Dipole source localization by means of maximum likelihood estimation. II. Experimental evaluation

Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology

Volumn 106, Issue 4, 1998, Pages 322-329

  Lutkenhoner B ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MÜNSTER   (Germany)

Author keywords

Auditory evoked field; Dipole source localization; Localization errors; Magnetoencephalography; Maximum likelihood estimation; Noise covariance

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BRAIN ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY; DATA ANALYSIS; DIPOLE; EVOKED AUDITORY RESPONSE; MAGNETOENCEPHALOGRAPHY; NOISE; PRIORITY JOURNAL;

ADULT; ELECTRIC STIMULATION; EVOKED POTENTIALS, AUDITORY; FEMALE; HUMANS; LEAST-SQUARES ANALYSIS; MAGNETOENCEPHALOGRAPHY; MALE;

EID: 0032055602     PISSN: 00134694     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0013-4694(97)00139-9     Document Type: Article

References (14)

1. Hari, R., Joutsiniemi, S. and Sarvas, J. Spatial resolution of neuromagnetic records: theoretical calculations in a spherical model. Electroenceph. clin. Neurophysiol., 1988, 71: 64-72.
2. Kuriki, S., Takeuchi, P.M. and Kobayashi, T. Characteristics of the background fields in multichannel-recorded magnetic field responses. Electroenceph. clin. Neurophysiol., 1994, 92: 56-63.
3. Liitkenhöner, B. Dipole source localization by means of maximum likelihood estimation: I. Theory and simulations. Electroenceph. clin. Neurophysiol., 1998, 106: 314-321.
4. Liitkenhöner, B., Lehnertz, K., Hoke, M. and Pantev, C. On the biomagnetic inverse problem in the case of multiple dipoles. Acta Oto-Laryngol. (Stockh.), 1991 (suppl. 491): 94-105.
5. Liitkenhöner, B., Pantev, C., 1992. The exogenous components of the auditory evoked field: current status. In: Hoke, M., Erné, S., Okada, Y., Romani, G. (Eds.), Biomagnetism; Clinical Aspects. Excerpta Medica, Amsterdam, pp. 143-152.
6. Lütkenhöner, B., Pantev, C., Hoke, M., 1990. Comparison between different methods to approximate an area of the human head by a sphere. In: Grandori, F., Hoke, M., Romani, G. (Eds.), Auditory Evoked Magnetic Fields and Electric Potentials. Advances in Audiology, vol. 6. Karger, Basel, pp. 103-118.
7. Nakasato, N., Fujita, S., Seki, K., Kawamura, T., Matani, A., Tamura, I., Fujiwara, S. and Yoshimoto, T. Functional localization of bilateral auditory cortices using an MRI-linked whole head magnetoencephalography (MEG) system. Electroenceph. clin. Neurophysiol., 1995, 94: 183-190.
8. Pantev, C., Bertrand, O., Eulitz, C., Verkindt, C., Hampson, S., Schuierer, G. and Elbert, T. Specific tonotopic organizations of different areas of the human auditory cortex revealed by simultaneous magnetic and electric recordings. Electroenceph. clin. Neurophysiol., 1995, 94: 26-40.
9. Pantev, C., Gallen, C., Hampson, S., Buchanan, S. and Sobel, D. Rcproducibility and validity of neuromagnetic source localization using a large array biomagnetometer. Am. J. EEC Technol., 1991, 31: 83-101.
10. Rosburg, T., Weiss, T., Haueisen, J., Nowak, H. and Sauer, H. Internal consistency of dipole localizations for the human movement-evoked magnetic field component I (MEF 1). Neurosci. Lett., 1996, 215: 4548.
11. Sarvas, J. Basic mathematical and electromagnetic concepts of the biomagnetic inverse problem. Phys. Med. Biol., 1987, 32: 11-22.
12. Sekihara, K., Ogura, Y. and Hotta, M. Maximum-likelihood estimation of current-dipole parameters for data obtained using multichannel magnetometer. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng., I992, 39: 558-562.
13. Teale, P., Goldstein, L., Reite, M., Sheeder, J., Richardson, D., Edrich, J. and Zimmermann, J. Reproducibility of MEG auditory evoked field source localizations in normal human subjects using a 7-channel gradiometer. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng., 1996, 43: 967-969.
14. Wikswo, J., Gevins, A. and Williamson, S. The future of the EEG and MEG. Electroenceph. clin. Neurophysiol., 1993, 87: 1-9.