Concrete construction employees: When does procedural fairness shape self-evaluations?

Journal of Applied Social Psychology

Volumn 36, Issue 3, 2006, Pages 644-663

  Smith, Heather J ^a   Thomas, Timothy R ^b   Tyler, Tom R ^c  

^a SONOMA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b WRIGHT INSTITUTE   (United States)

^c NEW YORK UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 33645291227     PISSN: 00219029     EISSN: 15591816     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.0021-9029.2006.00030.x     Document Type: Review

References (52)

1. Aiken, L. S., & West, S. G. (1991). Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
2. Andrade-Velasquez, E. R., Ayala, E. C., Leierier, S. J., Myers, W. A., & Lange, A. K. (2004). Health services satisfaction among Hispanic families: Having a child with a developmental disability. Unpublished manuscript, Sonoma State University, Rohnert Park, CA.
3. Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York: W. H. Freeman.
4. Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1173-1182.
5. Barreto, M., Spears, R., Ellemers, N., & Shahinper, K. (2003). Who wants to know? The effect of audience on identity expression among minority members. British Journal of Social Psychology, 42, 299-318.
6. Baumeister, R. F. (1998). The self. In D. Gilbert, S. T. Fiske, & G. Lindzey (Eds.), Handbook of social psychology (4th ed., pp. 680-740). New York: McGraw-Hill.
7. Baumeister, R. F., Campbell, J. D., Krueger, J. I., & Vohs, K. D. (2003). Does high self-esteem cause better performance, interpersonal success, happiness, or healthier lifestyles? Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 4, 1-44.
8. Bies, R. J., & Moag, J. S. (1986). Interactional justice: Communication criteria of fairness. In R. J. Lewicki & B. M. Straw (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior (Vol. 9, pp. 289-319). Greenwich, CT: JAI.
9. Bies, R. J., & Shapiro, D. L. (1987). Interactional fairness judgments: The influence of causal accounts. Social Justice Research, 1, 199-218.
10. Blader, S. L., & Tyler, T. R. (2003). A four-component model of procedural justice: Defining the meaning of a "fair process." Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 29, 747-758.
11. Branscombe, N., Ellemers, N., Spears, R., & Doosje, B. (2002). Intragroup and intergroup evaluation effects on group behavior. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28, 744-753.
12. Brislin, R. W. (1970). Back-translation for cross-cultural research. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 1, 185-216.
13. Brockner, J., Heuer, L., Magner, N., Folger, R., Umphress, E., & van den Bos, K., et al. (2003). High procedural fairness heightens the effect of outcome favorability on self-evaluations: An attributional analysis. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 91, 51-68.
14. Brockner, J., Siegel, P. A., Martin, C., Reed, T., Heuer, L., & Wiesenfeld, B., et al. (1998). The moderating effect of self-esteem in reaction to voice: Converging evidence from five studies. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75, 394-407.
15. rd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
16. Colquitt, J. A., & Greenberg, J. (2003). Organizational justice: A fair assessment of the state of the literature. In J. Greenberg (Ed.), Organizational behavior: The state of the science (pp. 165-210). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
17. Eden, D. (2003). Self-fulfilling prophecies in organizations. In J. Greenberg (Ed.), Organizational behavior: The state of the science (pp. 91-122). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
18. Ellemers, N., Doosje, B., & Spears, R. (2003). Do I want to be my enemy's friend? Effects of in-group and out-group respect on emotion and self-esteem. Unpublished manuscript, Leiden University, Leiden, The Netherlands.
19. Ellemers, N., Spears, R., & Doosje, B. (1999). Social identity: Context, commitment, content. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
20. Emler, N., & Hopkins, N. (1990). Reputation, social identity, and the self. In D. Abrams & M. A. Hogg (Eds.), Social identity theory: Constructive and critical advances (pp. 113-130). New York: Springer-Verlag.
21. th ed., pp. 915-918). New York: McGraw-Hill.
22. th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
23. Haslam, S. A., & Platnow, M. J. (2001). The link between leadership and followership: How affirming a social identity translates vision into action. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 27, 1469-1479.
24. Heuer, L., Blumenthal, E., Douglas, A., & Weinblatt, T. (1999). A deservingness approach to respect as a relationally base fairness judgment. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 25, 1279-1292.
