601-1610
14. Fischer C., Luaute J., Adeleine P., and Morlet D. Predictive value of sensory and cognitive evoked potentials for awakening from coma. Neurology 63 4 (2004) 669-673
15. Folmer R.L., and Yingling C.D. Auditory P3 responses to name stimuli. Brain Lang. 56 2 (1997) 306-311
16. Friedman D., Cycowicz Y.M., and Gaeta H. The novelty P3: an event-related brain potential (ERP) sign of the brain's evaluation of novelty. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 25 4 (2001) 355-373
17. Gaeta H., Friedman D., and Hunt G. Stimulus characteristics and task category dissociate the anterior and posterior aspects of the novelty P3. Psychophysiology 40 2 (2003) 198-208
18. Gorno-Tempini M.L., Price C.J., Josephs O., Vandenberghe R., Cappa S.F., Kapur N., Frackowiak R.S., and Tempini M.L. The neural systems sustaining face and proper-name processing. Brain 121 Pt 11 (1998) 2103-2118
19. Gott P.S., Rabinowicz A.L., and Degiorgio C.M. P300 auditory event-related potentials in nontraumatic coma. Association with Glasgow Coma Score and awakening. Arch. Neurol. 48 12 (1991) 1267-1270
20. Guerit J.M. Medical technology assessment EEG and evoked potentials in the intensive care unit. Neurophysiol. Clin. 29 4 (1999) 301-317
21. Kane N.M., Curry S.H., Butler S.R., and Cummins B.H. Electrophysiological indicator of awakening from coma. Lancet 341 8846 (1993) 688
22. Kane N.M., Curry S.H., Rowlands C.A., Manara A.R., Lewis T., Moss T., Cummins B.H., and Butler S.R. Event-related potentials-neurophysiological tools for predicting emergence and early outcome from traumatic coma. Intensive Care Med. 22 1 (1996) 39-46
23. Kiehl K.A., Laurens K.R., Duty T.L., Forster B.B., and Liddle P.F. Neural sources involved in auditory target detection and novelty processing: an event-related fMRI study. Psychophysiology 38 1 (2001) 133-142
24. Kurtz D., Trapp C., Kieny M.T., Wassmer J.M., Mugnaioni M.D., Pack A., and Hoff E. Study of recovery and the post-anaesthetic period (author's transl). Rev. Electroencephalogr. Neurophysiol. Clin. 7 1 (1977) 62-69
25. Laureys S., Perrin F., Faymonville M.E., Schnakers C., Boly M., Bartsch V., Majerus S., Moonen G., and Maquet P. Cerebral processing in the minimally conscious state. Neurology 63 5 (2004) 916-918
26. Lew H.L., Slimp J., Price R., Massagli T.L., and Robinson L.R. Comparison of speech-evoked v tone-evoked P300 response: implications for predicting outcomes in patients with traumatic brain injury. Am. J. Phys. Med. Rehabil. 78 4 (1999) 367-371
27. Lew H.L., Dikmen S., Slimp J., Temkin N., Lee E.H., Newell D., and Robinson L.R. Use of somatosensory-evoked potentials and cognitive event-related potentials in predicting outcomes of patients with severe traumatic brain injury. Am. J. Phys. Med. Rehabil. 8 1 (2003) 53-61 (quiz 62-4, 80)
28. Loveless N.E., Simpson M., and Naatanen R. Frontal negative and parietal positive components of the slow wave dissociated. Psychophysiology 24 3 (1987) 340-345
29. McCarthy G., and Wood C.C. Scalp distributions of event-related potentials: an ambiguity associated with analysis of variance models. Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol. 62 3 (1985) 203-208
30. Mecklinger A. Interfacing mind and brain: a neurocognitive model of recognition memory. Psychophysiology 37 5 (2000) 565-582
31. Moray N. Attention in dichotic listening: affective cues and the influence of instructions. Q. J. Exp. Psychol. 11 (1959) 56-60
32. Muller H.M., and Kutas M. What's in a name? Electrophysiological differences between spoken nouns, proper names and one's own name. NeuroReport 8 1 (1996) 221-225
33. Näätänen R., and Gaillard A.W.K. The orienting reflex and the N2 deflection of the event-related potentials. In: Gaillard A.W.K., and Ritter W. (Eds). Tutorials in ERP Research: Endogenous Components (1983), North-Holland Publishing Company
34. Näätänen R., Simpson M., and Loveless N.E. Stimulus deviance and evoked potentials. Biol. Psychol. 14 1-2 (1982) 53-98
35. Nakamura K., Kawashima R., Sugiura M., Kato T., Nakamura A., Hatano K., Nagumo S., Kubota K., Fukuda H., Ito K., and Kojima S. Neural substrates for recognition of familiar voices: a PET study. Neuropsychologia 39 10 (2001) 1047-1054
