Organizational Modularity and Intra-University Relationships Between Entrepreneurship Education and Technology Transfer

Advances in the Study of Entrepreneurship, Innovation, and Economic Growth

Volumn 16, Issue , 2005, Pages 275-311

  Nelson, Andrew ^a   Byers, Thomas ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 33645939527     PISSN: 10484736     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1016/S1048-4736(05)16010-X     Document Type: Review

References (56)

1. Adkison, J. A. (1979). Conflict and stress in interorganizational structures. ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED170861.
2. Association of University Technology Managers, Inc. (AUTM). AUTM licensing survey, FY 2003 survey summary (2004), AUTM, Northbrook
3. Autio E., Keelyey R., Klofsten M., and Ulfstedt T. Entrepreneurial Intent Among Students: Testing an Intent Model in Asia, Scandinavia and the USA. Frontiers of Entrepreneurship Research (1997), Babson College, Wellesley
4. Block Z., and Stumpf S.A. Entrepreneurship education research. In: Sexton D.J., and Kasarda J.D. (Eds). The state of the art in entrepreneurship (1992), PWS-Kent Publishing, Boston
5. Bok D. Universities in the marketplace (2003), Princeton University Press, Princeton
6. Brown S.L., and Eisenhardt K.M. The art of continuous change: Linking complexity theory and time-paced evolution in relentlessly shifting organizations. Administrative Science Quarterly 42 (1997) 1-34
7. Byers T., Keeley R., Leone A., Parker G., and Autio E. The impact of a research university in Silicon Valley: Entrepreneurship of alumni and faculty. The Journal of Private Equity 4 (2000) 7-15 (Winter 2000)
8. Charney, A., & Libecap, G. (2000). The impact of entrepreneurship education: An evaluation of the Berger Entrepreneurship Program at the University of Arizona, 1985-1999 Revised final report to the Kauffman Center for Entrepreneurial Leadership. Kansas City: The Ewing Marion Kauffman Foundation. 29 November 2000.
9. Cohen W., Nelson R.R., and Walsh J.P. Links and impacts: The influence of public research on industrial R&D. Management Science 48 1 (2002) 1-23
10. Elfenbein, D. (2004). Empirical studies of technology and alliance contracts. Ph.D. dissertation, Chapter 4, Harvard University (unpublished).
11. Friedland R., and Alford R.R. Bringing society back in: Symbols, practices, and institutional contradictions. In: Powell W.W., and DiMaggio P.J. (Eds). The new institutionalism in organizational analysis (1991), The University of Chicago Press, Chicago
12. Galbraith J. Designing complex organizations (1973), Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA
13. Gilbert, C. (2003). Beyond resource allocation: Toward a process model of response to discontinuous change. Working Paper. Cambridge: Harvard University.
14. Gorman G., Hanlon D., and King W. Some research perspectives on entrepreneurship education, enterprise education and education for small business management: A ten-year literature review. International Small Business Journal 15 (1997) 56-77
15. Gupta A., and Govindarajan V. Decentralization, strategy, and effectiveness of strategic business units in multi-business organizations. Academy of Management Review 11 4 (1986) 844-856
16. Hallen, B., & Eisenhardt, K. (2005). Organizational modularity: What is it? Working Paper. Department of Management Science and Engineering, Stanford University.
17. Hansen M.T. The search-transfer problem: The role of weak ties in sharing knowledge across organizational subunits. Administrative Science Quarterly 44 1 (1999) 82-111
18. Henderson R., Jaffe A.B., and Trajtenberg M. Universities as a source of commercial technology: A detailed analysis of university patenting, 1965-1988. The Review of Economics and Statistics 80 1 (1998) 119-127
19. Honig B. Entrepreneurship education: Toward a model of contingency-based business planning. Academy of Management Learning and Education 3 3 (2004) 258-273
20. Jaffe A. Real effects of academic research. The American Economic Review 79 5 (2000) 957-970
21. Jensen R., and Thursby M. Proofs and prototypes for sale: The licensing of university inventions. American Economic Review 91 1 (2001) 240-259
22. Katz J. The chronology and intellectual trajectory of American entrepreneurship education: 1876-1999. Journal of Business Venturing 18 2 (2003) 283-300
23. Kauffman Center for Entrepreneurial Leadership. The growth and advancement of entrepreneurship in higher education: An environmental scan of college initiatives (2001), The Ewing Marion Kauffman Foundation, Kansas City
24. Krueger N.F. The impact of prior entrepreneurial exposure on perceptions of new venture feasibility and desirability. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice 18 (1993) 5-21
25. Larsson R., and Finkelstein S. Integrating strategic, organizational, and human resource perspectives on mergers and acquisitions: A case survey of synergy realization. Organization Science 10 1 (1999) 2-26
