Attention maintains mental extrapolation of target position: Irrelevant distractors eliminate forward displacement after implied motion

Cognition

Volumn 88, Issue 1, 2003, Pages 109-131

  Kerzel, Dirk ^a  

^a JUSTUS LIEBIG UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

Author keywords

Attention; Flash lag; Implied motion; Left right asymmetry; Memory; Mental extrapolation; Representational momentum

Indexed keywords

EXTRAPOLATION; MOTION CONTROL;

IMPLIED MOTION;

COGNITIVE SYSTEMS;

ARTICLE; ATTENTION; DECISION MAKING; DISTRACTIBILITY; EYE MOVEMENT; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; LONG TERM MEMORY; MENTAL FUNCTION; MOTION; NORMAL HUMAN; POSITION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; STIMULUS RESPONSE; VISUAL STIMULATION;

EID: 0037403969     PISSN: 00100277     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0010-0277(03)00018-0     Document Type: Article

References (75)

1. Abrams R.A., Dobkin R.S. Inhibition of return: effects of attentional cuing on eye movement latencies. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance. 20:(3):1994;467-477.
2. Baddeley A.D. Working memory. 1986;Oxford University Press, Oxford.
3. Baldo M.V., Kihara A.H., Namba J., Klein S.A. Evidence for an attentional component of the perceptual misalignment between moving and flashing stimuli. Perception. 31:(1):2002;17-30.
4. Baldo M.V., Klein S.A. Extrapolation or attention shift? Nature. 378:(6557):1995;565-566.
5. Becker W., Fuchs A.F. Prediction in the oculomotor system: Smooth pursuit during transient disappearance of a visual target. Experimental Brain Research. 57:(3):1985;562-575.
6. Bennett P.J., Pratt J. The spatial distribution of inhibition of return. Psychological Science. 12:(1):2001;76-80.
7. Berry M.J. 2nd, Brivanlou I.H., Jordan T.A., Meister M. Anticipation of moving stimuli by the retina. Nature. 398:(6725):1999;334-338.
8. Braddick O.J. Low-level and high-level processes in apparent motion. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series B-Biological Science. 290:(1038):1980;137-151.
9. Cavanagh P., Mather G. Motion: the long and short of it. Spatial Vision. 4:(2-3):1989;103-129.
10. Churchland M.M., Lisberger S.G. Apparent motion produces multiple deficits in visually guided smooth pursuit eye movements of monkeys. Journal of Neurophysiology. 84:(1):2000;216-235.
11. Erlhagen W., Schöner G. Dynamic field theory of movement preparation. Psychological Review. 109:(3):2002;545-572.
12. Finke R.A., Freyd J.J. Transformations of visual memory induced by implied motions of pattern elements. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition. 11:(4):1985;780-794.
13. Finke R.A., Freyd J.J. Mental extrapolation and cognitive penetrability: reply to Ranney and proposals for evaluative criteria. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General. 118:(4):1989;403-408.
14. Finke R.A., Freyd J.J., Shyi G.C. Implied velocity and acceleration induce transformations of visual memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General. 115:(2):1986;175-188.
15. Finke R.A., Shyi G.C. Mental extrapolation and representational momentum for complex implied motions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition. 14:(1):1988;112-120.
16. Fischer B., Weber H. Express saccades and visual attention. Behavioral and Brain Sciences. 16:1993;553-610.
17. Folk C.L., Remington R.W., Johnston J.C. Involuntary covert orienting is contingent on attentional control settings. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance. 18:(4):1992;1030-1044.
18. Freyd J.J. Dynamic mental representations. Psychological Review. 94:1987;427-438.
19. Freyd J.J., Finke R.A. Representational momentum. Journal of Experimental Psychology. 10:1984;126-132.
20. Freyd J.J., Finke R.A. A velocity effect for representational momentum. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society. 23:1985;443-446.
21. Freyd J.J., Johnson J.Q. Probing the time course of representational momentum. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition. 13:(2):1987;259-268.
22. Fröhlich F.W. Über die Messung der Empfindungszeit. [On the measurement of sensation time]. Zeitschrift für Sinnesphysiologie. 54:1923;58-78.
