Probing the "annealing" mechanism of GroEL minichaperone using molecular dynamics simulations

Journal of Molecular Biology

Volumn 350, Issue 4, 2005, Pages 817-829

  Stan, George ^a   Brooks, Bernard R ^a   Thirumalai, D ^b  

^a NATIONAL HEART LUNG AND BLOOD INSTITUTE   (United States)

^b University of Maryland   (United States)

Author keywords

GroEL minichaperone; MD simulations; Protein protein interactions; Transient binding release mechanism

Indexed keywords

CASEIN; CHAPERONE; PROTEIN; PROTEIN GROEL; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

ARTICLE; GENETIC PROCEDURES; HYDROGEN BOND; HYDROPHOBICITY; MOLECULAR DYNAMICS; MOLECULAR INTERACTION; MOLECULAR MODEL; MOLECULAR PROBE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN BINDING; PROTEIN CONFORMATION; PROTEIN DOMAIN; PROTEIN FOLDING; PROTEIN ISOLATION; PROTEIN PROTEIN INTERACTION; PROTEIN SECONDARY STRUCTURE; PROTEIN STABILITY; PROTEIN STRUCTURE; SIMULATION;

EID: 20544466881     PISSN: 00222836     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmb.2005.05.012     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. A. Horovitz, Y. Fridmann, G. Kafri, and O. Yifrach Allostery in chaperonins J. Struct. Biol. 135 2001 104 114
2. Y. Makino, H. Taguchi, and M. Yoshida Truncated GroEL monomer has the ability to promote folding of rhodanese without GroES and ATP FEBS Letters 336 1993 363 367
3. R. Zahn, A.M. Buckle, S. Perrett, C.M. Johnson, F.J. Corrales, R. Golbik, and A.R. Fersht Chaperone activity and structure of monomeric polypeptide binding domains of GroEL Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 93 1996 15024 15029
4. J.D. Wang, M.D. Michelitsch, and J.S. Weissman GroEL-GroES-mediated protein folding requires an intact central cavity Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 95 1998 12163 12168
5. M.J. Todd, G.H. Lorimer, and D. Thirumalai Chaperonin-facilitated protein folding: optimization of rate and yield by an iterative annealing mechanism Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 93 1996 4030 4035
6. D. Thirumalai, and G.H. Lorimer Chaperonin-mediated protein folding Annu. Rev. Biophys. Biomol. Struct. 30 2001 245 269
7. M.R. Betancourt, and D. Thirumalai Exploring the kinetic requirements for enhancement of protein folding rates in the GroEL cavity J. Mol. Biol. 287 1999 627 644
8. D. Thirumalai Theoretical perspectives on in vitro and in vivo protein folding S. Doniach Statistical Mechanics, Protein Structure, and Protein-Substrate Interactions 1994 Plenum Press New York 115 134
9. H. Orland, and D. Thirumalai A kinetic model for chaperonin assisted protein folding J. Phys. 7 1997 533 560
10. A.I. Jewett, A. Baumketner, and J.E. Shea Accelerated folding in the weak hydrophobic environment of a chaperonin cavity: creation of an alternate fast folding pathway Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 101 2004 13192 13197
11. L. Chen, and P.B. Sigler The crystal structure of a GroEL/peptide complex: plasticity as a basis for substrate diversity Cell 99 1999 757 768
12. C. Chothia, M. Levitt, and D. Richardson Helix to helix packing in proteins J. Mol. Biol. 145 1981 215 250
13. G. Stan, D. Thirumalai, G.H. Lorimer, and B.R. Brooks Annealing function of GroEL: structural and bioinformatic analysis Biophys. Chem. 100 2003 453 467
14. R.D. Mountain, and D. Thirumalai Ergodic measures for the simulation for dielectric properties of water Comput. Phys. Commun. 62 1991 352 359
15. A.M. Buckle, R. Zahn, and A.R. Fersht A structural model for GroEL-polypeptide recognition Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 94 1997 3571 3575
16. M. Shtilerman, G.H. Lorimer, and S.W. Englander Chaperonin function: folding by forced unfolding Science 284 1999 822 825
17. A. van der Vaart, J. Ma, and M. Karplus The unfolding action of GroEL on a protein substrate Biophys. J. 87 2004 562 573
18. T.K. Chaudhuri, G.W. Farr, W.A. Fenton, S. Rospert, and A.L. Horwich GroEL/GroES-mediated folding of a protein too large to be encapsulated Cell 107 2001 223 233
19. J. Kyte, and R.F. Doolittle A simple method for displaying the hydropathic character of a protein J. Mol. Biol. 157 1982 105 132
20. D. Eisenberg, E. Schwartz, M. Komaromy, and R. Wall Analysis of membrane and surface protein sequences with the hydrophobic moment plot J. Mol. Biol. 179 1984 125 142
21. T.A. Tatusova, and T.L. Madden BLAST 2 sequences, a new tool for comparing protein and nucleotide sequences FEMS Microbiol. Letters 174 1999 247 250
22. D. Chivian, D.E. Kim, L. Malmström, P. Bradley, T. Robertson, and P. Murphy Automated prediction of CASP-5 structures using the Robetta server Proteins: Struct. Funct. Genet. 53 2003 524 533
23. B. Rost, and C. Sander Prediction of protein structure at better than 70% accuracy J. Mol. Biol. 232 1993 584 599
24. B.R. Brooks, R.E. Bruccoleri, B.D. Olafson, D.J. States, S. Swaminathan, and M. Karplus CHARMM: a program for macromolecular energy, minimization and dynamics calculations J. Comput. Chem. 4 1983 187 217
25. A.D. MacKerell Jr, D. Bashford, M. Bellott, R.L. Dunbrack Jr, J. Evanseck, and M.J. Field All-hydrogen empirical potential for molecular modeling and dynamics studies of proteins using the CHARMM22 force field J. Phys. Chem. B 102 1998 3586 3616
26. W.L. Jorgensen, J. Chandrasekhar, J.D. Madura, R.W. Impey, and M.L. Klein Comparison of simple potential functions for simulating liquid water J. Chem. Phys. 79 1983 926 935
27. U. Essmann, L. Perera, M.L. Berkowitz, T. Darden, H. Lee, and L.G. Pedersen A smooth particle mesh Ewald method J. Chem. Phys. 103 1995 8577 8593
28. H.J.C. Berendsen, W.F. van Gunsteren, H.R.J. Zwinderman, and R.G. Geurtsen Simulations of proteins in water Ann. New York Acad. Sci. 482 1986 268 286
29. M.E. Fisher Shape of a self-avoiding walk or polymer chain J. Chem. Phys. 44 1966 616 622
30. W. Humphrey, A. Dalke, and K. Schulten VMD-visual molecular dynamics J. Mol. Graph. 14 1996 33 38