Diversity begets diversity: Host expansions and the diversification of plant-feeding insects

BMC Evolutionary Biology

Volumn 6, Issue , 2006, Pages

  Janz, Niklas ^a   Nylin, Sören ^a   Wahlberg, Niklas ^a  

^a STOCKHOLM UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANALYTIC METHOD; ARTICLE; BIODIVERSITY; BUTTERFLY; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONTROLLED STUDY; HOST; INSECT SOCIETY; NONHUMAN; PLANT INSECT INTERACTION; SPECIES DIVERSITY; SPECIES RICHNESS; ANIMAL; CLASSIFICATION; ECOSYSTEM; GENETICS; PHYLOGENY; PLANT; SPECIES DIFFERENCE;

HEXAPODA; INSECTA; NYMPHALIDAE;

ANIMALS; BIODIVERSITY; BUTTERFLIES; ECOSYSTEM; PHYLOGENY; PLANTS; SPECIES SPECIFICITY;

EID: 33644552748     PISSN: 14712148     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/1471-2148-6-4     Document Type: Article

References (104)

1. May RM: How many species? Phil Tran R Soc Lond B 1990, 330:293-304.
2. Wilson EO: The diversity of life Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press; 1992.
3. Ehrlich PR, Raven PH: Butterflies and plants: a study in coevolution. Evolution 1964, 18:586-608.
4. Mitter C, Farrell B, Weigmann B: The phylogenetic study of adaptive zones: has phytophagy promoted insect diversification? Am Nat 1988, 132:107-128.
5. Farrell BD: "Inordinate fondness" explained: Why are there so many beetles? Science 1998, 281:555-559.
6. Schluter D: The Ecology of Adaptive Radiation Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2000.
7. Jaenike J: Host specialization in phytophagous insects. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 1990, 21:243-273.
8. Futuyma DJ: Evolution of host specificity in herbivorous insects: genetic, ecological, and phylogenetic aspects. In Plant-Animal Interactions: Evolutionary Ecology in Tropical and Temperate Regions Edited by: Price PW, Lewinsohn TM, Fernandes GW, Benson WW. New York: John Wiley & Sons; 1991:431-454.
9. Thompson JN: The coevolutionary process Chicago: University of Chicago Press; 1994.
10. Hawthorne DJ, Via S: Genetic linkage of ecological specialization and reproductive isolation in pea aphids. Nature 2001, 412:904-907.
11. Kelley ST, Farrell BD, Mitton JB: Effects of specialization on genetic differentiation in sister species of bark beetles. Heredity 2000, 84:218-227.
12. Janz N, Nylin S, Nyblom K: Evolutionary dynamics of host plant specialization: a case study of the tribe Nymphalini. Evolution 2001, 55:783-796.
13. Bush GL: Sympatric speciation in phytophagous parasitic insects. In Evolutionary Strategies of Parasitic Insects and Mites Edited by: Price PW. London: Plenum; 1975:187-206.
14. Carroll SP, Boyd C: Host race formation in the soapberry bug: natural history with the history. Evolution 1992, 46:1052-1069.
15. Feder JL, Chilcote CA, Bush GL: Genetic differentiation between sympatric host races of the apple maggot fly Rhagoletis pomonella. Nature 1988, 336:61-64.
16. Peterson MA, Denno RF: The influence of dispersal and diet breadth on patterns of genetic isolation by distance in phytophagous insects. Am Nat 1998, 152:428-446.
17. Stireman JO: The evolution of generalization? Parasitoid flies and the perils of inferring host range evolution from phylogenies. J Evol Biol 2005, 18:325-336.
18. Brooks DR, McLennan DA: The nature of diversity: an evolutionary voyage of discovery Chicago: University of Chicago Press; 2002.
