The motivational impact of school-based performance awards

Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education

Volumn 12, Issue 4, 1999, Pages 309-326

  Kelley, Carolyn ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN MADISON   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0011689748     PISSN: 0920525X     EISSN: 15730425     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1023/A:1008011810852     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. Bacharach, S.B., Lipsky, D.B., & Shedd, J.B. (1984). Paying for better teaching: Merit pay and its alternatives. Ithaca, NY: Organizational Analysis and Practice.
2. Bandura, Albert. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York: Freeman.
3. Blackford, Linda B. (1997a, December 2). KIRIS scores to be lowered at eleven schools: Investigators cite teacher helping, students cheating. Lexington Herald-Leader, http://www.kentuckyconnect.com.
4. Blackford, Linda B. (1997b, December 5). Improved scores found in majority of state schools: Reading and math show the largest increases. pp. A1, A6.
5. Clotfelter, Charles T., & Ladd, Helen F. (1996). Recognizing and rewarding success in public schools. In Helen F. Ladd (ed.), Holding schools accountable: Performance-based reform in education (pp. 23-63). Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
6. Cody, Wilmer S. (1998, April 3). Memorandum to all Kentucky teachers regarding testing and accountability. Kentucky Department of Education, Frankfort, Kentucky.
7. Cohen, David K. (1996). Standards-based school reform: Policy, practice, and performance. In Helen F. Ladd (Ed.), Holding schools accountable: Performance-based reform in education. (pp. 99-127). Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
8. Condry, J., & Chambers, J. (1978). Intrinsic motivation and the process of learning. In M.R. Lepper & D. Greene (eds.)., The hidden costs of reward. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
9. Deci, E.L. (1972). Work: Who does not like it and why. Psychology Today, 6(3), 56-58, 92.
10. Drummond, Steven. (1997, April 2). Bonuses weren't prime reason schools worked to improve, study in Kentucky says. Education Week on the Web. http://www.edweek.com.
11. Garbarino, J. (1975). The impact of anticipated reward upon cross-age tutoring. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 32, 421-428.
12. Goertz, M., Massell, D., & Chun, T. (1997). Education reform policy: From Congress to the Classroom. Maryland case study, 1996-97. Consortium for Policy Research in Education, University of Pennsylvania.
13. Hall, Gene E., & Caffarella, Edward P. (1997). Third-year implementation assessment of the Douglas County, Colorado School District Performance Pay Plan for Teachers. Douglas County School District.
14. Hartman, D.B., & Weil, R. (1997). Developing a performance pay plan for teachers: A process, not an event. American Federation of Teachers web page.
15. Heneman, Herbert M., III (1998). Assessment of the motivational reactions of teachers to a school-based performance award program. Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education.
16. Herzberg, F. (1968). One more time: How do you motivate employees? Harvard Business Review, 46(1), 56-57.
17. Holland, Holly. (1998). Making change: Three educators join the battle for better schools. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
18. Ichniowski, Casey, Shaw, K., & Prennushi, G. (1994). The effects of human resource management practices on productivity. Unpublished manuscript, Graduate School of Business, Columbia University.
19. Johnson, Susan Moore. (1986). Incentives for teachers: What motivates, what matters. Educational Administration Quarterly, 22(3), 54-79.
20. Kelley, Carolyn. (1998a). The Kentucky school-based performance award program: School-level effects. Educational Policy, 12(3), 305-324.
21. Kelley, Carolyn. (1998b). What makes for success? Enabling conditions and school improvement. Paper presented at the 1998 American Educational Research Conference, San Diego, California.
22. Kelley, Carolyn, & Odden, Allan. (1995). Reinventing teacher compensation systems. CPRE Finance Brief, Consortium for Policy Research in Education, University of Wisconsin-Madison.
23. Kentucky Department of Education. (1996, May). Kentucky teacher. Frankfort, KY: Author.
24. Kohn, Alfie. (1993). Punished by rewards: The trouble with gold stars, incentive plans, A's, praise, and other bribes. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
25. Locke, E.A. (1968). Toward a theory of task motivation and incentives. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 3, 157-189.
26. Lortie, Daniel C. (1975). Schoolteacher: A sociological study. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
27. Mento, Anthony J., Steel, Robert P., & Karren, Ronald J. (1987). A meta-analytic study of the effects of goal setting on task performance: 1966-1984. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 39, 52-83.
28. Mohrman, Susan Albers, & Lawler, Edward E., III. (1996). Motivation for school reform. In Susan H. Fuhrman & Jennifer A. O'Day (eds.), Rewards and reform: Creating educational incentives that work. (pp. 115-143). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
29. Murnane, Richard J., & Levy, Frank. (1996). Teaching to new standards. In Susan H. Fuhrman & Jennifer A. O'Day (eds.), Rewards and reform: Creating educational incentives that work. (pp. 257-293). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
30. National Center for Education Statistics. (1996). Common core of data (CCD): School years 1988-89 through 1993-94. [CD-ROM]. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, Office of Educational Research and Improvement.
31. Newmann, Fred M., et al. (1996). Authentic achievement: Restructuring schools for intellectual quality. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
32. Newmann, Fred M., & Wehlage, Gary G. (1995). Successful school restructuring: A report to the public and educators by the Center on Organization and Restructuring of Schools. Center on Organization and Restructuring of Schools, University of Wisconsin-Madison.
33. O'Day, Jennifer A. (1996). Introduction: Incentives and school improvement. In Susan H. Fuhrman & Jennifer A. O'Day (eds.), Rewards and reform: Creating educational incentives that work. (pp. 1-18). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
34. Odden, Allan, & Kelley, Carolyn. (1997). Paying teachers for what they know and do: New and smarter compensation strategies to improve schools. Thousand Oaks: Corwin Press.
35. Odden, Allan, Heneman, Herbert, Wakelyn, David J., & Protsik, Jean. (1996). School-based performance award designs: A case study. Unpublished manuscript. Consortium for Policy Research in Education, University of Wisconsin-Madison.
36. Rosenholtz, Susan J. (1991). Teachers' workplace: The social organization of schools. New York: Teachers College Press.
37. Rowan, Brian. (1996). Standards as incentives for instructional reform. In Susan H. Fuhrman & Jennifer A. O'Day (eds.), Rewards and reform: Creating educational incentives that work. (pp. 195-225). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
38. Sanders, William L., & Horn, Sandra P. (1994). The Tennessee Value-Added Assessment System (TVAAS): Mixed-model methodology in educational assessment. Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education, 8, 299-313.
39. Scott, W. Richard. (1992). Organizations: Rational, natural, and open systems. 3rd ed. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
40. Vroom, Victor H. (1964). Work and motivation. New York: Wiley.
41. Welbourne, Theresa M., & Mejia, Luis R. Gomez. (1995). Gainsharing: A critical review and a future research agenda. Journal of Management, 21(3), 559-609.
42. Williams, Gex "Jay." (1998, February 2). Problems with KIRIS test erode public's support for reforms. Kentucky Connect, A Service of the Lexington Herald-Leader.
43. Wright, Paul S., Horn, Sandra P., & Sanders, William L. (1997). Teacher and classroom context effects on student achievement: Implications for teacher evaluation. Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education, 11, 57-67.