A deservingness approach to respect as a relationally based fairness judgment

Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin

Volumn 25, Issue 10, 1999, Pages 1279-1292

  Heuer, Larry ^b   Blumenthal, Eva ^a   Douglas, Amber ^c   Weinblatt, Tara ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b Barnard College of Columbia University   (United States)

^c NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0033430692     PISSN: 01461672     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0146167299258009     Document Type: Article

References (84)

1. Adams, J. S. (1965). Inequity in social exchange. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 2, pp. 267-299). New York: Academic Press.
2. Bies, R. J. (1987). The predicament of injustice: The management of moral outrage. In L. L. Cummings & B. M. Staw (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior (Vol. 9, pp. 289-319). Greenwich, CT: JAI.
3. Bies, R. J., & Moag, J. S. (1986). Interactional justice: Communication criteria of fairness. In R. J. Lewicki, B. H. Sheppard, & M. H. Bazerman (Eds.), Research on negotiations in organizations (pp. 43-55). Greenwich, CT: JAI.
4. Bies, R. J., & Shapiro, D. L. (1987). Interactional fairness judgments: The influence of causal accounts. Social Justice Research, 1, 199-218.
5. Bies, R. J., & Shapiro, D. L. (1988). Voice and justification: their influence on procedural fairness judgments. Academy of Management Journal, 31, 676-685.
6. Bies, R. J., Shapiro, D. L., & Cummings, L. L. (1988). Causal accounts and managing organizational conflict: Is it enough to say it's not my fault? Communication Research, 15, 381-399.
7. Blau, P. M. (1955). The dynamics of bureaucracy: A study of interpersonal relations in two government agencies. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
8. Blysma, W. H., & Major, B. (1992). Two routes to eliminating gender differences in personal entitlement: Social comparisons and performance evaluations. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 16, 193-200.
9. Bowlby, J. (1973). Attachment and loss: Vol. 2. Separation: Anxiety and anger. New York: Basic Books.
10. Braband, J., & Lerner, M. J. (1975). "A little time and effort" . . . Who deserves what from whom? Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 1, 177-180.
11. Brockner, J. (1990). Scope of justice in the workplace: How survivors react to co-worker layoffs. Journal of Social Issues, 46, 95-106.
12. Brockner, J., Grover, S., Reed, T., DeWitt, R. L., & O'Malley, M. N. (1987). Survivors' reactions to layoffs: We get by with a little help for our friends. Administrative Science Quarterly, 32, 526-541.
13. Brockner, J., Tyler, T. R., & Cooper-Schneider, R. (1992). The influence of prior commitment to an institution on reactions to perceived unfairness: The higher they are, the harder they fall. Administrative Science Quarterly, 37, 241-261.
14. Brown, J. D. (1986). Evaluations of self and others: Self-enhancement biases in social judgments. Social Cognition, 4, 353-376.
15. Brown, R. (1986). Social psychology (2nd ed.). New York: Free Press.
16. Coopersmith, S. (1987). Self-esteem inventories. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.
17. Cropanzano, R., & Folger, R. (1989). Referent cognitions and task decision autonomy: Beyond equity theory. Journal of Applied Psychology, 74, 293-299.
18. Crosby, F. (1976). A model of egoistical relative deprivation. Psychological Review, 83, 85-113.
19. Crosby, F. (1982). Relative deprivation and working women. New York: Oxford University Press.
20. Davis, J. (1959). A formal interpretation of the theory of relative deprivation. Sociometry, 22, 280-296.
21. Deutsch, M. (1975). Equity, equality, and need: What determines which value will be used as the basis of distributive justice? Journal of Social Issues, 31, 137-149.
22. Farwell, L., & Weiner, B. (1996). Self-perceptions of fairness in individual and group contexts. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 22, 867-881.
23. Feather, N. T. (1992). An attributional and value analysis of deservingness in success and failure situations. British Journal of Social Psychology, 31, 125-145.
24. Feather, N. T. (1993). The rise and fall of political leaders: Attributions, deservingness, personality, and affect. Australian Journal of Psychology, 45, 61-68.
25. Feather, N. T. (1996). Reactions to penalties for an offense in retaliation to authoritarianism, values, perceived responsibility, perceived seriousness, and deservingness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 3, 571-587.
26. Feather, N. T., Volkmer, R. E., & McKee, I. R. (1991). Attitudes toward high achievers in public life: Attributions, deservingness, personality, and affect. Australian Journal of Psychology, 43, 85-91.
27. Folger, R. (1977). Distributive and procedural justice: Combined impact of "voice" and improvement on experienced inequity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 35, 108-119.
28. Folger, R. (1986). Rethinking equity theory: A referent cognitions model. In H. W. Bierhoff, R. Cohen, & J. Greenberg (Eds.), Justice in social relations (pp. 145-162). New York: Plenum.