19. Janz N, Thompson JN: Plant polyploidy and host expansion in an insect herbivore. Oecologia 2002, 130:570-575.
20. Thompson JN, Cunningham BM, Segraves KA, Althoff DM, Wagner D: Plant polyploidy and insect/plant interactions. Am Nat 1997, 150:730-743.
21. Pellmyr O, Leebens-Mack J: Reversal of mutualism as a mechanism for adaptive radiation in yucca moths. Am Nat 2000, 156:S62-S76.
22. Poulin R: Relative infection levels and taxonomic distances among the host species used by a parasite: insights into parasite specialization. Parasitology 2005, 130:109-115.
23. Radtke A, McLennan DA, Brooks DR: Resource tracking in North American Telorchis spr (Digenea : Plagiorchiformes : Telorchidae). J Parasitol 2002, 88:874-879.
24. Nosil P: Transition rates between specialization and generalization in phytophagous insects. Evolution 2002, 56:1701-1706.
25. Anderson RS: Weevils and plants - phylogenetic versus ecological mediation of evolution of host plant associations in Curculioninae (Coleoptera, Curculionidae). Mem Entomol Soc Can 1993, 165:197-232.
26. Dobler S, Mardulyn P, Pasteels JM, Rowell-Rahier M: Host-plant switches and the evolution of chemical defense and life history in the leaf beetle genus Oreina. Evolution 1996, 50:2373-2386.
27. Janz N, Nylin S: Butterflies and plants: a phylogenetic study. Evolution 1998, 52:486-502.
28. Lopez-Vaamonde C, Charles H, Godfray J, Cook JM: Evolutionary dynamics of host-plant use in a genus of leaf-mining moths. Evolution 2003, 57:1804-1821.
29. Pellmyr O: Yuccas, yucca moths and coevolution: a review. Ann Mo Bot Gard 2003, 90:35-55.
30. Percy DM, Page RDM, Cronk QCB: Plant-insect interactions: double-dating associated insect and plant lineages reveals asynchronous radiations. Syst Biol 2004, 53:120-127.
31. Ronquist F, Liljeblad J: Evolution of the gall wasp-host plant association. Evolution 2001, 55:2503-2522.
32. Roy BA: Patterns of association between crucifers and their flower- mimic pathogens: host jumps are more common than coevolution or cospeciation. Evolution 2001, 55:41-53.
33. Weintraub JD, Lawton JH, Scoble MJ: Lithinine moths on ferns: A phylogenetic study of insect-plant interactions. Biol J Linn Soc 1995, 55:239-250.
34. Nyman T: The willow bud galler Euura mucronata Hartig (Hymenoptera : Tenthredinidae): one polyphage or many monophages? Heredity 2002, 88:288-295.
35. Thompson JN: The geographic mosaic of coevolution Chicago: University Of Chicago Press; 2005.
36. Tabashnik BE: Host range evolution: the shift from native legume hosts to alfalfa by the butterfly, Colias philodice eriphyle. Evolution 1983, 37:150-162.
37. Singer MC, Thomas CD, Parmesan C: Rapid human-induced evolution of insect-host associations. Nature 1993, 366:681-683.
38. Thomas CD, Ng D, Singer MC, Mallet JLB, Parmesan C, Billington HL: Incorporation of a European weed into the diet of a North American herbivore. Evolution 1987, 41:892-901.
39. Fox CW, Nilsson JA, Mousseau TA: The ecology of diet expansion in a seed-feeding beetle: Pre-existing variation, rapid adaptation and maternal effects? Evol Ecol 1997, 11:183-194.
40. Futuyma DJ, Keese MC, Scheffer SJ: Genetic constraints and the phylogeny of insect-plant associations - responses of Ophraella communa (Coleoptera, Chrysomelidae) to host plants of its congeners. Evolution 1993, 47:888-905.
