Modified Class II open sandwich restorations: Evaluation of interfacial adaptation and influence of different restorative techniques

European journal of oral sciences

Volumn 110, Issue 3, 2002, Pages 270-275

  Andersson Wenckert, Ingrid E ^a   Van Dijken, Jan W V ^a   Hörstedt, Per ^a  

^a UMEÅ UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CALCIUM PHOSPHATE; DENTIN BONDING AGENT; DRUG DERIVATIVE; GLASS IONOMER; POLYSTYRENE DERIVATIVE; RESIN; RESIN CEMENT; SCOTCHBOND MULTI PURPOSE; SCOTCHBOND MULTI-PURPOSE; SILICON DIOXIDE; THYMOL; TUBULITEC; VITREMER; Z100 COMPOSITE RESIN; ZIRCONIUM;

ADOLESCENT; ARTICLE; CHEMISTRY; CHILD; CLASSIFICATION; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DENTAL EQUIPMENT; DENTAL SURGERY; DENTIN; DRUG COMBINATION; ENAMEL; ENDODONTICS; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; FEMALE; HISTOLOGY; HUMAN; INSTRUMENTATION; LIGHT; MALE; MECHANICAL STRESS; METHODOLOGY; MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS; NONPARAMETRIC TEST; PREMOLAR TOOTH; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; SCANNING ELECTRON MICROSCOPY; TOOTH BRUSHING; ULTRASTRUCTURE;

ADOLESCENT; BICUSPID; CALCIUM PHOSPHATES; CHILD; COMPOSITE RESINS; DENTAL CAVITY LINING; DENTAL ENAMEL; DENTAL POLISHING; DENTAL RESTORATION, PERMANENT; DENTIN; DENTIN-BONDING AGENTS; DRUG COMBINATIONS; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; FEMALE; GLASS IONOMER CEMENTS; HUMANS; LIGHT; MALE; MARGINAL ADAPTATION (DENTISTRY); MATRIX BANDS; MICROSCOPY, ELECTRON, SCANNING; MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS; POLYSTYRENES; REPLICA TECHNIQUES; RESIN CEMENTS; SILICON DIOXIDE; STATISTICS, NONPARAMETRIC; STRESS, MECHANICAL; THYMOL; ZIRCONIUM;

