Public presentations in mechanical engineering and the discourse of technology

Communication Education

Volumn 54, Issue 1, 2005, Pages 20-33

  Darling, Ann L ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF UTAH   (United States)

Author keywords

Communication Across the Curriculum; Communication in the Disciplines; Discourse of Technology; Engineering Education

Indexed keywords

EID: 33644983646     PISSN: 03634523     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/03634520500076711     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Bazerman, C. (1988). Shaping written knowledge: The genre and activity of the experimental article in science. Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Press.
2. Berkenkotter, C., & Huckin, T. N. (1993). Rethinking genre from a sociocognitive perspective. Written Communication, 10, 475-509.
3. Boyer Commission on Educating Undergraduates in the Research University (1998). Reinventing undergraduate education: A blueprint for America's research universities. New York: State University of New York.
4. Bucciarelli, L. L. (1994). Designing engineers. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
5. Carbaugh, D. (1996). Situating selves: The communication of social identities in America. Albany, NY: SUNY Press.
6. Cheney, G., Christensen, L. T., Zorn, T. E., & Ganesh, S. (2004). Organizational communication in an age of globalization: Issues, reflections, practices. Prospect Heights, IL: Waveland Press.
7. Cronin, M. W., & Glenn, P. (1991). Oral communication across the curriculum in higher education: The state of the art. Communication Education, 40, 356-367.
8. Cronin, M. W., Grice, G. L., & Palmerton, P. R. (2000). Oral communication across the curriculum: The state of the art after twenty-five years of experience. Journal of the Association of Communication Administration, 29, 66-87.
9. Dannels, D. P. (2001). Time to speak up: A theoretical framework of situated pedagogy and practice for communication across the curriculum. Communication Education, 50, 144-158.
10. Dannels, D. P. (2002). Communication across the curriculum and in the disciplines: Speaking in engineering. Communication Education, 51, 254-268.
11. Darling, A. L. (2002, November). Designing speech, designing selves: The design review presentation as a formal genre type for mechanical engineering students. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the National Communication Association, New Orleans, LA.
12. Darling, A. L., & Dannels, D. P. (1998, November). Disciplinary assessment of oral communication, Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the National Communication Association, New York.
13. Garside, C. (2002). Seeing the forest through the trees: A challenge facing communication across the curriculum programs. Communication Education, 51, 51-64.
14. Goetz, J. P., & LeCompte, M. D. (1984). Ethnography and qualitative design in education research, Orlando, FL: Academic Press.
15. Cuba, E. G., & Lincoln, Y. S. (1982). Epistemological and methodological bases of naturalistic inquiry. Educational Communication and Technology Journal, 30, 79-92.
16. Halloran, S. M. (1978). Eloquence in a technological society. Central States Speech Journal, 29, 221-227.
17. Kline, R. R. (2001). Using history and sociology to teach engineering ethics. IEEE Technology and Society Magazine, Winter 2001/2002, 13-20.
18. Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Beverly Hills: Sage.
19. Mathison, M. (2000). "I don't have to argue my design - the visual speaks for itself": A case study of mediated activity in an introductory mechanical engineering course. In S. Mitchell & R. Andrews (Eds.), Learning to argue in higher education (pp. 74-84). Portsmouth, NH: Boyton/Cook.
20. Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: A sourcebook of new methods. Beverly Hills: Sage.
21. Miller, C. R. (1998). Learning from history: World War II and the culture of high technology. Journal of Business & Technical Communication, 12, 288-316.
22. Morello, J. T. (2000). Comparing speaking across the curriculum and writing across the curriculum programs. Communication Education, 49, 99-113.
23. Morreale, S., Shockley-Zalabak, P., & Whitney, P. (1993). The center for excellence in oral communication: Integrating communication across the curriculum. Communication Education, 42, 10-21.
24. Perlman, B., & Varma, R. (2002). Improving ethical engineering practice. IEEE Technology and Society Magazine, Spring 2002, 40-47.
25. Philipsen, G. (1992). Culturally speaking. Albany, NY: SUNY Press.
26. Schofield, J. W. (2002). Increasing generalizability of qualitative research. In A. M. Huberman, & M. B. Miles (Eds.), The qualitative researcher's companion (pp. 171-203). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
27. Stephan, K. D. (2002). Is engineering ethics optional? IEEE Technology and Society Magazine, Winter 2001/2002, 6-12.
28. Swales, J. M. (1990). Genre analysis: English in academic and research settings. Boston, MA: Cambridge University Press.
29. Whitehead, A. N. (1929). The aims of education. New York: The Free Press.
30. Winsor, D. A. (1989). An engineer's writing and the corporate construction of knowledge. Written Communication, 6, 270-285.
31. Winsor, D. A. (1999). Genre and activity systems: The role of documentation in maintaining and changing engineering activity systems. Written Communication, 16, 200-224.
32. Yin, R. K., & Heald, K. A. (1975). Using the case survey method to analyze policy studies. Administrative Science Quarterly, 20, 371-381.