23. Halpern A.R., Kelly M.H. Memory biases in left versus right implied motion. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition. 19:(2):1993;471-484.
24. Handy T.C., Kingstone A., Mangun G.R. Spatial distribution of visual attention: perceptual sensitivity and response latency. Perception & Psychophysics. 58:(4):1996;613-627.
25. Harman C., Posner M.I., Rothbart M.K., Thomas-Thrapp L. Development of orienting to locations and objects in human infants. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology. 48:(2):1994;301-318.
26. Hayes A.E., Freyd J.J. Representational momentum when attention is divided. Visual Cognition. 9:(1-2):2002;8-27.
27. Hubbard T.L. Cognitive representation of linear motion: possible direction and gravity effects in judged displacement. Memory and Cognition. 18:(3):1990;299-309.
28. Hubbard T.L. The effect of context on visual representational momentum. Memory and Cognition. 21:(1):1993;103-114.
29. Hubbard T.L. Judged displacement: a modular process? American Journal of Psychology. 107:(3):1994;359-373.
30. Hubbard T.L. Cognitive representation of motion: evidence for friction and gravity analogues. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition. 21:(1):1995;241-254.
31. Hubbard T.L. Environmental invariants in the representation of motion: implied dynamics and representational momentum, gravity, friction, and centripetal force. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review. 2:(3):1995;322-338.
32. Hubbard T.L., Bharucha J.J. Judged displacement in apparent vertical and horizontal motion. Perception & Psychophysics. 44:(3):1988;211-221.
33. Hubbard T.L., Ruppel S.E. Representational momentum and the landmark attraction effect. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology. 53:(3):1999;242-256.
34. Hubbard T.L., Ruppel S.E. Spatial memory averaging, the landmark attraction effect, and representational gravity. Psychological Research. 64:(1):2000;41-55.
35. Kelly M.H., Freyd J.J. Explorations of representational momentum. Cognitive Psychology. 19:1987;369-401.
36. Kerzel D. Eye movements and visible persistence explain the mislocalization of the final position of a moving target. Vision Research. 40:(27):2000;3703-3715.
37. Kerzel D. Attention shifts and memory averaging. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology. Section A: Human Experimental Psychology. 55:(2):2002;425-443.
38. Kerzel D. A matter of design: there is no representational momentum without expectancy. Visual Cognition. 9:(1):2002;66-80.
39. Kerzel D. Memory for the position of stationary objects: disentangling foveal bias and memory averaging. Vision Research. 42:(2):2002;159-167.
40. Kerzel D., Jordan J.S., Müsseler J. The role of perception in the mislocalization of the final position of a moving target. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance. 27:(4):2001;829-840.
41. Kerzel D., Müsseler J. Effects of stimulus material on the Fröhlich illusion. Vision Research. 42:(2):2002;181-189.
42. Khurana B., Nijhawan R. Extrapolation or attention shift. Nature. 378:(6557):1995;566.
43. Khurana B., Watanabe K., Nijhawan R. The role of attention in motion extrapolation: are moving objects 'corrected' or flashed objects attentionally delayed? Perception. 29:(6):2000;675-692.
44. Kirschfeld K., Kammer T. The Fröhlich effect: a consequence of the interaction of visual focal attention and metacontrast. Vision Research. 39:1999;3702-3709.
45. Kourtzi Z., Kanwisher N. Activation in human MT/MST by static images with implied motion. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience. 12:(1):2000;48-55.
46. Kowler E., Steinman R.M. The effect of expectations on slow oculomotor control. I. Periodic target steps. Vision Research. 19:(6):1979;619-632.
47. Krekelberg B., Lappe M. Neuronal latencies and the position of moving objects. Trends in Neurosciences. 24:(6):2001;335-339.
48. McConkie G.W., Rayner K. Asymmetry of the perceptual span in reading. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society. 8:(5):1976;365-368.
49. Müller H.J., Rabbitt P.M. Reflexive and voluntary orienting of visual attention: time course of activation and resistance to interruption. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance. 15:(2):1989;315-330.
