Attitudes of professional anatomists to curricular change

Clinical Anatomy

Volumn 19, Issue 2, 2006, Pages 132-141

  Patel, K M ^a   Moxham, Bernard J ^a  

^a CARDIFF UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Anatomists; Attitudes; Course aims; Curricular change; Teaching methods

Indexed keywords

ANATOMY; ATTITUDE; CLINICAL MEDICINE; CURRICULUM DEVELOPMENT; DISSECTION; EDUCATION; LEARNING; MEDICAL EDUCATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUESTIONNAIRE; REVIEW; STUDENT; TEACHING;

ADULT; AGED; ANATOMY; ATTITUDE; CURRICULUM; EUROPE; HUMANS; MIDDLE AGED; QUESTIONNAIRES; TEACHING;

EID: 33644554534     PISSN: 08973806     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/ca.20249     Document Type: Review

References (28)

1. Ashwell KWS, Halasz P. 2004. An acrobat-based program for gross anatomy revision. Med Educ 38:1185-1186.
2. Brenner E, Maurer H, Moriggl B, Pomaroli A. 2003. General educational objectives matched by the educational method of a dissection lab. Ann Anat 185:173, 229-230.
3. Collins TJ, Given RL, Hulsebosch CE, Miller BT. 1994. Status of gross anatomy in the U.S. and Canada: Dilemma for the 21st century. Clin Anat 7:275-296.
4. Cottam WW. 1999. Adequacy of medical school gross anatomy education as perceived by certain postgraduate residency programs and anatomy course directors. Clin Anat 12:55-65.
5. Dangerfield P, Bradley P, Gibbs T. 2000. Learning gross anatomy in a clinical skills course. Clin Anat 13:444-447.
6. de Barros N, Rodrigues CJ, Rodrigues AJ, de Negri Germano MA, Cerri GG. 2001. The value of teaching sectional anatomy to improve CT scan interpretation. Clin Anat 14:36-41.
7. Dinsmore CE, Daugherty S, Zeitz HJ. 1999. Teaching and learning gross anatomy: Dissection, prosection, or "both of the above?" Clin Anat 12:110-114.
8. Dytham C. 2003. Choosing and using statistics. Oxford: Blackwell Science.
9. Fasel JHD, Bader C, Gailloud P. 1999. Anatomy teaching for medical undergraduates: General practice as a guideline? The brain. Clin Anat 12:115-119.
10. Fitzpatrick CM, Kolesari GL, Brasel KJ. 2001. Teaching anatomy with surgeons' tools: Use of the laparoscope in clinical anatomy. Clin Anat 14:349-353.
11. Heidger PM Jr, Dee F, Consoer D, Leaven T, Duncan J, Kreiter C. 2002. Integrated approach to teaching and testing in histology with real and virtual imaging. Anat Rec 269:107-112.
12. Heylings DJA. 2002. Anatomy 1999-2000: The curriculum, who teaches it and how? Med Educ 36:702-710.
13. Holla SJ, Selvaraj KG, Isaac B, Chandi G. 1999. Significance of the role of self-study and group discussion. Clin Anat 12:277-280.
14. Johnson JH. 2002. Importance of dissection in learning anatomy. Personal dissection versus peer teaching. Clin Anat 15:38-44.
15. Lemon N. 1973. Attitudes and their measurement. New York: Wiley.
16. Leong SK. 1999. Back to basics. Clin Anat 12:422-424.
17. Newell RLM. 1995. Follow the royal road: The case for dissection. Clin Anat 8:124-127.
18. Nieder GL, Nagy F. 2002. Analysis of medical students' use of web-based resources for a gross anatomy and embryology course. Clin Anat 15:409-418.
19. Op Den Akker JW, Bohnen A, Oudegeest WJ, Hillen B. 2002. Giving color to a new curriculum: Bodypaint as a tool in medical education. Clin Anat 15:356-362.
20. Prideaux D, Bligh J. 2002. Research in medical education: Asking the right questions. Med Educ 36:1114-1115.
21. Rajecki D. 1990. Attitudes. Sunderland, MA: Sinauer Associates.
22. Reidenberg JS, Laitman JT. 2002. The new face of gross anatomy. Anat Rec 269:81-88.
23. Shaw-Dunn J. 1995. Follow the radical road: Comment on R.L.M. Newell's paper. Clin Anat 8:131-133.
24. Skidmore JR. 1995. The case for prosection: Comment on R.L.M. Newell's paper. Clin Anat 8:128-130.
25. Thomas K. 1987. Attitude assessment. Maidenhead: TRC-Rediguides Ltd.
26. Thurstone LL, Chave EJ. 1951. The measurement of attitude: A psychophysical method and some experiments with a scale for measuring attitude toward the church. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
27. Utting M, Willan P. 1995. What future for dissection in courses of human topographical anatomy in universities in the UK? Clin Anat 8:414-417.
28. Verhoeven BH, Verwijnen GM, Scherpbier AJ, van der Vleuten CP. 2002. Growth of medical knowledge. Med Educ 36:711-717.