Time to speak up: A theoretical framework of situated pedagogy and practice for communication across the curriculum

Communication Education

Volumn 50, Issue 2, 2001, Pages 144-158

  Dannels, Deanna P ^a  

^a NORTH CAROLINA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0035629420     PISSN: 03634523     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/03634520109379240     Document Type: Article

References (67)

1. Anson, C. M., & Forsberg, L. L. (1990). Moving beyond the academic community: Transitional stages in professional writing. Written Communication, 7, 200-231.
2. Astin, A. (1991). Assessment for excellence: The philosophy and practice of assessment and evaluation in higher education. New York: Macmillan.
3. Bazerman, C. (1997). Discursively structured activities. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 4, 293-308.
4. Bazerman, C. (1988). Shaping written knowledge: The genre and activity of the experimental article in science. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.
5. Bazerman, C., & Paradis, J. (1991). Textual dynamics of the professions. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.
6. Berkenkotter, C., & Huckin, T. N. (1995). Genre knowledge in disciplinary communication: Cognition, culture, power. New York: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers.
7. Berkenkotter, C., Huckin, T. N. & Ackerman, J. (1988). Conventions, conversations, and the writer: Case study of a student in a rhetoric Ph.D. program. Research in the Teaching of English, 22, 9-44.
8. Black, K. M. (1994). An industry view of engineering education. Journal of Engineering Education, 83, 26-28.
9. Boyer Commission on Educating Undergraduates in the Research University. (1998). Reinventing undergraduate education: A blueprint for America's research universities. NY: State University of New York.
10. Brennan, M. (1997). Job market healthy for new chemistry graduates. Chemical and Engineering News, 75, 10.
11. Brown, J. S., & Duguid, P. (1994). Borderline issues: Social and material aspects of design. Human-Computer Interaction, 9, 3-36.
12. Brown, J. S., & Duguid, P. (1996). Keeping it simple. In T. Winograd (Ed.), Bringing design to software (pp 129-145). Reading, MA: ACM Press.
13. Brown, J. S., Collins, A., & Duguid, P. (1989). Situated cognition and the culture of learning. Educational Researcher, 18, 32-42.
14. Burke, J. D. (1991). The emergence of career wellness programs Chemical and Engineering News, 76, 77-78.
15. Campbell, J. A. (1991, November). Teaching public speaking as rhetorical reason. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Speech Communication Association, Atlanta, Georgia.
16. Campbell, K. K., & Jamieson, K. H. (1977). Form and genre: Shaping rhetorical action. Falls Church, VA: Speech Communication Association.
17. Clyne, R. (1996). Leading the team talk. The Engineer, 283, 42.
18. Cronin, M. W., & Glenn, P. (1991). Oral communication across the curriculum in higher education: The state of the art. Communication Education, 40, 356-367.
19. Cronin, M. W., & Grice, G. L. (1997, November). Oral communication across the curriculum: Designing, implementing, and assessing a University-wide program. Short course presented at the meeting of the National Communication Association, Chicago, IL.
20. Cronin, M. W., & Grice, G. L. (1993). A comparative analysis of training models versus consulting/training models for implementing oral communication across the curriculum. Communication Education, 42, 1-9.
21. Dannels, D. P. (2000). Learning to be professional: Technical classroom discourse and professional identity construction. Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 14, 5-37.
22. Darling, A. L., & Dannels, D. P. (1998, November). Disciplinary assessment of oral communication. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Communication Association, New York, NY.
23. Darling, A. L., & Scott, T. (1991, November). Politicizing pedagogy: Bringing Giroux into the public speaking classroom. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Speech Communication Association, Albuquerque, NM.
24. Freedman, A., & Adam, C. (1996). Learning to Write Professionally: 'Situated Learning' and the Transition from University to Professional Discourse. Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 10, 395-427.
25. Freedman, A., Adam, C., & Smart, G. (1994). Wearing suits to class: Simulating genres and simulations as genre. Written Communication, 11, 193-226.
26. Garvey, W. D. (1970). Communication, the essence of science: Facilitating information exchanges among librarians, scientists, engineers, and students. New York: Pergamon Press.
27. Gilbert, G. N., & Mulkay, M. (1982). Warranting scientific belief. Social Studies of Science, 12, 383-408.
28. Gilbert, G. N. (1976). The transformation of research findings into scientific knowledge. Social Studies of Science, 6, 281-306.
29. Haas, C. (1994). Learning to read biology: One student's rhetorical development in college. Written Communication, 11, 43-84.
30. Herrington, A. (1985). Writing in academic settings: A study of the contexts for writing in two college chemical engineering courses. Research in the Teaching of English, 19, 331-359.