50. Müller H.J., von Mühlenen A. Attentional tracking and inhibition of return in dynamic displays. Perception & Psychophysics. 58:(2):1996;224-249.
51. Müsseler J., Aschersleben G. Localizing the first position of a moving stimulus: the Frohlich effect and an attention-shifting explanation. Perception & Psychophysics. 60:(4):1998;683-695.
52. Müsseler J., Stork S., Kerzel D. Comparing mislocalizations with moving stimuli. The Fröhlich effect, the flash-lag effect and representational momentum. Visual Cognition. 9:(1/2):2002;120-138.
53. Nagai M., Yagi A. The pointedness effect on representational momentum. Memory and Cognition. 29:(1):2001;91-99.
54. Nijhawan R. Motion extrapolation in catching. Nature. 370:(6487):1994;256-257.
55. Pola J., Wyatt H.J. Smooth pursuit: response characteristics, stimuli and mechanisms. Carpenter R.H.S. Eye movements. 1991;138-157 Macmillan, London.
56. Pollatsek A., Bolozky S., Well A.D., Rayner K. Asymmetries in the perceptual span for Israeli readers. Brain & Language. 14:(1):1981;174-180.
57. Posner M.I. Orienting of attention. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology. 32:(1):1980;3-25.
58. Posner M.I., Cohen Y. Components of visual orienting. Bouma H., Bouwhuis D.G. Attention and performance. 1984;Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ.
59. Pratt J., Abrams R.A. Inhibition of return to successively cued spatial locations. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance. 21:(6):1995;1343-1353.
60. Pratt J., Abrams R.A. Inhibition of return in discrimination tasks. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance. 25:(1):1999;229-242.
61. Pratt J., Spalek T.M., Bradshaw F. The time to detect targets at inhibited and noninhibited locations: preliminary evidence for attentional momentum. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance. 25:(3):1999;730-746.
62. Reed C.L., Vinson N.G. Conceptual effects on representational momentum. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance. 22:(4):1996;839-850.
63. Senior C., Barnes J., Giampietro V., Simmons A., Bullmore E.T., Brammer M., David A.S. The functional neuroanatomy of implicit-motion perception or representational momentum. Current Biology. 10:(1):2000;16-22.
64. Sheth B.R., Shimojo S. Compression of space in visual memory. Vision Research. 41:(3):2001;329-341.
65. Shioiri S., Cavanagh P., Miyamoto T., Yaguchi H. Tracking the apparent location of targets in interpolated motion. Vision Research. 40:(10-12):2000;1365-1376.
66. Stelmach L.B., Campsall J.M., Herdman C.M. Attentional and ocular movements. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance. 23:(3):1997;823-844.
67. Suzuki S., Cavanagh P. Focused attention distorts visual space: an attentional repulsion effect. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance. 23:(2):1997;443-463.
68. Umilta C., Riggio L., Dascola I., Rizzolatti G. Differential effects of central and peripheral cues on the reorienting of spatial attention. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology. 3:(2):1991;247-267.
69. Verfaillie K., d'Ydewalle G. Representational momentum and event course anticipation in the perception of implied periodical motions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition. 17:(2):1991;302-313.
70. Whitney D., Cavanagh P. The position of moving objects. Science. 289:(5482):2000;1107a.
71. Whitney D., Cavanagh P. Surrounding motion affects the perceived locations of moving stimuli. Visual Cognition. 9:(1/2):2002;139-152.
72. Whitney D., Murakami I., Cavanagh P. Illusory spatial offset of a flash relative to a moving stimulus is caused by differential latencies for moving and flashed stimuli. Vision Research. 40:(2):2000;137-149.
73. Yantis S., Jonides J. Abrupt visual onsets and selective attention: voluntary versus automatic allocation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance. 16:(1):1990;121-134.
74. Yasui S., Young L.R. Perceived visual motion as effective stimulus to pursuit eye movement system. Science. 190:(4217):1975;906-908.
75. Yeshurun Y., Carrasco M. Attention improves or impairs visual performance by enhancing spatial resolution. Nature. 396:1998;72-75.