41. Futuyma DJ, Walsh JS, Morton T, Funk DJ, Keese MC: Genetic variation in a phylogenetic context - responses of 2 specialized leaf beetles (Coleoptera, Chrysomelidae) to host plants of their congeners. J Evol Biol 1994, 7:127-146.
42. Futuyma DJ, Keese MC, Funk DJ: Genetic constraints on macroevolution: the evolution of host affiliation in the leaf beetle genus Ophraella. Evolution 1995, 49:797-809.
43. Funk DJ, Futuyma DJ, Ortí G, Meyer A: A history of host associations and evolutionary diversification for Ophraella (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae): new evidence from mitochondrial DNA. Evolution 1995, 49:1008-1017.
44. Weingartner E, Wahlberg N, Nylin S: Dynamics of host plant use and species diversity in Polygonia butterflies (Nymphalidae). J Evol Biol 2005 in press. doi:10.1111/j.1420-9101.2005.01009.x:
45. Agapow PM, Isaac NJB: MacroCAIC: revealing correlates of species richness by comparative analysis. Divers Distrib 2002, 8:41-43.
46. Armbruster WS, Baldwin BG: Switch from specialized to generalized pollination. Nature 1998, 394:632-632.
47. Scheffer SJ, Wiegmann BM: Molecular phylogenetics of the holly leaf miners (Diptera : Agromyzidae : Phytomyza): Species limits, speciation, and dietary specialization. Mol Phyl Evol 2000, 17:244-255.
48. Camara MD: A recent host range expansion in Junonia coenia Hubner (Nymphalidae): Oviposition preference, survival, growth, and chemical defense. Evolution 1997, 51:873-884.
49. Fraser SM, Lawton JH: Host range expansion by British moths onto introduced conifers. Ecol Entomol 1994, 19:127-137.
50. Päivinen J, Grapputo A, Kaitala V, Komonen A, Kotiaho JS, Saarinen K, Wahlberg N: Negative density-distribution relationship in butterflies. BMC Biol 2005, 3:5.
51. Fox LR, Morrow PA: Specialization: species property or local phenomenon? Science 1981, 211:887-893.
52. Wilson EO: The nature of the taxon cycle in the Melanesian ant fauna. Am Nat 1961, 95:169-193.
53. Erwin TL: Taxon pulses, vicariance, and dispersal: an evolutionary synthesis illustrated by carabid beetles. In Vicariance biogeography - a critique Edited by: Nelson G, Rosen DE. New York: Columbia University Press; 1981:159-196.
54. Erwin TL: The taxon pulse: a general pattern of lineage radiation and extinction among carabid beetles. In Taxonomy, phylogeny, and zoogeography of beetles and ants Edited by: Ball GE. Dordrecht: W. Junk; 1985:437-472.
55. Halas D, Zamparo D, Brooks DR: A historical biogeographical protocol for studying biotic diversification by taxon pulses. J Biogeogr 2005, 32:249-260.
56. Spironello M, Brooks DR: Dispersal and diversification: macroevolutionary implications of the MacArthur-Wilson model, illustrated by Simulium (Inseliellum) Rubstov (Diptera: Simuliidae). J Biogeogr 2003, 30:1563-1573.
57. West-Eberhard MJ: Developmental plasticity and evolution New York: Oxford University Press; 2003.
58. Gatesy J, Baker RH, Hayashi C: Inconsistencies in arguments for the supertree approach: supermatrices versus supertrees of Crocodylia. Syst Biol 2004, 53:342-355.
59. Wahlberg N, Weingartner E, Nylin S: Towards a better understanding of the higher systematics of Nymphalidae (Lepidoptera : Papilionoidea). Mol Phyl Evol 2003, 28:473-484.
60. Wahlberg N, Braby MF, Brower AVZ, de Jong R, Lee MM, Nylin S, Pierce NE, Sperling FAH, Vila R, Warren AD, Zakharov E: Synergistic effects of combining morphological and molecular data in resolving the phylogeny of butterflies and skippers. Proc R Soc Lond B 2005, 272:1577-1586.