31. Herrington, A. (1992). Composing one's self in a discipline. In M. Secor & D. Charney (Eds.), Constructing rhetorical education (pp. 91-115), Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.
32. Herrington, A., & Moran, C. (1992). Writing, teaching, and learning in the disciplines. New York: Modern Language Association.
33. Joseph, F. (1992, October). Public speaking instruction in the age of multiculturalism. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Speech Communication Association, Chicago, IL.
34. Katz, S. M. (1993). The entry-level engineer: Problems in transition from student to professional. Journal of Engineering Education, 82, 171-173.
35. Kovacs, W. D. (1993). Engineering practice: Adopt a university. Civil Engineering, 63, 6.
36. Latour, B. (1988). Science in action. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
37. Latour, B., & Woolgar, S. (1979). Laboratory life: The social construction of scientific facts. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
38. Lave, J. (1991). Situated Learning in Communities of Practice. In L. Resnick, J. Levine, & S. Teasley (Eds.), Perspectives on socially shared cognition (pp. 63-83), Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
39. Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge, Eng.: Cambridge University Press.
40. Machlis, S., & Colucci, D. (1996). How to design in warp speed. Design News, 51, 62-64.
41. Mathison, M. (2000). "I don't have to argue my design-the visual speaks for itself": A case study of mediated activity in an introductory mechanical engineering course. In S. Mitchell & R. Andrews (Eds), Learning to argue in higher education (pp. 74-84). Portsmouth, NH: Boynton/Cook.
42. Mehren, E. (1999, March 22). Colleges, like, focus on speech. The Los Angeles Times, p. A1.
43. Miller, C. R. (1982). Knowledge in science and society. Pre/Text, 3, 31-49.
44. Miller, C. R. (1984). Genre as social action. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 70, 151-167.
45. Morreale, S., Osborn, M., & Pearson, J. (2000). Why communication is important: A rationale for the centrality of the study of communication. Journal of the Association for Communication Administration, 29, 1-25.
46. Morreale, S., Shockley-Zalabak, P., & Whitney, P. (1993). The center for excellence in oral communication: Integrating communication across the curriculum. Communication Education, 42, 10.
47. Morello, J. T. (2000). Comparing speaking across the curriculum and writing across the curriculum programs. Communication Education, 49, 99-113.
48. Myers, G. (1990). The social construction of two biologists' proposals. Written Communication, 2, 219-245.
49. Nelson, J. S., Megill, A., & McCloskey, D. N. (1987). The rhetoric of the human sciences: Language and argument in scholarship and public affairs. Madison, WI: The University of Wisconsin Press.
50. Pabbati, P. V., & Rathod, M. S. (1995). Study of curriculum models that integrate mathematics, physical sciences, computers, and communication in technical courses. Proceedings of the 1995 Annual ASEE Conference, Anaheim, CA, 1, 215-220.
51. Paradis, J., Dobrin, D., & Miller, R. (1985). Writing at Exxon ITD, Notes on the writing environment of an R & D organization. In L. Odell & D. Guswami (Eds.), Writing in non-academic settings (pp. 281-307). New York: Guilford Press.
52. Philipsen, G. (1992). Speaking culturally. Albany: State University of New York Press.
53. Rogoff, B. (1990). Apprenticeship in Thinking. New York: Oxford University Press.
54. Schneider, A. (1999, March 26). Taking aim at student incoherence: Spread of speech programs across the curriculum irks some communications professors. Chronicle of Higher Education, A16.
55. Selzer, J. (1983). The composing processes of an engineer. College Composition and Communication, 34, 178-187.
56. Shaeiwitz, J. (1999). Outcomes assessment: Its time has come. Chemical Engineering Education, 33, 102-104.
57. Spitzberg, B., & Cupach, W. (1984). Interpersonal communication competence. Beverly Hills: Sage Publications.
58. Sprague, J. (1991, November). The pedagogical sphere: Exploring the luminal territory between public and private life. A paper presented at the annual meeting of the Speech Communication Association, Chicago, IL.
59. Suchman, L. A. (1987). Plans and situated actions: The problem of human-machine communication. Cambridge, NY: Cambridge University Press.
60. Toulmin, S. E. (1958). The uses of argument. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
61. Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
62. Winsor, D. A. (1989). An engineer's writing and the corporate construction of knowledge. Written Communication, 6, 270-285.
63. Winsor, D. A. (1990). Engineering writing/Writing engineering. College Composition and Communication, 41, 58-70.
64. Winsor, D. A. (1994). Invention and writing in technical work: Representing the object. Written Communication, 11, 227-250.
65. Winsor, D. A. (1996). Writing like an engineer: A rhetorical education. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
66. Winsor, D. A. (1999). Genre and activity systems: The role of documentation in maintaining and changing engineering activity systems. Written Communication, 16, 200-24.
67. Zernike, K. (1999, January 31). Talk is, like, you know, cheapened: Colleges introduce classes to clean up campus 'mallspeak.' The Boston Globe, p. A1.