Assistance control on a haptic system for human adaptive mechatronics

Advanced Robotics

Volumn 20, Issue 3, 2006, Pages 323-348

  Suzuki, Satoshi ^a,b,c   Kurihara, Keiichi ^a   Furuta, Katsuhisa ^a,b,c,d,e   Harashima, Fumio ^a,b,c,f  

^a TOKYO DENKI UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

^b Tokyo Denki University ^*

^c IEEE   (Japan)

^d Science Council of   (Japan)

^e JAPAN SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY AGENCY   (Japan)

^f UNIVERSITY OF TOKYO   (Japan)

Author keywords

Assist control; Force vision interaction; Haptic interface; Online identification; Proficiency

Indexed keywords

ASSIST-CONTROL; FORCE/VISION INTERACTION; ONLINE IDENTIFICATION; PROFICIENCY;

ADAPTIVE SYSTEMS; CONTROL SYSTEM ANALYSIS; ESTIMATION; IDENTIFICATION (CONTROL SYSTEMS); INTERACTIVE COMPUTER SYSTEMS; MECHATRONICS; ONLINE SYSTEMS;

HAPTIC INTERFACES;

EID: 33645974331     PISSN: 01691864     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1163/156855306776014349     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. V. Hayward, S. R. Astley, M. Cruz-Hernandez, D. Grant and G. Robles-De-La-Torre, Haptic interfaces and devices. Sensor Rev. 24, 16-29 (2004).
2. S. P. DiMaio, S. E. Salcudean, C. Reboulet, S. Tafazoli and K. Hashtrudi-Zaad, A virtual excavator for controller development and evaluation, in: Proc. IEEE Int. Conf. on Robotics and Automation, Leuven, pp. 52-58 (1998).
3. M. Yoneda, F. Arai, T. Fukuda, K. Miyata and T. Naito, Operational assistance for straight-line operation of rough terrain crane, in: Proc. IEEE Int. Conf. on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, Tokyo, Vol. IV, pp. 27-32 (1999).
4. M. C. Nechyba and Y. Xu, Human control strategy: abstraction, verification and replication, IEEE Control Syst. Mag. 17, 48-61 (1997).
5. M. Yoneda, F. Arai, T. Fukuda, K. Miyata and T. Naito, Assistance system for crane operation with haptic display -operational assistance to suppress round payload Swing, in: Proc. IEEE Int. Conf. on Robotics and Automation. Detroit, MI, pp. 2924-2176 (1999).
6. A. Tustin, The nature of the operator's response in manual control and its implications for controller design. J. Inst. Electrical Eng. 94(IIA), 190-202 (1947).
7. J. R. Ragazzini, Engineering aspects of the human being as a servo-mechanism, Am. Psychol. 3, 219-314 (1948).
8. M. Iguchi, Human-Machine System. Kyo-ritsu (1970) (in Japanese).
9. S. Baron, D. L. Kleinman and W. H. Levison, An optimal control model of human response part II: prediction of human performance in a complex task, Automatica 6, 371-383 (1970).
10. D. M. Wolpert and M. Kawato, Multiple paired forward and inverse models for motor control, Neural Networks 11, 1317-1329 (1998).
11. M. Kawato, Internal models for motor control and trajectory planning, Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 9, 718-727 (1999).
12. R. C. Miall, D. J. Weir, D. M. Wolpert and J. F. Stein, Is the Cerebellum a Smith Predictor? J. Motor Behavior 25, 203-216 (1993).
13. K. Furuta, Control of pendulum: from super mechano-system to human adaptive mechatronics, in: Proc. 42nd Conf. on Decision and Control, Maui, HI, pp. 1498-1507 (2003).
14. K. Kosuge, K. Furuta and T. Yokoyama, Virtual model following control of robot arms, in: Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, Raleigh, NC, pp. 1549-1554 (1987).
15. D. L. Kleinman, S. Baron and W. H. Levison, An optimal control model of human response part I: theory and validation, Automatica 8, 357-369 (1970).
16. A. Phatak, H. Weinert, I. Segall and C. N. Day, Identification of a modified optimal control model for the human operator, Automatica 12, 31-41 (1976).
17. Y. Yamada, H. Konosu, T. Morizono and Y. Umetani, Proposal of skill-assist: a system of assisting human workers by reflecting their skills in positioning tasks, in: Proc. IEEE Int. Conf. on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, Tokyo, Vol. IV, pp. 11-16 (1999).
18. T. Tsuji and Y. Tanaka, Tracking control properties of human-robotic systems based on impedance control, IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybernet. A 30, 523-535 (2005).