26. Lenoir, T., Rosenberg, N., Rowen, H., Lecuyer, C., Colyvas, J., & Goldfarb, B. (2004). Inventing the entrepreneurial university: Stanford and the co-evolution of Silicon Valley. Working Paper. Stanford University.
27. Martin, J., & Eisenhardt, K. (2003). Cross-business synergy: Recombination, modularity and the multi-business team. Academy of Management 2003 Best Paper Proceedings.
28. Martin, J., & Eisenhardt, K. (2004). What is different in dynamic markets? Value-creation through cross-business collaborations in multi-business corporations. Working Paper. Red McCombs School of Business. The University of Texas at Austin.
29. McMullan W.E., and Long W.A. Entrepreneurship education in the nineties. Journal of Business Venturing 2 3 (1987) 261-275
30. Mowery D.C., Nelson R.R., Sampat B.N., and Ziedonis A.A. The growth of patenting and licensing by U.S. Universities: An assessment of the effects of the Bayh-Dole Act of 1980. Research Policy 30 (2001) 99-119
31. Mowery, D., & Sampat, B. (2004). The Bayh-Dole Act of 1980 and university-industry technology transfer: A model for other OECD governments?. Working Paper. UC Berkeley.
32. Mowery D., Sampat B., and Ziedonis A. Learning to patent: Institutional experience, learning, and the characteristics of U.S. University patents after the Bayh-Dole Act, 1981-1992. Management Science 48 (2002) 1-17
33. Mowery D., and Ziedonis A. Academic patent quality and quantity before and after the Bayh-Dole Act in the United States. Research Policy 31 (2002) 399-418
34. Nelson A. Cacophony or harmony: Multivocal logics and technology licensing by the Stanford University Department of music. Industrial and Corporate Change 14 (2005) 1
35. Nelson, R., & Levin, R. (1986). The influence of science, university research and technical societies on industrial R&D and technical advance. Policy Discussion Paper Series No. 3, Research Programme in Technological Change, Yale University, Newhaven, Connecticut, 1986.
36. Nunnally J.C. Psychometric theory. 2nd ed. (1978), McGraw-Hill, New York
37. Owen-Smith J., and Powell W.W. The expanding role of university patenting in the life sciences: Assessing the importance of experience and connectivity. Research Policy 32 (2003) 1695-1711
38. Peterman N., and Kennedy J. Enterprise education: Influencing students' perceptions of entrepreneurship. Entrepreneurship, Theory and Practice 28 (2003) 129-144
39. Robinson P., and Sexton E. The effect of education and experience on small business and entrepreneurial success. Journal of Business Venturing 9 (1994) 141-156
40. Rosenberg, N. (2002). America's university/industry interfaces: 1945-2000. Working Paper. Department of Economics, Stanford University.
41. Schramm C. Building entrepreneurial economies. Foreign Affairs 83 4 (2004) 104-115
42. Scott W.R., Ruef M., Mendel P.J., and Carconna C.A. Institutional change and healthcare organizations (2000), The University of Chicago Press, Chicago
43. Solomon G.T., Duffy S., and Tarabishy A. The state of entrepreneurship education in the United States: A nationwide survey and analysis. International Journal of Entrepreneurship Education 1 1 (2002) 1-22
44. Stanford Office of Technology Licensing (Stanford OTL). Stanford Office of Technology Licensing Annual Report 2003-2004 (2005), Stanford University, Palo Alto, CA
45. Thompson J.D. Organizations in action (1967), McGraw-Hill, New York
46. Thornton P. Markets from culture: Institutional logics and organizational decisions in higher education publishing (2004), Stanford University Press, Stanford
47. Thursby J., and Thursby M. Industry perspectives on licensing university technologies: Sources and problems. Journal of the Association of University Technology Managers 12 (2000) 9-22
48. Thursby J., and Thursby M. Who is selling the ivory tower? Sources of growth in university licensing. Management Science 48 1 (2002) 90-104
49. Tsai W. Social structure of 'coopetition' within a multiunit organization: Coordination, competition, and intra-organizational knowledge sharing. Organization Science 13 (2002) 179-191
50. Tushman M.L., and O'Reilly III C.A. Ambidextrous organizations: Managing evolutionary and revolutionary change. California Management Review 38 4 (1996) 8-30
51. Tushman M.L., and O'Reilly III C.A. The ambidextrous organization. Harvard Business Review 82 4 (2004) 74-81 April 2004
52. Vesper K. New developments in entrepreneurship education. In: Sexton D.L., and Smilor R.W. (Eds). The art and science of entrepreneurship (1986), Ballinger, Cambridge 379-387
53. Vesper K.H. New venture strategies (1990), Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs
54. Vesper K.H., and Gartner W.B. Measuring progress in entrepreneurship education. Journal of Business Venturing 12 5 (1997) 403-421
55. Wang, E. L., & Kleppe, J. A. (2000). How to assess the effectiveness of engineering programs in invention, innovation and entrepreneurship. Proceedings, American Society of engineering education annual conference, Session 1454, St. Louis, MO.
56. Weick K.E. Educational organizations as loosely coupled systems. Administrative Science Quarterly 21 1 (1976) 1-19