Translocation boost protein-folding efficiency of double-barreled chaperonins

Biophysical Journal

Volumn 90, Issue 10, 2006, Pages 3375-3381

  Coluzza, Ivan ^a   Van Der Vies, Saskia M ^b   Frenkel, Daan ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CAMBRIDGE   (United Kingdom)

^b VU UNIVERSITY AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

^c FOM INSTITUTE AMOLF   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CHAPERONIN;

ARTICLE; HYDROPHOBICITY; MODEL; MOLECULAR DYNAMICS; PROTEIN FOLDING; PROTEIN STRUCTURE; PROTEIN TRANSPORT; SIMULATION;

EID: 33646196636     PISSN: 00063495     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1529/biophysj.105.074898     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Fenton, W. A., and A. L. Horwich. 2003. Chaperonin-mediated protein folding: fate of substrate polypeptide. Q. Rev. Biophys. 36:229-256.
2. Thirumalai, D., D. Klimov, and G. Lorimer. 2003. Caging helps proteins fold. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 100:11195-11197.
3. Young, J. C., V. R. Agashe, K. Siegers, and F. U. Hartl. 2004. Pathways of chaperone-mediated protein folding in the cytosol. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 5:781-791.
4. Sigler, P. B., Z. Xu, H. S. Rye, S. G. Burston, W. A. Fenton, and A. L. Horwich. 1998. Structure and function in GroEL-mediated protein folding. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 67:581-608.
5. Takagi, F., N. Koga, and S. Takada. 2003. How protein thermodynamics and folding mechanisms are altered by the chaperonin cage: molecular simulations. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 100:11367-11372.
6. Stan, G., B. R. Brooks, and D. Thirumalai. 2005. Probing the "annealing" mechanism of GroEL minichaperone using molecular dynamics simulations. J. Mol. Biol. 350:817-829.
7. van der Vaart, A., J. Ma, and M. Karplus. 2004. The unfolding action of GroEL on a protein substrate. Biophys. J. 87:562-573.
8. Jewett, A. I., A. Baumketner, and J.-E. Shea. 2004. Accelerated folding in the weak hydrophobic environment of a chaperonin cavity: creation of an alternate fast folding pathway. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 101:13192-13197.
9. Thiyagarajan, P., S. Henderson, and A. Joachimiak. 1996. Solution structures of GroEL and its complex with rhodanese from small-angle neutron scattering. Structure. 4:79-88.
10. Saibil, H. R., D. Zheng, A. M. Roseman, A. S. Hunter, G. M. F. Watson, S. Chen, A. A. Dermauer, B. P. Ohara, S. P. Wood, N. H. Mann, L. K. Barnett, and R. J. Ellis. 1993. ATP induces large quaternary rearrangements in a cage-like chaperonin structure. Curr. Biol. 3:265-273.
11. Saibil, H., and N. A. Ranson. 2002. The chaperonin folding machine. Trends Biochem. Sci. 27:627-632.
12. Rabut, G., and J. Ellenberg. 2001. Nucleocytoplasmic transport: diffusion channel or phase transition? Curr. Biol. 11:R551-R554.
13. Kim, H., and K. J. Shin. 1999. Exact solution of the reversible diffusion-influenced reaction for an isolated pair in three dimensions. Phys. Rev. Lett. 82:1578-1581.
14. Morrissey, M. P., Z. Ahmed, and E. I. Shakhnovich. 2004. The role of cotranslation in protein folding: a lattice model study. Polymer. 45:557-571.
15. Betancourt, M., and D. Thirumalai. 1999. Pair potentials for protein folding: choice of reference states and sensitivity of predicted native states to variations in the interaction schemes. Protein Sci. 8:361-369.
16. Miyazawa, S., and R. Jernigan. 1985. Estimation of effective interresidue contact energies from protein crystal structures: quasi-chemical approximation. Macromolecules. 18:534-552.
17. Shakhnovich, E., and A. Gutin. 1993. Engineering of stable and fastfolding sequences of model proteins. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 90:7195-7199.
18. Coluzza, I., H. G. Muller, and D. Frenkel. 2003. Designing refoldable model molecules. Phys. Rev. E. 68:046703.
19. Coluzza, I., and D. Frenkel. 2004. Designing specificity of proteinsubstrate interactions. Phys. Rev. E. 70:051917.
20. Coluzza, I., and D. Frenkel. 2005. Virtual-move parallel tempering. Chemphyschem. 6:1779-1783.
21. Weissman, J. S., C. M. Hohl, O. Kovalenko, Y. Kashi, S. Chen, K. Braig, H. R. Saibil, W. A. Fenton, and A. L. Norwich. 1995. Mechanism of GroEL action: productive release of polypeptide from a sequestered position under GroES. Cell. 83:577-587.
22. Weissman, J. S., H. S. Rye, W. A. Fenton, J. M. Beechem, and A. L. Horwich. 1996. Characterization of the active intermediate of a GroEL-GroES-mediated protein folding reaction. Cell. 84:481-490.
23. Hayer-Hartl, M., F. Weber, and F. Hartl. 1996. Mechanism of chaperonin action: GroES binding and release can drive GroEL-mediated protein folding in the absence of ATP hydrolysis. EMBO J. 15:6111-6121.
24. Chaudhry, C., G. W. Farr, M. J. Todd, H. S. Rye, A. T. Brunger, P. D. Adams, A. L. Horwich, and P. B. Sigler. 2003. Role of the gamma-phosphate of ATP in triggering protein folding by GroELGroES: function, structure and energetics. EMBO J. 22:4877-4887.
25. Weissman, J. S., Y. Kashi, W. A. Fenton, and A. L. Horwich. 1994. GroEL-mediated protein-folding proceeds by multiple rounds of binding and release of nonnative forms. Cell. 78:693-702.
26. Burston, S. G., J. S. Weissman, G. W. Farr, W. A. Fenton, and A. L. Norwich. 1996. Release of both native and non-native proteins from a cis-only GroEL ternary complex. Nature. 383:96-99.
27. Martin, J., and F. U. Hartl. 1997. The effect of macromolecular crowding on chaperonin-mediated protein folding. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 94:1107-1112.
28. Derrida, B. 1981. Random-energy model: an exactly solvable model of disordered systems. Phys. Rev. B. 24:2613-2626.
29. Frenkel, D. 2004. Speed-up of Monte Carlo simulations by sampling of rejected states. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 101:17571-17575.