EID: 0036595449     PISSN: 09098836     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1034/j.1600-0447.2002.11210.x     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. 1 Geurtsen W, Schoeler J. 4‐year retrospective clinical study of Class I and II composite fillings. J Dent 1997 ; 25: 229–232.
2. 2 Hickel R, Manhardt J. Longevity of restorations in posterior teeth and reasons for failure. J Adhesive Dent 2001 ; 3: 45–64.
3. 3 Rasmusson CG, Lundin SÅ. Class II restorations in six different posterior composite resins: Five‐year results. Swed Dent J 1995 ; 19: 173–182.
4. 4 Wilson NHF, Wilson MA, Wastell DG, Smith GA. Performance of Occlusin in butt‐joint and bevel‐edged preparations: Five‐year results. Dent Mater 1991 ; 7: 92–98.
5. 5 Dietschi D, Siebenthal G, Neveu‐Rosenstand L, Holtz J. Influence of the restorative technique and new adhesives on the dentin marginal seal and adaptation of resin composite class II restorations: an in vitro evaluation. Quintessence Int 1995 ; 26: 717–727.
6. 6 Dietschi D, Herzfeld D. In vitro evaluation of marginal and internal adaptation of Class II resin composite restorations after thermal and occlusal stressing. Eur J Oral Sci 1998 ; 106: 1033–1042.
7. 7 Hilton TJ, Schwartz RS, Ferracane JL. Microleakage of four Class II resin composite insertion techniques at intraoral temperature. Quintessence Int 1997 ; 28: 135–144.
8. 8 Davidson CL, Feilzer AJ. Polymerization shrinkage and polymerization shrinkage stress in polymer‐based restoratives. J Dent 1997 ; 25: 435–440.
9. 9 Davidson CL. Glass ionomer bases under posterior composites. J Esth Dent 1994 ; 6: 223–226.
10. 10 Van Dijken JWV. A 6‐year evaluation of a direct composite resin inlay/onlay system and glass ionomer cement–composite resin sandwich restorations. Acta Odontol Scand 1994 ; 52: 368–376.
11. 11 Alster D, Feilzer AJ, De Gee AJ, Mol A, Davidson CL. The dependence of shrinkage stress reduction on porosity concentration in thin resin layers. J Dent Res 1992 ; 71: 1619–1622.
12. 12 Feilzer AJ, De Gee AJ, Davidson CL. Relaxation of polymerization contraction shear stress by hygroscopic expansion. J Dent Res 1990 ; 69: 36–39.
13. 13 Attin T, Buchalla W, Kielbassa AM, Helwig E. Curing shrinkage and volume tric changes of resin‐modified glass ionomer restorative materials. Dent Mater 1995 ; 11: 359–362.
14. 14 Feilzer AJ, Dooren LH, De Gee AJ, Davidson CL. Influence of light intensity on polymerization shrinkage and integrity of restoration–cavity interface. Eur J Oral Sci 1995 ; 103: 322–326.
15. 15 Van Dijken JWV, Hörstedt P, Waern R. Directed polymerization shrinkage versus a horizontal incremental filling technique. Interfacial adaptation in vivo. In: Class II Cavities. Am J Dent 1998 ; 11: 165–172.
16. 16 McLean J. Evolution of glass ionomer cements–A personal view. In: Hunt PR, ed. Glass Ionomers, the next generation, 1994. Proceedings of the 2nd International Symposium on Glass Ionomers, Philadelphia, 61–74.
17. 17 Van Dijken JWV, Kieri C, Carlén M. Longevity of extensive Class II open sandwich restorations with a resin‐modified GIC‐composite. J Dent Res 1999 ; 78: 1319–1325.
18. 18 Lindberg A, Van Dijken JWV, Hörstedt P. Interfacial adaptation of Class II polyacid‐modified resin composites/resin composite laminate restorations in vivo. Acta Odontol Scand 2000 ; 58: 77–84.
19. 19 Welbury RR, Murray JJ. A clinical trial of the glass ionomer cement‐composite resin ‘sandwich’ technique in Class II cavities in permanent premolar and molar teeth. Quintessence Int 1990 ; 21: 507–512.
20. 20 Davidson C, Davidson‐Kaban S. Handling of mechanical stresses in composite restorations. Dent Update 1998 ; 25: 274–279.
21. 21 Alomari OD, Reinhardt JW, Boyer DB. Effects of liners on cusp deflection and gap formation in composite restorations. Oper Dent 2001 ; 26: 406–411.
22. 22 Dauvillier BS, Feilzer AJ, De Gee AJ, Davidson CL. Visco‐elastic parameters of dental restorative materials during setting. J Dent Res 2000 ; 79: 818–823.