25. Heuer, L., Penrod, S., Hafer, C. L., & Cohn, I. (2002). The role of resource and relational concerns for procedural justice. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 11, 1468-1482.
26. Hunt, M. O. (2000). Status, religion, and the "belief in a just world": Comparing African Americans, Latinos, and Whites. Social Science Quarterly, 81, 325-343.
27. Judge, T. A., Locke, E. A., & Durham, C. C. (1998). Dispositional effects of job and life satisfaction: The role of core evaluations. Journal of Applied Psychology, 83, 17-34.
28. Koper, G., Van Knippenberg, D., Bouhuijs, F., Vermunt, R., & Wilke, H. (1993). Procedural fairness and self-esteem. European Journal of Social Psychology, 25, 313-325.
29. Lind, E. A., & Tyler, T. R. (1988). The social psychology of procedural justice. New York: Plenum.
30. MacKinnon, D. P., & Dwyer, J. H. (1993). Estimated mediated effects in prevention studies. Evaluation Review, 17, 144-158.
31. Maertz, C. P., Mosley, D. C., Bauer, T. N., Posthuma, R. A., & Campion, M. A. (2004). Do procedural justice perceptions in a selection testing context predict applicant attraction and intention toward the organization? Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 34, 125-145.
32. Magner, N. R., Walker, R. B., & Johnson, G. G. (1992). Testing a model of voice, control, procedural justice and organizational commitment with latent variable structural equation analysis. International Journal of Conflict Management, 3, 223-236.
33. Robbin, S. P. (1997). Organizational, behavior: Concepts, controversies, applications. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
34. Rosenberg, M. (1979). Conceiving the self. New York: Basic Books.
35. Schmitt, M. T., & Branscombe, N. R. (2002). The internal and external causal loci of attributions to prejudice. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28, 620-628.
36. Schwarzer, R., & Jerusalem, M. (1992). Self-efficacy as a resource factor in stress appraisal processes. In R. Schwarzer (Ed.), Self-efficacy: Thought control of action (pp. 195-213). Washington, DC: Hemisphere.
37. Sherif, M. (1967). Group conflict and cooperation: The social psychology. London: Routledge.
38. Simon, B., & Sturmer, S. (2003). Respect for group members: Intragroup determinants of collective identification and group-serving behavior. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 29, 183-193.
39. Smith, H. J., Tyler, T. R., Huo, Y. J., Ortiz, D. J., & Lind, E. A. (1998). The self-relevant implications of the group value model: Group membership, self-worth, and procedural justice. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 34, 480-493.
40. Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. (1986). The social identity theory of intergroup behavior. In S. Worchel (Ed.), Psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 33-48) Chicago: Nelson Hall.
41. nd ed.). New York: Praeger.
42. Thibaut, J., & Walker, L. (1975). Procedural justice. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
43. Thibaut, J. W., & Kelly, H. H. (1959). The social psychology of groups. New York: Wiley.
44. Turner, J. C. (1991). Social influence. Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole.
45. Turner, J. C., Hogg, M. A., Oakes, P. J., Reicher, S., & Wetherell, M. S. (1987). Rediscovering the social group: A self-categorization theory. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
46. Tyler, T. R., & Blader, S. L. (2000). Cooperation in groups. Ann Arbor, MI: Taylor & Francis.
47. Tyler, T. R., Boeckmann, R. J., Smith, H. J., & Huo, Y. J. (1997). Social justice in a diverse society. Denver, CO: Westview.
48. Tyler, T. R., Degoey, P., & Smith, H. J. (1996). Understanding why the justice of group procedures matters: A test of the psychological dynamics of the group value model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 913-930.
49. Tyler, T. R., & Lind, E. A. (1992). A relational model of authority in groups. In M. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 25, pp. 115-191). New York: Academic.
50. Tyler, T. R., & Smith, H. J. (1999). The sources of the social self. In T. R. Tyler, R. M. Kramer, & O. John (Eds.), The psychology of the social self (pp. 223-264). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
51. Van den Bos, K., & Miedema, J. (2000). Toward understanding why fairness matters: The influence of mortality salience on reactions to procedural fairness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79, 355-366.
52. Vermunt, R., Van Knippenberg, D., Van Knippenberg, B., & Blaauw, E. (2001). Self-esteem and outcome fairness: Differential importance of procedural and outcome considerations. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86, 621-628.