An Expanded Protein Folding Cage in the GroEL-gp31 Complex

Journal of Molecular Biology

Volumn 358, Issue 3, 2006, Pages 905-911

  Clare, Daniel K ^a   Bakkes, Patrick J ^b   van Heerikhuizen, Harm ^b   van der Vies, Saskia M ^b   Saibil, Helen R ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^b VU UNIVERSITY AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

bacteriophage T4; cryo electron microscopy; gp31; GroEL; molecular chaperone

Indexed keywords

ADENOSINE DIPHOSPHATE; ADENOSINE TRIPHOSPHATE; CHAPERONIN; COAT PROTEIN; GLYCOPROTEIN; GLYCOPROTEIN GP23; GLYCOPROTEIN GP31; POLYPEPTIDE; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

ARTICLE; BACTERIOPHAGE T4; COMPLEX FORMATION; CRYOELECTRON MICROSCOPY; CRYSTAL STRUCTURE; ESCHERICHIA COLI; IMAGE PROCESSING; PEPTIDE MAPPING; PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN FOLDING; PROTEIN PROTEIN INTERACTION; PROTEIN STRUCTURE;

ESCHERICHIA COLI;

EID: 33646057665     PISSN: 00222836     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmb.2006.02.033     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Houry W.A., Frishman D., Eckerskorn C., Lottspeich F., and Hartl F.U. Identification of in vivo substrates of the chaperonin GroEL. Nature 402 (1999) 147-154
2. Kerner M., Naylor D., Ishihama Y., Maier T., Chang H., Stines A., et al. Proteome-wide analysis of chaperonin-dependent protein folding in Escherichia coli. Cell 122 (2005) 209-220
3. Fayet O., Ziegelhoffer T., and Georgopoulos C. The GroES and GroEL heat shock gene products of Escherichia coli are essential for bacterial growth at all temperatures. J. Bacteriol. 171 (1989) 1379-1385
4. Braig K., Otwinowski Z., Hegde R., Boisvert D.C., Joachimiak A., Horwich A.L., and Sigler P.B. The crystal structure of the bacterial chaperonin GroEL at 2.8 Å. Nature 371 (1994) 578-586
5. Fenton W.A., Kashi Y., Furtak K., and Horwich A.L. Residues in chaperonin GroEL required for polypeptide binding and release. Nature 371 (1994) 614-619
6. Lin Z., Schwartz F.P., and Eisenstein E. The hydrophobic nature of GroEL-substrate binding. J. Biol. Chem. 270 (1995) 1011-1014
7. 7 chaperonin complex. Nature 388 (1997) 741-750
8. Weissman J.S., Hohl C.M., Kovalenko O., Kashi Y., Chen S., Braig K., et al. Mechanism of GroEL action: productive release of polypeptide from a sequestered position under GroES. Cell 83 (1995) 577-587
9. Mayhew M., da Silva A.C., Martin J., Erdjument-Bromage H., Tempst P., and Hartl F.U. Protein folding in the central cavity of the GroEL-GroES chaperonin complex. Nature 379 (1996) 420-426
10. Lin Z., and Rye H.S. Expansion and compression of a protein folding intermediate by GroEL. Mol. Cell 16 (2004) 23-34
11. Landry S.J., Zeilstra-Ryalls J., Fayet O., Georgopoulos C., and Gierasch L.M. Characterization of a functionally important mobile domain of GroES. Nature 364 (1993) 255-258
12. Motojima F., Chaudhry C., Fenton W.A., Farr G.W., and Horwich A.L. Substrate polypeptide presents a load on the apical domains of the chaperonin GroEL. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 101 (2004) 15005-15012
13. Gray T.E., and Fersht A.R. Cooperativity in ATP hydrolysis by GroEL is increased by GroES. FEBS Letters 292 (1991) 254-258
14. Todd M.J., Viitanen P.V., and Lorimer G.H. Dynamics of the chaperonin ATPase cycle: implications for facilitated protein folding. Science 265 (1994) 659-666
15. Rye H.S., Roseman A.M., Chen S., Furtak K., Fenton W.A., Saibil H.R., and Horwich A.L. GroEL-GroES cycling: ATP and nonnative polypeptide direct alternation of folding-active rings. Cell 97 (1999) 325-338