29. Folger, R., & Bies, R. J. (1989). Managerial responsibilities and procedural justice. Employee Responsibilities and Rights Journal, 2, 79-90.
30. Greenberg, J. (1990). Employee theft as a reaction to underpayment inequity: The hidden cost of pay cuts. Journal of Applied Psychology, 75, 561-568.
31. Greenberg, J. (1993a). The social side of fairness: Interpersonal and informational classes of organizational justice. In R. Cropanzano (Ed.), Justice in the workplace: Approaching fairness in human resource management (pp. 79-103). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
32. Greenberg, J. (1993b). Stealing in the name of justice: Informational and interpersonal moderators of theft reactions to underpayment inequity. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 54, 81-103.
33. Greenberg, J. (1994). Using socially fair treatment to promote acceptance of a work-site smoking ban. Journal of Applied Psychology, 79, 288-297.
34. Greenberg, J., Solomon, S., Pyszczynski, T., Rosenblatt, A., Burling, J., Lyon, D., Simon, L., & Pinel, E. (1992). Why do people need self-esteem? Converging evidence that self-esteem serves an anxiety-buffering function. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63, 913-922.
35. Griffin, D. W., & Bartholomew, K. (1994). Models of the self and other: Fundamental dimensions underlying measures of adult attachment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 430-445.
36. Gurin, P. (1985). Women's gender consciousness. Public Opinion Quarterly, 49, 143-163.
37. Gurin, P., & Townsend, A. (1986). Properties of gender identity and their implications for gender consciousness. British Journal of Social Psychology, 25, 139-148.
38. Gurr, T. R. (1970). Why men rebel. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
39. Hogan, R., & Emler, N. P. (1981). Retributive justice. In S. Lerner & M. Lerner (Eds.), The justice motive in social behavior (pp. 125-143). New York: Plenum.
40. Homans, G. C. (1961). Social behavior: Its elementary forms. New York: Harcourt Brace and World.
41. Huo, Y. J., Smith, H. J., Tyler, T. R., & Lind, E. A. (1996). Superordinate identification, subgroup identification, and justice concerns: Is separatism the problem; is assimilation the answer? Psychological Science, 7, 40-45.
42. Kanfer, R., Sawyer, J., Earley, P. C., & Lind, E. A. (1987). Participation in task evaluation procedures: The effects of influential opinion expression and knowledge of evaluative criteria on attitudes and performance. Social Justice Research, 1, 235-249.
43. Ketcham, W., & Morse, W. C. (1965). Dimensions of children's social and psychological development related to school achievement (Cooperative Research Project No. 1286). Ann Arbor: University of Michigan, Office of Education, Department of Health, Education, and Welfare.
44. Kirk, R. (1968). Experimental design: Procedures for the behavioral sciences. Belmont, CA: Brooks/Cole.
45. Koper, G., Van Knipenberg, D., Bouhuijs, F., Vermunt, R., & Wilke, H. (1993). Procedural fairness and self-esteem. European Journal of Social Psychology, 23, 313.
46. Lane, R. L. (1988). Procedural goods in a democracy: How one is treated versus what one gets. Social Justice Research, 2, 177-192.
47. LaTour, S. (1978). Determinants of participant and observer satisfaction with adversary and inquisitorial modes of adjudication. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 36, 1531-1545.
48. Lerner, M. (1977). The justice motive: Some hypotheses as to its origins and forms. Journal of Personality, 45, 1-52.
49. Lerner, M. (1980). The belief in a just world: A fundamental delusion. New York: Plenum.
50. Lerner, M. (1987). Integrating societal and psychological rules of entitlement: The basic task of each social actor and fundamental problem for the social sciences. Social Justice Research, 1, 107-125.
51. Lerner, M., Miller, D. T., & Holmes, J. G. (1976). Deserving and the emergence of forms of justice. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in Experimental Social Psychology (Vol. 3, pp. 133-162). New York: Academic Press.
52. Leventhal, G. S. (1980). What should be done with equity theory? In K. J. Gergen, M. S. Greenberg, & R. H. Willis (Eds.), Social exchange: Advances in theory and research (pp. 27-55). New York: Plenum.
53. Lind, E. A., Kanfer, R., & Earley, P. C. (1990). Voice, control, and procedural justice: Instrumental and noninstrumental concerns in fairness judgments. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59, 952-959.
54. Lind, E. A., Kurtz, S., Musante, L., Walker, L., & Thibaut, J. W. (1980). Procedure and outcome effects on reactions to adjudicated resolution of conflicts of interest. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39, 643-653.
55. Lind, E. A., Lissak, R. I., & Conlon, E. E. (1983). Decision control and process control effects on procedural fairness judgments. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 13, 338-350.
56. Lind, E. A., & Tyler, T. R. (1988). The social psychology of procedural justice. New York: Plenum.
