Determination and mapping of activity-specific descriptor value ranges for the identification of active compounds

Journal of Medicinal Chemistry

Volumn 49, Issue 7, 2006, Pages 2284-2293

  Eckert, Hanna ^a   Bajorath, Jürgen ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BONN   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ALGORITHM; ARTICLE; CHEMICAL ANALYSIS; DATA BASE; DRUG ACTIVITY; MAPPING OF ACTIVITY SPECIFIC DESCRIPTOR VALUE RANGE; SCORING SYSTEM; SCREENING;

ALGORITHMS; DATABASES, FACTUAL; PHARMACEUTICAL PREPARATIONS; QUANTITATIVE STRUCTURE-ACTIVITY RELATIONSHIP;

EID: 33645658325     PISSN: 00222623     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1021/jm051110p     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Livingstone, D. J. The characterization of chemical structures using molecular properties. A survey. J. Chem. Int. Comput. Sci. 2000, 40, 195-209.
2. Bajorath, J. Selected concepts and investigations in compound classification, molecular descriptor analysis, and virtual screening. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 2001, 41, 233-245.
3. Esposito, E. X.; Hopfinger, A. J.; Madura, J. D. Methods for applying the quantitative structure-activity relationship paradigm. Methods Mol. Biol. 2004, 275, 131-214.
4. Johnson, M., Maggiora, G. M., Eds. Concepts and Applications of Molecular Similarity, John Wiley & Sons: New York, 1990.
5. Stahura, F. L.; Bajorath, J. New methodologies for ligand-based virtual screening. Curr. Pharm. Des. 2005, 11, 1189-1202.
6. Bajorath, J. Integration of virtual and high-throughput screening. Nat. Rev. Drug Discovery 2002, 1, 882-894.
7. Brown, R. D.; Martin, Y. C. Use of structure-activity data to compare structure-based clustering methods and descriptors for use in compound selection. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 1996, 36, 572-584.
8. Stahura, F. L.; Bajorath, J. Partitioning methods for the identification of active molecules. Curr. Med. Chem. 2003, 8, 707-715.
9. Willett, P.; Barnard, J. M.; Downs, G. M. Chemical similarity searching. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 1998, 38, 983-996.
10. Rusinko, A., III; Farmen, M. W.; Lambert, C. G.; Brown, P. L.; Young, S. S. Analysis of a large structure/biological activity data set using recursive partitioning. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 1999, 39, 1017-1026.
11. Xue, L.; Bajorath, J. Molecular descriptors for effective classification of biologically active compounds based on principal component analysis identified by a genetic algorithm. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 2000, 40, 801-809.
12. Agrafiotis, D. K.; Lobanov, V. S. Nonlinear mapping networks. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 2000, 40, 1356-1362.
13. Agrafiotis, D. K.; Lobanov, V. S. Multi-dimensional scaling of combinatorial libraries without explicit enumeration. J. Comput. Chem. 2001, 22, 1712-1722.
14. Manallack, D. T.; Ellis, D. D.; Livingstone, D. J. Analysis of linear and nonlinear QSAR data using neural networks. J. Med. Chem. 1994, 37, 3758-3767.
15. Pearlman, R. S.; Smith, K. M. Novel software tools for chemical diversity. Perspect. Drug Discovery Des. 1998, 9, 339-353.
16. Pearlman, R. S.; Smith, K. M. Metric validation and the receptor-relevant subspace concept. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 1999, 39, 28-35.
17. Sheridan, R. P.; Kearsley, S. K. Why do we need so many chemical similarity search methods? Drug Discovery Today 2002, 7, 903-911.
18. Godden, J. W.; Stahura, F. L.; Bajorath, J. Variability of molecular descriptors in compound databases revealed by Shannon entropy calculations. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 2000, 40, 796-800.
19. Godden, J. W.; Bajorath, J. Differential Shannon entropy as a sensitive measure of differences in database variability of molecular descriptors. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 2001, 41, 1060-1066.
20. Godden, J. W.; Bajorath, J. Chemical descriptors with distinct levels of information content and varying sensitivity to differences between selected compound databases identified by SE-DSE analysis. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 2002, 42, 87-93.
21. Godden J. W.; Xue, L.; Kitchen, D. B.; Stahura, F. L.; Schermerhorn, E. J.; Bajorath, J. Median partitioning: a novel method for the selection of representative subsets from large compound pools. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 2002, 42, 885-893.
22. Molecular Drug Data Report (MDDR); MDL Information Systems Inc.: San Leandro, CA, 2005.
23. MOE (Molecular Operating Environment); Chemical Computing Group Inc.: 1255 University Street, Montreal, Quebec, Canada, H3B 3X3, 2005.
24. Xue, L.; Godden, J.; Gao, H.; Bajorath, J. Identification of a preferred set of molecular descriptors for compound classification based on principal component analysis. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 1999, 39, 699-704.
25. Xue, L.; Bajorath, J. Accurate partitioning of compounds belonging to diverse activity classes. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 2002, 42, 757-764.
26. MACCS structural keys; MDL Information Systems Inc.: San Leandro, CA, 2002.
27. Godden, J. W.; Furr, J. R.; Bajorath, J. Recursive median partitioning for virtual screening of large databases. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 2003, 43, 182-188.
28. Godden, J. W.; Furr, J. R.; Xue, L.; Stahura, F. L.; Bajorath, J. Molecular similarity analysis and virtual screening in binary-transformed chemical descriptor spaces with variable dimensionality. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 2004, 44, 21-29.
29. Diller, D. J.; Hobbs, D. W. Deriving knowledge through data mining high-throughput screening data. J. Med. Chem. 2004, 47, 6373-6383.
30. Gribbon, P.; Sewing, A. High-throughput drug discovery: what can we expect from hits? Drug Discovery Today 2005, 10, 17-24.
31. Agrafiotis, D. K.; Lobanov, V. S.; Salemme, R. F. Combinatorial informatics in the post-genomics era. Nat. Drug Discovery Rev. 2002, 1, 337-346.
32. Warmuth, M. K.; Liao, J.; Rätsch, G.; Mathieson, M.; Putta, S.; Lemmen, C. Active learning with support vector machines in the drug discovery process. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 2003, 43, 667-673.
33. Jorissen, R. N.; Gilson, M. K. Virtual screening of molecular databases using a support vector machine. J. Chem. Inf. Model. 2005, 44, 549-561.