36. Nessler D., Mecklinger A., and Penney T.B. Perceptual fluency, semantic familiarity and recognition-related familiarity: an electrophysiological exploration. Brain Res. Cogn. Brain Res. 22 2 (2005) 265-288
37. Ofek E., and Pratt H. Neurophysiological correlates of subjective significance. Clin. Neurophysiol. 116 10 (2005) 2354
38. Oswald I., Taylor A.M., and Treisman M. Discriminative responses to stimulation during human sleep. Brain 83 (1960) 440-453
39. Pernier J., Perrin F., and Bertrand O. Scalp current density fields: concept and properties. Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol. 69 4 (1988) 385-389
40. Perrin F., Bertrand O., and Pernier J. Scalp current density mapping: value and estimation from potential data. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 34 4 (1987) 283-288
41. Perrin F., Pernier J., Bertrand O., and Echallier J.F. Spherical splines for scalp potential and current density mapping. Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol. 72 2 (1989) 184-187
42. Perrin F., Garcia-Larrea L., Mauguiere F., and Bastuji H. A differential brain response to the subject's own name persists during sleep. Clin. Neurophysiol. 110 12 (1999) 2153-2164
43. Perrin F., Bastuji H., Mauguiere F., and Garcia-Larrea L. Functional dissociation of the early and late portions of human K-complexes. NeuroReport 11 8 (2000) 1637-1640
44. Polich J. P300 from a passive auditory paradigm. Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol. 74 4 (1989) 312-320
45. Pratt H., Berlad I., and Lavie P. 'Oddball' event-related potentials and information processing during REM and non-REM sleep. Clin. Neurophysiol. 110 1 (1999) 53-61
46. Proverbio A.M., Lilli S., Semenza C., and Zani A. ERP indexes of functional differences in brain activation during proper and common names retrieval. Neuropsychologia 39 8 (2001) 815-827
47. Rugg M.D., Schloerscheidt A.M., and Mark R.E. An electrophysiological comparison of two indices of recollection. J. Mem. Lang. 39 (1998) 47-69
48. Shah N.J., Marshall J.C., Zafiris O., Schwab A., Zilles K., Markowitsch H.J., and Fink G.R. The neural correlates of person familiarity. A functional magnetic resonance imaging study with clinical implications. Brain 124 Pt 4 (2001) 804-815
49. Signorino M., D'Acunto S., Angeleri F., and Pietropaoli P. Eliciting P300 in comatose patients. Lancet 345 8944 (1995) 255-256
50. Snyder E., and Hillyard S.A. Long-latency evoked potentials to irrelevant, deviant stimuli. Behav. Biol. 16 3 (1976) 319-331
51. Squires N.K., Squires K.C., and Hillyard S.A. Two varieties of long-latency positive waves evoked by unpredictable auditory stimuli in man. Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol. 38 4 (1975) 387-401
52. Sutton S., Braren M., Zubin J., and John E.R. Evoked-potential correlates of stimulus uncertainty. Science 150 700 (1965) 1187-1188
53. Van Lancker D.R., Cummings J.L., Kreiman J., and Dobkin B.H. Phonagnosia: a dissociation between familiar and unfamiliar voices. Cortex 24 2 (1988) 195-209
54. Van Lancker D.R., Kreiman J., and Cummings J. Voice perception deficits: neuroanatomical correlates of phonagnosia. J. Clin. Exp. Neuropsychol. 11 5 (1989) 665-674
55. Wilding E.L., and Rugg M.D. An event-related potential study of recognition memory with and without retrieval of source. Brain 119 Pt 3 (1996) 889-905
56. Wood N., and Cowan N. The cocktail party phenomenon revisited: how frequent are attention shifts to one's name in an irrelevant auditory channel?. J. Exp. Psychol. Learn Mem. Cogn. 21 1 (1995) 255-260
57. Yago E., Escera C., Alho K., Giard M.H., and Serra-Grabulosa J.M. Spatiotemporal dynamics of the auditory novelty-P3 event-related brain potential. Brain Res. Cogn. Brain Res. 16 3 (2003) 383-390
58. Yasuda Y., Nakamura T., and Beckman B. Brain processing of proper names. Aphasiology 14 11 (2000) 1067-1089
59. Yingling C.D., Hosobuchi Y., and Harrington M. P300 as a predictor of recovery from coma. Lancet 336 8719 (1990) 873
60. Zatorre R.J., Meyer E., Gjedde A., and Evans A.C. PET studies of phonetic processing of speech: review, replication, and reanalysis. Cereb. Cortex 6 1 (1996) 21-30