57. MacCoun, R. J., Lind, E. A., Hensler, D. R., Bryant, D. L., & Ebener, P. A. (1988). Alternative adjudication: An evaluation of the New Jersey automobile arbitration program. Santa Monica, CA: Institute for Civil Justice, RAND Corporation.
58. Major, B. (1994). From social inequality to personal entitlement: The role of social comparisons, legitimacy appraisals, and group membership. In M. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in Experimental Social Psychology (Vol. 26, pp. 293-355). New York: Academic Press.
59. Pepitone, A., & L'Armand, K. (1996). The justice and injustice of life events. European Journal of Social Psychology, 26, 581-597.
60. Pruitt, D. G., & Rubin, J. Z. (1986). Social conflict: Escalation, stalemate, and settlement. New York: Random House.
61. Rawls, J. (1971). A theory of justice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
62. Rosnow, R. L., & Rosenthal, R. (1989). Definition and interpretation of interaction effects. Psychological Bulletin, 105, 143-146.
63. Rosnow, R. L., & Rosenthal, R. (1991). If you're looking at the cell means, you're not looking at only the interaction (unless all main effects are zero). Psychological Bulletin, 110, 574-576.
64. Rousseau, D. (1989). Psychological and implied contracts in organizations. Employee Rights and Responsibilities Journal, 2, 121-139.
65. Runciman, W. G. (1966). Relative deprivation and social justice: A study of attitudes to social inequality in twentieth-century England. Berkeley: University of California Press.
66. Simmons, C. H., & Lerner, M. J. (1968) Altruism as a search for justice. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 9, 216-225.
67. Skitka, L. J., & Tetlock, P. E. (1992). Allocating scarce resources: A contingency model of distributive justice. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 28, 33-37.
68. Skitka, L. J., & Tetlock, P. E. (1993). Providing public assistance: Cognitive and motivational processes underlying liberal and conservative policy preferences. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65, 1205-1223.
69. Smith, H. J., & Tyler, T. R. (1996). Justice and power: When will justice concerns encourage the advantaged to support policies which redistribute economic resources and the disadvantaged to willingly obey the law. European Journal of Social Psychology, 26, 171-200.
70. Stouffer, S. A., Suchman, E. A., DeVinney, L. C., Starr, S. A., & Williams, R. M., Jr. (1949). The American soldier: Adjustment during army life (Vol. 1). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
71. Swann, W. B., Jr., Pelham, B. W., & Krull, D. S. (1989). Agreeable fancy of disagreeable truth? Reconciling self-enhancement and self-verifications. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57, 782-791.
72. Swann, W. B., Jr., & Read, S. J. (1981). Self-verification processes: How we sustain our self-conceptions. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 77, 353-372.
73. Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. (1986). The social identity theory of intergroup behavior. In S. Worchel & W. Austin (Eds.), Psychology of intergroup relations (2nd ed., pp. 7-24). Chicago: Nelson-Hall.
74. Thibaut, J., & Walker, L. (1975). Procedural justice: A psychological analysis. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
75. Thibaut, J., & Walker, L. (1978). A theory of procedure. California Law Review, 66, 541-566.
76. Tyler, T. R. (1987). Conditions leading to value expressive effects in judgments of procedural justice: A test of four models. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 333-344.
77. Tyler, T. R. (1989). The psychology of procedural justice: A test of the group-value model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57, 830-838.
78. Tyler, T. R. (1994). Psychological models of the justice motive: Antecedents of distributive and procedural justice. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 850-863.
79. Tyler, T. R., & Degoey, P. (1995). Collective restraint in social dilemmas: Procedural justice and social identification effects on support for authorities. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69, 482-497.
80. Tyler, T. R., Degoey, P., & Smith, H. (1996). Understanding why the justice of group procedures matters: A test of the psychological dynamics of the group-value model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 913-930.
81. Tyler, T. R., & Folger, R. (1980). Distributional and procedural aspects of satisfaction with citizen-police encounters. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 1, 281-292.
82. Tyler, T. R., & Lind, E. A. (1992). A relational model of authority in groups. In M. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 25, pp. 115-191). New York: Academic Press.
83. Tyler, R., Rasinski, K., & Spodick, N. (1985). Influence of voice on satisfaction with leaders: Exploring the meaning of process control. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 48, 72-81.
84. Walster, E., Berscheid, E., & Walster, E. (1976). New directions in equity research. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in Experimental Social Psychology (Vol. 9). New York: Academic Press.