Virtual screening of molecular databases using a support vector machine

Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling

Volumn 45, Issue 3, 2005, Pages 549-561

  Jorissen, Robert N ^a   Gilson, Michael K ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND BIOTECHNOLOGY INSTITUTE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ALGORITHMS; CLASSIFICATION (OF INFORMATION); DATA REDUCTION; DIGITAL LIBRARIES; MOLECULAR STRUCTURE; VIRTUAL REALITY;

MOLECULAR DATABASES; SUPPORT VECTOR MACHINES (SVM); VIRTUAL SCREENING;

DATABASE SYSTEMS;

ALGORITHM; ARTICLE; DATA BASE;

ALGORITHMS; DATABASE MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS;

EID: 20444410410     PISSN: 15499596     EISSN: 1549960X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1021/ci049641u     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Bajorath, J. Integration of virtual and high throughput screening. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 2002, 1, 882-894.
2. Bajorath, J. Virtual screening: methods, expectations, and reality. Curr. Drug Discovery 2002, 2, 24-28.
3. Sheridan, R. P.; Kearsley, S. K. Why do we need so many chemical similarity search methods? Drug Discovery Today 2002, 7, 903-911.
4. Oprea, T. I.; Davis, A. M.; Teague, S. J.; Leeson, P. D. Is there a difference between leads and drugs? A historical perspective. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 2001, 41, 1308-1315.
5. Oprea, T. I. Current trends in lead discovery: are we looking for the appropriate properties? J. Comput.-Aided Mol. Des. 2002, 16, 325-334.
6. Vapnik, V. Statistical Learning Theory; Wiley: New York, 1998.
7. Burges, C. J. C. A Tutorial on Support Vector Machines for Pattern Recognition. Data Mining Knowl. Discovery 1998, 2, 121-167.
8. Burbidge, R.; Trotter, M.; Buxton, B.; Holden, S. Drug design by machine learning: support vector machines for pharmaceutical data analysis. Comput. Chem. 2001, 26, 5-14.
9. Warmuth, M. K.; Liao, J.; Ratsch, G.; Mathieson, M.; Putta, S.; Lemmen, C. Active learning with support vector machines in the drug discovery process. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 2003, 43, 667-673.
10. Sorich, M. J.; Miners, J. O.; McKinnon, R. A.; Winkler, D. A.; Burden, F. R.; Smith, P. A. Comparison of linear and nonlinear classification algorithms for the prediction of drug and chemical metabolism by human UDP- glucuronosyltransferase isoforms. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 2003, 43, 2019-2024.
11. Zernov, V. V.; Balakin, K. V.; Ivaschenko, A. A.; Savchuk, N. P.; Pletnev, I. V. Drug discovery using support vector machines. The case studies of drug-likeness, agrochemical-likeness, and enzyme inhibition predictions. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 2003, 43, 2048-2056.
12. Chang, C.-C.; Lin, C.-J. LIBSVM: a library for support vector machines, 2001, Software available at http://www.csie.ntu.edu.tw/~cjlin/libsvm.
13. Platt, J. Fast Training of Support Vector Machines using Sequential Minimal Optimization; Microsoft Research Technical Report MSR-TR-98-14; 1998.
14. Keerthi, S. S.; Shevade, S. K.; Bhattacharyya, C.; Murthy, K. R. K. Improvements to Plait's SMO Algorithm for SVM Classifier Design. Neural Comput. 2001, 13, 637-649.
15. Cortes, C.; Vapnik, V. Support vector networks. Machine Learning 1995, 20, 273-297.
16. Harper, O.; Bradshaw, J.; Gittins, J. C.; Green, D. V.; Leach, A. R. Prediction of biological activity for high-throughput screening using binary kernel discrimination. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 2001, 41, 1295-1300.
17. Wilton, D.; Willett, P.; Lawson, K.; Mullier, G. Comparison of ranking methods for virtual screening in lead-discovery programs. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 2003, 43, 469-474.
18. Sindhwani, V.; Rakshit, S.; Deodhar, D.; Erdogmus, D.; Principe, J. C.; Niyogi, P. Feature Selection in MLPs and SVMs based on Maximum Output Information. IEEE Trans. Neural Netw. 2004, 15, 937-948.
19. Guyon, I.; Weston, W.; Barnhill, S.; Vapnik, V. Gene Selection for Cancer Classification using Support Vector Machines. Machine Learning 2002, 46, 389-422.
20. Golub, T. R.; Slonim, D. K.; Tamayo, P.; Huard, C.; Gaasenbeek, M.; Mesirov, J. P.; Coller, H.; Loh, M. L.; Downing, J. R.; Caligiuri, M. A.; Bloomfield, C. D.; Lander, E. S. Molecular classification of cancer: class discovery and class prediction by gene expression monitoring. Science 1999, 286, 531-537.
21. IsisDraw 2.4, MDL Information Systems, Inc., 2001.
22. Dalby, A.; Nourse, J. G.; Hounshell, W. D.; Gushurst, A. K. I.; Grier, D. L.; Leland, B. A.; Laufer, J. Description of several chemical structure file formats used by computer programs developed at Molecular Design Limited. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 1992, 32, 244-255.
23. http://www.mdl.com/solutions/white_papers/ctfile_formats.jsp.
24. http://dtp.nci.nih.gov/docs/3d_database/Structural_information/ structural_data.html.
25. http://www.maybridge.com.
26. Sadowski, J.; Gasteiger, J. From Atoms and Bonds to Three-Dimensional Atomic Coordinates: Automatic Model Builders. Chem. Rev. 1993, 93, 2567-2581.
27. Walters, P.; Stahl, M. http://smog.com/chem/babel.
28. Todeschini, R.; Consonni, V.; Pavan, M. DRAGON 2.1. Milano Chemometrics and QSAR Research Group: Milan, Italy, 2002.
29. Csizmadia F. JChem: Java applets and modules supporting chemical database handling from web browsers. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 2000, 40, 323-324.
30. Willett, P.; Barnard, J. M.; Downs, G. M. Chemical Similarity Searching. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 1998, 38, 983-996.
31. Pearlman, D. A.; Charifson, P. S. Improved scoring of ligand-protein interactions using OWFEG free energy grids. J. Med. Chem. 2001, 44, 502-511.
32. Halgren, T. A.; Murphy, R. B.; Friesner, R. A.; Beard, H. S.; Frye, L. L.; Pollard, W. T.; Banks, J. L. Glide: a new approach for rapid, accurate docking and scoring. 2. Enrichment factors in database screening. J. Med. Chem. 2004, 47, 1750-1759.
33. Ginn, C. M. R.; Turner, D. B.; Willett, P.; Ferguson, A. M.; Heritage, T. W. Similarity Searching in Files of Three-Dimensional Chemical Structures: Evaluation of the EVA Descriptor and Combination of Rankings Using Data Fusion. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 1997, 37, 23-37.
34. Kubinyi, H.; Hamprecht, F. A.; Mietzner, T. Three-dimensional quantitative similarity-activity relationships (3D QSiAR) from SEAL similarity matrices. J. Med. Chem. 1998, 41, 2553-2564.
35. Golbraikh A.; Tropsha A. Beware of q2! J. Mol. Graphics Mod. 2002, 20, 269-276.
36. Golbraikh, A.; Shen, M.; Xiao, Z.; Xiao, Y. D.; Lee, K. H.; Tropsha, A. Rational selection of training and test sets for the development of validated QSAR models. J. Comput.-Aided Mol. Des. 2003, 17, 241-253.