61. Kawahara AY: Rediscovery of Libythea collenettei Poulton & Riley (Nymphalidae: Libytheinae) in the Marquesas, and a description of the male. J Lep Soc 2003, 57:81-85.
62. Ackery PR, Vane-Wright RI: Milkweed butterflies: their cladistics and biology London: British Museum (Natural History); 1984.
63. Brown KSJ, Freitas AVL: Juvenile stages of Ithomiinae: overview and systematics (Lepidoptera: Nymphalidae). Tropical Lepidoptera 1994, 5:9-20.
64. Brower AVZ, Freitas AVL, Lee M-M, Silva Brandão KL, Whinnett A, Willmott KR: Phylogenetic relationships among the Ithomiini (Lepidoptera: Nymphalidae) inferred from one mitochondrial and two nuclear gene regions. Syst Ent 2006 in press.
65. Penz CM, DeVries PJ: Phylogenetic analysis of Morpho butterflies (Nymphalidae, Morphinae): implications for classification and natural history. Am Mus Novit 2002, 3374:1-33.
66. Brower AVZ: Phylogenetic relationships among the Nymphalidae (Lepidoptera), inferred from partial sequences of the wingless gene. Proc R Soc Lond B 2000, 267:1201-1211.
67. Freitas AVL, Murray DAH, Brown KS: Immatures, natural history and the systematic position of Bia actorion (Nymphalidae). J Lep Soc 2002, 56:117-122.
68. Peña C, Wahlberg N, Weingartner E, Kodandaramaiah U, Nylin S, Freitas AVL, Brower AVZ: Higher level phylogeny of Satyrinae butterflies (Lepidoptera: Nymphalidae) based on DNA sequence data. Mol Phyl Evol in press.
69. Harvey DJ: Higher classification of the Nymphalidae, Appendix B. In The Development and Evolution of Butterfly Wing Patterns Edited by: Nijhout HF. Washington DC: Smithsonian Institution Press; 1991:255-273.
70. Penz CM: Higher level phylogeny for the passion-vine butterflies (Nymphalidae, Heliconiinae) based on early stage and adult morphology. Zool J Linn Soc 1999, 127:277-344.
71. Penz CM, Peggie D: Phylogenetic relationships among Heliconiinae genera based on morphology (Lepidoptera: Nymphalidae). Syst Ent 2003, 28:451-479.
72. Pierre J: Systématique cladistique chez les Acraea (Lepidoptera, Nymphalidae). Ann Soc Entomol Fr 1987, 23:11-27.
73. Brower AVZ: Phylogeny of Heliconius butterflies inferred from mitochondrial DNA sequences. Mol Phyl Evol 1994, 3:159-174.
74. Brower AVZ, Egan MG: Cladistic analysis of Heliconius butterflies and relatives (Nymphalidae: Heliconiiti): a revised phylogenetic position for Eueides based on sequences from mtDNA and a nuclear gene. Proc R Soc Lond B 1997, 264:969-977.
75. Simonsen TJ: Fritillary butterflies: phylogeny, historical zoogeography and morphological aspects of the tribus Argynnini (Lepidoptera: Nymphalidae). In PhD thesis University of Copenhagen, Department of Entomology, Zoological Museum; 2004.
76. Willmott KR: Cladistic analysis of the Neotropical butterfly genus Adelpha (Lepidoptera: Nymphalidae), with comments on the subtribal classification of Limenitidini. Syst Ent 2003, 28:279-322.
77. Larsen TB: The butterflies of Kenya and their natural history Oxford: Oxford University Press; 1991.
78. Larsen TB: Butterflies of West Africa Stenstrup, Denmark: Apollo Books; 2005.
79. Wahlberg N, Brower AVZ, Nylin S: Phylogenetic relationships and historical biogeography of tribes and genera in the subfamily Nymphalinae (Lepidoptera: Nymphalidae). Biol J Linn Soc 2005, 86:227-251.