16. Weissman J.S., Kashi Y., Fenton W.A., and Horwich A.L. GroEL-mediated protein folding proceeds by multiple rounds of binding and release of nonnative forms. Cell 78 (1994) 693-702
17. Georgopoulos C.P., Hendrix R.W., Casjens S.R., and Kaiser A.D. Host participation in bacteriophage lambda head assembly. J. Mol. Biol. 76 (1973) 45-60
18. Zweig M., and Cummings D.J. Cleavage of head and tail proteins during bacteriophage T5 assembly: selective host involvement in the cleavage of a tail protein. J. Mol. Biol. 80 (1973) 505-518
19. Laemmli U.K., Beguin F., and Gujer-Kellenberger G. A factor preventing the major head protein of bacteriophage T4 from random aggregation. J. Mol. Biol. 47 (1970) 69-85
20. van der Vies S.M., Gatenby A.A., and Georgopoulos C. Bacteriophage T4 encodes a co-chaperonin that can substitute for Escherichia coli GroES in protein folding. Nature 368 (1994) 654-656
21. Georgopoulos C.P., Hendrix R.W., Kaiser A.D., and Wood W.B. Role of the host cell in bacteriophage morphogenesis: effects of a bacterial mutation on T4 head assembly. Nature New Biol. 239 (1972) 38-41
22. Bakkes P.J., Faber B.W., van Heerikhuizen H., and van der Vies S.M. The T4-encoded cochaperonin, gp31, has unique properties that explain its requirement for the folding of the T4 major capsid protein. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 102 (2005) 8144-8149
23. Keppel F., Rychner M., and Georgopoulos C. Bacteriophage-encoded cochaperonins can substitute for Escherichia coli's essential GroES protein. EMBO Rep. 3 (2002) 893-898
24. Koonin E.V., and van der Vies S.M. Conserved sequence motifs in bacterial and bacteriophage chaperonins. Trends Biochem. Sci. 20 (1995) 14-15
25. Hunt J.F., van der Vies S.M., Henry L., and Deisenhofer J. Structural adaptations in the specialized bacteriophage T4 co-chaperonin Gp31 expand the size of the Anfinsen cage. Cell 90 (1997) 361-371
26. Ranson N.A., Clare D.K., Farr G.W., Houldershaw D., Horwich A.L., and Saibil H.R. Allosteric signalling of ATP hydrolysis in GroEL-GroES complexes. Nature Struct. Mol. Biol (2006) In the press
27. Landry S.J., Taher A., Georgopoulos C., and van der Vies S.M. Interplay of structure and disorder in cochaperonin mobile loops. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 93 (1996) 11622-11627
28. Snyder L., and Tarkowski H.J. The N terminus of the head protein of T4 bacteriophage directs proteins to the GroEL chaperonin. J. Mol. Biol. 345 (2005) 375-386
29. Fokine A., Leiman P.G., Shneider M.M., Ahvazi B., Boeshans K.M., Steven A.C., et al. Structural and functional similarities between the capsid proteins of bacteriophages T4 and HK97 point to a common ancestry. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 102 (2005) 7163-7168
30. Crowther R.A., Henderson R., and Smith J.M. MRC image processing programs. J. Struct. Biol. 116 (1996) 9-16
31. Frank J., Radermacher M., Penczek P., Zhu J., Li Y., Ladjadj M., and Leith A. SPIDER and WEB: processing and visualization of images in 3D electron microscopy and related fields. J. Struct. Biol. 116 (1996) 190-199
32. Navaza J., Lepault J., Rey F.A., Alvarez-Rua C., and Borge J. On the fitting of model electron densities into EM reconstructions: a reciprocal-space formulation. Acta Crystallog. sect. D 58 (2002) 1820-1825
33. Jones T.A., Zou J.-Y., Cowan S.W., and Kjeldgaard M. Improved methods for the building protein models in electron density maps and the location of errors in these models. Acta Crystallog. sect. A 47 (1991) 110-119