23. 23 Knibbs P. The clinical performance of a glass polyalkenoat (glass ionomer) cement used in a ‘sandwich’ technique with a composite resin to restore Class II cavities. Br Dent J 1992 ; 172: 102–107.
24. 24 Mathis RS, Ferracane JL. Properties of a glass ionomer/resin composite hybrid material. Dent Mater 1989 ; 5: 355–358.
25. 25 Uno S, Finger WA, Fritz U. Long‐term mechanical characteristics of resin‐modified glass ionomer restorative materials. Dent Mater 1996 ; 12: 64–69.
26. 26 Friedl KH, Schmalz G, Hiller KA, Mortazavi F. Marginal adaptation of composite restorations versus hybrid ionomer/composite sandwich restorations. Oper Dent 1997 ; 22: 21–29.
27. 27 Dietrich T, Lösche AC, Lösche GM, Roulet JF. Marginal adaptation of direct composite and sandwich restorations in Class II cavities with cervical margins in dentin. J Dent 1999 ; 27: 119–128.
28. 28 Dietrich T, Kraemer M, Lösche GM, Wernecke K‐D, Roulet JF. Influence of dentin conditioning and contamination on the marginal integrity of sandwich Class II restorations. Oper Dent 2000 ; 25: 401–410.
29. 29 Hasegawa T, Itoh K, Yukitani W, Wakumoto S, Hisamitsu H. Effects of soft‐start irradiation on the depth of cure and marginal adaptation to dentin. Oper Dent 2001 ; 26: 389–395.
30. 30 Lösche GM. Marginal adaptation of Class II composite fillings: guided polymerization versus reduced light intensity. J Adhesive Dent 1999 ; 1: 31–39.
31. 31 Sakaguchi RL, Berghe HX. Reduced light intensity decreases post‐gel contraction while maintaining degree of conversion in composites. J Dent 1998 ; 26: 695–700.
32. 32 Wieczkowski G, Joynt PB, Davis EL, Yu XY, Cleary K. Leakage patterns associated with glass‐ionomer based resin restorations. Oper Dent 1992 ; 17: 21–25.
33. 33 Sjödin L, Uusitalo M, Van Dijken JWV. Resin modified glass ionomer cements. In vitro microleakage in Class II sandwich‐ and direct Class V fillings. Swed Dent J 1996 ; 20: 77–86.
34. 34 Andersson‐Wenckert IE, Van Dijken JWV, Hörstedt P. Interfacial adaptation of in vivo aged poly‐acid modified resin composite (compomer) restorations in primary molars. Clin Oral Invest 1998 ; 2: 184–190.
35. 35 Van Dijken JWV, Hörstedt P. Marginal breakdown of fired cemented inlays cemented with glass polyalkenoate (ionomer) cement or resin composite. J Dent 1994 ; 22: 265–272.
36. 36 Van Dijken JWV, Hörstedt P. Marginal breakdown of 5‐year direct composite inlays. J Dent 1996 ; 24: 389–394.
37. 37 Van Meerbeek B, Braem M, Lambrechts P, Vanherle G. Morphological characterization of the interface between resin and sclerotic dentin. J Dent 1994 ; 22: 141–146.
38. 38 Van Dijken JWV. Clinical evaluation of three adhesive systems in Class V non‐carious lesions. Dent Mat 2000 ; 16: 285–291.
39. 39 Hannig M, Friedrichs C. Comparative in vivo and in vitro investigation of interfacial bond variability. Oper Dent 2001 ; 26: 3–11.
40. 40 Krejci I, Petrac M, Lutz F. Wear and marginal adaptation of resin‐reinforced glass‐ionomer class II restorations. Acta Med Dent Helv 1996 ; 1: 117–122.
41. 41 Krejci I, Sparr D, Lutz F. A three sited light curing technique for conventional Class II composite resin restorations. Quintessence Int 1987 ; 18: 125–131.
42. 42 Lutz F, Krejci I, Luescher B, Oldenburg TR. Improved proximal margin adaptation of Class II composite resin restorations by use of light‐reflecting wedges. Quintessence Int 1986 ; 10: 659–663.
43. 43 Beznos C. Microleakage at the cervical margin of composite Class II cavities with different restorative techniques. Oper Dent 2001 ; 26: 60–69.
44. 44 Neiva IF, De Andrada MAC, Baratieri LN, Monteiro S Jr, Ritter AV. An in vitro study of the effect of restorative technique on marginal leakage in posterior composites. Oper Dent 1998 ; 23: 282–289.
45. 45 Tate WH, Friedl KH, Powers JM. Bond strength of composites to hybrid ionomers. Oper Dent 1996 ; 21: 147–152.
46. 46 Fortin D, Vargas MA, Swift EJ. Bonding of resin composites to resin‐modified glass ionomers. Am J Dent 1995 ; 8: 201–204.