80. Wahlberg N, Nylin S: Morphology versus molecules: resolution of the positions of Nymphalis, Polygonia, and related genera (Lepidoptera : Nymphalidae). Cladistics 2003, 19:213-223.
81. Holloway JD: The affinities within four butterfly groups (Lepidoptera: Rhopalocera) in relation to general patterns of butterfly distribution in the Indo-Australian area. Trans R Entomol Soc 1973, 125:125-176.
82. Hill RI, Penz CM, DeVries PJ: Phylogenetic analysis and review of Panacea and Batesiabutterflies (Nymphalidae). J Lep Soc 2002, 56:199-215.
83. Jenkins DW: Neotropical Nymphalidae. VIII. Revision of Eunica. Bulletin of the Allyn Museum 1990, 131:1-175.
84. Ackery PR: Host plants and classification: a review of nymphalid butterflies. Biol J Linn Soc 1988, 33:95-203.
85. Asher J, Warren M, Fox R, Harding P, Jeffcoate G, Jeffcoate S: The millenium atlas of butterflies in Britain and Ireland Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2001.
86. Bascombe MJ, Johnston G, Bascombe FS: The Butterflies of Hong Kong London: Academic Press; 1999.
87. Carrión Cabrera JE: Estatus de Atlantea tulita (Dewitz, 1877) en Puerto Rico. In Masters thesis Universidad de Puerto Rico, Departamento de Biología, Universidad de Puerto Rico; 2003.
88. Common IFB, Waterhouse DF: Butterflies of Australia Sydney: Angus and Robertson; 1972.
89. Corbet AS, Pendlebury HM: The butterflies of the Malay Peninsula Kuala Lumpur: Malayan Nature Society; 1992.
90. DeVries PJ: The butterflies of Costa Rica and their natural history, Papilionidae, Pieridae, Nymphalidae Princeton: Princeton University Press; 1987.
91. Ebert G: Die Schmetterlinge Baden-Württembergs Stuttgart: Verlag Eugen Ulmer; 1993.
92. Gibbs GW: New Zealand Butterflies: Identification and Natural History Auckland: William Collins Publishers Ltd; 1980.
93. Johnston G, Johnston B: This is Hong Kong: Butterflies Hong Kong: Hong Kong Government Publications; 1980.
94. Larsen TB: Butterflies of Lebanon Beirut: National Council for Scientific Research; 1974.
95. Parsons M: Butterflies of the Bulolo-Wau valley Honolulu: Bishop Museum Press; 1991.
96. Pyle RM: The Audobon Society Field Guide to North American Butterflies New York: Alfred A. Knopf; 1981.
97. Lepidoptera and some other life-forms [http://www.funet.fi/pub/sci/bio/ life/intro.html]
98. Scott JA: The butterflies of North America Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press; 1986.
99. Smart P: The illustrated encyclopedia of the butterfly world London: Salamander Books; 1975.
100. Tolman T: Butterflies of Europe Princeton and Oxford: Princeton University Press; 1997.
101. Tuzov VK: Guide to the butterflies of Russia and adjacent territories Sofia: Pensoft; 2000.
102. Bremer B, Bremer K, Chase MW, Reveal JL, Soltis DE, Soltis PS, Stevens PF, Anderberg AA, Fay MF, Goldblatt P, Judd WS, Kallersjo M, Karehed J, Kron KA, Lundberg J, Nickrent DL, Olmstead RG, Oxelman B, Pires JC, Rodman JE, Rudall PJ, Savolainen V, Sytsma KJ, van der Bank M, Wurdack K, Xiang JQY, Zmarzty S: An update of the Angiosperm Phylogeny Group classification for the orders and families of flowering plants: APG II. Bot J Linn Soc 2003, 141:399-436.
103. The classification of Nymphalidae [http://www.zoologi.su.se/research/ wahlberg/Nymphalidae/Classification2.htm]
104. Felsenstein J: Phylogenies and the comparative method. Am Nat 1985, 125:1-15.